Who was Cho's father?
Cho's tortured plays keep mentioning a step-father, and describing a son who was badly abused by a step-father. In the USA, more than 80% of criminals come from broken homes and single mothers.
I'm wondering, and the US media and blue gun thugs are keeping us from knowing, what kind of family did Cho come from. The British media has reported that his mother was from an upper class North Korean family and her husband is from a low class family. but, nobody has seen fit to tell the public about who was in fact Mr. Cho's father. Blue gun thug agencies have all refused to answer questions about it. No US media will talk about it at all. They treat us like mushrooms, keeping us in the dark and tossing shit on our heads.
It seems a good guess that Cho was from a broken home, or was perhaps a bastard. Did his low class stepfather badly abuse him, and perhaps he suffered brain injury from abuse at an early age in Korea. Boys who grow up without their fathers are the most abused children. Mothers who remarry are the most likely to abuse children, and her latest bed partner, the kid's step-father, is the second most likely to abuse. And they both abuse boys twice as much as they abuse girls. Did Cho suffer brain injury as an abused child in Korea?
When we are trying to understand how someone could do what Cho did, an understanding of his childhood, step-father, etc., is central to the understanding. Our media and blue gun thugs are doing a great disservice to the public by refusing to allow us to know what is killing our children and why.
I'm wondering, and the US media and blue gun thugs are keeping us from knowing, what kind of family did Cho come from. The British media has reported that his mother was from an upper class North Korean family and her husband is from a low class family. but, nobody has seen fit to tell the public about who was in fact Mr. Cho's father. Blue gun thug agencies have all refused to answer questions about it. No US media will talk about it at all. They treat us like mushrooms, keeping us in the dark and tossing shit on our heads.
It seems a good guess that Cho was from a broken home, or was perhaps a bastard. Did his low class stepfather badly abuse him, and perhaps he suffered brain injury from abuse at an early age in Korea. Boys who grow up without their fathers are the most abused children. Mothers who remarry are the most likely to abuse children, and her latest bed partner, the kid's step-father, is the second most likely to abuse. And they both abuse boys twice as much as they abuse girls. Did Cho suffer brain injury as an abused child in Korea?
When we are trying to understand how someone could do what Cho did, an understanding of his childhood, step-father, etc., is central to the understanding. Our media and blue gun thugs are doing a great disservice to the public by refusing to allow us to know what is killing our children and why.
posted by Bob | Friday, April 20, 2007
4 Comments:
There would be no gun laws if women couldn't vote.
The law that effectivly banned fully automatic weapons was passed in the 30s, only a decade after women got the vote.
Before then you could have any gun you want. Now you cannot. We are not allowed.
Is there away we could successfully promote violent revolution? (Or is there any other way we can quickly resolve this issue of women's rights and weapon control?).
--MikeeUSA--
Mikee,
Truth is, you CAN own any weapon you want. You just don't know how to go about it.
Here's my private email for tips on how to circumvent the law and have a ball :
Josh_Demko_99@hotmail.com
Note to anonymous: (April 22, 2007 5:06 PM)
Nonsense! The federal government criminal gun thugs will stop an nothing to enforce their illegal restirctions. They will gladly shoot your son, your wife, and even your dog. They will use internationally banned WMD poison gas ("CS") to kill dozens of men, women, and children. The POTUS, DOJ, FBI and BATF, and of course SCOTUS opertate in direct oppostion to the US Constitution, and are the worst criminals in the USA.
They are afraid that there would be an armed insurrection if the people could own and bear arms as provided for by the 2nd Amendment. They are probably right, and the harder they work at oppressing the people the more right their fears get.
Cho was a true muslim through and through.
You know what makes a person who they are? It's their ideas, their beliefs, their psychology and if that psychology is damaged it becomes a pathology.
Cho's pathology was identical to muslim pathology. That of a total and utter victim.
Hitler wrote an open letter from his bunker hours before his suicide STILL blaming the jews and the communists. 60m dead and he still hadn't learnt his lesson. A victim to the end.
Palestinian suicide bombers have such little self esteem that instead of taking the noble path of Gandhi or Martin Luther King they believe their best option is to die. Again, the ultimate victims.
Islamic terrorists having to blow up civilians because of American foreign policy. American did it to them. America's to blame. Once, again. Muslims are the ultimate victims.
Did you hear Cho in the video? "You made me do this. The decision was yours."
Cho suffered from muslim pathology. One of victimhood.
In this sense Cho was a true muslim.
p.s. islam is the number promoter of the victim pathology. if their was no islam cho would never have done this.
islam has been very successful at promoting the victim mentality around the globe and this is why terrorism is becoming more and more common.
Post a Comment
<< Home