The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Friday, November 17, 2006

Dead whores don't get custody

OJ Simpson has a new book out called If I Did It. Couched in "if" the book details how and why OJ cut up his lying, whoring, family destroying wife. To review the known facts, Nicole Simpson (a white woman who had married a black celebrity jock) got bored with her life choice and began a new life of whoring, lying and attacking her husband and his family. To support her violent emotional destruction of OJ's family she called in the blue gun thugs. She made up feminazi "DV" accusations to document her upcoming "no fault" divorce and gain custody of OJ's children. Backed by the blue gun thug feminazi Gestapo and the agents of Satan in black robes of hell she had OJ captured, caged, and declared "guilty" of the faux feminazi "crime" of "domestic violence." Regular readers of The Truth According to Bob are aware that so-called "domestic violence" is a feminazi hate fiction designed to brand good men as criminals. Instead of obeying her husband, an emotional feminazi starts a fight and then calls in the blue gun thug Gestapo to destroy her husband. After laying her groundwork, Nicole Simpson abrogated her marriage vows, destroyed his family by leaving her husband to go drugging and whoring. Taking the fictional "domestic violence" setup into feminazi anti-family court guaranteed the lying, whoring, adulterous bitch a semi-permanent claim on OJ's money and children. Regular readers of The Truth According to Bob are also aware that dead whores don't get custody of the father's children.

It is a husband's right and responsibility to correct and stop a lying drug abusing whore who destroys his family and hurts his children. She should not have been allowed to profit and celebrate a victory over a man and his family. The death of Nicole was entirely proper and warranted. For thousands of years, before feminism, it was generally known to be the legal and moral right of husband's and fathers to do whatever was necessary to protect his family. Wives vow to obey their husbands and thereafter the husband has the duty to control and/or punish wives who fail to obey his authority. Under femininazism the emotionally uncontrolled females make marriage vows as today's fling, and then use their feminazi laws to wreck havoc on their families and children when their female emotional instability operates as females always do. Civilized law recognizes that females are emotionally unstable and incapable of maintaining stable families unless they are ruled and controlled by a dominant stable husband. The husband has the responsibility to take effective action to keep his children safe and in a good family situation. A good father does not allow an emotionally disruptive adulterous whore to hurt his children. Nicole had refused all other of OJ's reasonable attempts to maintain his family. Faced with her extremely destructive wanton female behavior was entirely appropriate that her destruction be carried out. Her false feminazi accusations and blue gun thug assaults on her husband had to be stopped for the protection of his family. Her adulterous whoring life had to be stopped for the protection of his family. Her "family court" enforced "custody" had to be stopped for the protection of his family. Her death was entirely necessary and timely. OJ should be applauded by all decent men and fathers for taking the necessary action to protect his children and their family.

The ancillary death of Ron Goldman was unfortunate. The untimely death of a man is always disappointing. Mr. Goldman, however, was aiding and abetting an adulterous wife, committing adultery with her, and attempted to intervene in the righteous actions of her husband to end her evil destruction of his family. Killing the adulterer who is screwing a man's wife, also destroying his family, has long been recognized as fitting and suitable punishment. OJ was completely within the rights and responsibilities of a husband and father when he killed the adulterous Mr. Goldman. A man of honor does not allow another man to screw his wife, and demonstrates his honor by killing the family destroying adulterer. The man's friends and brothers may also assist in protecting the family by killing the adulterer. For dishonoring OJ by screwing his wife, Mr. Goldman deserved exactly what he got. Moral righteousness was restored by his death.

Many Americans watched the OJ trial on TV, one of the longest and most watched TV dramas ever shown. Parades of blue gun thugs and county persecutors lied to the jury about the law, the rights of husbands, the evidence, and every fact of the case. Fortunately the jury didn't buy their heinous grandstanding and phony attempts to destroy a father who had protected his family. The jury decided that OJ was "not guilty" and the lying feminazi persecutor cunt had to pound sand. The lying family destroying whore got what she richly deserved along with her adulterous lover. Moral righteousness and the integrity of the family were restored by her death. All good men need to take back our families, our cities, and our nations. We need to retake control of our families and put our wives back into their proper places. The rule of feminazi cunts and the massive destruction of our families must be ended.

After a great deal of consideration, Bob has awarded the coveted

Mr. Orenthal James Simpson
For Courage to protect his family.

to OJ Simpson for his courage to protect his family from the ravages of a lying whoring cunt who was backed by an army of blue gun thugs and agents of Satan. May he be applauded by all good men and loving fathers everywhere.

Labels: ,


Anonymous Anonymous said...

What proof exists that Ron Goldman was having sex with Nicole B. Simpson?

From all reports, he was a waiter, a casual acquaintance returning misplaced glasses to Nicole that fateful night.

Families of the two victims were and still are devastated. If the father, Fred Goldman, encountered Bob Allen bragging about the bloody slayings, he would (rightfully) erupt in rage and pain and go for bob's throat. Who could blame him?

November 17, 2006 6:14 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous:
When a woman marries she leaves her father and becomes one with her HUSBAND. After marriage her "family" is her HUSBAND and his children. When they ask at the wedding, "Who gives this woman.." the father gives her away, and after that she cleaves unto her husband.

Nicole's family (her husband and kids) was devastated by HER destruction and divorce. Of course her family is devastated. Her father and mother failed to raise, train, and encourage her sufficiently to maintain a stable marriage. The "victims" of this sordid story is OJ Simpson and his children who lost their family integrety by their mother's whoring, divorce, and adultery.

The details of Ron Goldman's relationship with Nicole are irrelevant. He was involved because he interfered between a husband and his wife. Do I believe that a waiter would go to a customer's home to return glasses? Better try that lie on someone more gulible.

November 17, 2006 6:58 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous:
Your pathetic old feminazi hate comments had been sorted and catelogued when your mother tried them. A feminazi mind can't understand well enough to post rational argument so you resort to ad-hominem insults, much like 3rd graders. Here's the feminist dictionary entry for your latest attempt:

Feminist definition: "Sick" --> adj. 1. A man who consistently supports equal legal rights while opposing feminist domination. 2. Someone winning a debate with a feminist. 3. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism.

Usually used as an ad-hominem attack

Translation: "You're right on, but I won't admit it."

Synonyms: terribly confused, defective brain, take the IQ-test, morons, taking meds, nuts, seek professional help, fucked in the head had one too many hits of crack, needs therapy, off, etc.

November 17, 2006 8:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sick = a slashin' we will go.

November 18, 2006 4:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With this article, "Dead whores don't get custody", I completely agree.


November 18, 2006 6:39 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to readers: Please review Bob's rules for comments on the left margine before submitting comments. Several off topic comments have been deleted. Comments must be on topic, not contain ad-hominem name calling, and observe the other requirements. Thank you.

November 18, 2006 6:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What? No mention of the topic of slavery yet?

November 18, 2006 10:25 PM  
Anonymous C said...

Looking back at all of the nonsense of this so-called "trial" of OJ Simpson I realized it was just a load of shit.

It's not hard to realize that Nicole Simpson was more than likely a "cash-out" dishonest-divorce whore who wanted more than half of OJ's money and his kids to appease her insanity.

Basically Nicole was testing OJ to see if she could get away with anything she wanted!

Good for OJ that he put an end to her all those years ago.

From my point of view the only reason OJ got away with it was because he was a former football player, had millions of dollars, and let's not deny this crucial fact: he was a black sports-star.
Can you say Kobe Bryant? Exactly.

Any how I hope OJs family is ok now.

People always fly off the handle whenever they discuss the "OJ trial"
because it was a chaotic dramatic tele-visual fiasco to desensitize a bunch of no-morals "liberals" into blantant hatred of men who take justice into their own hands and do not rely on the "protection racket" to do their work for them.

And furthermore a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do; if she was unfaithful to him, then obviously good riddance to old rubbish!

November 22, 2006 12:03 PM  
Anonymous C said...

There is a lot we do not know about the situation, because the media corporations only tell us a limited portion of "what happened".

Obviuosly everything was stacked against OJ from the start.

We knew nothing of Nicoles actions.
We know nothing of Ron Goldmans actions.

But from what I can see today with american women doing the dishonest whore-divorce two-step left and right like it's going out of style(NOT!) It's not hard to realize that Nicole was one of those typical useless ameri-con women who did nothing her whole life and enticed a wealthy black man into knocking her up then years later she plans to divorce his ass and take 60% or more of all his money and property, including his children! Doesn't this sound familiar nowadays?

Anyhow we men know that women are far more capable of deceitful, manipulative and psychotic activity.
As we men can see of all the limited coverage/info about women murdering "their" children in cars, in bathtubs(drownings) and other varied insane murders that go hardly noticed in this corporate media whorehouse.

I like the title to this article:
"Dead whores don't get custody"
and what a perfect example!

November 22, 2006 12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When controls on female behavior are removed, we see the real deal, women's true nature in the raw: selfish, infantile behavior showing no concern for men. Or for whether their actions are right or wrong.

This is a natural and logical result of "women's rights."

"Women's rights" made it possible for Nicole Brown to walk away from her marriage with great ease and reward to herself.

"Women's rights" made it possible for her to take away OJ's kids and his hard-earned money.

And "women's rights" made it possible for her to behave like a whore, because unrestrained female sexual behavior is an essential aspect of "women's rights."

IOW, "women's rights" made it possible for her to disregard duty, honor, responsibility, modesty, morals, obligation, sacrifice, good character, respect, or frugality. In fact, virtue is the great enemy of "women's rights."

"Women's rights" makes it possible for all women to behave like disgusting trash with impunity.

And they behave like disgusting trash because women are children and are not capable of growing up. It is dumb to expect women to act as responsible adults, just as it is to expect humans to fly. Neither is capable of it.

Children don't have rights, nor should they. They don't know what's best for them, and they need to be led - just like women. Without men, women are rudderless, feral, and blindly self-centered.

The solution is obvious: Men MUST reduce women's freedoms and choices. Just as we set restrictions on the behavior of minors under 18, so must we do for women as well.

In a healthy, functioning society, women cannot be free individuals. It is imperative that their behavior and choices be regulated by men. More and more men must be taught and convinced that controlling women (and thus, eliminating "women's rights") is both in their best interest as men and the right thing to do.

November 22, 2006 9:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Without men, women are rudderless, feral, and blindly self-centered"

That is true and that is why every destructive act in history was done by a woman, not a man.

We have only to look at 9/11.

November 23, 2006 4:36 PM  
Blogger Martha said...

You are right on on this post!! If we had more good brave men like OJ liberal dyke hags would be careful of what they did to the men in their lives!! Thank you for speaking the truth!!!

December 03, 2006 1:03 PM  
Anonymous Mr. Anonymous said...

Anonymous (November 23, 2006 4:36 PM) said...

"Without men, women are rudderless, feral, and blindly self-centered"

That is true and that is why every destructive act in history was done by a woman, not a man.

We have only to look at 9/11.


Notice how this childish, hate-filled woman responded.

It's the attitude of a disrespectful child towards an adult.

It's like a child saying that since adults are the ones who commit murder (or some other crime), it would be hypocritical for adults to take on any moral authority to supervise and discipline children.

And not only that, society would improve if only the children were placed in a position to be in charge, and have power traditionally reserved for adults.

This is what passes for "logic" and "rational thinking" in the female mind, gentlemen.

It is also a key justification for the whole notion of "women's rights."

In other words, women will use your very masculine identity, your very being as a MAN to indict you as a criminal, so as to prevent any attempt at addressing and correcting female bad behavior. That is exactly what this woman just did.

And the result: "women's rights" continues to exist.

Take a look at another woman responding in a similar way to another post on this blog:

Anonymous (November 27, 2006 3:42 PM) said...

"Likewise, when men drive drunk, or commit felonies like arson, rape, torture, murder, child abuse, armed robbery -- how are they demonstrating a mature, logical, rational mind?"

They defile and insult men, with unspeakable foulness, in a manner that in an earlier time would have been UNTHINKABLE for any woman (or man, for that matter) to even contemplate daring if she ever hoped to live another minute: using the fact of your male-ness to insult you and berate you with.

And these women do this - insulting and defiling your masculine dignity right in your face - for what?

They do so for reasons that have nothing to do with the welfare, or desires, or the hopes of men.

They insult and defile your masculine dignity to demand, and to justify their claim for "women's rights" - IOW, the power to destroy and humiliate men with impunity.

-- Mr. Anonymous --

December 07, 2006 12:20 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home