The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Friday, January 13, 2006

Hate TV has another hissy fit.

Over the past few days the anti-MEN hate mongers on FOX TV have been frothing at the mouth in a mad raving hissy fit over a judge who has tried to bring some rational sense into the field of hysterical misandry of the feminazi and their Gestapo army and media propaganda organizations. A man in Vermont was accused of "molesting" a girl over several years. The facts of the case show that the girl in question enjoyed the encounters and only became a "victim" when organized hate found out that she could be used to destroy another MAN. The raving haters demanded that his whole life be destroyed. Meanwhile the "victim" had suffered no bodily injury or financial loss. At worst her feelings had been hurt when she grew tired of the relationship. Like the large majority of "rape victims" she suffered very little if any harm. The great LIE of the "rape-hate" industry claims that rape is a "fate worse than death." In fact, rape is simply sex with the man instead of the woman making the decisions. Rape takes away the female's assumed unlimited sexist right to make all decisions about sex between a man and a woman. In this case the only alleged injury is that the girl was too young to have legal authority to decide what she enjoyed and therefore it is an excuse for the man to be utterly destroyed. The tired old dried up whiny bitches hate competition from younger females almost more than they hate men. Rape-hate has gotten so far from rational that Bob has called for a moratorium on rape-hate persecution of men until emotions cool and sanity replaces hysteria.

Instead of sending the man off to Auchwitz or a similar hell hole to end his life Judge Edward Cashman brought a semblance of sanity to the sentencing. The sane judge spoke truth in the face of hysterical hate, and the hate mongers are going nuts. The judge observed that punishing another man does not help anyone and costs society a great deal. FOX "news" spin master O'Really was so angry that a MAN had not been destroyed that he was jumping off his chair and shouting at his guest experts. Sean Insanity is beating his drum, men-bad, men-bad, men-bad. The blond bimbo goes on and on. Their hatred of MEN is deep and wide. Their record includes angry demands that a Cuban father be denied access to his son, and angry accusations of Florida judges who upheld ages old law that gives a husband authority to make tough decisions about his dying wife. In case after case FOX and O'Really demonstrate their hysterical burning hatred of men. Day after day it’s women=victim, men=villain, hate, hate, hate. For days now O'Really has been using the resources of FOX to whip up protest letters to the government of Vermont, vilifying a judge who fails to persecute and destroy men. Even Rush Limbaugh joined the misandrist chorus, defending the hurt feelings of a female and demanding the total destruction of a man.

And O'Really is not by any stretch unusual in his personal attacks on anyone who brings sanity to the feminazi war on men. According to the raving misandrists anyone who objects to their hate is "insane" or "a pedophile." Bob often receives hate mail from misandrist bigots who can't stand the light of truth speaking out against their institutionalized hate. The hate mail always focuses on ad-hominem accusations instead of dealing with the issues involved. The issues of misandrist hate are indefensible, so silencing the opposition by personal attack has been the standard feminazi tactic. From the fem-nags on the Internet to O'Really and friends on the media their hatred drives them to attack the person, especially if it is a man who is speaking out against their sexism and stands against the war on men. Shame on them all. Decent MEN stand up for MEN and refute the hate of violent sexist bigots like O'Really and his hate mongering friends at FOX. It's time for MEN and women who oppose the war on men to send e-mail or letters to O'Really and the others. Tell them that hate is not acceptable.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, suppose have a 5-year old daughter.

You want to fondle/ penetrate your child's vagina. Would you? What's to stop you?

Can I watch? Your 5-year old daughter sure looks cute to me.... hey, I'd like to have sex with her. Nothing wrong with that. Can I proceed?

January 13, 2006 3:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's those Bilderbergers !

January 13, 2006 7:25 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

LOL. I see we have the feminist whine about "your daughter" or mother, etc. Logical argument was never a feminazi ability. See:

January 14, 2006 3:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is "illogical" about inquiring about the rape of your Mother (Mrs. Allen)? Or the rape of Miss Allen (if you have a daughter)?

What is illogical about questioning your belief that junior-high girls should cheerfully surrender their bodies to grown men?

For every false accusation of forced sex, there are far more truthful ones. Many men are indeed the weaker vessel, grabbing what they want the way little boys grab candy.

You got no more right to steal a person's body, than I have the right to steal your car or rob a bank.

What's wrong with you, Bob?

January 14, 2006 4:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is no such thing as rape.

A REAL MAN like O.J. Simpson was maligned and ruined for life, on misconstrued charges of spousal rape, assults and murder.

Everybody heard the 911 tapes of that selfish Blond Bitch Nicole, pleading for "help". O.J. was angry and shouting in the background. But heck, it was Nicole's fault. If O.J. slapped her, she deserved it.

O.J. was acquitted of the stabbings. But even if he HAD killed his wife, she deserved it for being in the arms other men.

O.J. was an outraged husband; you can only take so much. Killing an unfaithful wife is a HONOR KILLING in any decent culture.

So now O.J. is left to grow old, depressed -- and alone in his Condo. Even his kids despise him, all because of the FemiNazi media.

O.J. was accused of stabbing that selfish Blond Bitch. Now, he'll never have the dignity and honor every REAL MAN deserves. He's considered GUILTY simply because he's MALE... like it's a crime to be MALE. All because we are so emotionally attracted to the "poor little woman" syndrome.

Heck, we should be honoring O.J. Simpson as one of a dying breed of REAL MEN. Instead, we revile him and honor a dead Blond Bitch.

January 14, 2006 5:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rape rarely hurts the girl and thus, the man should not be prosecuted.

Likewise there are relative degrees of theft. A guy breaks in a store, steals a pack of gum. Why should he be prosecuted? It was only a small item. Why should his life be ruined over that?

If he steals a major item, like a computer, then of course, he is a real thief. And should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

January 15, 2006 4:30 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

The penalty should be proportional to the crime, that's why we have crimes like "petty theft" or "grand theft." Our crime laws have several levels of homocide. Unfortunatly the raging misandry that has infested so-called crimes against women makes even the most trivial offence into a hysterical hate fest worth totally destroying the man involved. Wrong! The penalty should be proportional to the crime, no harm, no foul.

January 18, 2006 4:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"In fact, rape is simply sex with the man instead of the woman making the decisions. Rape takes away the female's assumed unlimited sexist right to make all decisions about sex between a man and a woman."
Decision making???? Think about men's physiological processes during sexual arousal and then explain to me if a woman could rape a man. Obviously if a woman consents to sex she already has her man's OK. Otherwise nothing will happen. So rape is clearly about the will of one person as opposed to mutual consent.
And whatever dumb fuck said rape doesn't hurt obviously doesn't have much experience with it. If it wasn't excruciatingly painful why do you think women mind so much? Incidentally, have you ever bled from your genitals because someone has ripped them open with a blunt object? Maybe you should give it a try

January 21, 2006 10:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob - is rape ever "trivial"?

Are you a Christian?

January 22, 2006 5:58 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

To Anonymous: Yes, most "rape" is so trivial she didn't realize it was "rape" until the next day when her feelings weren't as high as she had hoped, or the next decade when she needed a story of "my rapist" to share with the victimologist feminist coffey group. For the small percentage of actual "rape" there ususally is no injury other than hurt feelings, and often there has been orgasms and erotic satisfaction, according to the counselors guide at the rape crisis center.

January 23, 2006 12:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: You believe rape of a female is trivial".

For women attacked in their homes (Ted Bundy's M.O.), or by a stranger in some neighborhood, there is TERROR. This is not consentual sex, just sheer force used by some male.

The guy who opinined that "rape rarely hurts the girl", was either ignorant, vicious, or writing tongue-in-cheek to counter bob's mentality. (I doubht bob could detect that).

Of course rape is painful, particularly for a kid (12-13) whose body is not yet developed.

There are no "hurt feelings", just a terrorized, violated human being.

If rape is trivial (desired by females according to bob?), then why are rape-victims brought into hospital ERs suffering so much pain, shock? And later AIDS or STD possibly?

Why is rape a crime?

bob, can't you get it?

Rape=violence with a sexual element.

Rape is a MAN's ultimate contempt for females.

Why do you suppose Saddam Hussein used Rape Rooms as punishments?

Bob: have you ever raped a woman? Her age? The circumstances?

Have you ever actually talked with rape victims?

I do NOT consider rape trivial. If bob would smear me for having an opinion, ok.

bob, I sincerely hope you have no kids. But if a daughter is ever raped, I hope she'll call it "trivial".... So "trivial" you'd not call Police, thus assuring the guy rapes again.

January 23, 2006 3:40 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: Bob notes that you immediatly switch from rape to Ted Bundy's mass murder, a typical feminazi rhetorical switch, because you know that rape, in and of itself, is just sex with a disagreement over who will decide. Bob enjoys your hysterical hissy fit. Pound sand bimbo.

January 24, 2006 11:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's a thought.

Some men do not rape because they believe the Bible. They believe in Christ. They call rape sinful, and make no excuses for it. They believe sex belongs in marriage between two partners who cherish each other.

January 24, 2006 4:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

bob, why label something a 'hissy-fit', when you know it isn't?

January 24, 2006 5:24 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Answer to a moron's prayer: - legalize rape.

Then throw open prison doors, let convicted rapists stampede to freedom. Save the taxpayers' money.

January 25, 2006 1:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Define a "genuine rape" that requires the man be punished?

January 27, 2006 7:00 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Someone who hasn't the balls to post her name asked, "Define a "genuine rape" that requires the man be punished?" Like a typical feminist she framed the question so that the primary misandrist dogma of feminism is assumed as the background framework before which further discussion may commence. In this case the "question" asserts that "men should be punished for rape." That misandrist assertion is one of the feminist hate lies that has been repeated so often and so long that the feminazi assume it to be "the truth." To the contrary, it is just one of the many hate dogmas that organized feminism continues to push to justify destroying millions of men. Like German National Socialism looking for solutions to "The Jewish Problem" and assuming that "The Jewish Problem" was beyond question, modern feminazi hate dogma needs to be questioned at it's core. The blind assertions of feminist hate are the real problem.

Before your "question" can be answered, Ms. Anonymous, you need to demonstrate the validity of your hateful sexist assertion that "men should be punished." Without draging murder or other physical battery into the discussion, it's about "rape" remember, you need to demonstrate that rape is hurtful more than her hurt feelings about losing her assumed female power to control men. Rape, after all, is just sex with a disagreement over who will decide tonight. Feminists demand that females always decide, and assert that "men should be punished" when the female loses her dominate position over men. That assertion has not been proven here Ms. Anonymous. Your old tired feminazi dogma doesn't cut muster here. We don't assume that "men should be punished. How very hateful of you to say so.

Bob has called for a moratorium on punishing men for "rape" until the hysterical ravings of feminism can have time to calm down and cooler heads can rethink the entire feminazi assertion.

January 28, 2006 1:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Bob, guess you've been outwitted by a 20 year old woman. I made comment #8 and apparently you couldn't think of any way to refute it.
Ha ha ha! How does this make you feel Bob?

April 11, 2006 7:01 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: Your privious comment was so far from reality that all you did was to demonstrate the ignorance and rape-hate training that passes for education of young women today. Such stupidity hardly deserves a response. Sex almost never causes any serious injury regardless of who decided to do it. Sex is often quite enjoyable regardless of who decided to do it. The physical act of sex is not changed by who decided upon it. Try reading the counselors handbook at your local "Rape Crisis (hate) Center" sometime. Next time keep your stupid rape-hate lies in your "women's studies" hate training classes where they belong.

April 11, 2006 9:19 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home