Pepsi Max “Don't Hurt Me” commercial has a man hit and knocked down at about second 23.
Pepsi Mas, “Love Hurts” shows a violent bitch continually using Domestic Violence against a man. The “gag” is at the end when he ducks and her violent assault hits another female. The abused and beaten man drags her off before her violence gets her in trouble. The message is that hurting a female is a serious problem, but all her violence against the man is normal and acceptable female behavior.
Pepsi Max “Torpedo Cooler” shows men getting hit in the gonads first and then getting hit in the head and knocked down. .
Pepsi Max “First Date” ad promotes obscene sexist stereotypes about men by suggesting that all a man thinks about is “I want to sleep with her.” while the woman is thinking a wide range of thoughts.
Pepsi probably hires one of the ad agencies run by misandrist feminist bitches to produce their ads. According to research done by Glenn Sacks, it turns out that females have gravitated toward the advertising businesses. Perhaps that's because advertising does not deal with any real knowledge. Its all about "feelings." The lesbitches in advertising hate men and often include misandry in their produced ads. Corporations often assign the "affirmative action" female manager to a non-production area like advertising and public relations thinking they will not do as much harm there as they would if they fucked up their production or distribution. The corporate ad manager ends up being another misandrist lesbitch who thinks the misandrist commercials are a "good." use for corporate money. Or, maybe Pepsi just hates men.
I wrote the following comment to their "Contact Pepsi" web site
I was extremely offended by your promotion of violence against men including sexual violence against men in your Superbowl commercials. At a million dollars per minute to promote hate and violence surely the Pepsi company can find a better use for its funds.
I was shocked when the first Pepsi commercial included offensive misandry of violence against men. But then the next Pepsi commercial, and the next Pepsi commercial also included promotion of hate and violence against men. Shame, shame, shame on you. Hate and violence is wrong.
I have noticed that numerous other men are discussion Pepsi's hate campaign on numerous Internet comment and discussion sites.
In response to your hate and violence campaign against men, I have permanently discontinued purchase of any Pepsi product. May your suffer the violence you advocate for others.
I have noticed other MEN were offended enough to start posting comments about Pepsi's misandry and violence against men on such places as a political editorial about big corporations. The discussion about anti-men hate ads needs to be more focused. Pepsi needs to hear that their hate promotions are not acceptable, and not good for business.
PepsiCo owns some of the world's most popular brands, including Pepsi-Cola, Mountain Dew, Diet Pepsi, Lay's, Doritos, Tropicana, Gatorade, and Quaker. Their Chaircow and Chief Executive Officer is a misandrist bitch by the name of Indra K. Nooyi. The good news is that corporations run by cows invariably lose money and eventually fade or are sold.
I suggest that MEN go to the Contact Pepsi web site and let them know how offensive their hate campaign is to men. Pass this information to other web sites and discussion forums. And stop buying Pepsi products. Contact Pepsi now
"The message is that hurting a female is a serious problem, but all her violence against the man is normal and acceptable female behavior."
ReplyDeleteExactly - I noticed this too - the woman is allowed to commit all the violence she wants against her boyfriend - but when a female is teh target - then its a crime.
I'd boycott pepsi, but I do not drink it anyway - its toxic waste with rotgut in it.
Note to ScareCrow:
ReplyDeleteI don't buy their crap hardly ever either, but that makes it easier to boycott hate.
Fuck Pepsi Bitches I hardly buy their crap either because it's a bitches drink
ReplyDeleteMen need to start FLOGGING the shit out of women AGAIN we'll put them in their RIGHTFUL place under mens feet
ReplyDelete"Men need to start FLOGGING the shit out of women"
ReplyDeleteCan't imagine how you're still single.
Because I enjoy it (being single) at least I don't have to KowTow to Feminazi Rubbish.
ReplyDeleteElam we know it's you.
Elam we know it's you.
ReplyDeleteWho's "we"? You got a gerbil up your ass?
Lemmiwinks!!
ReplyDelete*snarf* The classic "Stupid Spoiled Whore" episode of South Park.
ReplyDeleteThanks man. I'd completely forgotten that one.
Find the episode about scientology. It's hilarious. Tom Cruise tried to sue over it iirc.
ReplyDeleteElam we know it's you.
ReplyDeleteBy we I meen MR Allen and I and I don't need to know about your wild sexual fantasies
Paranoia AND projection. Tell me there's a big conspiracy to keep you from getting medical help and you'll have the trifecta.
ReplyDeleteWhich one is supposed to be Elam?
ReplyDeleteThe Smart ass commenter IS ELAM
ReplyDeleteWho's Elam and which commenter is supposed to be him/her?
ReplyDeleteHappy Marc Rudov Day!
ReplyDeleteThe one who want's to flog women is Elam? What a freak. I can see why you don't like him.
ReplyDeleteThank you for posting this,Bob. I joined in with you in sending an irate email to Pepsi.
ReplyDeleteTo contact the guy who made the commercial and tell him what you think contact him here: bebosley@yahoo.com His name is Brad Bosley
ReplyDeletePut in the subject line: Super Bowl Pepsi Max Ad
I might risk alienating you here.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the double standards argument. I understand what you mean.
On the other hand, you as a self professed libertarian, probably will get my other point.
-------------------------
Great post. Totally correct. If the gender were reversed, women would protest. Any minor violence against women is considered a crime.
So protesting serves to enforce equal rights.
======
Now, while I agree with you, I also harbor an almost opposite view:
I think government should not meddle in people's lifes, meddle with commercials, jokes etc.
Nor should art, commercials, most commercial behavior constantly be monitored for policital correctness, be it by government or other institutions.
My alternative remedy would be not to allow political correctness interfere. Stop heeding to feminist "sensitivities". Allow commercials demeaning to men, but also to women. Allow commercials that use women as "objects".
Remember when car repair shops had Playboy pinups all over? But this hurt women's "sensitivity".
Re-institute our old freedom, then also allow commercials like this.
Don't start more and more laws, regulations, sensitivities. Get government, feminism, political correctness out of the way.
Of course, I am being unrealistic. So your action, protesting, is probably the only one that can be done realistically.
==========
Just found your blog. Interesting. Feel free to come over and visit my blog. Human Stupidity. Feel free to comment
Pick the topics that interest you and try to ignore those that alienate you. I have a talent to alienate everyone with some topic.
Note to Human Stupidity:
ReplyDeleteBob does not advocate government control of broadcasting or commercials. Advertisers intend to associate their products with good feelings, not anger. If some people contact them and point out that their misguided men bashing associates their product with anger, they will rethink their own promotion.
One rule taught in many business colleges is that there are 100 angry former customers for ever 1 who complains, and it does not take very many angry former customers to shift the balance from profit to loss. So business schools teach that every angry customer who complains is VERY important to understand and make changes in the way you do business.
The Pepsico, Inc. misandry campaign is now on at least 2 blogs, and numerous MEN have complained. If Pepsico has any brains (not entirely clear) they will change their ways. If they don't change, there are no companies too big to fail.
It does not take government control. Market forces are a lot quicker and a lot more responsive than government.
Let me clarify. I did not really mean only government.
ReplyDeleteIn my ideal world, even the general public would not be rife with sensitivities.
In my ideal world, one can make jokes at the expense of women, put up the bikini photo of one's wife on his desk, put pin up photos in car repair stations, make ethnic and racial jokes, and also make jokes at the expense of men.
I would rather have general freedom of expression, of jokes, of advertising, etc without having to watch out for 100 different group sensitivities.
There is almost no joke left that does not offend someone.
But, 99 different groups demand sensitivity.
The only group left to be bashed with impunity are men.
So, to make the score even, to level the playground, you are right: men need to express their sensitivities and complain about offensive advertising.
But I am still dreaming on: I wish, instead the other 99 interest groups (especially feminists, of course) would stop protesting and interfering and stop demand respect for their sensitivities. I sometimes have unrealistic ideals.