Only a MAN is “lewd”
A man without pants is charged with “public Lewdness” but a female without pants is only charged with driving drunk.
In a typical case of blue gun thug sexism, the blue gun thugs in Yonkers, NY, stopped a female for drunken driving and possession of illegal drugs, and found that she was without pants. Since she has a pussy pass from any sexual impropriety she was excused for the indecency charge. By contrast, a man who was obeying all the laws except for not wearing pants was charged with “public lewdness.” The contrast between the two cases demonstrates the blatant legal bigotry that makes men “lewd” but females just naked. Bob objects to that irrational and hateful bigotry against men. A man is not “lewd” for being a man. Sexist injustice is no justice at all.
Read Story.
In a typical case of blue gun thug sexism, the blue gun thugs in Yonkers, NY, stopped a female for drunken driving and possession of illegal drugs, and found that she was without pants. Since she has a pussy pass from any sexual impropriety she was excused for the indecency charge. By contrast, a man who was obeying all the laws except for not wearing pants was charged with “public lewdness.” The contrast between the two cases demonstrates the blatant legal bigotry that makes men “lewd” but females just naked. Bob objects to that irrational and hateful bigotry against men. A man is not “lewd” for being a man. Sexist injustice is no justice at all.
Read Story.
posted by Bob | Tuesday, March 25, 2008
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home