In 2013 Obama was visiting several African nations advocating the gay agenda according to the demands of bit money gay contribtors. His gay advocacy was publicly rebuked in Kenya. His public rebuke was kept out of lamestream media in the US.
In January 2014 the Christian government of Nigeria passed a law against gay marriage with about 98% support of their people. The Nigeria law requires prison terms for gays who openly flaunt their sickness. The government of Uganda followed their lead and passed a similar law. American gay agenda pundits were outraged. Big money gay agenda contributors to Obama demanded that he do something about the anti-gay laws in Christian Africa. That was less than 4 months ago. In response to powerful gay agenda pressure Obama, Kerry, and the US government set about attacking the Christan Nigerian government.
Concurrently in Africa one of the Islamic Jihad groups is Boko Haram. Over the past few years Obama has refused to oppose the Boko Haram organization despite their obvious terrorist activities. Obama's ideology supports global Islam, they are the “Dreams of My Father” about which Obama wrote his book. Working quietly with Boko Haram, Obama encouraged and financed (with our money) their attack on Nigerian Christians. Only about four months after Nigeria's new law on gay marriage, Obama and Boko Haram were able to attack Christian schools and capture almost 300 female slaves. The point of attack was to kidnap girls studying at Christian schools. The kidnapping embarrassed Nigeria's Christian government as ineffective and incompetent. In one covert action Obama could oppose Christians, support Islam, and push the gay agenda in Africa. His message to other African governments is that opposition to gay marriage brings big problems.
Of course American feminists are vexed that around 300 girls are being sold into slavery, and not being told why. The US media plays their Boo Hoo tape, but only when it pressures the Nigerian government. American Christians and others hold prayers for the lost girls, but even they won't talk about Obama and his gay/Islam agenda. That is hard ball in the real world. A few hundred girls get sacrificed. The media spins Obama to look like he is opposing it rather than having done it. The lies never end with that criminal regime. All the useful idiots refuse to see the obvious and go on supporting Odumbo even as they publicly whine about missing girls.
Note to anonymous: Your aggressive 3rd grade name calling was deleted. Its easier than facing the truth. So much truth in this article.
ReplyDelete[Right on, Bob. Great blog! Sharing what popped up on my computer.]
ReplyDeleteHarvey Milk Stamped "Out" Forever !
The Obama Cabal is behind universal GAYety with a "forever" postage stamp glorifying Harvey Milk, a Jewish homosexual predator "attracted to boys aged 15-19," according to WikiAnswers! (Also see Wikipedia.)
Global gaydom was even predicted by Jesus (see "days of Lot" in Luke 17 and compare with Genesis 19).
And the Hebrew prophet Zechariah (14th chapter) says that during the same end-time gay "days" ALL nations will come against Israel and fulfill the "days of Noah" at the same time (see Luke 17 again) - a short time of anti-Jewish genocide found in Zechariah 13:8 when two-thirds of all Jews will die.
In other words, when "gay days" have become universal, all hell will break loose!
The same "days" will cause worldwide human government to collapse in just a few short years! For the first time ever there won't be enough time for anyone to attend college, have a family, enjoy retirement, etc. It will also be the last time anyone like ObabaBlackSheep will be able to keep pulling the wool over our eyes!
One final thought. The more we see gays "coming out," the sooner Jesus will be "coming down"!
For more, Google or Yahoo "God to Same-Sexers: Hurry Up," "Jesus Never Mentioned Homosexuality. When gays have birthdays...," "FOR GAYS ONLY: Jesus Predicted...," "USA - from Puritans to Impure-itans!" and "The Background Obama Can't Cover Up."
(PS: HOMOgenized Milk is preferred by Gov. Schwarzenaggravator and Pres. ObabaBlackSheep.)
If Jesus said to go and imprison the "sick" as you called them why not! Christians dont imprison infact Christians are imprisoned for their Faith !
ReplyDeleteIf Jesus said to go and imprison the "sick" as you called them why not! Christians dont imprison infact Christians are imprisoned for their Faith !
ReplyDeleteThey weren't getting married in the schools.
ReplyDeleteI don't see anything in the old testament about putting either girls or young women in schools.
In the old testament a man can rape a young girl and keep her as his own (Deuteronomy 22 28-29) but he must pay her father some money and not send her away. If you read the hebrew it is clear that this is talking about young females, ie girl children, not grown ass women. The word used means from infancy to adolecence.
The christian way (really the western way) is not good for men. It's only really good for fathers and women. Men are below females (or at the most, equal) in christianity of atleast the modern back to the victorian versions.
Some coloured muslims took some non-married non-engaged non-given young coloured women.
Better to drink milk before spoils.
No one else was doing it.
Elliot Rodgers and the bizarre world of the "incels." (Involuntarily celibate. The term just screams "pitiful victim, please do everything for me" doesn't it?)
ReplyDeleteThis rich entitled asshole goes on a killing spree, stabs his three roommates because they're getting laid and he isn't. Whiny little jerk who is an "incel" because nobody got him a girlfriend FOR him.
"Incel." Code for sniveling loser. Women don't owe you sex because you exist. You want women? Be a MAN and then you get women.
I think that "incels" will be getting a lot more attention, and zero sympathy now. "Waaaaaaaaah waaaaaah waaaaaah I can't get laid so I go kill because I am so entitled to Teh Hot Sexy Sex from any woman I want because Incel!"
Loser
May 25, 9:33 pm, if you want insight into the mind of an incel, I recommend this blog: http://thatincelblogger.wordpress.com/
ReplyDeleteHe started out making sense, but then degenerated into this bizarre, quasi-religious pseudo-intellectual blathering that just rambles. It's either funny or very disturbing, depending on your viewpoint. Personally I think the writer will end up going on a killing spree as well. He's enraged at his parents for not getting him a girlfriend and had a scheme where he demanded that the government of whatever country he lives in set up a dating service and get him a girlfriend that way. He's on Reddit as well.
OK, I read some of that blog. At least until my eyes started bleeding. This guy is nuts and a ticking bomb. Incel is a stupid idea. Women have been giving it away since the mid-sixties. Incel=loser. Eliot Rodger was an idiot. From what I read his idea of getting women was to dress in designer clothes and walk around campus and think that pretty blonds would just fall out of the sky or something. I have no sympathy for them or the idiot who writes the blog.
ReplyDeleteI tried to read That Incel Blogger's pretentious tripe, but life's just too damn short to spend time on that kind of self-pity. Man, if you can't find a girlfriend don't blame the government or women. Apply the principle of Occam's Razor. It's your unpleasant personality. Incel. A made-up term for a made-up condition. If you don't have a women in your life that doesn't make you a victim and nobody owes you shit. Quit whining.
ReplyDeleteThat comment about women not owing men sex reminds me of comments on another blog.
ReplyDeleteIt said that is true, women are not obliged to give sex to men. But, men are also not obliged to give women support; child support; alimony; property settlements; welfare when women can't keep their knees together. College loans. And, lots more.
And, men aren't obliged to do anything for women who do give men sex.
Interesting logic the feminists gave us when they said women aren't obliged to give sex to men. We need to follow that logic to its logical end.
Anonymous age 72
"He started out making sense, but then degenerated into this bizarre, quasi-religious pseudo-intellectual blathering that just rambles"
ReplyDeleteWhat are you rambling about, you imbecile? "Quasi- religious"? I am not even religious.
Do you have any arguments for all of this?
" It's either funny or very disturbing, depending on your viewpoint."
What on earth could be funny about the topics I deal with? You have to be mentally retarded to say that.
" He's enraged at his parents for not getting him a girlfriend"
It's much more complicated than that.
"had a scheme where he demanded that the government of whatever country he lives in set up a dating service and get him a girlfriend that way"
Not just my govt but all of them. However, it had now been abandoned.
"Incel is a stupid idea."
This is like saying that deprivation of any kind as an "idea".
"Women have been giving it away since the mid-sixties."
But only to cretins. Never to decent men. Also, they stopped being marriage material at that time.
" Incel=loser."
Wrong. Losers are the type of men who get women today.
Our modern culture is a declining culture much like the Late Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire, but with one difference. We have very effective birth control. This adds one other evolutionary factor to the mix. Since our society financially punishes successful men who have children with many women by imposing child support on them, such men who have intelligence and are responsible will tend to use birth control. Women who are intelligent and want to control the number of children they have will also use birth control. It will tend to be the stupid and irresponsible who don't use birth control. The evolutionary benefit of this should be obvious. So not only is our society evolving towards immorality like former declining empires, we are also evolving towards stupidity and irresponsibility. The more feminist a culture is, the faster this evolutionary process is occurring since feminism promotes all aspects that contribute to evolutionary decay including promiscuity, alimony and child support laws, and birth control. This is why one sees that women in feminist societies find moral men to be boring and intelligent and responsible men to be nerds. Women in feminist societies find immoral, stupid, irresponsible men to be the most sexually exciting. And in a sense they are correct because in such a society this is the type of man who is the most evolutionarily successful.
and
Both Nazism and Liberalism are designed to exterminate a certain segment of the population. Nazism targeted certain races while Liberalism targets decent and intelligent people. Apartheid simply aims separation. I wish we had Apartheid where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos. But Liberalism has no interest in separation of any kind. Liberalism is designed for the complete elimination of decent and intelligent people, giving us a pure Idiocracy.
There are some differences between Nazism and Liberalism. Nazism, coming from Germany, was more efficient and aimed for rapid extermination, while Liberal extermination is a slower process. This is why we have no death camps. Also, Nazism was intentional, the Germans being fairly intelligent people, while Liberalism is unintentional, since Liberals are fools. Liberals do not consciously want to eliminate anyone, but they are repulsed by decent people and, through Feminism, they have unintentionally managed to create a system that is highly effective at genetically eliminating decent people. And this is why all of you incels are here.
Tl:dr- it is the worst men who reproduce most in liberal societies, not best men.
ReplyDeletebeen busy this summer. Just came back to reald. It is scary, but thatincelblogger makes a lot of sense.
What I see from those who call incels losers is the usual "the more women you bang the better man you are" group. Sort of like boar hogs.
Anonymous age 72
I find it odd when MRAs and men in other pro-male, anti-feminism schools of thought are also anti-gay/bi-male. So you you don't believe men should be dependent on women or supportive of misandrist ideology and yet you don't support men's right to love each other. It's sort of like how in Abrahamic religion men are taught that they are superior to females and that they should essentially dominate and hate women but then they are also told they can not love another man. So men are stuck in this vicious cycle of misogyny and internalized misandry and homophobic rhetoric that forces men to be dependent on women as their source of love and support. Doesn't make sense. I hope this makes sense as it's late and I'm a bit drunk.
ReplyDeleteI might add you claim to be anti-misandry but your post would put you in support of it since Anti-gay measures in many African & Arab countries target men primarily. These men are violently abused and many killed for being gay. So basically persecuted for daring to love maleness. How can you advocate for the rights of straight men to have freedom of sexual expression without persecution, while simultaneously condemning other men for enjoying their sexual nature with another male?
ReplyDeleteSorry, RedErik. Real men support real marriage and strong women who are our wives and the mothers of our children. Fags are not real men. Real men support our families and our children.
ReplyDelete