The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Obama Regime May be Bankrupt.

Update September 19, 2009

According to a morning report today on KHQ TV News, the DOJ employees still haven't been paid. The DOJ blames the delay on a payroll contractor. According to the report the original accounting and payroll contractor failed to make the August payrolls. DOJ says that they hired a new contractor but has still not managed to pay its employees. The DOJ only still promises to pay employees for 2 weeks at the end of September.

Original Post
Bob has learned from FOX News affiliate KAYU that many federal employees of the US Marshals Office, a part of the US DOJ, have not been paid since July. The employees have now been promised that they will get only 2 weeks pay at the end of September. Federal employees regularly get paid every 2 weeks. Most DOJ employees have continued to work more than a month since their last paychecks bounced.

Bob has also learned that affiliates of CBS, NBC, and ABC are continuing to ignore this story. The bankruptcy of the US Government would be the biggest news item of this century, but leftist media refuses to tell the people what is going on. This story broke at the end of the news day on Friday, 9-11, so federal employees and many news service staff have been out of their offices for the weekend.

If the government inability to pay its employees was due to a failure of its convoluted payroll system, they would be promising to pay a full months pay and back pay owed as soon as the payroll system problems are dealt with. Only a lack of money to make payments would cause anyone, including a government, to promise only half pay at the end of next month. If payroll can pay half pay they can pay whole pay unless they have no money to pay their employees.

Be afraid. Be very afraid. Stockpile food and ammunition, and whiskey for trade goods.

Labels: , , , , , ,


Anonymous Anonymous said...


I won't insult your intelligence with the standard, "no way man," or the required pleasantry of "PLEASE say it ain't so." In light of the total collapse over the past year of the last of what was once America, I genuinely HOPE your information is correct. With no remaining claim to legitimacy, it's past time for this government to fall.

That said, I can't find any evidence supporting your claim. Would you please add some sort of verification? A link, a name, a phone number... The KAYU website has nothing about it.

If this is true, it's THE signal. Things are about to get very interesting, if it's true.

September 12, 2009 9:31 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
I can understand your concern. KAYU featured it as "braking news" late Friday night after their web techs had gone for the weekend. We verified it with their news director who said that the wives of DOJ employees had come to them with the story because they cannot pay for food. The government employees involved are continuing to work and are reluctant to go public. Bob expects reports of the Government's inability to pay its employees to become wider and more generally known next week.

September 13, 2009 6:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now it's broke and like me. Cool.

September 13, 2009 9:26 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looks like some libraries in Philadelphia may close due to lack of funds. Libraries here are closed two days a week to save money. What do you think of public libraries?

September 13, 2009 3:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some libraries in Philadelphia may close due to lack of funds. Libraries here close two days a week to save money. What do you think of public libraries?

September 13, 2009 3:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Public libraries should be closed. They do good to regular people. My local library is staffed entirely by women who refuse to remove objectionable materials from the collection. they stock books for children that promote witchcraft and demon worship. Other childrens books show non-traditional gender roles as though they were normal. Books for adults include materials on homosexuality that treat it as normal. The Holy Bible is shelved alongside what the librarians call "religious texts" as though they were all the same. When asked to remove unsuitable books from the borrowing collection the libraries provide no help, only endless amounts of paperwork. Closing libraries would save municipalities much-needed funds and help remove exposure to improper influences from children and adults as well. Public libraries contribute nothing and cost all taxpayers. Taxation without representation is unAmerican and should be stopped. Close the libraries.

September 15, 2009 3:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If Bob says it, it has got to be true
Anonymous Age 67

September 15, 2009 5:25 PM  
Blogger rkyobo said...

Hi Bob! I am a 56 yr old woman, and I don't hate men. In fact, I have been very happily married to a wonderful man for 37 years. However, I have to say - 95% of spouse abuse that occurs every year in the USA is perpetrated by males. Four women are killed by their husband or boyfriend every day. I'm not saying all men are evil or even that most men are evil. I'm just saying that generally, if a woman reports that she is being psychologically or physically abused by her husband, she should be given the benefit of the doubt and protected. Most of the time, women don't report their abuse for fear that they will not be believed, and will be mistreated by our great American justice system, that so many times has favored abusive men over their wives. Some of the terms you used in your article referring in a degrading way to women's genitals reveals your anti-woman attitude. If you don't hate women, then you shouldn't use those degrading and offensive terms.


September 23, 2009 6:48 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to rkyobo:
You "don't hate men," you just believe and recite all the anti-men hate dogma of the feminazi hate machine. What a bunch of hate mongering cowshit!

September 23, 2009 7:25 PM  
Blogger rkyobo said...


No, not really. My husband is a chaplain and I work with battered women and their husbands - trying to help them to stop battering their wives. That's why I know the statistics.


September 23, 2009 9:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would like to know where she got those "facts" from. Most likely from a man hater group like NOW.

September 24, 2009 4:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That clueless man hater should log onto then link onto "a letter on domestic violence", then link onto available research and see what the facts really are. Her ignorance of the facts is appalling.

September 24, 2009 5:06 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
You guessed it. She's a professional misandrist bigot. She gets paid by our tax money to promote anti-men hate.

September 24, 2009 5:54 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Ms. rkyobo:
The "DV" shelter industry was created by a British woman named Erin Pizzy who opened the first "women's shelter." The industry was soon taken over by men hating lesbitches who promote lies and hate. Instead of reciting all their usual hate lies, I suggest you read Ms. Pizzy's latest published article about "Domestic Violence."

September 24, 2009 6:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't know if she hates men, but she is awful naive,and to me that is all the more reason why we need a men's right movement.

September 24, 2009 7:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When men (or women) lash out and commit violence, no one in their right mind should condone that. Instead, every bit of help available should be offered to (1) protect his victims, past or potential ones; and (2) help the man learn better, saner ways to live and solve problems.

If beating, raping, stabbing, shooting, were measures of true "manhood", Charles Starkweather would have been Man of the Year 1958.

September 28, 2009 4:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wrong again Bob,Its now October 2nd,Your high drama balloon has bursted.But of course you wont admit it.

October 02, 2009 10:40 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
In news today Penski couldn't find any Asian auto makers who would agree to manufacture Saturn cars for US Dollars. Saturn is being shelved.

In news Today the IOC won't plan to come to Chicago after Obama's personal intervention.

In news today the US depression is now the worst since 1933, which makes sense since our government is imitating the 1933 National Socialist Labor Party takeover of Germany.

October 02, 2009 12:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's October. Next month is time for elections. It occurs to me that taking the tactics of abortion protesters (who are mostly men, and led by men) would be a good idea to protest womens voting. Stand outside polling places with signs and vocal protesting. Engage with the media to explain why. Do you know of any such protests planned or have suggestions on how to organize some?

October 05, 2009 1:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Bob.
Geek Feminists seem to be trying to get me arrested again:

Here a feminist man compares me to hitler,stalin, and says I'm the worst blight on the free software community every:

Here's other talk:

They just made a wiki web page about me today awell:

They wish to find out who I am, expose me (note: I support the same things in real life as on the net) and report me to the police (and have me arrested).

I post here because I don't think my emails are getting through.

The feminist men reallly want me to be incarcerated. I guess they need to show off to the women of the world.

Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberties.

October 06, 2009 2:50 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to MikeeUSA:
Congratulations on stirring up the feminazi geek squad. Reading all of those links their only complaint is that you fail to support the usual feminazi anti-men hate campaign. There is nothing a feminazi hates worse than a man who tells her to cram her anti-men hate where the sun doesn't shine.

The "feminist" is another accolade for a man who tells the hate bitches to pound sand.

Its often been observed that a man can measure his effectiveness by counting the opposition that is created against him. If you weren't effective they would ignore you.

The World According to Bob has inspired at least 2 parody blogs and several cyber attacks. None of them have been effective at anything other than directing more traffic to read the wisdom of Bob. Let that be a lesson. The old Hollywood standard was "It doesn't matter what they call you, as long as they spell your name right." Make sure you post links on their web comments so that readers can go read your message first hand. And be sure to thank them for stirring up readership.

October 06, 2009 4:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: Could you link to the newer

I put the posts that have angered the "geek feminists" (note: they don't actually code anything) there. The blogger weblog is blocked for all but people logged into blogger by google. One of the "geek feminists" admitted to helping get it shut down.

It seems that the "geek feminists" and the other types of feminists that we all know (who have made parody sites of yours, etc) share the same circles. They seem to be a limited group of women (not a whole lot of active members).

They also have men hangers-on who help them when they need more in-depth technical assistance in tracking someone down, infact the men do it without being asked.

I would say there are 10 truely active "geek feminists" women, plus many admirers. One of them, ofcourse, is the editor of (Carla Schrodinger). Others, including men who subscribe to the pro-women's rights beliefs, are in other editorial positions. They are not the actual programmers that make freesoftware, but those men can be influenced by them because said people appear to be "high up" and in "influential positions".

Notice how the women's rights activists go for the positions where they can control the flow of discussion. Notice how they try to have those who oppose them arrested (I've been reported to the police and FBI many times).

I wonder, Bob, do we, men, live in hell? The things we desire most we are punished for persuing or having.

October 06, 2009 7:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

*Carla Schroder is the name of the editor.

October 06, 2009 7:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If a man respects equal rights for all, don't mock him as "less of a man". He says what he means. He's as much entitled to his view as Mikee or Bob are to theirs.

October 07, 2009 3:06 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
For more than a century the phrase "equal rights" has been twisted by feminism to mean "female domination." A man today who uses the phrase "equal rights" is supporting 160 years of feminist anti-men advocacy. He deserves no respect from men.

October 07, 2009 3:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

True equality of rights under law does NOT mean one group dominates another. If you think you're being persecuted, that's your problem.

October 07, 2009 4:00 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Men and females are not the same, and our biological abilities and our natural roles in society are not the same. Asserting "true equality between men and women" is a feminist myth. Manginas who pander to feminist dogma do not belong in a group of real men. Its time for MEN to reaffirm our historic and natural place in our families and our society.

October 07, 2009 4:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is an excellent piece on the "Angry Harry" website called "Eqality between men and women is not acheivable". see Absolutely brilliant piece,

October 07, 2009 6:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Depends on what you mean by equality. The genders may have different natural abilities, but also overlapping abilities where gender is not an issue.

Legal equality means treating people fairly; they can vote, achieve education, jobs they quality for, own property, money, etc. People also have rights NOT to be persecuted such as by beatings, rape, involuntary servitude, "honor killings".

Any man who deems it his "right" to harm others, exemplifies why the "rights" of barbarians have no place in a civilized world.

October 08, 2009 12:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Historic and 'natural' place for men in families and societies?

Does that mean restoring mens' power to rape, beat, bully, humiliate, degrade women? Apparently it does. So if you mean that, go forward, in public, giving your true I.D. And state exactly what you want. Quit hiding.

October 08, 2009 12:36 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Reciting the old tired hate lies of feminazi propaganda only serves to demonstrate the mental condition of those who live on misandry. That udder nonsense has no place in a rational discussion.

October 08, 2009 1:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Does that mean restoring mens' power to rape, beat, bully, humiliate, degrade women? Apparently it does. So if you mean that, go forward, in public, giving your true I.D. And state exactly what you want. Quit hiding."

Why? So said men can be jailed for "hate speech" or "making terroristic threats" or be fired from their jobs and kicked out of their universities?

Even if men agree that, say, females should be married to men once said females are able to have children (12,13,14 years old usually), that men SHOULD NOT be punished for raping their wives, that it would be far better for MEN if young virgin females that were raped were given over as brides to the man rather than the man being punished for his natural drive to aquire a mate, men are NOT politically in control of ANYTHING.

Furthermore, the only men who speak out are the ones who wish to crucify their fellow man. They like to show off how "good" and "reasonable" they are to the women. If any man were to speak out diffrently he would get no public support (though many men would think to themselves: yes that would be good for me... but I am not stupid enough to voice them.)

Why should men publically "out" themselves when they have absolutly NO POWER of ___ANY___ kind and ___NEVER EVER___ WILL?

What? So you can have them arrested? Fired? Thrown in jail? Sued? Silenced?

Talk. Does. Nothing.
And, well, men don't have the capacity to do anything other than talk.

We're screwed.
Never will change.

Men have always wanted it to be easy to get a little wife.

That's never happened.

We are powerless. Absolutly powerless, and always have been powerless.

The onlything good in our lives is money, and the only why we can get enough is through school and then work. You demand that we forfeit that?
Our only source of happiness?

October 08, 2009 2:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Feminism results in demographic suicide for any country or society that is highly influenced by it.It also is the polar opposite of "legal equality".It has nothing to do with equality. it is not congruent with nature.

October 08, 2009 6:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Feminism has promoted and is the cause of the biggest mass murder the world has ever known, that being abortion.Check out

October 08, 2009 6:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So why does every knuckle head liberal out there sat we must be tolerant of Islam? The religion that is known for "honor killings".

October 08, 2009 6:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: The "geek feminist" apparently have been calling the police and are calling upon their geek community to help locate me and "bring me to justice". Here they decide that I am guilty of a felony for posting anti-women's rights ideas on their weblogs and apparently to their emails:

If they do succede, what should be done?

IANAL and all that, but I had a bit of a look at the New York Penal Code, and here’s what I found.

First up, the most relevant stuff is in section 120, where it defines various degrees of stalking. The fourth degree is:

A person is guilty of stalking in the fourth degree when he or she intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person, and knows or reasonably should know that such conduct:

1. is likely to cause reasonable fear of material harm to the physical health, safety or property of such person, a member of such person`s immediate family or a third party with whom such person is acquainted; or

2. causes material harm to the mental or emotional health of such person, where such conduct consists of following, telephoning or initiating communication or contact with such person, a member of such person`s immediate family or a third party with whom such person is acquainted, and the actor was previously clearly informed to cease that conduct [...]

It goes on a bit more, but you get the gist — it’s about “reasonable fear” and “mental and emotional harm”, not about the specific wording.

The third degree goes on to say that it’s basically the same as the 4th but you do it to 3 or more people, or that you threaten death or rape. That’s a more serious crime, obviously. And then section 485 on hate crimes says that if you do any of the other stuff because of someone’s gender, it exacerbates it and bumps it up a level, which brings third degree stalking up from a misdemeanour to a felony.

I will add, though, that I am personally holding off on calling law enforcement because the only comment that I personally received was the one quoted first, that got pasted all round blogs in the last week, which is IMHO a little oblique. Still disturbing, but to my mind not as actionable as the Debian death threats from ‘07, which I did not receive as I wasn’t active in the community at that time. I might be making the wrong choice here; I’m not sure. I’m going to continue to think about it.

They have their male hangers-on helping them ofcourse.

Here's more "work" they've been doing:

And here's another:

I actually posted this to go along with the Geek Feminism PSA about Mikee (trigger warning, of course). What we found in the process of Kirrily writing that was that in the US, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and Australia (at the very least) you should report to local law enforcement who will escalate to federal cybercrime divisions as necessary. Those are countries we're located in, but given they *all* agreed that's what to do, I'm guessing it's a decently universal thing.

They want me to be jailed.
I don't want to be jailed.
I also will not stop speaking against them and their pro-women's rights beliefs.

What is the solution, the correct course of action?

Everyone: This is what women do: they try to have proxy force (police, law system) destroy those who do not obey and agree with them.

They use the law against their husbands. They use the law against their political enemies.
And they have no real enemies to use the law against... if feminism had true enemies there would be no women's rights. They only have people that talk against them... and they must crush them.

October 09, 2009 12:00 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Mikee,
The NY statute says you have to pursue a "particular parson" for "no legitimate purpose." Posting political opinions, even unpopular political opinions, on an on-line forum is a "legitimate purpose." It also is NOT pursuing a "particular purpose."

As far as I know you have not been threatening anyone from a legal perspective. A nebulous, non-specific, political opinion that someone "should die" is rhetorical and not specific threat. Likewise the copied statement that men would be well served to go to feminist organization offices to kill feminists has no specifics as to specific offices, specific people, etc. to be an actual threat rather than idle rhetoric.

From following their links, the only specific person who is being stalked, harassed, and threatened for no legitimate purpose is Mikee.

This kind of thing goes on so frequently that most police agencies routinely ignore it. From the US you can say almost anything about a "public" person such as a politician or celebrity as long as you don't make a specific threat. You can legally publish political opinions about other philosophical or political movements such as feminism with legal protection.

I suggest that you use whatever tech ability you have to find information about the real names of the sponsors of these threats and offer to sue them for liable or report them for criminal stalking. You might even post a message on their board offering to report them for criminal stalking and threats.

You might also speak with a civil rights attorney about your rights to speech being diminished. Having an attorney to phone if they do call the blue gun thugs would be handy to get you away from their clutches. You can't always rely on blue gun thugs to follow the law, but lieyers really confuse them.

October 09, 2009 12:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The women's rights activists do not hide their names. Not even "skud" does.

October 09, 2009 1:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pro-women's rights man trying to get me arrested.

"Inciting violence is a crime. Inciting murder is a crime. He is doing both on his website, and isn't at all shy about it."

(He is Richard Bowen (or atleast that's his pen name, rbowen))

October 13, 2009 7:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some Men's Rights Movement (if there exists such a thing) commentators have, at diffrent times, tried to come up with a nice declaration of what the "movement" is all about, or what it should be all about, or what they would like it to be all about. They've drafted rather long documents containing points that they think men should agree with, stand by, and together fight for implementation, etc. These documents containined both "rights" and "responsibilities"; they were rather constraining, and really didn't object much to the current pro-women's rights culture nor say anything that was very benificial to men's wishes at all (well, how benificial can words ever be?). Here's my contribution to the haystack:

The prerogative of a Man is to find for himself a mate. So much as he avoids taking another man's mate, no barrier (legal or customary) should be placed to obstruct him.
Females should be married off to men once said females are able to have children (usually at age 12, 13, or 14.)
The "penalty" for the rape of a young unmarried female should be that she is awarded to the man as a permanent wife of his (As stated in Deuteronomy 22)
Men should rape their wives at will.
Females should obey their husbands in all things, as if they were domestic servants.
If a nation seeks to opress its men by denying them these liberties, than it should be destroyed.

Death To women's Rights
Viva Men's Liberty
Liberty (for Men). Equality (amongst Men). Fraternity


October 13, 2009 7:53 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

You should report "brown" and several of the others to the Internet Crime Complaint Center for stalking, harassment, and conspiracy to do those crimes.

General political opinions and rhetoric are legal protected speech, even if offensive, but the kind of stalking and harassment that they are carrying out against a particular person is not legal. Take their advice and report them.

October 13, 2009 9:01 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:

Several recent comments have been way too far off topic. Please keep your comments germane to the topic. Other correspondence should be sent privately to Bob using the link on the left column of The World According to Bob

October 13, 2009 6:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thoughts on this:
Also we really have to move to another country. America will always be a pro-women's rights anti-men and anti-men-owning-weapons shithole. Fortunatly it will soon be poor aswell so the supporters of such things will have less happy lives. Why do you stay in america?

Federal authorities in the Seattle area filed weapons and drug charges against a man alleged to be involved in the militia and sovereign citizens movement as well as a local secessionist group. Andrew Steven Gray, 32, was arrested early last month after FBI agents searched his storage unit and found a machine gun, twenty rifles, four silencers, two bulletproof vests and 9,000 rounds of ammunition.

Gray’s arrest is another example of revived strength in the sovereign citizens movement, a trend recently reported on in the Intelligence Report.

In court documents unsealed last week, federal agents said the case began after a paid informant revealed that Gray had been shooting a rifle and pistol in Snohomish County, Wash., at a building called the Militia Training Center which “routinely holds training for individuals involved in the militia movement.” The informant secretly recorded Gray admitting to owning guns, even though he is forbidden to possess firearms as an ex-felon.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer noted, “among the weapons seized were two guns manufactured by a Snohomish gunsmith whose offerings include parts named ‘Christian warrior’ and ‘NObama.’” In an affidavit, FBI agent Gregory Kraus stated that one of the indicators of Gray’s sovereign citizen ideology were previous legal filings he made claiming the State of Washington had no authority over him due to problems with the constitutional convention of 1889, as well as Gray’s driver’s license, on which the words “no liability accepted” are written over his signature. “Based on my training and experience I know that this is also an indicator of ’sovereign citizen’ ideology,” stated Kraus.

October 15, 2009 8:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

this administration is hanging our troops out to dry in iraq and afghanistan trying to attach the hate crime bill to the suplimental funding budget for the war knowing that it dosnt have a prayer of passing on its own merits,,,

October 17, 2009 4:22 PM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

True equality of rights under law does NOT mean one group dominates another. If you think you're being persecuted, that's your problem.

And posting here without a brain is your problem but like most stupid assholes you have no problem sharing your ignorance with everybody.

January 09, 2010 6:19 PM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

People also have rights NOT to be persecuted such as by beatings, rape, involuntary servitude, "honor killings".

You mean "involuntary servitude" such as alimony?

January 09, 2010 6:22 PM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

Does that mean restoring mens' power to rape, beat, bully, humiliate, degrade women? Apparently it does. So if you mean that, go forward, in public, giving your true I.D. And state exactly what you want. Quit hiding.

You're posting as "anonymous" so don't be a hypocrite.

January 09, 2010 6:26 PM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

Like Bob said,Mikee nail their cunts to the wall.

January 09, 2010 6:39 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home