HughesNet Still Sucks
Update February 27, 2009
Bob is back on-line.
The HughesNet techie came out, replaced the modem. That didn't fix the problem. He said the transmitter was broken and would have to be ordered. He went away.
The HughesNet techie came out again 5 days later. He replaced the transmitter. It still didn't work. After an hour he found that the connection on the cable to the transmitter had corroded. He cut it off and put on a new connector. They will probably charge me for the new modem and transmitter. It took a week to fix.
Original Post
Moderation of comments on The World According to Bob will experience some delays during the next few days due to HughesNet difficulties. For more on HughesNet see HughesNet Really Sucks
Bob apologizes for any delays. Comment moderation will resume the normal schedule whenever HughesNet gets around to fixing the totally worthless and very overpriced service.
Bob is back on-line.
The HughesNet techie came out, replaced the modem. That didn't fix the problem. He said the transmitter was broken and would have to be ordered. He went away.
The HughesNet techie came out again 5 days later. He replaced the transmitter. It still didn't work. After an hour he found that the connection on the cable to the transmitter had corroded. He cut it off and put on a new connector. They will probably charge me for the new modem and transmitter. It took a week to fix.
Original Post
Moderation of comments on The World According to Bob will experience some delays during the next few days due to HughesNet difficulties. For more on HughesNet see HughesNet Really Sucks
Bob apologizes for any delays. Comment moderation will resume the normal schedule whenever HughesNet gets around to fixing the totally worthless and very overpriced service.
Labels: HughesNet
posted by Bob | Friday, February 19, 2010
26 Comments:
Hello, interesting to read this. i also get knowledge from your post.Wonderful article, very well explained.
We have Hughes net. The fair access policy with its 300mb download per 24 hours, keeps you from downloading any large files or watching videos, with the exemption being between the hours of 11:00PM and 2:00AM. Not too many people are up that late.
I have a fairly good Edge connection with my PDA, but EDGE is pretty slow compared to 3G and unfortunately the tethering plan for most cell providers costs $60.00 per month for a 5 measly Gigs! That's less than Hughes. Not a lot of internet options for us country folk Bob.
Hey Bob, in addition to HughesNet sucking, the Men's Rights Movement sucks too!
I just had all my comments deleted from the-spearhead.com less than 6 hours after I signed up and posted them. From the forum, from the article section. Why? Because I posted stuff like this:
----------------------------
Political Suggestions about women's Rights:
* Females be married once they are able to have children (usually at ages: 12, 13, 14).
* Men never persecuted for having relations with a young female of childbearing age.
* The marital rape exception reinstated (So that a man is never persecuted for raping his wife).
* If a man rapes a unmarried/unbetrothed++ virgin girl he marries her, pays her father some money, and doesn't divorce her.
++Bethrothal here meaning female living with husband for about one year before the marraige feast/ceremony.
* Females barred from bringing claims against their husband (or similar) in court.
* Females barred from divorcing their husbands.
* Females barred from collecting monies from husband (child support etc).
* Other similar things to remove all power from females and make them what men desire.
(About Child Support: A saying from Bob is: child support is a seat at a Man's table and a cot to sleep on in his house)
All of the above are to the benifit of men, if you're against them then you do not much care to allow your fellow man benifit: you're not a friend.
Additionally:
* Women's rights activists be cleansed from the earth.
* All rapists, batterers, etc be freed from the prisons.
Additionally:
* Clone girls, sell them (untouched) to men, so as to constructivly change the market so that all men have what they wish to have.
* Investigate who brought women's rights upon the world, destroy those who did (in much of the world women's rights is new as of the 90s and 00s: in India, for example, it really started in earnest in the late 90s).
Young wives are a supreme pleasure to men. That is why they are now banned the world over.
In most of the world it is now illegal to take a young wife under the age of 18 or to have relations with one's wife at will.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MaritalRapeCriminalizedMap.svg
And there is _nothing_ men can do about it.
Men have NO political power.
(You can't jerrymander THIS 48 percent minority into a majority anywhere (because, unlike with races, men and women are dispersed together everywhere in the same ratio.)
Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberties.
--MikeeUSA--
----------------------------
You can still see their response comments here:
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/02/27/stopping-male-genital-mutilation/#comments
and some here:
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/02/27/major-drama-in-us-armed-forces-as-women-take-on-combat-roles/
Bob: You and Masculinist Man are the only men with websites that support Men's Liberties. The rest of the men's rights "activists" want men caged for the same things women want men caged for.
Isn't this unfortunate. I surely hope their movement is not a success: it will not bring liberty and pleasure to Men.
--MikeeUSA--
They banned me again, so I posted this:
""
[quote]
Snark (etc) February 28, 2010 at 09:18
[quote]PS: I also noticed that you banned me from commenting, thanks faggots.[/quote]
Nice work, Welmer. How about an IP ban this time?
[/quote]
Heh, IP ban. LOL.
You people are scum.
For all of human history men married sweet cute young females of childbearing age. People like you stop us now... and we want you gone.
Normal men appreciate young fertile females.
Worthless quislings do not.
You are the obstacle men need to grind into dust. You are the men who are our legistlative overloards, our judges, our jailers, our masters. You believe you do good by opposing nature and the interests of men.
It is bad for a man to be persecuted for taking for himself and unclaimed girl as his wife. It is bad for a man to be destroyed for having relations with his females at his will. It is bad for men to be denied the sweet brides they have always longed for (and in the past, before the acendancy of the Good Man, did aquire.)
You are the enemy of Man.
Your kind is the obstacle to our fulfillment.
You are the column of necessary masculinity that without which women's rights would crash decisively against the rock that is the men of the world. You are their shield, and for us to get to claim our prize we must destroy you.
""
Which of course they deleted.
They also deleted some of the posts of someone who was supporting me.
What's the point of engaging in a "men's movement" when it doesn't want anything good for men?
What's the point of fighting this fight to gain nothing?
Why are the-spearhead.com men scumbags?
You're opinion?
Mikee, I hate feminists as much as the next guy, but most of the stuff you come out with is disgusting.
[quote]
""Feminist Scum said...
Mikee, I hate feminists as much as the next guy, but most of the stuff you come out with is disgusting.""
[/quote]
Yes, you do hate feminism as much as the next guy: Not very much at all. Most "guys" don't hate feminism that much, they just think it's gone a tad too far. (The word "guy" is apt here).
I advocate: Females being married once they are able to have children (this is usually at age 12, 13, or 14).
If that is disgusting then all the patriarchs of the Bible are disgusting and all of YOUR ancestors who were men were disgusting.
I advocate: That if a man rapes a young virgin female who is not married/bethrothed (bethrotal, in this sence, is when a female lives with her husband for about a year before the wedding feast) he marries her, he pays the father some money, and he doesn't divorce her. He is NOT JAILED. He is NOT PUNISHED.
If that is disgusting then the men who wrote the Bible are disgusting. The men who operated in any good Catholic country were disgusting. And many of your male ancestors who were not quisling ass kissing scum were also disgusting.
I advocate: Men rape their wives whenever they (the men) wish to.
If that is disgusting than all your male ancestors are disgusting, nearly all the men who have every existed are disgusting, the men of the bible are disgusting, pretty much any man worth anything with any ounce of self respect and dignity is disgusting.
A good, strong, man has relations with his females at his will.
-----------------------
You, like the majority of men in these democracies, oppose such men. You want them sent to prison so Nice men like yourself, who fancy themselves as good men, can take the place of the stronger upstanding men. And you do. Men are in jails all across the world now for having their way with their females.
You are not a man who has the interests of his fellow man in mind.
No, You are a democratic man. You are a quisling. You pander to the wants and "reasonable needs" of women. You stand against the liberties men have always had in men's countries up untill this age.
You are an enemy of men who know what they themselves desire, and unfortunatly in a democracy men such as you, allied with women, reign absolutly supreme.
I hate democracy. It gives women and men like you power over men who desire to control females and have them as they wish to.
Your nickname is absolutely correct: FeministScum.
Death To women's Rights
Viva Men's Liberties.
And I hope your democracy comes crashing down upon your head.
--MikeeUSA--
Bob, what is your opinion, have you moved to the more reasonable side too? Where their only concern in worthless prattle about nothing? And their highest crusade is against circumcision? (And anything more "extreme" than that is rejected, deleted, and banned)
I hate the men of the men's movement: the vast majority support women's rights and are scum that should be buried along with the women's rights activists.
All you (MRA people) want is a fucking bone from the table. You don't want the world. You don't want what is to the most advantage for men. You are begging quisling scum that turns against your fellows and throw them under the bus (weather it be rape, domestic violence, "underaged" marraige. You support all the laws that most disadvantage men... you just don't want them to apply to "good nice men" like yourself... because you don't take charge, you don't enforce dicipline, and you would never dare take a cute young virgin as a bride of yours.)
As long as democracy reigns, Men like FeministScum will bear over men like me, men like Argus, men who like youthful young women, men who wish to control those girls and have them for themselves.
As long as men like FeministScum are the good, you all have only cougars to look forward to.
Bob, Look at this map:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MaritalRapeCriminalizedMap.svg
The MAJORITY of the WORLD is at WAR with men.
What can we do?
Please tell me.
http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32701
"The states made progress in the past 20 years toward eliminating exemptions for sex offenders who are married to their victims."
Bob, we are losing badly all around the world. How can we win? Even the muslim countries are getting on the women's rights bandwagon.
WHY ARE WE POWERLESS?
Why must the world be a hell for men?
Why must WOMEN win?
Why can't we make women LOSE and MEN win.
Men are punished all around the world now for spousal rape and taking young wives.
This is because of women's rights and the white knights who support that.
What can we do?
Please tell me.
Mikee, I think you just like reading yourself whining. If you want something to be done, then do it. Right now women are legally considered human in the U.S., with all attendant rights like being secure in their person and home and all that. If you want that changed, then do something about it. Go to law school, or hire an ambitious, anti-feminist lawyer who already graduated. File suit against being discriminated against in marriage. Protest at local polling places. I noticed a lot of women voting yesterday with no public outcry at all. Go on your local news. Make a fuss and get the cause noticed. If nothing else get on YouTube. Don't underestimate the reach of that kind of viral marketing.
Don't wait for someone else to work on your behalf. Every father with a daughter will work against you, and shame other men from working with you. Make some noise on your own, or just shut up and accept that you're never going to get what you want.
The law is your enemy. Use it as a weapon instead of having it be used against you. Get the cause noticed. Make some noise.
I never will get what I want.
The age of men is over.
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/4/46/MaritalRapeCriminalization.png
Map image confirms it.
"Every father with a daughter will work against you, and shame other men from working with you."
Yes, bad men cannot get what they wish to have in a democracy. Bad men only thrive in kingdoms, olagarchies, and dictatorships where other bad men (who also like young women and take pride in dominating females rather than being dominated by or being equal to females) have eachother's backs.
Democracy is good for good men who support women's rights and is deadly ... infact has killed... the world of bad men who are very much desirious of girls.
Unfortunatly, good men have the most powerful army in the world... things like this didn't used to happen. It used to be that bad men ruled... and other bad men who liked to dominate girls had the society they wanted to facilitate their pleasure.
Old England was like this untill the middle 1800s. Rome was like this untill it's apex. Men had their girls and tilled them as they wished. Men took young wives, raped them, loved them, and excercised dominion over them. America was never like this. America was always the land of the good and always respected women's rights to atleast some extent. Example: Men would convict other men for rape in early america. Men would be whipped in public in America for hitting their wives. In europe, France at that time, men would never convict another man for rape.
Now America is everywhere. The good man reigns supreme with his queen, his equal. No longer are girls enslaved to be the female servants and toys of bad men.
It is most unfortunate.
America has always been the enemy of all but the good man... and right now America is god.
Please God, You, the original bad man: destroy them please. Destroy them I beg You. Make it how it was... how it was good for bad men who followed in your footsteps and in the example you gave. Let us have our girls back.
Men's rights activists post about how advocating that young females of childbearing age be married, how men have a right to have relations with their wives at will, and how men who seek to aquire an unclaimed young woman should not be punished but instead have the girl married to them... has nothing to do with "men's rights" and is damaging "the movement" and how I'm apparently a woman and don't care about "men's issues".
http://forahouseboy.blogspot.com/2010/03/warning-to-mikeeusa.html
http://www.antifeministtech.info/2010/03/haters-mikeeusa/
Men's issues have everything to do with the criminalization of men's desires for, and pursuit of, females. What they prattle on about on their men's sites are tangential issues which stem completely from the former.
The Men's Rights Activists seem to want to succede to succede, but not to turn the world so that it be to the benifit of men in totality. They want a trophy, nothing more.
Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberties.
--MikeeUSA--
Your thoughts?
Your thoughts?
I don't know Mikee, but here's a thought. You think you're the only one working for real Men's Rights, and everyone else in the MRM is a liar, quisling, white knight, or whatever. Everyone else in the MRM thinks you're a troll, disguised feminist, or outright nutjob supporting rape, pedophilia and other crimes instead of real Men's issues like divorce/support inequality. Maybe, just maybe, you're wrong and they're right.
Where do you see men demanding child brides in the civilized world? Where do you see men demanding the right to rape? I'm not working for any of that, and don't want to see any of it enacted. I want balance, not tyranny. It's part of being American.
My thoughts.
I want tyranny. Pro-men tyranny.
Anything that is to the benifit of men I am for. I hate democracy because men like you reign over men like me. It is only the dictatorships and monarchies of the world that do not interfere with a man's relationship over his wife:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MaritalRapeCriminalizedMap.svg
"It's part of being American."
American values have destroyed the world.
America is the anti-man.
Bob, what are your opinions, on all this, on being an american, etc etc
Note to anonymous:
The fundamental meaning and purpose of marriage is the biological joining of a man and woman to make children and create a family. In a traditional marriage the woman agrees to engage in sex with her husband to get pregnant and produce children. The husband agrees to engage in sex with his wife for the same reason. The concept of "spousal rape" abdicates the underlying meaning of marriage. The Nations shown on that Wiki map no longer recognize traditional marriage. Feminism has succeeded in abolishing traditional marriage in those nations.
"The Nations shown on that Wiki map no longer recognize traditional marriage. Feminism has succeeded in abolishing traditional marriage in those nations."
More and more join. MOST of the world is on that wiki map (in red). Obviously there is NOTHING men can do about it.
Women Reign Absolutly Supreme. It is their world now. This earth is not our, it does not belong to men any longer.
How do we destroy this women's world?
Note to anonymous:
The gynocracy will collapse because female suffrage eventually destroys the economy and the nation. MEN need to join together to hasten the day that it collapses and is replaced by a decent society. (See Legal Notice)
traditional marriage = slavery for women
"The gynocracy will collapse because female suffrage eventually destroys the economy and the nation. MEN need to join together to hasten the day that it collapses and is replaced by a decent society. (See Legal Notice)"
The USA has been at it for over a century. It hasn't collapsed.
Bob: how do I get the wife I want?
Up untill the mid 90s americans could go to a southern state to marry. They had their marraige age at 12, and you could live in the woods and be away from feminist laws.
Not anymore.
Same with the rest of the third world.
All men support the feminist laws and the lack of nice sweet young virgin wives.
All around the globe.
Except in afghanistan.
All men want to be "good men"
This, we cannot defeat.
Yes, traditional marraige is a type of slavery for women (though not the till the fields black slavery... actually it's insulting to call women married slavery due to what enslaved men went through). But it is good for men to command a nice young female and possess her. It's really good.
And that's why we should reinstate this female slavery.
Besides, little girls dream of their wedding and they're not thinking of being a domineering bitch, it's nice to get them that wedding immediatly once they are able to have children.
They get to live the dream. Also females have been bred, by men, to be submisive to a dominant man. It takes a lifetime of propaganda since they're born to make them war against that. It also takes the same amount to get boys and men to not be domineering by default.
I know I always wanted to dominate. And soon later I learned that I wanted to dominate girls. So cute and pretty.
It was only social conditioning that made that latent. Once puberty kicked in though, it came back and crystalized.
Girls need to be opressed by men. Female slavery needs to be started young so both the man and the young woman can really enjoy it and not waste the female's youth.
don't feed the trolls
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/03/04/texas-taliban/
Note to anonymous:
The Amarillo Fundies are over reaching and attacking everyone. They attack Masons and other Christian denominations as well as all other religions. However they are a symptom of the worsening anti-white, anti-men, and anti-Christian programs of our government and our media. Many Texans are willing to revolt if someone will lead them. I wouldn't be surprised if some in the US Army aren't thinking of an "Inglorious Bastards" type coup d'etat if Obama pushes his plan to turn the military gay. A little bit of leadership would attract millions of supporters from the heartland of America.
Obama has worked to portray himself as "like Lincoln." It must be remembered that Lincoln precipitated a major civil war.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/09/opinion/09tue2.html?ref=opinion
McDonald's sued again. Does it matter that it's by a man this time?
Note to anonymous:
A man will be held to a much higher standard of personal responsibility than a female. In addition, he won't receive as high of a settlement.
It should be noted that fryer grease is a well known hazard at McD. Many of their workers suffer burns from the fryer grease. Fryer grease is a lot hotter than coffee. In addition, many customers demand that coffee is boiling hot, which in Albuquerque where the cow's lawsuit happened, is only about 200 degrees F. Fryer grease is often 400 or 500 degrees.
My father would complain to the waiter if the coffee wasn't boiling hot. but, nobody wants 500 degree chicken. It is negligent to serve chicken sandwiches at that temperature.
Bob: are you on Facebook?
Post a Comment
<< Home