ARMS or "handguns?"
A big news item today on all the TV channels is a SCOTUS case regarding a handgun ban in Washington, DC. The SCOTUS case is said to be the first consideration of the 2nd Amendment by agents of Satan in black robes of hell since the 1930s.
Bob finds it interesting that NONE of the media will mention “arms.” Yahoo, for example says, “Conservative justices question D.C. handgun ban.” They all recite the Constitution, and then switch immediately to talking about "guns," and not talking about "arms."
The US 2nd Amendment says nothing at all about “handguns. The 2nd Amendment says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Nobody in the media will talk about “arms.” While “handguns” are a small subset of “arms” the two words are quite different.
Bob wonders where the conversation was sidetracked from “arms” to “guns.” Some decades ago US President Nixon held talks with the Soviet Union called “Strategic Arms Limitation Talks.” They were talking about “arms.” The US Constitution says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Who is controlling the conversation? Who has decided that the people can not even talk about our right to keep and bear arms?
Bob finds it interesting that NONE of the media will mention “arms.” Yahoo, for example says, “Conservative justices question D.C. handgun ban.” They all recite the Constitution, and then switch immediately to talking about "guns," and not talking about "arms."
The US 2nd Amendment says nothing at all about “handguns. The 2nd Amendment says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Nobody in the media will talk about “arms.” While “handguns” are a small subset of “arms” the two words are quite different.
Bob wonders where the conversation was sidetracked from “arms” to “guns.” Some decades ago US President Nixon held talks with the Soviet Union called “Strategic Arms Limitation Talks.” They were talking about “arms.” The US Constitution says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Who is controlling the conversation? Who has decided that the people can not even talk about our right to keep and bear arms?
posted by Bob | Tuesday, March 18, 2008
20 Comments:
"I stand corrected the protest yesterday was about the police continually arresting and harassing Ray without justification,
http://www.megaphonedad.net/on-line%...eaflet%202.pdf"
Kill the fucking police.
Police exist ONLY to protect women. Men can protect themselves. Thusly ALL police are enemies of Men.
I'm going to put politics aside for awhile and take the WMD challenge.
"Police exist ONLY to protect women. Men can protect themselves. Thusly ALL police are enemies of Men".
There's a lot of truth to this!
I have noticed for some time now that radio "Conservatives" (And I use that term loosely) such as partisan, Republican, party hack, Bushbots, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin, and whack jobs like Michael Savage, have decided that you are only conservative if support the Trigger happy, Taser happy, head beating, 45 cops with guns trained on one crippled un-armed shop lifter police who are only doing a thankless job that no one else wants to do?
If you do not support the “wonderful police”, you are a America hating, ACLU loving liberal? I do not for the life of me know how conservatives can listen to these phony idiots!
Men cannot always protect themselves.
"Men cannot always protect themselves."
That is correct.
Man vs an army that will never stop the hunt for him == Man dies.
Men cannot protect themselves against the pro-women's rights police because Men are unarmed and unorganized and would be murdered if they ever tried to remedy either of those situations.
We are slaves and will always be slaves. We will never have happiness. We will never have good wives. We will never have freedom. There is NOTHING we can do about this EVER.
"We are slaves and will always be slaves. We will never have happiness. We will never have good wives. We will never have freedom. There is NOTHING we can do about this EVER."
Never give up hope, societal collapse or a revolution could be just around the corner!
Men will always be slaves of their own ignorance, self-pity and whining. You will never find peace by taking away someone else's human rights. You will never find happiness by writing a blog like Bob's, or looking to him as your friend. After all, what has he accomplished that made you feel free?
"After all, what has he accomplished that made you feel free?"
It's not about FEELING free. It is about being FREE in reality, including the freedom to aquire nice young females as wives and enslave them to happy domestic servitude.
Many Men do not FEEL free. Giving them lies won't help them at all, even if the lies make them feel free for a month or two.
Death To women's Rights.
So after all these years of Blogging, how has Bob given you the precious freedom to enslave young girls? And be FREE to live like real men did in primitive societies?
We are costantly moving forward; indeed on the brink of possibily electing a woman President. It'll take more than a man's Blog to push us back to a more primitive society that makes REAL MEN happy.
Note to anonymous;
Your lies and hate serve no purpose here but to show how perverted your misandrist mind has become. When your kind has been elminated the victory will have been won.
"We are costantly moving forward; indeed on the brink of possibily electing a woman President"
Apparently this "Gal" doesn't moniter the polls too closely? If Hillary is the next president it will be because some back door deals were arranged ousting Obama from the nominee, as most liberals don't even like her!
Women are only were women are because the federal government forced it to be so! There is precious little women can do better than men!
The millions of dollars of sexual harrasment law suits further prove that women still can't handle being in the work force long after the government forced it to be "woman friendly"! With out affirmative Action type hiring policies they would be nowhere!
Also, the western economies are tanking and fast, women will again be dependant on men, perhaps sooner than one thinks? however, after feminism liberated men from the slavery of marriage and family, will men want them back?
http://womenintheworkplacetoday.blogspot.com/
Check this out guys,
I came across this on Eternal Bachelor. It is hands down the best Anti-Feminist article I have ever read! Funny, a good read and oh so very true!
Lawsuits stemming from sexual harassment prove that women CAN handle the workforce. And have more right being there than the immature jackasses who waste time harassing people (like kids do in school when they harass).
That's why teachers punish disruptive bullies. That's why all civilized societies now have laws against harassment!
A smart, conscientious worker cannot be bothered with bullying. It jeopardizes productivity. The beseiged worker has no choice but first warn the harasser, they report him and let the LAW take its proper course.
Just don't harass. Have respect. If you didn't learn self-control and respect in elementary school, learn it now.
The workforce does not belong exclusively to one gender or one ethnicity. It belongs to all people with skills, brains and human decency.
Note to anonymous:
LOL. No, toots, laws on "harassment" demonstrate that females are incompetent children who are incapable of maintaining normal relationships at work without special protections. They won't work, they can't be fired, and they are protected by law. No wonder any sane employer will try to discount their pay.
The one who's abnormal is the bully not the victim.
Or would you rather have laws protecting the immature tormentors who can't control themselves?
Bob, if you choose to believe harassment does not exist, fine. Sane people know otherwise. They punish the bad guy, not the good guy. Keep living in your own skewed world. It's all you know.
Note to anonymous:
Feminist harassment and bullying of men at work is an important problem, but it is not germane to this topic. Further posts on feminist harassment and bullying at work will be deleted. Please review Bob's rules for comments on the left column. Thank you.
Too bad the pro-harrasment laws (anti-men's freedom to speak as they wish) anonomous woman cannot be killed :( . Good societies have always executed or banished women like her.
"Lawsuits stemming from sexual harassment prove that women CAN handle the workforce".
Silly female logic at its finest!
Would this not be the equivalent of saying that a guy who works as a body guard, but gets his ass kicked every night is proving he can do the job because he shows up for work?
"It jeopardizes productivity"
Actually, what jeopardizes productivity is when the men who are actually doing all the work have to constantly fear that somehow they looked at or said the wrong thing to a female colleague!
"female colleague!"
A female can rarely ever be a man's colleague, usually she's an enemy, not a partner.
Post a Comment
<< Home