OJ Innocent?
Like many Americans I watched bits and pieces of the OJ trial a few years ago, and was appalled by the unanimous verdict that acquitted him. Lately, however, I'm beginning to wonder. One of the primary witnesses for the prosecution of OJ was a blue gun thug named Mark Fuhrman. The jury had to sit and listen to Fuhrman's accusations of OJ, while we, the public, mostly got filtered remarks that were rebroadcast on the evening news. Some years later Fuhrman has become the host of a morning talk show on KGA radio in Spokane, WA. Bob has had the occasion to listen to Fuhrman now and then while traveling through that area. Every time Fuhrman opens his mouth it's immediately obvious that he's a lying scumbag. He talks like the worst self-righteous pig filth. It's obvious from listening for only a few minutes, that he is still typical of the gun thug mentality. For the past several years I've thought OJ was guilty. But now, I'm reconsidering. If that turd said he was guilty, he was probably innocent. Fuhrman's lies, deceptions, and incompetent bungling in the OJ case are listed on this web site.
posted by Bob | Friday, February 17, 2006
5 Comments:
I love both post's. Full of vital humor.
Thank you
Magnus SE
People forget the media doesn't care about the truth.
Remember the Rodney King case where the media played the same footage over and over and didn't even bother telling the cops side of things. Well one documentary took a 1/2 hour snapshot of the prosecutors case, and a 1/2 hour snapshot of one of the defendant's lawyer's case. The prosecution relied on showing the footage over and over out of context. The defendant's laywer put that footage into a context, broke it down blow-by-blow (sorry), showed how they were just following training etc.. In short, the defendant's lawyer absolutely demolished the prosecution. Now if you just relied on the media's downright lies, you would think there was no way in hell they were doing their job right. The media even lied about easily disproven "facts". The first jury was not comprised of only white people, which is what the media reported.
In Australia it was reported that Martha Stewart was "convicted of charges relating to insider trading". I'm not pissing in your pocket in any way, shape or form. The media, the so called vanguards of truth, actually said that. It took me 2 seconds to find out she was charged with obstruction of justice for declaring she was innocent. Wow, media, good going. Before some idiot replies back, yes I know she said she was, and was proven to be, innocent of insider trading. The media might as well have reported that the movie Jaws was about an ill tempered goldfish. After all, can you prove that there were no ill tempered goldfish swimming in the ocean when the filmed the movie?
So when people say OJ is guilty, I say show me actual evidence. Don't point to media stories. And for God's sake, don't point to episodes of Law and Order, like some people I know do.
Me:"Dude, you know it's fiction, don't you?"
Them:"Yeah, but it's based on a true story, so it must be true."
Me:"WTF?"
To Darkbuddah:
1. The blue gun thugs have beaten two men to death just this past month in my out of the way town of Spokane, where Mark Fuhrman now does a radio talk program. I believe that the blue gun thugs in the Rodney King beating and the countless beating deaths that go on every day in the US are "just doing their jobs." The problem is that murdering citizens and beating citizens almost to death is no less wrong because they are trained to beat up and murder people. Proving that such beatings are doing their jobs is no excuse. The guards at Auchwitz who sent a million to gas chambers and crematoriums were "just doing their jobs" too. Evil is not excused by being a job.
2. Martha Stewart was convicted of lying to an FBI agent for denying that she had committed a crime. Her conviction flouted the US constitution and fundamental rights of citizens. Once again the evil gun thugs and their evil minions of Satan who wear black robes of hell are the real criminals.
3. You are right that the talking heads of the media are both dishonest and very biased. Anything they say is probably deliberatly lying. Much of it is deliberate hate speech.
Bob
Bob,
Your ignorance of Mark Fuhrman and the evidence in the Simpson case is abysmal. And I'm wondering what Fuhrman radio show you might be referring to--it certainly can't be the same that I'm listening to, the one where Mark Fuhrman is tirelessly exposing local crime and corruption, as well as speaking up for society's victims such as the children abused by Catholic priests. So Bob, did you by any chance hear the shows where he called for an explanation of one of the deaths you just referred to, the death of Otto Zehm? I guess not. I think you just hear what you want to hear, if you listen at all. Fortunately Mark’s regular listeners appreciate what he's doing for the community.
Note to Capt. Brittles:
(Captain of what? The blue gun thugs? A sworn bully liar no doubt.)
Evidence: => Lies the blue gun thugs told.
In Bob's other blog entries there is discussion of the consistent SCOTUS decisions affirming blue gun thug policy to lie all the time. No citizen can ever rely on anything blue gun thugs say -- SCOTUS. Lying is their standard proceedure.
Sorry, Capt., as long as little faded blue turds like Fuhrman are "evidence" then OJ was probably innocent. And that goes for his constant hate mongering on radio too. He uses "abused children" to promote hate, attack the church, and make a buck. For months he ranted daily in support of the newspapers political attacks on the Mayor, using lies, cheap innuendo, and half truths to support the latest political agenda. A few months later he's using the same lies and half truths to attack the same political machine he spent months supporting. He displays the worst kind of pig mentality day after day. Fuhrman is a lying gutter scum pig, and that's all that he ever will be.
Post a Comment
<< Home