Men Fighting Back
Idiot Gun Thugs Murdered Each Other!
After 3 days of blaming Mr. Trim for killing one of the blue gun thugs and wounding another, it turns out that the stupid, incompetent, violent and "highly trained" pigs gunned each other down. Read Story When these steroid driven madmen go out to assassinate someone, they blast away at anything in sight, and fire in all directions. As long as they get to kill, kill, kill someone, anyone, another blue suit is just good enough. Like the Atlanta gun thugs who shot each other while assassinating the 92 year old female while she watched her TV, the NY blue gun thugs, and all the rest, open fire and blast away in all directions. This country needs a well-armed militia, and we need to take weapons out of the hands of criminal gangs of assassins in blue suits. They are far too dangerous to be handling weapons.
--------------- ORIGINAL 4-25-07 --------------------
In New York State one brave man is fighting for his life against hoards of violent gun thugs in blue suits and body armor. On Tuesday, April 24, 2007 highwayman Matthew Gombosi tried to rob Travis D. Trim, of North Lawrence New York. Most men would have coward and given up their purse. Mr. Trim had enough of the gun thug armed robbery and defended himself, and every man has an inalienable right to defend himself against armed robbery. Unfortunately, the blue gun thugs know that many decent citizens hate their rotten guts so they routinely wear body armor. Highway robber Gombosi was knocked down but not seriously injured by the courageous defense of his intended victim. Valiant Mr. Trim made an escape from tyranny, but the blue gun thug gangs hate and fear men of courage. Their police state oppression of the public is very intolerant of men who defend themselves. Their next move it to group up and focus their entire attention on destroying a man who resists their malicious tyranny. Read story. The NY blue gang has not released the names of their dead or wounded thugs.
By Wednesday morning hundreds of blue suited thugs were scouring the area seeking to restore their absolute power over the people. The search activities of two of them were cut short near Margaretville, possibly by Mr. Trim. He was cornered in a house, seeking to avoid confrontation and avoid violence. His peace was violently disrupted by a blaze of gunfire, and again tried to he defend himself. Blue gun thug scum David C. Brinkerhoff died, and the other filth in blue, Richard Mattson was wounded.
Hip Hip Hooray
Hip Hip Hooray
For courageous action in defense of freedom we hereby award the coveted
Mr. Travis D. Trim
The blue gun thugs then fired incendiary grenades into the house and it was fully engulfed in flames. Read story. Trim may have been killed by the dead and wounded scum because he stopped shooting and a body was found in the burned out house. Outnumbered and outgunned Mr. Trim's life was brutally cut short. According to some reports the house is the location where Mr. Trim wasted the two blue gun thugs this morning. Blue gun thugs are very willing to burn you to death if they can't beat you to death or shoot you 32 times with less effort. Mr. Trim was an ordinary man going about his business when he was attacked and eventually destroyed by the evil in blue. May he rest in peace.
20 Comments:
Entertaining defense of the Criminal Trim.
Yeah yeah! (ATHF Carl voice) THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!
BTW: Bob did you know that under Islamic law if you rape a virgin girl you get murdered by the muslims but under Biblical law if you rape a virgin girl you just pay money to father and marry her?
Why is the MUSLIM law anti-men. Also did you know that they crucify people and cut off the hand and foot from opposite sideds of the body of anyone who steals, corrupts the land, tries to convert muslims to some other religion.
The Biblical punishment for theft is paying back 2x what you stole.
Why do muslims hate men (they hate everyone). Also they will kill men who are gay but just whip lesbians.
It should be the opposite since lesbians hate men.
I don't like muslim law. I think we should get rid of it and replace it with pro-men law that allows men to take nice little wives by their own will.
What do you think Bob?
I want to beat up a muslim who believes in amputations. I hate those.
Note to anonymous: (April 25, 2007 5:25 PM)
Prior to the rise of modern nation states and their hellhole prisons most crime and punishment was carried out locally by concerned neighbors and elders. Virtually all ancient legal codes, Babylonian, Egyptian, Hebrew, Islamic, Celtic, etc., specified reasonable penalties that could be carried out efficiently and been done with. People who offended the community often had to make restitution, and pay compensation for their crimes. For serious crimes people could be executed, or shunned from the community. Sometimes, such as in Islamic law, they were punished by loss of an ear or hand, etc. Whatever the punishment the elders and villagers could carry out the punishment and then get back to their lives. There were no hellhole prisons and armies of gun thugs and prison guards which destroy the fabric of modern society. Much of ancient wisdom has been lost by modern Injustice Systems and their concentration camps.
Nothing new here - another man loses control and causes suffering for everyone involved. Nice going.
Meanwhile --- instead of deadly destructive behavior, here is a brilliant young person whose IQ is off the charts. And is set to graduate College after only a year of diligent study:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18310636/?GT1=9246
hooray
Note to anonymous:
It is really sad to see a nice young woman giving up a good life as a wife and mother to be misguided into the feminist fraud of a man's career. Her life is rapidly becoming a waste as her child bearing years pass by and she learns to be the whore rather than the good wife. It makes decent people cry to see how tragic a good young woman becomes, and to contemplate her wasted life. The feminazi are to blame for so many wasted young women. Shame on them all.
Bob: but why in Islamic law does the man get murdered if he rapes a virgin where in the Biblical law he just marries the girl and pays some money?
How can you defend that anti-men barbarity which is similar to femAmerica's stance on rape?
Face it: Islam is early feminism/equality.
Note to Anonymous (April 26, 2007 12:47 AM)
Bob is not Islamic and does not generally defend Islamic law. I have no idea where you got that idea. There are some good ideas in many of the old religious laws even though they are incorporated into flawed religious systems.
My understanding, from news stories, about Islamic law and rape is that all adultery is punishable by death, and rape is adulatory. It is good that it doesn't punish rape more than other sex, and bad that sex is punished so severely. Islam uses asceticism as a way to control the psychology of the masses. When someone has to give up many pleasures they are much more likely to convince themselves that they are doing it for a valid reason. Islamic law is good that it requires two witnesses to convict a man who denies the crime, including adultery and rape. When a woman accuses rape she is admitting adultery and therefore subject to her own death penalty. The reason she did sex does not erase the fact that she admitted doing it. It tends to reduce frivolous false accusations. I have heard lately that feminism is making inroads into strict enforcement against the woman for adultery in many Islamic communities though.
Bob does not support severe punishment for sex or for any pleasure. Asceticism is inherently offensive for many reasons, not the least of which is its use for domination and control of the people.
So Bob you think we should go beat up muslims and drive them from our countries?
(Especially since islam is becoming more feminist).
Nearly Every muslim I've talked to ever has been in favor of women's rights.
Shouldn't we fight them if they are against us (after fighting women who believe in women's rights)?
Muslims are evil buchers of men.
They enjoy cutting off hands and feet and torturing their fellow man: they should die for that.
Achieving higher education and career goals, does NOT make a woman a whore.
Reverend Jerry Falwell's daughter graduated from Liberty University -a pious virtuous Christian girl.
She then graduated from med school and is a highly acclaimed surgeon. Not to mention a virtuous wife and mother who, along with her surgeon husband, lives biblically. That is hardly the definition of WHORE, or street-walker.
Note to Anonymous (April 26, 2007 12:59 PM)
Beating up Muslims would hardly be productive in reasserting responsible male authority over our families and society. Some parts of the Koran advocate Islamic war or elimination or takeover against every nonbeliever. We have seen many violent acts by those who follow the strict teaching of Islam. However many Muhammadans do not follow the strict teachings any more than many Christians follow the strict law of Moses.
Monotheism invariably causes excessive domination and control of the people, wars and domestic terrorism, excessive "crime" and punishments. Islam has a history of war and killing that is typical of monotheism. People end up believing that they are killing for God, or "God told me to kill." On the whole, Bob does not favor religious wars.
Note to Anonymous (April 26, 2007 1:35 PM)
Throughout history women have always divided themselves between wives and whores. Wives stay with their fathers until given in marriage. Wives focus their life career on being a mother and wife. Some women have always chosen to be whores. Whores include those courtesans who get a man's education. Whores eschew marriage, choosing instead to have affairs, hookups, relationships, and bastards. The great majority of women today are directed and educated into the whore life, eschewing marriage, pursuing men's careers, becoming single mothers.
A woman who has already passed half of her best biological baby making years and is pursuing an "education" without any displayed intention of finding a husband has obviously chosen against the wife/mother path for her life, she has chosen the whore path. That is a shame and a waste of an otherwise good woman.
Ridiculous -- it is obviously NOT a "whore path" that the daughter of Reverend Falwell followed. Or the ultra-conservative Phyllis Schlafly (devout Catholic, mother of 6, highly educated with M.S. and law degree).
And what of Catholic nuns, who for centuries, were relatively more educated? They often taught, did social work, contemplative or missionary work, nursing, etc. ?
Anyone labeling a celibate nun in her religious life as "whore", can't know whereof they speak. In fact, that would be sacrilege and defamation of character.
The strict, imaginary division between virtuous wife vs. educated whore, is ridiculous.
I'm sure you won't publish my last comments as they go against your girly-man ideas.
There's no cause for celebration here. Brinkerhoff leaves behind an infant daughter. Prediction: Another fatherless home. Girl raised by mother. Another anti-gun feminist in the making.
Truth is, for many women, a "husband" is of secondary importance. Like it or not, that's the way it is. All the threats Bob et al can make, won't alter that.
Women may eventually marry if they so choose. But career, personal bank account, educational opportunities for advancement -- all that comes before some husband. It's a matter of personal dignity and safety. Without that we are prisoners in the Dark Ages.
Note to Sherry T.
Your other comment contained ad-hominem insults which are not permissable under Bob's rules for comments posted on the left column.
The only good blue gun thug is one who has returned to room temperature like the evil Brinkerhoff. Unfortunatly there aren't enough like him. The rest are still out there robbing, beating, and killing the public, and destroying the lives of men.
Note to anonymous (April 26, 2007 4:24 PM)
Strictly speaking a Catholic Nun has chosen to be a "bride of Jesus," the wife path in life.
Women may eventually marry if they so choose. But career, personal bank account, educational opportunities for advancement -- all that comes before some husband. It's a matter of personal dignity and safety. Without that we are prisoners in the Dark Ages.
----
If you didn't notice: men are withdrawing from society.
There are two possiblities form here:
1: Society crumbles because men don't maintain it, we return to the darkages. Men, seeing that there is no longer a capable police state since technology is gone, take women (maybe by force sometimes) as wives at will, at whatever age they want, and do whatever they want with them.
2: Women quickly learn how to operate society. Men sink deeper and deeper into poverty while women get richer and richer. A charasmatic leader starts class warfare against women (the rich). Society becomes anti-women's rights and pro-men (with or without a darkage).
Those are the only options that will happen (women giving up power to men will never happen because Women HATE Men and Love Themselves).
Gentlemen, we need a War.
--MikeeUSA--
Truth is, for many women, a "husband" is of secondary importance. Like it or not, that's the way it is. All the threats Bob et al can make, won't alter that.
And a wife is of NO importance and men should remain single because of it.
I agree men should remain single.
But Bob DEMANDS that young women MUST MARRY. Bob believes marriage and family is the only "honorable" way of life for a "decent" woman.
Post a Comment
<< Home