Wild blue dogs maul men
Springfield and Massachusetts state gun thugs intended for their vicious assault dog to cause exactly that kind of inhuman and permanent injury to somebody. The news article says that the dog attacked the “wrong” man. Bob asks, who is the “right” man to suffer his flesh being ripped apart by a vicious wild dog? Who is the “right” man to be so violently and viciously attacked and so badly injured? What wild stretch of imagination gives any justification for such vicious, brutal, and criminal assault by the Springfield and Massachusetts state gun thugs?
Every violent criminal who participated in the brutal vicious attack should be sent to their own hellhole prison for ten years for aggravated assault, including their supervisors and the nutter reporters who treat massive blue gun thug violations of human bodies as a normal everyday life.
The blue gun thugs are not there to protect you or me, they never have been and they never will be for our protection. The average person would be far better off without these violent vicious gangs of blue suited thugs roaming our streets with their vicious dogs attacking and rendering the flesh of men on the streets.
2 Comments:
Interesting. the article you linked to no longer exists. Wonder why that would be?
I can go back and find articles from newspapers and magazines 10 years ago, but this one was somehow "deleted".
Note to Countryman: Unfortunatly MSNBC apparently does not keep local news links permanently. They cross-link to a local news source, and this one seems to have vanished. It worked when this was originally posted.
Post a Comment
<< Home