The Fruit of Feminism is Death
For more than a century and a half lesbian feminists have worked hard to destroy families and create a lesbian wet dream utopia where all children will be raised by single mothers. The common definition of “family” used by major media now translates as “a mother and her children.” Fathers are eschewed by feminist dominated culture as some “patriarchal” relics from a bygone era. But despite all the feminazi misandry, the role of fathers in a family is vitally necessary for a safe and effective society. Children growing up without fathers do so much less well in their lives that single momism ought to be called criminal child abuse. Among the probably outcomes of single mothers raising children without a father's love and guidance are almost 90% of criminals and crime.
In North Carolina recently we have seen two Universities with large Feminist Hate Departments beginning to reap the fruits of feminism and its destruction of good families. At Duke University they still profess feminist hate despite the ongoing disgrace of the Hate 88. In January of this year, Indian graduate student Abhijit Mahato was shot to death a few blocks from the campus in Durham, NC. A few miles away the University of North Carolina has preached and taught misandrist feminist hate since 1976. In early March, Eve Carson, student body President of the University of North Carolina was gunned down on a street in Chapel Hill, NC.
The blue gun thugs now tell us that both killings were done by young men named Lawrence Alvin Lovette, and Demario James Atwater. Both young men were raised in feminist single-mother homes without fathers. Both were the product of feminism. Both are the expected result of destroying families and professing hate. These killings are the inevitable result of feminist destruction of families.
The killings will continue. They are the fruits of hate and destruction of families so actively professed by both Duke University and University of North Carolina. They profess hate and teach destruction. They are now reaping the destruction they have sown.
Read story
In North Carolina recently we have seen two Universities with large Feminist Hate Departments beginning to reap the fruits of feminism and its destruction of good families. At Duke University they still profess feminist hate despite the ongoing disgrace of the Hate 88. In January of this year, Indian graduate student Abhijit Mahato was shot to death a few blocks from the campus in Durham, NC. A few miles away the University of North Carolina has preached and taught misandrist feminist hate since 1976. In early March, Eve Carson, student body President of the University of North Carolina was gunned down on a street in Chapel Hill, NC.
The blue gun thugs now tell us that both killings were done by young men named Lawrence Alvin Lovette, and Demario James Atwater. Both young men were raised in feminist single-mother homes without fathers. Both were the product of feminism. Both are the expected result of destroying families and professing hate. These killings are the inevitable result of feminist destruction of families.
The killings will continue. They are the fruits of hate and destruction of families so actively professed by both Duke University and University of North Carolina. They profess hate and teach destruction. They are now reaping the destruction they have sown.
Read story
posted by Bob | Thursday, March 13, 2008
21 Comments:
Men who were raised in strong patriarchal homes by strong loving Fathers:
Mohamed Atta, Eliot Spitzer, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Gary Crosby
Once again feminists are long on rhetoric and short on facts. Any lie is as good as another for a feminsit. No wonder their children do so poorly.
Mohamed Atta
Atta was the son of a single mother (Bouthayna Mohamed Mustapha Sheraqi) who didn’t marry until Atta was 14 years old.
Eliot Spitzer
Despite some scandals and offensive political positions, Mr. Shitzer became a prominent and wealthy lieyer and Governor of New York. He is a very successful man. He was raised with his Jewish parents.
Adolf Hitler
Alois Hitler was born a bastard of a single mother. For the first 39 years of his life he bore his mother's surname, Schicklgruber.
Joseph Stalin
At age 10, Stalin’s family was broken up by his mother who sent him to Russian schools while his father (Visarion “Beso” Dzhugashvili) was expelled from the town by the blue gun thugs. Afterward he lived with his mother. Despite the fact that some may disagree with his politics, he was one of the most successful emperors/dictators of modern times. He succeeded in reaching and holding the highest political office of the largest nation on earth.
Gary Crosby
Gary Crosby was the child of an alcoholic Hollywood disaster of a family. He was an American singer and actor who became better known for writing a lacerating memoir of his father, entertainment legend Bing Crosby than for his own music and acting work. His mother was alcoholic singer/actress Dixie Lee, Bing Crosby's first wife.
{Data taken from Wikipedia.}
Good post, Bob!
So Anon is full of shit basically? No surprise there then.
Note to feminist filth bags. If you make claims, they will be investigated.
Dammit Bob, why do you have to throw the truth in people's faces? Now that poor idiot has to spend the next week looking for reasons to convince himself that Wikipedia lied on all of those biographies. (except Spitzer)
And as we should all know by now, the truth is whatever a liberal tells us it is. Please report to your nearest television set for reprogramming.
Note to readers. Please review the difference between anecdote and data. Whether or not there are individual examples of good or bad men in history is anecdotal. A discussion of historical figures is off topic whether you agree or disagree with their political positions. An excemption may be allowed if their political position was relavant to the topic of this article, feminism and the results of feminism. For example, the rise to power of Adolph Hitlar was the first great victory of female suffrage. German femiNazis widely supported his programs and policies and were the basis for his political power. The fruit of feminism is often death.
The Institution of Family is a psychotic anachronism.
This guy(?) throws out all job applicants who have hit their wife or been accused as such. I think he/she should be executed.
What do you think?
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=489290&cid=22768422
Re:We already brand criminals as unemployable (Score:2)
by dbcad7 (771464) on Sunday March 16, @07:11PM (#22768422)
Sometimes it's not a matter of having a criminal record, but whether or not it was disclosed on the application.. Lying on a app is the thing.
When I have done hiring, I have come across many apps with criminal records.. to me the offense was what I judged on.. for example violent crimes and spousal abuse immediately went to the trash., A drunk driving offense if several years old, was ok.. Sad thing is, you would be surprised how little checking is actually done on applications.,, you want honest people, but sometimes they screw themselves out of a job by listing their record, when it usually isn't even checked. (unless the position specifically requires such a check).. course down the road is immediate termination if it's found you lied on your application.
I recently had the pleasure of beating to a pulp a BIG STRONG MANLY FATHER, humiliating him in front of his buddies AND his CHILDREN!
I Maced him, then Tasered him, then STOMPED ON HIS CROTCH when he was down.
He has sworn revenge, but I know for a fact that he's too big a COWARD to try and take me on again.
Note to readers:
There is nothing thar riles up feminazi like a man speaking the truth. Judging by the level of hateful comments (summarily deleted) we must be getting very close to home with the truth of feminazi hate and violence. They reap what they have sown.
I recognized feminist garbage hate from an early age. Feminism is like a religious cult in which:
Woman is God. Man is Satan.
Woman is good. Man is evil.
Woman is superior. Man is inferior.
Woman is to be protected. Man is to be punished.
Woman has the right to hit man. Man has no right to hit woman, even while woman is hitting him.
Woman is strong. Man is weak.
Woman is loved. Man is hated.
Since I was in my early teens, I felt very much offended, disrespected, belittled by much of what I read and heard in the media. I wondered what did I do to these people for them to keep telling me how worthless I was an how much better that girl is than I. Now understand they are stink, ugly, simple minded, hate mongers.
So what do you want, Bob? That people agree with your views even if they must disobey their conscience to do so?
Note to anonymous;
Bob's Comment Rules are conspicuously posted on the left column of The World According to Bob
There are too many manginas these days who allow feminists to crap in MRM playgrounds.
I wasn't expecting rambutans, but death isn't even a fruit, dumbass.
I thought that most single mothers were single because the father didn't want to commit to raising his child. If that's the case should the woman who had the balls to actually raise the kid be blamed, or the father that ran out on her? I know in my stepfather not only burned down our house, but cheated on my mother before trying to divorce and take every asset she had while she was raising his children, and he had children with another woman that he hasn't raised before us, and is now having another child with another woman. You wonder why women are single? Why not ask the asshole who burned my house down and left my mother who was working so hard to make ends meet and support his lazy ass.
marie said: "my stepfather.."
Your stepfather is not your father, toots. Your mother's latest fuck does not ever make a family. Your mother failed to form a decent family and made children with a series of losers it is SHE who made a mess out of your life and the lives of her other children.
Hey, my father wasn't a saint either. Granted, he is a REALLY decent guy and a big cornerstone to my life, there are reasons why my mother left him. He married another woman, is that bad too? Sometimes people don't get the right partner the first time, and I am willing to accept that they divorced. I love my step mother, she is really awesome, and if it wasn't for the divorce then I would have never had my little half brother and half sister who I treasure so dear, but still, they should have never had to suffer from some loser as their father who would just prefer to take everything he can and not take responsibility for the seeds he has sown.
Yeah, this is a little late, but I just had the privilage of locating this piece of work via another website.
I'd like to point out that not all single mothers are single mothers by choice. Some are infact left in less than perfect financial situations by former boyfriends and husbands. While I do agree a stable FAMILY environment is most important in raising well balanced and ethically sound children. The word FAMILY is not always interpreted as Man, Woman, Kids.
Finally, it's fairly arrogant of you to imply that you're aware of why either of these men chose to kill. There maybe a number of circumstances contributing to their choices. But rather than factor in not only a possible single parent household, you choose to ignore possible poverty, over exposure to violence and violence against women, or even perhaps good old misogyny. Because, lest we forget, each victim of murder here was female...
Meh squealed "I'd like to point out that not all single mothers are single mothers by choice."
LOL.
1. She has a CHOICE to keep her legs together.
2, She can use a wide variety of birth control pills and products.
3. She has "a woman's right to choose."
4. She can give the baby for adoption.
5. She can abandon the baby no questions asked.
If she CHOOSES to bypass all of these options and become a single mother it is by CHOICE, not chance.
Pathetic fat sows like Meh probably believe that all of the many choices that single mothers have are irrelevenat. The wide ass crowd thinks that they can tell the same lies to Bob and men that she and her feminazi sista's pretend to each other that they believe.
Sorry, toots, those lies haven't cut the muster since your grandmother got the pill. Get back to Weight Watchers and lie to the other sista's.
Your reply stated that you are only aware that they can become MOTHERS by choice. You never said anything about their ability to be none-SINGLE by choice.
LOL.
1. She has a CHOICE to keep her legs together. (at the time she might not have known she would not be married two years down the road)
2, She can use a wide variety of birth control pills and products. (see 1.)
3. She has "a woman's right to choose." (see 1.)
4. She can give the baby for adoption. (see 1.)
5. She can abandon the baby no questions asked. (it's illigal, worse then a single parent house and see 1.)
What about if only the father raises them? I personaly have no objection to the idea but if a single mother can not raise a child then there is no reason to assume a father can.
Post a Comment
<< Home