I've heard the term "sexual predator" on the news a lot lately. The FBI arrests a man who responded to their on-line impersonation of a young woman seeking sex. The legislatures in several states aggressively write new laws to punish "sexual predators" more severely. The talking heads on FOX, CNN, CBS, and other media continually use "sexual predators" as whipping boys to drum up hatred against men. But, someone asked, what is a "sexual predator?" As close as I have been able to understand from all the hoopla and hate, a "sexual predator" is a MAN who is attempting to find a woman for sex. But isn't that what MEN have always done? Isn't finding a woman for sex the most basic instinctive male behavior? And conversely, don't virtually all women also want to find a man for sex? In recent years, women's fashions have become more and more sexually focused. Today's young women at schools and offices dress as provocatively as only working whores did a generation ago. Obviously neither men nor women spend all our time seeking sex, we all have other parts of our lives, but sex is a very important, and biologically necessary part of all our lives. It has always been the men who are supposed to be sexually aggressive, to seek out the females for sex, to make them pregnant, and to continue our species. The standard male sexual aggressive behavior is common to most species. It is the most NORMAL male behavior, and welcomed by the females of all species as well. Only in the past decades, fueled by a violent feminazi hate war on men, has "sexual predator" even become a term. Now it's a "crime" in the violent hate war on men.
Whenever you hear the term "sexual predator" translate it to it's root meaning -- a normal sexual man looking for a normal sexual woman. Whenever you hear Ms. Suckhind, Mr. O'Really, or any of the other misandrist bigots on TV or other media use the term "sexual predator" you have identified a shock trooper in the violent feminazi hate war on MEN. Whenever you hear the term you have identified an organization that is waging that war, making up hate propaganda to excuse their massive destruction of MEN. Like the 3rd Reich's propaganda branch the TV cable networks pound away with their hate message. Like the Gestapo before them, the FBI, and your local blue gun thugs round up millions of MEN and send them to hell holes to rot and die. They use the term "sexual predator" as one of their lying excuses for hate. All of the hate mongering bigots should be rounded up and hanged by decent citizens.
Bob
Many men have great difficulty controlling their urges. Some weak men indulge in forced sex, others in excessive cruelty, theft, violence, etc.
ReplyDeleteHere is a predatory beast from the 15th century, Vlad the Impaler (Count Dracula):
http://www.donlinke.com/drakula/vlad.htm
Note Dracula's joy in impaling women with a hot stake through their vagina. It was a type of crucifixion, Slavic-style.
Note to anonymous: Vlad was not "weak" as you assert, in fact he was the antithisis of weakness. Your caim that MEN who take direct action are "weak" is a variation of the common feminazi "small dick" propaganda insult. Sorry bitch, your old tired hate propaganda doesn't work here.
ReplyDeleteIt depends on how men take "direct action". Are they acting justly for a good cause? Are they protecting decency, liberty, human rights?
ReplyDeleteOr are they behaving as selfish maniacs -- crucifying, burning, mutilating innocents? Hijacking airplanes, slaughtering thousands in a single morning on 9/11? Just because they were angry, their precious feelings hurt, and they gave in to their unstable emotions in a torrent of killing rage.
Vlad the Impaler (15th century) was weak. He was a psychopath. If you doubt that, think how you might have fared living in his kingdom. At a whim, Vlad could have ordered a sharp stake jammed into your rectum, bob. Or he might have lured you into his castle, locked the doors, and set the building ablaze.
Vlad also tortured animals.
If you deem Vlad the Impaler a strong example of sane manhood, Christian virtue, etc., you need your head examined. Stat.
Strength is one thing. Cruelty is another.
Bob:
ReplyDeleteSpell it "antithesis".
Actually, Dracula was the antithesis of strength. A strong man is a moral man. He can control his desire to torture. A weak one can't.
Likewise, a weak male screams "bitch", "cunt", etc. because:
1) He thinks it makes him look strong.
2) He thinks he can intimidate his target.
3) He gives in to his bitterness, and launches a verbal temper tantrum.
4) All of the above or some combination.
Note to anonymous: Another common feminazi LIE is to claim that men are bad today because some historical man was bad. Instead of pointing out any falacy in Bob's assertion (Bob is always right) you reverted to "Vlad Dracula was bad, therefore many men today are bad." Logical LIES like that demonstrate the fraud of feminazi propaganda. Your psychobabble about Vlad was "weak" is also obviously wrong. In fact, everything you've said is wrong. Bob enjoys it when feminiazi bitches whine and carry on. Boo Hoo!
ReplyDeleteROFLMAO!!!!
Bob
Men taking direct action, good or bad?
ReplyDeleteBad: robbing a bank.
Good: apprehending the bank robber.
There is no such thing as a sexual predator.
ReplyDeleteParticularly in view of the man (Mr. Cooey) who kidnapped a Florida child from her bed last year. The 9 yr old girl was held for days, raped and killed (buried alive).
In 2004, a man Joseph Smith kidnapped an 11 yr old girl, raped and strangled her.
Those men were NOT sexual predators !!
Bob notes that the raving hysterical feminazi minds can not rationally discuss "sexual preditor" and immediatly switch to murderers. Sorry, Toots, that rhetorical switch may fly in your victimology sista's sob session, but around here it dosen't cut the muster. Your mad raving hystrical hatred of men, misandry, is, again, well demonstrated.
ReplyDeleteBob