Campus Hero Stops a Bully
In Phoenix, Arizona, the town bully got his this week. Last December, bully Isaac Smith and his two sidekicks assaulted and beat up Mr. Rodney Smith. Mr. Rodney is no relation to Isaac Smith. Isaac Smith and two other bullies punched and kicked Rodney Smith repeatedly as he lay on the ground, breaking his jaw in two places. They also punched Mr. Rodney's girlfriend when she tried to stop them. The December assault and beating was ignored by the Phoenix blue gun thugs. Beating up a man is never “wrong” when the blue gun thug gang is involved. Anyone who had assaulted a female would be spending 20 years in hell. But a man who is a victim of violent assault is left to defend himself.
For the next several months bully Smith made life hell on campus for Mr. Rodney, threatening him with more violence every time their paths crossed on the small campus. On Thursday, July 24, 2008, Mr Rodney had had enough of the ongoing assaults. When bully Isaac Smith hit Mr. Rodney in the face, he found out that real men don't just lie down forever. This time Mr. Rodney was armed for self protection. This time bully Isaac was left lying face down in a pool of his own blood. Even a couple of other students who stood back and allowed the bully to assault Mr. Rodney found out the hard way that condoning violence is not always safe. In recognition of his heroic self defense and for taking prompt manly action against a violent bully, Mr. Rodney Smith is hereby awarded the Coveted Golden Bull.
Golden Bull Award
Mr. Rodney Smith
For Courage and Manly Action
After the self defense shooting, Phoenix blue gun thugs went to the home of Mr. Rodney's parents to terrorize and brutalize his family. Both of Mr. Rodney's parents and three other people were assaulted, chained, brutalized, and hauled off to cages by the blue gun thug gang as it violated their rights to the legal protection of their own home. Read media report.
College President Ken Jerkwater said, "The safety of our students and staff is our highest priority and all appropriate measures are being taken to ensure the safety of our campus." Bob observes that College President Jerkwater had done nothing to protect the safety of Mr. Rodney while he was repeatedly being assaulted on-campus over several months. Jerkwater had done nothing to prevent the pattern of repeated assaults including the violent assault immediately before Mr. Rodney acted in self defense last Thursday. Jerkwater's lies are exposed as lies. His policy has been to ignore and allow repeated violence against students on campus. His sexist policy of tolerance of violent against men forces men to defend themselves on his campus.
Young Mr. Rodney should be immediately released from any blue gun thug custody and praised as a manly man by authorities in Phoenix. He deserves an apology. College President Jerkwaters should award Mr. Rodney a fully paid scholarship at South Mountain college as an apology for their failure to take any action to protect students from violence over the past several months. His parents should be immediately released from the hellhole cells and given a full apology from the City with an offer of monetary compensation for the violent abuse they suffered at the hands of the blue gun thug gang.
When those in power give us nothing but lies and terrorize the people, it becomes necessary for the people to take action to restore freedom and respect in our communities. More heroes like Mr. Rodney are needed to reclaim our communities, our colleges, and our families.
For the next several months bully Smith made life hell on campus for Mr. Rodney, threatening him with more violence every time their paths crossed on the small campus. On Thursday, July 24, 2008, Mr Rodney had had enough of the ongoing assaults. When bully Isaac Smith hit Mr. Rodney in the face, he found out that real men don't just lie down forever. This time Mr. Rodney was armed for self protection. This time bully Isaac was left lying face down in a pool of his own blood. Even a couple of other students who stood back and allowed the bully to assault Mr. Rodney found out the hard way that condoning violence is not always safe. In recognition of his heroic self defense and for taking prompt manly action against a violent bully, Mr. Rodney Smith is hereby awarded the Coveted Golden Bull.
Mr. Rodney Smith
For Courage and Manly Action
After the self defense shooting, Phoenix blue gun thugs went to the home of Mr. Rodney's parents to terrorize and brutalize his family. Both of Mr. Rodney's parents and three other people were assaulted, chained, brutalized, and hauled off to cages by the blue gun thug gang as it violated their rights to the legal protection of their own home. Read media report.
College President Ken Jerkwater said, "The safety of our students and staff is our highest priority and all appropriate measures are being taken to ensure the safety of our campus." Bob observes that College President Jerkwater had done nothing to protect the safety of Mr. Rodney while he was repeatedly being assaulted on-campus over several months. Jerkwater had done nothing to prevent the pattern of repeated assaults including the violent assault immediately before Mr. Rodney acted in self defense last Thursday. Jerkwater's lies are exposed as lies. His policy has been to ignore and allow repeated violence against students on campus. His sexist policy of tolerance of violent against men forces men to defend themselves on his campus.
Young Mr. Rodney should be immediately released from any blue gun thug custody and praised as a manly man by authorities in Phoenix. He deserves an apology. College President Jerkwaters should award Mr. Rodney a fully paid scholarship at South Mountain college as an apology for their failure to take any action to protect students from violence over the past several months. His parents should be immediately released from the hellhole cells and given a full apology from the City with an offer of monetary compensation for the violent abuse they suffered at the hands of the blue gun thug gang.
When those in power give us nothing but lies and terrorize the people, it becomes necessary for the people to take action to restore freedom and respect in our communities. More heroes like Mr. Rodney are needed to reclaim our communities, our colleges, and our families.
Labels: AIS, Blue gun thugs, Colleges, Golden Bull Award, government, government tyranny, People fight back, police violence, Universities
posted by Bob | Friday, July 25, 2008
32 Comments:
Sounds like Bernhard Goetz all over again...
Blue Gun Thugs never protect men, only prevent them from defending himself. I can only hope the jury has what it takes to aquit him.
I feel this young man was within his legal right, he was repeatedly victimized so what was he supposed to do? Continue to put up with it?
Eric is right. There was a time not so long ago that the citizens had an equal right to law enforcement to defend themselves using firearms, even defense against out of hand law enforcement that we are plagued with so much of today. However, try defending yourself against a blue gun thug; you will be going to prison for a long time regardless of the thugs actions! They should not have special rights that enable them to do whatever they want to do to you with no recourse on your part, as in many ways they do today!
I remember the Bernard Goetz case from several years back, one thing I would guess, I'll bet no one fucks with Bernie anymore?
Unfortunately, due to many decades of liberal anti-firearms legislation, "If you use a gun (Sorry couldn't resist) you Goetz it in the end!"
Angry man loses control of himself, opens fire during a church service, killing one person:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25872864
Anonymoust squealed, "...loses control of himself..."
Cowshit! He controlled himself and his shotgun very effectively.
You continually send that feminazi cowshit. It mostly gets deleted. Your continual examples of angry men getting revenge are off topic.
I applaud people who stand up to their oppressors. If you end up having to take action like the type described here, you should probably try to do it covertly. You may want to be a martyr but it's just no good if you're behind bars or in a coffin. Having said that, if the authorities come after you for defending yourself, you may as well fight them too. No just society punishes the victim and lets the aggressor walk free. And if that college was allowing it's students to be assaulted, then I'd say Jerkwater is an apt name for it's president. :)
Police: Killer targeted church for liberal views
2 people killed, seven hurt, after man opens fire in Tennessee church
Owen said Adkisson was apparently frustrated over being out of work and had a "stated hatred of the liberal movement."
The church is known for advocating women's and gay rights and founding an American Civil Liberties Union chapter.
------------
Good I hope he killed some women's rights activists and belivers.
That church shooter should have controlled his anger and NOT killed people. Simple as that. Now look whats going to happen to him. 58 years old - spend next 10 to 20 years rotting in jail and die there. Not worth it.
The shooter, a 58 year old man who couldn't keep a job, killed a woman and a man. The dead man was described as good-hearted, a "burly" usher who protected others during the gunfire:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080728/ap_on_re_us/church_shooting
The killer hated Blacks and gays. He hated anything that promoted equality or human rights.
I'm guessing he hated women too, because his ex reportedly feared for her life.
He'll have a long time in jail to rejoice in what he did.
Some anonymous sow squealed, "hated anything that promoted equality or human rights."
To understand what she means we need to understand that "equality" means "female-->good, men-->bad."
To understand what she means we need to understand that "human rights" means "every damn thing the female wants and to hell with men."
To understand what this sow means by "promoted equality and human rights," it translates as promoting female dominance, black dominance, gay dominance, and 4th rate status for white men. There is nothing inherently equal about whiny female sows squealing and there are no "human rights" for men.
As the feminists define "human," here is the quote, "Feminism is the radical notion that only women are human." Feminist "human rights" do not include men.
You can keep your hate speech, sow. We've heard it all before.
"Now look whats going to happen to him. 58 years old - spend next 10 to 20 years rotting in jail and die there. Not worth it."
Not worth it? Well his previous 58 years weren't so great, now he's killed a feminist woman... and a man who jumped infront of his gun (unfortunate). But he did kill a feminist woman.
So: Sad 78 or less year life
vs
Sad 78 year or less year life where a FEMINIST WOMAN WAS DRAGGED DOWN TO HELL WITH HIM... with the last 20 years not being much diffrent, other than in location, to the first 58.
He did the right thing.
Bob what do you think of this article from 1890:
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9D03E1D8123BE533A25752C1A9609C94619ED7CF
The man wanted to marry a 12 year old girl.
Her mother agreed. He and her were locked up. The girl was sent to some christian society or something.
What do you think of that?
It happend in 1890.
Nothing has changed from then till now.
Note to anonymous:
1. That story link is off topic for this article. Further off topic links will be deleted.
2. That was NYC, a hotbed of first wave feminist domination during those years.
3. The age of the intended husband was outside of reason. A young woman needs a husband of an appropriate age, a man in his 20s or early 30s.
4. Something odd was going on with the mother. Follow the money.
"3. The age of the intended husband was outside of reason. A young woman needs a husband of an appropriate age, a man in his 20s or early 30s."
A man can have children with a girl untill he dies. Why shouldn't older men have a nice wife if they want one?
I myself am only 20, but I am likely not going to marry when I'm 30.
You would deny me a nice young wife?
Females were made for men, not the other way around. It doesn't matter what the girl wants, just that she can get pregnant by whom she marries.
"Reason" is the reason we have women's rights in the first place. If we had followed wants and desires (or men) rather than "reason" there would be not a shread of women's rights.
Also:
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOAQKzY-aOBqDspFkEAV_ZO65vZAD928F1CG0
Police found a four-page letter written by Adkisson suggesting he targeted his ex-wife's former congregation out of hatred for its liberal policies, including its acceptance of gays.
Execution of illegal immigrant who raped and murdered two teenage girls:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080806/wl_afp/usmexicoicjjusticefamily_080806204428
Was the brutal rape something that these two girls enjoyed, bob? Bet their grieving parents wouldn't think so. But what does a grieving parent know?
Note to anonymous:
That case is another example of very sexist injustice. Females who murder men are rarely sentenced to penalties more severe than "time served" while awaiting trial and a few months probation. Just this week we read about a female who murdered her husband and stood by watching him bleed to death. This week the courts awarded her custody of his children. Of course she is not in prison. The contrast between men executed and females getting excused typifies rampant sexism in the American Injustice System.
What about the rape itself, plus the murder of those 2 young girls? Was that equally wrong? Morally repugnant, deserving of the death penalty?
anonymous-August 07
I doubt there are many people who enjoy being brutally raped. But it's still not a crime on the same level as murder. That man was put to death for MURDER, which I think is a perfectly reasonable punishment. Yet for some inexplicable reason, you choose to emphasize the rapes. Why? Do you really feel that murder is the lesser crime? I'm absolutely certain those grieving parents you mention would feel much better if their daughters had only been raped, instead of murdered.
That said, Bob is entirely correct about women getting off far easier than men. When was the last time you heard about a woman being executed? And of course, we have an ever increasing rate of instant trial/execution by cop. Those executions are also overwhelmingly men. Then there are the 4028 men we've lost in Iraq, versus 102 women. Or the on the job death rate, at 93% male. Or the fact that women already live 6 years longer than men.
It seems to me that if rape is the biggest problem women have to worry about, it's only because they know they're far less likely to be killed than men.
That church shooter should have controlled his anger and NOT killed people. Simple as that. Now look whats going to happen to him. 58 years old - spend next 10 to 20 years rotting in jail and die there. Not worth it.
I disagree,58 is a good age to go for it. Your youth is behind you and the only thing you have to look forward at this point is deminishment and death by way of old age so why not go for it?
I'm guessing he hated women too, because his ex reportedly feared for her life.
Just because women screech this before cops and judges doesn't make it true.
Just because Masculist Man screeches that wives never really have violent spouses, doesn't mean they don't.
http://www.wral.com/news
/national_world/national
/story/3369257/
You'll love this one, Bob.
Cop gets 440 years for four rapes.
BLOOMINGTON, Ill. - A former police sergeant convicted of raping four women
was sentenced to 440 years in prison Tuesday.
One of Pelo's victims testified that he was almost gentle at times, while
another said took particular delight in learning, after he'd raped her, that
she was pregnant.
Note to anonymous:
That news article about the blue gun thug being hoist on his own petard is both disturbing and satisfying.
It is satisfying because a blue gun thug was taken down by his own cannibalistic organization which will blame and frame the nearest available man. No man deserves to be sent to hell more than a blue gun thug who worked for years to destroy men.
But it is disturbing on a couple of levels. First, there is virtually no evidence that this particular man was guilty of rape. The "evidence" amounted to witnesses who claimed MONTHS LATER to be able to identify his voice or his photo. Such spectral evidence is often generated by evil persecutors and blue gun thugs to send innocent men to hell. There was no physical evidence such as DNA, hairs, etc., which corroborated the fiction of witnesses.
Secondly it is disturbing because none of the alleged victims suffered any significant harm from the alleged crimes. The sentence is far, far, far beyond what would be rational and appropriate for a female getting laid. He was found "guilty" of 25 counts of "aggravated sexual assault" (rape) based on only 4 "victims" and 4 crimes. An appropriate penalty for "gentle" stranger rape would be a civil fine of around $50 per rape. The convictions and sentence is raging anti-men hate, and that's all that it is.
Might this convince the cops to kill feminists?
Civil war?
Note to anonymous:
Blue gun thugs are selected for their low IQs. They are all too stupid to figure it out.
At the low rate of $50 per session, does Bob feel that rape is a better investment than call girls?
Note to anonymous:
I have heard that $50 would pay for a common street whore in many cities. The street value of sex, in the market, is about $50.
Bob does not agree with your assumption that men must always pay females. Sex is at least as much of a benefit to females as to men.
Bob must pay more attention. Anonymous made no statement of assumption that men must pay for sex. Sometimes it is merely more convenient to do so.
Sex doesn't benefit anyone - male or female - when it is brutally, painfully forced on someone. That includes the risk of serious disease.
Once again, any brutality, or threat thereof, is a separate crime, and should be punished as such. The overwhelming majority of what is currently described as rape, is so called "acquaintance rape." These typically involve coercion, intoxication, or changed minds, instead of physical force.
I think the problem here is that the feminists have spent 2 generations defining rape down. What was called rape 50 years ago, usually required hospitalization, and involved a man who the victim barely knew, if at all. Today, many statisticians count it as rape when the woman merely has regrets about it later. It doesn't necessarily even involve intercourse, of any kind. They do this to greatly exaggerate the numbers, in order to draw sympathy from men. But then they continue to talk about all "rapes" as if they were the traditional violent type, which is now only a small fraction of the rigged numbers. The only place in today's society where the legal system still exclusively uses that traditional definition of rape, is in prisons. Numerous studies show that the majority of violent rapes are committed against imprisoned MEN, not women.
All rapists are in God's image.
Post a Comment
<< Home