The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Monday, July 03, 2006

Pink Pansies race to condemn Mack

Pink Pansies are racing to condemn Darren Mack. When Darren Mack counter attacked against evil Judge Weller (see Bobstruth ) many men on the Internet publicly applauded.

But the self-proclaimed leaders of MEN kowtowed to the gun thug mentality and condemned Mack. Radio host and columnist Glen Sacks immediately condemned Mack for his bravery in the face of the enemies of men and demanded that other men do likewise. In a second column Sacks repeats his condemnation. see Sacks column. Sorry Glen, you lead MEN by figuring out where we are going and getting there first. You don't lead men by sniveling at the crotches of feminist gun thugs and left wing Satanists in black robes.

Now "Ifeminist" and false friend of men, Wendy McElroy of FOX news has written demanding that fathers condemn Mack. She's following the FOX anti-men editorial policy. McElroy's feminism shines brightly in her column in the last paragraph where it's the dead wife that is the trump card for McElroy. In her "I" feminist mind, only women matter, and in this case it's only Mrs. Mack who mattered. Buzz off toots, when MEN need some sorry cunt telling us what to do, we'll let you know.

The Men's movement is alive and well. The real MEN's movement began and has grown by MEN who don't listen to the apologists, female diverters, and counterfit leaders who's goal is to appease feminist injustice. The MEN's movement isn't going to listen to these milquetoast feminists who pretend to be part of us. Their rush to condemn a hero of men shows their true color, pussy pink.

20 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anytime a woman calls herself a feminist, there is bound to be trouble for men.

July 03, 2006 9:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anytime a boy calls himself a man, he's a butcher.

July 05, 2006 1:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

People condemn Mack because he is a cold-blooded murderer. He should receive the death penalty and be gently put to sleep by a veterinarian.

July 05, 2006 4:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What the Feminists and their Media apologists have never answered is a simple question they never asked. Namely what caused Darren Mack to go postal? Why did he get so desperate that he murdered his exwife and shot the Judge? This simple question has never been asked. Why is that?

Men's Rights Advocates know the answer. It is that the Judge made insane income demands that destroyed Darren Mack financially and had no interest in hearing Mack's problems.

Mack is simple a resource to be exploited to the State's benefit. They get a percentage of what they collect in Child Support.

Khankrumthebulgar

July 05, 2006 5:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anytime a woman spends time on a men's blog complaining about men, she suffers from penis envy.

July 05, 2006 8:49 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

People concemn Welller because he's responsible for the destruction of thousands of men and children. He has destroyed the families and lives of thousands. He should be brutally impaled in the public square and left there until the flesh rots from his bones.

July 06, 2006 6:47 AM  
Blogger Duncan Idaho said...

I can't stand the way feminists are outraged at Darren Mack's actions and insisting us men should condemn him

Andrea Yates brutally tortured and killed her five innocent sons and feminists were rushing to defend her, to claim she is a victim!

Darren Mack (allegedly) killed his greedy parasite of an ex-wife then shot the filthy judge who's job is to destroy families. And we're meant to condemn him!?

Give Darren Mack a medal!

And give Andrea Yates the needle!

July 06, 2006 11:00 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Duncan Idaho

Bob has awarded Darren Mack the Golden Bull Award See How Many Families has Weller Destroyed

Andrea Yates should be impaled on the public square and left to rot so other females can see what happens to a female who kills her own sons.

July 06, 2006 12:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Public condemnation of their father by gender rights activists is the very last thing the Mack children need at this moment.

July 06, 2006 6:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A teaching moment: The feminist poster here calls Darren Mack a
"cold-blooded murderer."



How mindless feminists are! Darren Mack had just been divorce-raped
by Judge Weller and his ex-wife. I can hardly think of a more
enraging situation. It's the polar opposite of a "cold-blooded"
killing.



Does the feminist even know what "cold-blooded" means? Does the
feminist even care whether what it writes is true? To ask that
question is to answer it.

July 06, 2006 10:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Darren Mack is a hero, he had the courage to fight, a courage that none of us, me included, have. He will now be imprisoned for life or killed, which is unfortunate. I hope he is able to escape somehow to live another day.

When a woman divorces her husband she deserves death as she is showing power over him and defiance of him. She made the vow "till death do us part" and Darren Mack enforced it, what he did was completely correct.

I pray for the day when there will be no women's rights and men's rights will be elevated to their proper place.

It is unfortunate that more men do not do what Mack has done, if they did then there would either be no women's rights or there would be no men as the governments of the world would have to exterminate men to protect their precious privledged goddesses: it would be liberty for men or death (of the whole human species, as you cannot have children without the input of men).

--MikeeUSA--

July 07, 2006 12:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is particularly disturbing about Judge Weller is the comments from Attorneys. He is very abusive towards non-custodial Parents. He is hostile towards Fathers in particular. And is unreasonable in his financial demands.

The reality is that States get a percentage of what they collect on child Support. This is why the Suicide Rate amongst Divorced Fathers is so high. It is in fact why every 17 minutes a Man takes his life in the US. Thats more than 15,000 Men a year. Yet the media ignores this war of Attrition against Men. Since Men are the disposable Gender.

Khankrumthebulgar

July 07, 2006 7:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why didn't Mack control himself?

July 07, 2006 1:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why didn't George Washington control himself?

July 08, 2006 12:56 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Why doesn't Sen. Hitllary Clinton control HERself?

July 08, 2006 11:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Recently an M.B.A. business executive named Justin Barber was found guilty of murdering his wife.

A mountain of evidence pointed to the young man as the one who pulled the trigger on a deserted Florida beach. (His story of a faceless assailant didn't hold up).

Mrs. Barber had taken out a 2 million dollar life insurance policy. Mr. Barber had been having numerous affairs and running up huge debts.

Justin Barber will likely be sentenced to death.

Is this fair ?!

Premeditated murder of a cunt? And a guy gets death for that?

July 08, 2006 8:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What does God say about Darren Mack and what he did?

July 13, 2006 7:13 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: Next time you get God's cell phone number please pass it along. Thanks.

July 16, 2006 2:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, is it possible you can be wrong about some things?

July 18, 2006 5:51 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (July 18, 2006 5:51 PM)

It is theoretically possible for Bob to be wrong occassionally. However, in practice, his errors are generally insubstantial typos and word processing errors, not errors of substance.

If you want the real truth about real life in the 21st century, go with Bob's truth.

July 18, 2006 8:43 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home