The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

No woman is illegal.

Yesterday Bob was listening to political commentary on radio when they started talking about Sen. Hillary's campaign stop at a Mexican restaurant. While munching some tacos, Ms. Hitllary listened to the views of employees and other patrons. One man supposedly complained about immigration policy, “My wife is illegal.” Sen. Hitllary responded with her very sexist view, “No woman is illegal.” It was an offhand unscripted comment that clearly demonstrates the sexist female view of “equality.” In the femzi mind if Sen. Hitllary, only WOMEN are always legal, but men are not included. A man with similar views on open borders would have said something like, “Nobody is illegal.” When a cunt is elected, she represents cunts. She does not represent “everybody” or any man. She does not belong in public office. Her kind of prejudice should be sent home to her family, to mind her kitchen. No man should ever vote for a cunt.

Read media story

Labels: ,

32 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Death To women's Rights.
When will it happen?

January 12, 2008 11:32 AM  
Blogger Miss Ondrya said...

It's very telling also in another way: in the minds of many people [i]children[/i] are always legal, because they should enjoy care and protection anywhere they are in the world. Apparently deep in her heart Hillary regards women as children. Like so many social reformers she has a low opinion of the people she seeks to [i]uplift[/i].

January 12, 2008 1:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

MRAs don't like you:



http://www.the-niceguy.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=32763&hl=

Serin says:
"
Your definition of justice is...insane, for lack of a better word. Actually, I think that's the best word.

-Serin
"

remo says:
"I think you should be "eliminated" from posting on this website, troll."

Now I don't think the kid should be killed, just the adulterous woman because she betrayed and disobeyed and disrespected her husband.

Why is it that the niceguys hate you?

Also notice the other "solution":
"Men should just avoid women"

Basically... don't fight to win, just throw in the towel. Rather then fighting and destroying women's rights run away?

What do you think of the MRAs?

January 12, 2008 4:28 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Like all cunts, you are badly mistaken. The feminist infiltrators of some on-line web sites are afraid of and attack any man who has the balls to speak against feminists, but the real MRAs support and encourage The World According to Bob.. Perhaps you should learn to distinguish between the real men and the quislings.

January 12, 2008 5:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Since when am I a cunt? Did I say I liked the MRAs cited? From all my time in MRA land I have seen that almost _all_ MRAs are like serin and remo, almost every single MRA. This is why I don't like it when someone accuses me of being an MRA, I don't like being in the company of the majority of that group. You know that they want you and any Man like you dead or in prison because you actually speak against women's rights and all feminism and are for Men.

Can democracy ever work to the good of Men, even an only Men vote democracy? Look at the majority of MRAs... then add the non-MRAs... what do we get with that?

January 12, 2008 6:06 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous;
There is a strong psychological tendency in any minority group for the leaders to oppose any member who makes waves and upsets the status quo. The leaders have a vested interest in leading a minority and don't want to attract the ire of the majority. Men's Rights groups today have a bunch of men with vested history of leading a bunch of whiny nobodies who will never get anywhere. There is also a bunch of feminists who pretend to be Men's Activists for the purpose of disrupting and preventing effective action. Their tactic is to join wiht the vested no-action men and criticize any real man who would make waves and take effective action against feminism. They create sham men's discussions for the purpose of draining men's energy and preventing real change. The "nice guy" discusison is a faux men's rights page of that sort. Bob and a growing number of real men ignore the pussy men and advocate real change.

January 12, 2008 6:30 PM  
Anonymous Stephen said...

Feminists are so smug. They act like MRAs don't exist unless they say we exist. They don't seem to realize that if men stop playing the game then the game is over. M.G.T.O.W. and the marriage strike are slowly dismantling feminism and the femhags know it. They may not show it but feminists are terrified of men who are beginning to wake up to all the fraud that feminism left in its wake. I suggest men boycott women until this mess is cleaned up.

January 12, 2008 8:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In sweeden prostitution is legal, but it is illegal to be a john (a man who has sex with prostitutes).

When the muslims destroy the nordic countries, and God willing they will, I will rejoice.

Death To women's Rights.
Death To all women's societies.

January 12, 2008 9:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You American men who think you can just withdraw and let the problem take care of itself are not only fooling yourselves.

You also reveal your laziness and wimpy attitude towards approaching the American women problem.

Frankly, all this talk of "strike" sounds very unmanly. For Christ's sake, men don't go on strike against women.

I've heard a lot of complaining by men about feminism and the poor quality of American women.

But you are avoiding the solution to what ultimately will make American women better people: taking away their rights, restricting their freedoms, and enforcing this by a vigilant male presense hovering over them.

January 12, 2008 10:55 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

You may have noticed that Bob doesn't just talk about boycotting females. Men who take effective action against whiny feminists are featured prominently on The World According to Bob

Nevertheless, females are 100% dependent on the labor of men. Females are all leeches who produce none of their own food, shelter, transportation, or other physical needs. The men who have been looking for foreign brides have already inspired a feminist dominated Congress to start passing laws intended to confine American men and outlaw foreign brides. If the boycott wasn't having an effect the feminists wouldn't be so worried.

January 13, 2008 8:02 AM  
Blogger Miss Ondrya said...

The way a man resists depends on his personality, temperament, experiences and possibilities.

If a man goes on strike he puts pressure on the system, if a man attacks the funding of a feminist organization he puts pressure on the system, if a man goes on national television to make a case he puts pressure on the system, if a man walks amok he puts pressure on the system.

We can't all be expected to take the same approach. It doesn't matter. Any kind of pressure is good pressure.

January 13, 2008 8:50 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Miss Ondrya:
Exactly. Men are no longer listening to controlling bitches who try to tell men what to do and what not to do, and all the while trying to shame men into submission. The various tactics and strategies used by different men to confront the gynocracy will vary from verbal objections to dumping her body in the bay. Whatever tactic a man chooses to undermine or confront the gynocracy, it will be his choice, and not hers.

January 13, 2008 9:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

New mirror of my weblog:
http://mikeeusa.pressword.com/

Don't know how long it will last.

January 13, 2008 3:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: I could make more MRA/Anti-women's-rights-activist flags/ensigns. What do you think would be good for some?

January 13, 2008 5:17 PM  
Blogger ChicagoMan said...

I agree with you Bob.

I stopped posting at the nice-guy forums a few months ago. They are a bunch of male "victims" It was a post about racism and how we can stop racism by eliminating special privileges for black people. It was also about black/white double standards. You know, how blacks can call whites racially based names, but whites can't do the same. About how there is a Miss Black America but blacks can be miss America. I also talked about how during college, blacks would form their own groups excluding whites, but whites didn't do this.

My post was simple, eliminate the double standards, same goes in the male/female arena.

You would think I was talking to a bunch of feminists.


The men's movement will go nowhere if all we have is a bunch of whiners that advocate removing yourself from everything in general.

Sure you can avoid marriage and the like, but in order for change to happen, you have to be proactive, otherwise stop whining.

January 14, 2008 8:50 AM  
Blogger Kuuenbu said...

So, uh, how is this any worse than saying "no man is illegal"? Such phraseology has been used for centuries when discussing human rights and philosophy. Are you going to start complaining about that as well?

Political correctness is no better in reverse.

January 14, 2008 9:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Nice Guys will never have children. Without children of their own (not children of the state (in modern countries including America (which should be violently overthrown) the pro-women's rights government and the women own the children, fathers do not have offspring, they only have "responsibility")) their ideas fade quickly away. If you can raise your own sons (rather then the state and the women raise them) then you can indoctrinate them into your belief system. The women do not want that to happen (nor does the state), especially when they finally destroyed the power of Men this century.

We need a very violent revolution. We need to burn our pro-women's rights enemies alive along with their supporters/armies of police.

January 14, 2008 9:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.the-niceguy.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=32956&hl=
Check this out. The Nice Guy MRAs are hating on Sean Penn because he had sex with russian women while he was married and when his wife came in on his party and then left in a storm someone asked him where she was and he responded "who cares". They (The NG MRAs) say he committed adultery when in the Bible a Man can only commit adultery when he has sex with someone else's wife. He did not commit adultery:

------------------------------------
QUOTE (Drew J @ Jan 13 2008, 03:00 PM) *
I do not agree with his cheating. He should have just sent her packing first.

QUOTE (Laboratory Mike @ Jan 13 2008,
I'd have to agree.

QUOTE (dylanfish2 @ Jan 14 2008, 02:31 AM) *
Me too.

nigeles175d says:
I agree too. His attitude when he is discovered is atrocious too. He shows no guilt, remorse or shame, nor any consideration, sympathy or empathy for how he has hurt his wife. I know nothing about his wife, but there can be no excuse that any spouse "deserves" this adultery and mistreatment alone, never mind the fact that two wrongs never make a right. I guess Penn is a Bad Boy™ at heart and the women are taken in by him.
--------------------------------

Why do these MRAs hate on their fellow man for having relations with multiple women? He didn't screw anyone else's wife...

January 14, 2008 10:18 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Kuuenbu:
Linguistically, the word "man" has had the inclusive meaning of "human" while "woman" has always been a special case subset of "man." To say that no man is illegal is to say that no person is illegal, including all subcategories. To single out a single subcategory, “women” as special is sexist.

January 14, 2008 10:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How would we say man (as in men, not women)? When I talk of man I mean men, not women.

K:
"PCism" is NOT just as bad in reverse. Sexism against women is good for men, sexism against men is bad for men.

January 14, 2008 1:25 PM  
Blogger Miss Ondrya said...

Mike, go eat a feminist. Stop trying to drive a wedge between MRAs. Do something useful.

January 15, 2008 12:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

miss: Is there a diffrence between an MRA who accepts women's rights (1850s to 1920s feminism) and one who is opposed to women's rights? Should they be grouped under the same banner?

January 15, 2008 9:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mikee isn't doing anything to "drive a wedge between MRAs." He's just using a different strategy. Those other groups you mention are trying to fix the problem by working within the system. Mikee has come to the conclusion that the problem IS the system.

Most MRAs are working under the same premise as the old "House Niggers." They thought they could make their lives better by kissing the right body parts on Massa'. The Black Seminoles, on the other hand, killed Massa'. They gained their freedom, where the "House Nigers" gained somewhat lighter chains, at best. Mikee represents the thinking of the Black Seminoles.

Sure, the rest of the slaves at the time were denouncing those vicious Seminoles, at least in front of Massa'. But if you believe they really thought it was such a bad thing, you're delusional. And the same goes for those MRAs who still try to work within the system. If Mikee's method works, they won't hesitate to jump in with him.

January 16, 2008 10:56 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The sniping of other Men's Rights sites does nothing but reward the Feminists. Lets look at the big picture. Yesterday Michael Nifong was forced to file for bankruptcy to try to stave off $180 million in Civil Judgments. The Feminists are not posting this bad news. Its like a Nightmare that will not go away.

Second yesterday Matthew McConaughey Hollywood Alpha male ueber Hunk. Announced his 24 year old Brazilian girl friend and he are expecting a Baby. Ben Kingsley married a Brazilian Model 30 years younger than he. Nicholas Cage married a 19 year old Asian Waitress and they have a son. Again not a mention on the Feminist sites. Hollywoods Elite Men espouse Feminism and marry or have children with non Feminized Women.

And the ultimate expression of the collapse of the Feminist I can do anything. Is Britney Spears is going to Marry her Moslem Boyfriend and convert to Islam. Her in Laws insist she wear a Veil just short of a complete Burka. You could not make this shit up. You go Girl.

And the Feminist sites are ignoring another Honor Killing in the UK. Thats two girls in Dallas just under two weeks ago, and now one in the UK. Feminists are in a panic.

Men are rejecting them in record numbers. Last year in the US 12% of US Marriages was to Foreign Women. If the present trend continues in 60 years we will have bred Feminism out of our culture.

Shooting at each other in a circle only helps the FemNags. Brothers we are Men we are independent and will have different opinions. We don't think like a Herd. We are not Women.

January 16, 2008 12:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Shooting at each other in a circle only helps the FemNags. Brothers we are Men we are independent and will have different opinions. We don't think like a Herd. We are not Women."

The moderate MRAs enjoy taking shots at less moderate MRAs. A moderate MRA even told Bob to get lost in Bob's introduction post on Nice Guy's forum because Bob links to less-moderate MRAs on his weblog. The moderate MRAs immediatly attacked Bob in his first post because they went to his weblog and saw he links to non-moderates.

The moderate MRAs also ban all non-moderates from their websites and forums and also delete the non-moderates posts (erasing the works of their fellow man).

Why should non-moderates not express a less-then-pleased opinion of the moderates? Why do you use shaming language "let's not be like women" because of another Man's opinion? Men should atleast say whatever they wish to say... and one day do what they wish to do (wipe away women's rights, have the nice young virgin wives they've wanted).

January 16, 2008 1:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have taken some heat personally, been accused falsely of supporting the Rape of my own Daughter by upholding Bob's Right to Freedom of Expression. In our emails back and forth, I have found a polite Man who thinks deeply and expresses himself eloquently.

While Bob and I do not agree on all points. I have defended his rights, Lukeskywalker's, and even MikeeUSAs. While being slandered myself.

The Divide and Conquer gambit is ancient. We need to find common ground and help each other, respect that we will have differing opinions knowing we are Independent and Men. We do not think like a Herd and we never will.

Bob does not censor opinions he disagrees with. Kudos to your integrity Bob. Feminists, Christian sites have routinely censored my postings.

Gents make no mistake on it. We are winning the FemNags are worried, so much so they are calling for the Censorship of Women's sites critical of Feminism.

Khankrumthebulgar

January 17, 2008 12:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"We need to find common ground"

The problem is that the moderates attack and ban anyone who is either less extreme then they are or more extreme. You need to fit within their narrow band to stay on their good side.

They remind me of modern 'conservatives'.

January 17, 2008 10:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My personal opinion is that some in the Men's Movement see an opportunity for Fame or income and their personal ambitions get in the way of the Mission or task. To change the culture and the Laws. The constant sniping of each other does not help our cause. Get past it and move on.

I have defended Bob at the Nice Guy's Forum and have been banned at others. I still insist they have a right to their opinions. Like The American Women Suck forum. I was banned there and still insist he has a right to his ideas.

Some Men have been so beaten down for so long they are mentally emasculated. And it takes them time to recover their Mental Masculinity and Assertiveness again.

It is akin to Pavlov's Dog experiments. When men assert themselves they are told "Bad Dog". When they cave into the Feminists and their enablers they are told "Good Mangina" here is a bone.

Over a long period of time they get worn down mentally. It takes time and reflection to realize you have been abused mentally. And to assert your rights as a Man again.

Our culture hates masculine Men who do their own thing. Women cannot get enough of Alpha Males. They fall all over themselves to have them as Sexual Partners.

What Women say and what they do are two entirely different things.

January 18, 2008 8:45 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to the men:
Quiet conversation, logical arguments, "me too" victimology, and polite requests for equal consideration will result in no more results now than they have over the past century. Men can only succeed by taking forceful manly action against feminism. We men have to help all the beaten down brothers to find their manliness and stop pandering to feminazi domination. Jews didn't survive by helping the Nazi's round up Jews, nor will men succeed by helping the femiNazi round up men.

We can't even just choose one way of counterattack against the feminism. We have to have men who will take bold, decisive action to stop their leadership, political "snipers" if you will. We also concurrently need more organized large groups of men. We need politicians, rhetoric specialists, web publishers, book writers, and every kind of men working toward a common goals in their own way.

We need to applaud when a man takes action against a bitch whore feminist. We need to object when the gynocracy takes action against a man for whatever “legal” excuse, and they always have some excuse. And most of all we need to support each other by helping the beaten down manginas to see the light and regain some hope of manhood.

January 18, 2008 10:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You American men are still shooting blind in the dark.

You don't like feminism, and you talk about doing "something" (whatever that is).

But you still lack the courage and honesty to admit where you have to go.

So I will tell you where you must go: American women can only be decent human beings under a patriarchal framework in which female rights are substantially reduced or eliminated.

I have news for you American men: this is the ONLY context in which women can be decent, respectful, feminine people.

You CANNOT nurture or inspire decent women under a regime that does not take into account the fundamental differences between men and women. Unfortunately, this is the situation of western liberal regimes.

Eventually, you American men will need a SELF-CONSCIOUS society that openly expresses (via law) the fundamental differences between men and women. This is the destination you American men must reach if the scourge of feminism is to be destroyed forever.

January 18, 2008 8:27 PM  
Anonymous Missy said...

Something has to be the tipping point to force change and bring men fully back into power where they belong.

January 18, 2008 10:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey guys, nature has a way of evening things out. When the economy crashes there will be soccer moms giving blowjobs for a couple of gallons of gas for the suv.

This feminist shit hole culture is going down fast. The best we can do is ride it out and make sure we don't get any shit on our shoes.

Grrrll power only exists in a wealthy nanny state. When the shit hits the fan, women will know their place.

January 22, 2008 8:25 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home