The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

Has ANY female EVER been hurt by rape?

When Bob's mother was growing up the advice or rape that women of Bob's grandmother's generation gave them was "If rape is inevitable, you might as well lie back and enjoy it." Feminists have decried this age-old female advice. It perpetuates ancient female knowledge that sex is a normal body activity that can be enjoyable, even if it wasn't her idea. Many years later Bob learned that the counselor's training manual at a local Rape Crisis Center contains advice for counselors to deal with women who enjoyed the rape and had screaming wild orgasms during the rape. Often, according to the manual, it leaves them confused about whether or not they are really a "victim" or a beneficiary of the rape.

Over several decades Bob has known several women who supposedly were raped, or legally were raped. For example, Bob once dated a young woman whose first sexual experience was being raped by a Catholic Priest at the age of 19. She was confused about the theological and religious implications, but she liked the sex well enough to give up celibacy and take up with men like me. One of the young females in Bob's high school had been doing sex with her uncle about once a week since she was 11 years old, and thoroughly enjoyed it. Legally, it was one of the most harshly prosecuted kinds of "rape" despite the lack of harm. The last time Bob saw her she was a well adjusted 29 year old wife and mother who still occasionally met her uncle for sex, and still enjoyed every hot fucking bit of it. The fictional rape of Scarlet by Ret Butler made Gone With the Wind into the best selling novel of all time, and rape continues to be a dominant theme in most female's chosen fiction.

Meanwhile the feminazi has condemned rape as the worst possible crime. Their rape-hate propaganda campaign has made virtually all sex into rape and all men into evil rapists. Any man convicted or who pleads guilty to a rape crime is vilified for life. Forever he must register his location with the blue gun thugs, have his neighbors notified, and not live near any normal location. Often he is driven out of town, every town. And the definition of "rape" has been expanded to include every sexual encounter that the female regrets the next day or the next year. Sex with young women is defined as "rape" for the purpose of vilifying young men, even while the woman is the active sexual aggressor. Sex is defined as "rape" by law when the female has had a few drinks for the purpose of vilifying young men, while a man is responsible for all of his actions such as sex or driving, even when he drank more than she did. An encounter where she went to his hotel room at midnight for the purpose of sex is called "rape" for the purpose of vilifying young men, if she didn't enjoy it as much as she hoped she would. And while it's not "rape" the playful or incidental touching of a girl by a 6 year old boy is now prosecuted criminally as "sexual abuse."

Over the past several decades Bob has read probably thousands of news stories about "rape," known several females who claimed to have a "my rapist," but Bob has never met a woman who suffered any actual harm from rape, by any definition. Now we are not talking about murder of battery which are different crimes. All you hysterical femorrhoids who immediately switch mentally from "rape" to serial murder can back off. Murder is a different topic. We are talking about rape, the forced sexual joining of a man and a female. The humping up and down without her controlling the man and the situation.

We are also not talking about the pain that some virgin women feel during their first sex. Virginal pain is normal to being female and sex regardless of the circumstances. Normal sexual feelings are irrelevant to the topic of rape.

In Bob's experience from talking to many females, the female often got hurt feelings from rape, mostly from the loss of control over the man and the situation. Often feminist females hold onto and nurse their hurt feelings for years or decades, refusing to let it go, waiving "my rapist" like a flag for admission to the feminist victimology club, much like DAR applicants pointing to "my ancestor." But were they hurt by the rape? Other than a few hurt feelings, not at all.

The counselor's guide for the Rape Crisis Center teaches counselors how to convince well fucked women that they are "victims!" when they had a good time getting laid. Grandmother's "relax and enjoy it" would be good advice to many who phone the Rape Crisis Center. But the femorrhoids who staff the Center work in the rape-hate industry. Every rape is a fate worse than death and the female is destroyed for life (don't ask them how). There are many urban legends about some female who almost died from the injuries suffered by rape, but like other urban legends nobody is able to track down who or where it actually happened. The so-called victims are encouraged to dwell on their victimhood, to amplify and magnify, to seek counseling in order to wallow in their hurt feelings. Having a good time and letting it go just isn't acceptable to those who use rape as a weapon in their hate war against men.

Bob has never met or known any woman who was hurt by rape other than a few hurt feelings which would go away quickly if they weren't fed and amplified over and over and over. Let's face it. The insertion of a cock into a cunt is a normal, natural body function for both the man and the female. It's how cunts work and what they do. It's their normal function. There are two billion or more women on earth who, on average, enjoy sex ever week or two. That means that a million women somewhere in the world are enjoying the insertion of a cock into their cunts right now as you read this article. It just doesn't cause physical injury to the female no matter who decided that now would be a good time to do it.

How about you readers? Do you know any female who was actually hurt by being raped, by being forced to accept a man's cock in her cunt? If you do please let us know with specifics, not urban legends. Leave out the mass murder scenarios too, that's murder, not rape. Bob just doesn't think rape actually hurts anyone and therefore is not is a serious crime at all. What do you all say?


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, when a "man" rapes a woman, he is telling her he has no respect for her as a person.

April 18, 2006 5:04 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Anonymous, when a female refuses sex with a man, she's telling him that she has no respect for him as a man. She receives what she does to others. Of course he won't respect her.

April 18, 2006 5:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, are you saying that whenever a man demands sex with any woman, she must consent?

What about a man's wife (such as YOUR wife?). She must consent to sex with all who demand it?

Let's say your Father harasses your wife during a visit. They wind up in bed.

Or the mailman comes in for a midday "chat" in your absence. Or the plumber. A neighbor, etc.

Your wife must have sex with all these men or risk their disrespect?

April 18, 2006 6:23 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Anonymous obviously doesn't know any woman who was ever hurt by being raped either. Otherwise she would have told us about it.

April 18, 2006 6:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was hurt by being raped Bob. I was stabbed to the point of never being able to have children and Bob, let me tell you, it hurt like Hell. It still does. I'm haunted by it every day. I'm haunted by the fact that my husband at the time couldn't face the idea of having sex with me again- I was used goods and useless since I could no longer produce the children we both longed for. I was in agony when I finally had to have a historectomy after years of surgeries, hormone therapy and a period that lasted 7 1/2 months due to the damage done. I was hurt when another woman claimed to have been raped when the truth was she didn't want her boyfriend to know she'd slept with someone else. I'm hurt by the flashbacks of another man's face when I want to make love to my husband. I'm hurt by the nightmares. I'm hurt by the violation of my right to say no- just like the right you have to refuse. I'm hurt by the fact that I was seen simply as a sexual object. I'm hurt by the fact that my own father wouldn't have anything to do with me afterwards- I was suddenly dirty. I'm hurt by the fact that other men I knew decided to have a try since I was so obviously used goods and I no longer deserved respect or courtesy. Men like you Bob. I'm hurt by the fact that my pain and confusion after the rape led me to be very promiscuous for several years- I didn't respect my self or my body any more than the rapist did.
Bob, I found your blog through a fathers rights support group you and I are both on. Your comments there frighten and sicken me. Your comments here are contemptable. I support mens rights- I have fought both in the US and the UK for fathers rights to equal access to their children. I have spoken before state legislatures in support of fathers rights. I know men are getting the short end of things right now, but you have gone too far. Yes, sex is a natural act for CONSENTING adults- I wasn't consenting. I did not enjoy being assaulted. I did not enjoy being stabbed. I did not enjoy having my life altered in one instant. I did not enjoy having my right to be a parent taken away from me.
So there, a woman who was hurt by being raped.
You never answered the last writers question Bob- what if it was your wife? Your daugther? Your sister? Your mother? Are they supposed to simply lie back and enjoy an attacker? Are you yourself a predator Bob? Sounds to me like you're trying to justify yourself.
Bob, at this point I'd like to say I wish it had been you instead of me, but I could never wish this kind of pain on anyone.

April 19, 2006 2:44 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Dear Anonymous: Your rant is typical of the femorrhoids who hold onto "my rapist" for years and whine and blame every bad thing they have ever done on five minutes of unwanted sex. You blame years of your promiscuity on "my rapist," how convenient an excuse. Like all feminazi, her crimes are always some man's fault, never the female's fault. And we are supposed to believe that insertion of one man's cock instead of another caused severe physical pain and damage that neither her husbands cock and nor even her years of promiscuity didn't cause. Like all feminazi rants, Ms. Anonymous makes wild claims that just don't add up. Her feelings were hurt she's nursed and fed her hurt feelings for years, using "my rapist" as the evil upon which to blame all her sins and emotional problems. Instead of getting on with her life and accepting her responsibility she blames some man. And now, of course, in typical feminazi fashion, she digresses into ad-hominem insults aimed at Bob for daring to question the standard feminazi propaganda line. She was "stabbed," describing a man's body as a weapon. Her feelings were hurt. She lost control of men and sex. Boo Hoo!

And then she tosses in the usual femorrhoid "mother, daughter, sister" misdirection. Perhaps you can explain to us how my particular mother, sister, or daughter is any different from any other female who want's to get laid and who blames the nearest available man for all her problems? Well, Toots, what if it was my father, brother, uncle, or son's life is destroyed, be sent to a hell hole prison for decades, and become a pariah in any community simply because he boffed some female who suffered no significant injury? As Bob's grandmother advised, rape can be enjoyable, as enjoyable as any other sex. Destroying a man's life over sex is so far beyond rational that only a feminazi hate monger would consider it. No, Toots, Bob's mother, sister, daughter is no more important than Bob's father, brother, son. And Bob's mother, sister, daughter is like other women, they also want to get laid. Don't use that old feminist hate propaganda line about, "your mother, sister, or daughter." It's old tired feminazi hate speech and it's time to stuff it up your arse.

An old wise woman Bob once knew summed it up this way, "Happiness is a sticky crotch."

April 19, 2006 7:10 AM  
Anonymous Nat said...

Sorry, my English is not perfect. Anonymous, I have sympathy for you and I'm sorry that this has appened to you. But I'm not surprise that Bob is not. Few years ago, I was walking home from the bus station and a man was hidding near of me and was wearing a mask. He tried to rape me. He said to me: "Stop screaming or I kill you." I had to break his nose to escape. According to Bob's theory, I must go to jail while the assaillant must be free because apparently he was more "harmed" than me. After all, if I had let him rape me, I would not had to break his nose and maybe I would not have been killed, so nobody would be harmed. Bob doesn't have to worry about this "poor dear", the police did not find him. But I don't know if the police did catch him after he "innocently" kidnapped, threatened and raped another woman.

April 19, 2006 3:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: what have all the religions throughout history said about rape?

What have most all nation's laws said about rape?

That it was morally OK? Legal?

In particular, what do you say about Judeo-Christian teachings about rape?

April 19, 2006 4:02 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Dear Anonymous: Islamic law specified a death penalty for adultery. It does not distinguish the reason for the adultery. A woman making a complaint about rape is confessing to adultery. It is my understanding that Christianity has no similar laws as such, and now has thousands of different denominations each with their own interpretation. Prior to feminism, many christians were not far from the Islamic view of adultery for any reason.

April 19, 2006 4:42 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Dear Nat. Your story reminds me of a book I read recently in which the author's female friend bet him $100 that he couldn't "rape" her if she resisted. After several attempts he lost the bet. It is really hard to actually rape a female who resists, as you describe. Yes, you hurt him more than he hurt you. He was injured, you were not.

It also demonstrates why some legal codes such as the Islamic laws view rape as adultery, and assume that the female was at least complacent.

We still haven't found anyone who was actually injured by rape, nor anyone who can explain how sexual insertion would be more physically injurious or even painful without permission than with permission.

As the old grandmother said, "If rape is inevitable, you might as well lie back and enjoy it."

April 19, 2006 4:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, unless you are a complete moron, you know full well that rape is violent and painful for the victim.

I believe you enjoy torturing and taunting women who suffered rape. Their anger and pain excite you.

You masturbate as you read all this. It's what you want.

April 19, 2006 5:30 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Dear Anonymous: You can repeat that tired old feminazi rape-hate propaganda as often as you want but it doesn't make it true. The counselor's guide at Rape Crisis Centers generally teaches counselors how to convince women that they are "victims" after having a fucking good time getting raped. I was somewhat surprised when I learned that fact from my local rape-hate industry. No, Anonymous, the "complete moron" is the fool who believes all the rape-hate sexist propaganda lies. Rape is, after all is said and done, just sex with a disagreement over who will decide.

April 19, 2006 6:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is it ok to force a complete stranger to have sex if you want it?

April 19, 2006 6:28 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Is it even possible? Don't be so stupid.

April 19, 2006 6:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is possible to force a complete stranger to have sex. It has been done for 10,000 years especially in war-time.

How many German women were forced to have sex (i.e., raped) by victorious Allied troops? Russian conquerors raped every German Frau they could find, as revenge for the Wehrmacht raping all those Russian women in 1941.

Natalee Holloway was raped because she was pretty. It is ok to rape a girl like that, and we know she enjoyed it. Just as your Grandmother said.

April 19, 2006 6:50 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

ROFLMAO!!! Anonymous wrote, "Natalee Holloway was raped because she was pretty." That's such a typical example of femorrhoid rape-hate propaganda. NH was DRUNK, and DRUGGING, and LOOKING TO GET LAID. There is NO EVIDENCE at all that she was raped, or even succeeded in getting laid. Probably she OD'd on the beach and washed out with the tied. But the worthless scum femorrhoid talking heads and their feminazi viewers yammer on and on about "rape" and "men are bad." Pound sand bitch!

April 20, 2006 7:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


You mean "washed out with the tide", not tied.

April 20, 2006 4:05 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Yea, tide, passed out on the beach, OD'd, swept out to sea most likely.

April 20, 2006 4:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is truly interesting and Feminists will not talk about is the Rape Fantasies Women have. The Women's Romance Novels frequently have this theme a Woman forced to submit to a Forcefull Man. What rubbish. There are web sites where Women share their Rape Fantasies. This is seen as "Empowerment of Female Sexuality". Feminists are inconsistant with their Rhetoric. Some favor Slut Feminism others decry Male Domination.

How is any sane person able to negotiate this maze of irrational thought and just plain bull shit. We are lead to believe that Women can be ferocious Warriors engaging in Ground Combat, and cannot handle Sexual Harrassment by our Masculine Warrior Caste. Which is it? I am sick of the lies and distortions of reality by the FemNags.

I have been hearing these lies for 4 decades now. Same old tired shit all the time. Women are helpless creatures brutalized by Savage Males. Yet we see how many are passed out from Alcohol Intoxication and willingly boast about their Sexual Exploits. Hell Oprah had a young Woman who boasted she had 88 Men ejaculate on her face. She boasted about it. Oprah is no Better than Howard Stern.

You dumbasses are as stupid as a Box of Rocks. Get some new material already it just doesn't sell anymore. We can spot Snake Oil Sales persons.


April 20, 2006 6:01 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Yes, Khank, there is a reason why "Gone With The Wind" is the biggest selling novel of all time. Hint: It's not about the war.

April 21, 2006 9:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, how can you be a Christian (I assume you are one), and justify sex outside of marriage?

April 21, 2006 4:20 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: 1. Comments are generally limited to opinions and discussion that is germaine to the topic. Bob's personal life is not the topic of this blog. See the rules for comments on the left side bar of the blog. 2. You assume way too much. Bob never said any of that. Try reading BobsTruth before you assmume what Bob might have said.

April 21, 2006 8:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some here may be old enough to remember the "Luke and Laura" Story on the Daytime Soap Opera "General Hospital". Laura a young Woman was raped by Luke who she later fell in Love with and Married. It was one of daytime TV's most watched events. Now please tell me why Rape was celebrated by a show whose primary audience was Female? Is is only Rape when a Woman "feels" it is? When she does not obtain her desired result??

And we have a rash of young Women who act irresponsibly and put themselves at risk thinking they have the right to be stupid with their safety. Who is responsible there? Rape and Abortion are the two sacraments of the Feminist movement.

All Sex is Rape even consentual Sex according to University of Michigan Feminist and Law Professor Catherine McKinnon. What can sane Men think about the issue anymore?

Then we have the little gem of Kobe Bryant's sexual escapades with Kate Farber. Interviewed on TV was her Female buddy. They were having a Bet as to who could Fuck the most Men in a 26 week period. Kate Farber had Semen from 3 different Men in her panties after the alleged rape by Kobe Bryant. Funny thing Kate was bragging about the "Size of Kobe's Manhood and what a great lay he was".


April 22, 2006 10:14 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Khank: Yes indeed, if all sex is rape, as the femorrhoids tell us, then almost all rape is a f'ing good time. The "rapist" ought to get a reward.

April 22, 2006 12:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let's get this straight. Bob insists:

1) Submitting to sex (forced or consentual) is the duty of all wives or girlfriends?

yes ___
no ____


A female must resist rape if assaulted by a total stranger? b/c hhaving sex with him would be the SIN of fornication --which dishonors the man she belongs to. (He alone claims her as his property).

yes ___
no ____

3) It is NOT wise to have sex with strangers, because of std, AIDS, etc.?

yes ___
no ____

4) or, a woman should FORGET the threat of disease, and have sex anyway on demand?

yes ____
no _____

5) God forbids extramarital sex?

yes ___
no ____

April 22, 2006 4:36 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Dear Anonymous:
The covenant of marriage is about sex. The wife promises to do sex with her husband, to bear and raise his children, in exchange for his promise to support and protect her. When she says, "I do" that is what she is promising. Marriage is consentual, not rape (barring shotgun marriages, etc.).
Most religions oppose adultery including most Christian denominations.

April 22, 2006 7:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There was one rape in Florida that involved an twelve-year-old girl. The intruder had broken into the home after midnight and raped the mother and left her tied up. He then went to the daughter's room and raped and sodomized her. He also used a variety of objects around the home. The police said it was the worst case they had ever seen. She required seven surgeries, a hysterectomy, and colostomy bag. She nearly died twice during the course of the seven surgeries. This was Halloween night, sometime in the late '80 or early '90's.

April 22, 2006 8:56 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Dear Anonymous: Your story sounds like another variation of the common femorrhoid rape-hate myth, a feminazi urban lagend. Some mythical girl (not a woman)gets sodomized (in addition to rape) and supposedly suffers severe injuries. Like all urban myths it's retold about different girls in different places with various variations. Even in your story the mother (a woman) didn't suffer any harm from the rape, and the girl's injuries were from various forms of sodomy with "a variety of objects." Even in your urban rape-hate myth no woman was injured by rape. You have to exaggerate from a girl and other, not rape, assaults. Your rape-hate myth serves to further demonstrate Bob's observation -- that women are never actually hurt by rape.

April 22, 2006 9:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not bullshit, Bob. It was in the paper for months. South Florida. The guy broke into the house, it wasn't a "date rape b.s. story". The victim was a kid. You can deny that rape exists entirely, but *never* is no more true than any other circumstance in life.

April 23, 2006 4:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jessica Lunsford, a 9 year old Florida girl, was kidnapped, raped and murdered in 2005. Taken right out of her home by a sexual predator - some old man.

We will never know if the child suffered pain during the rape. Or how much it hurt to die by being buried alive.

April 23, 2006 5:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, if you mean that sex is a duty in marriage, then SAY Marriage.

Don't make it sound like you mean all women should have sex with all men at all times. That is crazy.

While sex is an expected part of the marriage agreement, common sense tells you it is not always possible. A woman may be ill. Her husband may have become dangerously mentally sick due to drugs, alcohol, Alzheimers. He may be violent. Then she has a right to refuse sex - a right indeed to leave before she gets hurt or killed.

A woman is NOT a toy, but a human being. Treat her with dignity, you'll get dignity returned to you.

Treat a wife as a slave or object, then you have no conscience. Without a conscience, you are an inhuman monster and should live with the crocodiles.

April 23, 2006 5:36 PM  
Anonymous drex said...

You have made some excellent points Bob. Men are being criminalised for being young, inexperienced and unable to deal with women who play foolish games.

I know women who have taken advantage of men, waking up with an ugly boiler on their hard on and they agree that under the definitions of rape that they too must be rapists..

Women can consent to sex, then withdraw it while the man is about to unload his cargo..

If a woman is drunk, she cannot consent..

Seems that the femi-nazi dominated law does not think much of a womans ability to take responsibility and to be able to make her mind up..

We are subject to a male hate campaign on the issue of "rape" that frees women of any responsibility and as in other areas of law, encourages them to seek revenge on men who just dont want to be accessories of women..

Sex has become a game for women to beat men with and the sad thing is, the more women try and vilify and criminalise men, the less likely women will be to get the sort of knicker ripping sex they truly want as men are now too damned scared of being caught out and would rather have a wank or visit a whore than deal with the fickle teasers that have nothing to offer a man other than a free ticket to misery if they wish to comply with their control freakery or jail if they do not..

The femi-nazi's are ruining it for normal women who just happen to have a few scraps of common sense and an ability to not seek out thrills they cant handle..

I personally cannot stand women who have to control sex, I would not go near them with a barge pole..

Most of my sexual encounters are a result of women DEMANDING sex, yes, demanding that they have instant sex, at the click of a finger.. They think that this is just how it should be, women demanding instant wood regardless of what sir is doing or thinking at the time.. Yet still I find that they want the actual act to be all to their tune, and if they dont get precisely the positions and sweet talk and all the trimmings that they like, they want to stop the act just like that..

No problems for me, I pull out and show em the door, dont need that when there are so many desperate women out there who would love a go on the old pleasure pole!

(Any pleasure a woman gets during sex is purely incidental and is not the primary reason I have sex with em!)

As a man, I have encountered many women who talk a good shag, but just dont deliver the goods..

I can walk away or show em the door.. these women dont deserve the opportunity to have sex at all, let alone cry "rape".

Better to visit an honest whore than attempt sex with an amatuer thrill seeker who has no clue what she can actually handle when it comes to sex..

I was married to a woman who had rape fantasies and indeed it was a match made in heaven..

She claimed that child birth was relatively painless compared to the good seeing to's i used to give her..

Great woman she was, pity she was quite insane and had a bad habit of attacking women she decided where dressed too provocatively and were in her view inciting rape..

"Teach the slut a lesson she wont forget.."

Sent her packing in the end, like most blokes, I dont see the need or pleasure in violence.

Its time this "rape" nonsense was put into perspective before we end up with hordes of aggressive women going short of sex because men just dont want to risk it..

April 23, 2006 6:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Feminists believe all sex is rape. Do you believe all rape is (consensual) sex?

April 23, 2006 10:26 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Dear Anonymous: Like all feminazi propaganda idiots you haven't the brain power to distinguish between rape and murder. The topic is rape, and you jump to murder because rape just isn't much of a crime. Yes, sometimes little girls are murdered, but not as often as boys. Mommy murder is the leading cause of death of boys who die at much higher rates than girls.

Your invocation of the misandrist media as authority, "It was in the paper for months," only serves to demonstrate the magnitude of the feminazi rape-hate propaganda machine. The several little boys who died during the same period were never mentioned. The papers only print stories that promote the feminist propaganda line women=victim, men=villains.

Like all mindless femorrhoids your rape-hate hysteria equates rape with murder. Sorry, Toots, your story only demonstrates that nobody is able to point to a real life case where rape ever hurt any woman. Most of the time a good hard f'ing is a boon to females.

April 24, 2006 6:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who the hell said anything about murder, Bob?! Jeez, you're as radical as a feminazi. Since you're injecting murder and abuse on boys into this, there was the murder of a little boy by both parents during that timeframe. Mommy and Daddy got angry that their innocent young son couldn't figure out how to use the potty on their schedule. Unfortunately, they didn't get the death penalty. Going back to rape, if what you're saying, specifically, is that no woman has ever been injured and hospitalized long-term from penile penetration, I would say that is most likely true. The walls of a woman's vagina are elastic and generally made to accomodate the penis.

April 24, 2006 9:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


I don't believe you have ever been hurt by a woman.

Nor do I believe that Feminism (a positive thing), has caused you any harm.

April 24, 2006 4:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What the Bible thinks about the rape of virgin girls (I'm sure the pro-women's rights christians know nothing of this though):

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (New International Version)

28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. [a] He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (King James Version)
28If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;

29Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (New American Standard Bible)
28"(A)If a man finds a girl who is a virgin, who is not engaged, and seizes her and lies with her and they are discovered,

29then the man who lay with her shall give to the girl's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall become his wife because he has violated her; he cannot divorce her all his days.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (New International Version)
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. [a] He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (New Living Translation)
28"If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, 29he must pay fifty pieces of silver[a] to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (English Standard Version)
28"If a man meets a virgin who is not betrothed, and seizes her and lies with her, and they are found, 29then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (Darby Translation)
28If a man find a damsel, a virgin, who is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found,

29then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty [shekels] of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he hath humbled her; he may not put her away all his days.

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (New International Version - UK)
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered,

29 he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

April 24, 2006 8:33 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous:
You are right, biblical law compensates the father of a young virgin because her loss of virginity is an economic loss to her family. It's an equitable settlement, not a hate settlement. In the bible, as you cite, when a non-virgin is raped there is no penalty, because sex is intrinsically an equal reward for both parties.

April 29, 2006 7:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Bible gawd is a rapist.

April 29, 2006 9:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Bible kicks ass.

Death To women's Rights.

April 29, 2006 9:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is arguably one of the dumbest posts I have ever read.

Has Bob ever heard of the Central Park jogger? Beaten, gang-raped, and sodomized by young Negro bucks going on a rampage in the late '80s? Do you think she was hurt by her rape, Bob?

Her story:

April 29, 2006 10:37 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: Your citation of a woman who was beatten in Central Park is typical of rape-hate hysterical misdirection. That woman was hurt by being beatten, not be being raped. Your mind is so filled with anti-men hate that you are unable to talk about rape without leaping immediatly to beating and murder. Your post demonstates that again. Despite all the hysterical hatred of the anti-men hate propaganda machine, rape is pleasurable as often as unpleasant, and really isn't much of a crime.

April 29, 2006 11:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Death to human rights.

May 01, 2006 4:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is absolutely no question that the laws on the books today must undergo drastic changes if normal, healthy relations between men and women are to return again.

Feminist-influenced laws designed to shield women and punish men have done tremendous damage to society - probably beyond repair. If US society ever recovers from the ravages brought upon by the women's movement, then the legal system must be re-tooled to remove all feminist influence as much as possible.

When the women's movement finally collapses, American women will never again re-gain their previously traditional status as "innocent, helpless victims." They will (probably forever) be regarded with cold wariness, distrust, and scorn.

All so-called "domestic violence" laws - including VAWA - MUST be abolished. No exceptions. There is no need to add on more laws to already existing laws pertaining to assault.

Marital rape laws should also be abolished. There should be NO marital rape laws whatsoever.

- Tim

May 01, 2006 11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cathy Young posted a story the other day in the Boston Globe "Rape As A Weapon". The epidemic of False Rape allegations to punish Men is openly being discussed. We have too many Women who are careless with their personal Safety and Security. They have taken over Men in their consumption of Alcohol and reckless behavior. And want Society structured to remove all Risks for them and accountability for their actions.

How can we even take Women seriously anymore. Stranger Rapes do happen. But Women have to be responsible for their choices of Male Companions. When you choose Thugs, Criminals, Players and Bad Boys. Get inebriated then are indignant when bad things happen to you whose fault is it?


May 02, 2006 9:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"How can we even take Women seriously anymore."

I no longer take women seriously anymore whenever they cry "rape." Especially American women.

American women as a whole have sunk to such a level of degradation that it's no longer possible for me to feel any sympathy for them whenever misfortune befalls them.

The hard, cold reality is that we are in a gender war. And the enemy today is not al-Qaida, or the Muslims, or the Hispanics, or the blacks.

The enemy is the white woman.

May 02, 2006 1:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are all women witches? What says your religion, bob? Krank? Tim?

"Thou shall not suffer a witch to live" (Exodus 22:18).

May 02, 2006 3:54 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: Please don't assume that women are witches. It's an insult to witches.

May 02, 2006 4:29 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: Black American women are as bad as white American women, or maybe worse. Black men have it as bad or worse than white men, and black women have destroyed their families even more than white women have. Candy Rice is as bad as Senator Hitllary. Ophra, who's child of an unknown father died suspieciously, preaches misandry daily. Women, the feminazi, are the enemies of men, of whatever color.

May 02, 2006 4:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When feminism called on women to "liberate" themselves from "oppression," the result was that it cheapened sex. And when it cheapened sex, it cheapened rape to the point where now it doesn't mean anything.

While I agree that feminist women come in all races and colors, a sane, normal man should still avoid white western women. Don't even think about marrying them. Or even dating them. Just stay away from them. They are damaged, sociopathic creatures un-fit to be wives.

A man's best bet is to visit a foreign, non-western, non-feminist country to meet truly feminine ladies.

May 03, 2006 3:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


But aren't most witches traditionally female? Please enlighten.

May 03, 2006 4:45 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: RE: Witches. No, actually witches are men and women. In Old English the word for witch had masculine and feminine endings, "wicca" and "wicce." According to many published reports, witches were the spiritual leaders of one form of pre-christian indigenous religion in western Europe. The leader of each group was said to be a "Man in black." In more recent times, Gerald Gardner (a man) reintroduced witchcraft as a pagan religious practice in England in the 1950s. Another man, Alex Sanders, went public with another variation of similar witchcraft about the same time. Both pagan religious forms of witchcraft migrated rapidly to the US and Canada and are still practiced today.

In the 1960s and 1970s, various feminists claimed that witchcraft was a women's religion and also anti-men. Like all feminist lies it stretches the truth all out of reality. Real witchcraft is a pagan family religion with as many men as women. For a scholarly treatise on witchcraft and it's heritage read "Witch Cult in Western Europe: A Study in Anthropology," by Margaret Alice Murray, originally by Oxford University Press, now reprinted ISBN: 0766144550.

Insinuating that violent evil hate mongering feminazi are linked to witchcraft is a religious slur on the many good MEN who are involved in the modern resurgence of pagan religion. Feminists have taken over leadership and now dominate many Christian denominations as well. The men's resistance against the evils of feminism needs good men of ALL religions.

May 03, 2006 8:17 PM  
Anonymous Mel said...

Bob, you certainly offer a unique perspective.

I was just wondering if you have a daughter? If so, how would you react if she came to you, distraught, because she claimed to have been raped?


May 04, 2006 3:23 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Melissa:
The false feminazi argument, "what about your wife, mother, daughter" has been addressed in earlier comments. No matter how many times you femorrhoids repeat those old tired saws, they still are false arguments. See comment 6, "And then she tosses in the usual femorrhoid "mother, daughter, sister" misdirection. Perhaps you can explain to us how my particular mother, sister, or daughter is any different from any other female who want's to get laid and who blames the nearest available man for all her problems? Well, Toots, what if it was my father, brother, uncle, or son's life is destroyed, be sent to a hell hole prison for decades, and become a pariah in any community simply because he boffed some female who suffered no significant injury?"

Bob would hope that his mother, daughter, sister would have more sense than the average femorrhoid, but that is highly unlikely. Your typical misleading femorrhoid argument adds nothing rational to a discussion, and places the value of mother, daughter, sister far ahead of Bob's brother, father, son. How very sexist of you.

May 04, 2006 6:23 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Melissa:
If my daughter whined that the sex she got last night was "rape" and her feelings were hurt, I wouldn't feel anywhere near as concerned as I would if my son was sentenced to spend 20 years in some hell hole prison and registered as a "sex offender" for the rest of his life because some whiny bitch filed a false rape charge. Comparing equity with reality, the daughters few minutes of discomfort and hurt feelings are miniscule compared to the son's loss of his whole life, family, career, savings, and everything he has. Your misandrist repetition of the false "what about your daughter" argument completely trivializes massive harm done to men, and pretends that even a minor hurt to a female is far more important. It's whiny ungrateful hateful bitches like you who have destroyed our families and culture.

May 04, 2006 8:58 AM  
Anonymous Tim said...

Melissa's question is very typical in her self-absorbed, narcissistic, victim mentality. It also illustrates the shabby, degraded state of American women today and why "rape" is really no cause for men to feel much moral outrage anymore.

Her use of "your mother, daughter" is not an argument at all. It is blind, self-absorbed indifference to any suggestion that women are as much responsible or are even the instigators of so-called "rape" incidents.

Melissa's "your mother, daughter" tactic is becoming more and more apparent to large numbers of men for what it really is: an attempt to manipulate weak, ignorant men by kicking in their natural male instinct.

The obvious result is that these men act as shields to protect worthless women like Melissa from suffering the consequences for their terrible, irresponsible behavior.

Women like Melissa are not interested in doing the right thing. They are also not interested in justice, or the welfare of men.

It is a great mistake for men to believe that women and men feel identically for each other. Women do not have a natural instinct to protect or care for men - there is no "female chivalry." Men must always remember that women are interested in themselves, and will use and manipulate men to advance solely their interests at the expense of everything (and everyone) else.

- Tim

May 04, 2006 12:50 PM  
Anonymous Mel said...

Interesting responses.

Can you please also explain different types of rape? Say, for example, a woman is out jogging in the middle of the day, and is abducted and restrained. During the course of this she suffers many physical injuries - broken ribs etc. Is this rape, or has she enjoyed it?

What about a child being raped? Or is this not rape either?

OR, when you talk about rape, are you referring only to 'date rape'?

A question now for both Bob and Tim - what if a good friend of yours (male) was raped?

Can men be raped?


May 04, 2006 3:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Bob.
Q1 If a homosexual man raped you would that be considered ok? You would class this as his natural urge?
Q2 Is it ok for a woman to rape a man?

May 04, 2006 4:02 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous:
1. Homosexuality is psychotic perversion and does not use natural body parts in the manner and for the purpose for which they are intended. There is nothing "natural" about their perverted urges. It is even wrong to call a homosexual union, "sex" if you want to be accurate. Homosexual "sex" is always wrong.
2. Did anyone say that rape is okay? [ looking around 8-)]

May 04, 2006 4:33 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Melissa:
It is typical for femorrhoids to assume beating and/or murder instead of rape. Your "jogger" supposition suffered physical injuries due to assault and battery, a different crime than rape. The hysterical female of the rape-hate machine no longer distinguishes between rape and serious assault. We also note that far more men are assaulted and injured than women.

As for "children," the current definition of "child" is based on feminazi hate, not on the physiological or psychological reality of young women. Until feminism women were considered women after their menarche, when they could become pregnant and are hormonally driven to want sex. Sex that the woman wants is not rape, no matter how much you hate men.

And yes, men and boys are raped sometimes. If one uses the feminist definition, sex when drunk or when coerced by social pressures, then men are raped more than women. It's really not much of a big deal.

May 04, 2006 4:42 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Jane:
Your comments have been rejected because they do not comply with the comment guidelines published on the left margine of Bobstruth. Please read the rules for comments before writing again.
comment rules

May 04, 2006 4:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


You represent all men.

May 04, 2006 9:01 PM  
Anonymous Wash O'Hanley said...

Dear Bobert,
My name is Wash O'Hanley, perhaps you have heard of me because I am quite a popular radio host here in Freehold Iowa and a member of Jesus' own church the Landover Baptists. You site was brought to my attention by a link from one of our pastors and I must say I am shocked and appalled by this awful article you have written. It is as if you find some joy in spitting in the face of God by saying that the destruction of another man's property is OK.

Genesis 7:2
Exodus 20:17
Jeremiah 6:12

A woman is a man's property, whether it be a married woman to her husband or a single woman to her father. And this most sacred of bonds (which the God-hating Homosexuals and Thesbians in this country want to destroy much like the virginity of their anal cavities)cannot be broken. When a preverted Liberal rapist defiles a woman (white Christian Baptists only apply) he is destroying the property of someone.

When you make claims such as yours about rape you are saying that it is also ok for a man to destroy another man's car, vandalize his home or steal his BBQ. Well I'm going to tell you one thing right off the bat Bobert, I use a Weber grill and have been since 1967, it's all America and it cooks the meat evenly- none of this half done crap.

I understand the horrified feelings that your readers that have provided negative feedback to you feel. Many of your readers showed disgust at your article and I just want to address them right now; I feel for you! I know how you feel. Rape is awful because when you do it you devalue the property of husbands and fathers every where. And when you rape a woman the good and right book says that it is your responsibility to then buy that woman from her father (Exodus 22:16).

Mr. Bobert, I hope you see the error in your ways. Sure you can say that rape only affects the woman involved and possibly the bastard love child that results from it who will suffer years and years of tourment on the play ground, the other children calling him names and throwing rocks at him until eventually he joins a homosexual teen group on a trip to Raging Waters. But I think you need to reconsider. When you rape a woman it is like you're taking the products off a shelf at a grocery store and using them without buying them. It is like you are taking a carton of Cherry Garcia ice cream, opening the lid and slowly sticking your hardened penis into the slowly melting but enticingly cold dairy treat. Rape is unconstitutional and anti capitalist.

I challenge you to come onto the Wash O'Hanley show and debate me on this subject. Please contact me on the forums. If you don't I will post that you are a coward on all the public forums and I am a member of.

May 04, 2006 9:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your site is the most ignorant site i've ever had the mispleasure of coming across. i have seen photo's used as evidence in a court of law of rape victims and their very obvious injuries, injuries that have resulted in the victims not being able to conceive children afterwards. You have no idea what you are talking about, and your ignorance is beyond comprehension.

May 04, 2006 11:57 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Wash O'Hanley:
Bob has not said that rape is not a violation of the husband's rights to his wife, or the father's property interest in his daughter. Both are very expensive luxury items for men and should not be defiled by another man adequate without compensation. All fornication and/or adultery by a wife or daughter diminishes the man's property. Of course, for the many women these days who have left their father or husband and gone off to live as common whores there is no man who's property can be further diminished by her fornication.
Bob would be pleased to be a guest on your radio show any time. I'm sure it would be interesting and informative for your audience.

May 05, 2006 7:20 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (May 04, 2006 11:57 PM)
Bob loves it when you femorrhoids throw a hissy fit. It so well demonstrates your complete lack of mental ability to discuss rationally, and it shows that Bob has succeeded in causing you an emotional disturbance. ROFLMAO!!!!
Pound sand, bitch!

May 05, 2006 9:58 AM  
Anonymous Mel said...

Hi again, Bob.

I should have corrected you earlier, but I'll state now - for the record - that I am not American. Either you or Tim (was that his name) seemed to assume that I was. It may come as a surprise, but Americans are not the only people in the world to use the internet.

I find it interesting that you separate the act of physical asault from the act of rape.

If a person is physically assaulted (no rape involved), do you expect them to be 'get over' the attack by the time the bruises have faded and broken bones have mended?

If you talk to victims of violence, by and large they will tell you that it's not the physical aspect that is the most destructive. It's the violation and the emotional scars that cause the damage.

Most rape victims would say the same thing. Let's say, for example, that a woman is raped. Her rapist passes an STD on to her (something easily fixed, HIV would obviously fall into a separate category). You could say that this woman has been 'hurt' by rape, yet it's not the physical damage that causes the problems.

The problem is caused by the violation and the degradation.

I am also interested in your comments regarding children. Can you please clarify your view for me?

Girls are beginning to menstruate at much earlier ages in general. So, if a nine year old girl who has just begun her periods is forced to have sex, is that okay?

What about a late developing 15 year old who has not yet had her first period? If she is forced to have sex, is that okay?


May 05, 2006 4:49 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Melissa: Rape-hate feminism is much the same in all the important English speaking countries. It doesn't matter which one you are from, a feminazi is a feminiazi wherever she lives. The age old biological age for women to marry and begin their family is the early to middle teen years. Only rape-hate as a weapon in the feminazi war on men has declared normal young men as "rapists" for NORMAL sexuality with NORMAL young women. Whatever country you are from, your repetition of common rape-hate misandry is bigoted and offensive.

May 05, 2006 5:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, what is marriage?

May 05, 2006 7:29 PM  
Anonymous Tim said...

There is only one word to describe the behavior of Melissa on this web log: psychosis.

Obviously, a nerve has been struck with her, and her false civil demeanor belies her seething, envious rage and vengeful hatred boiling beneath the surface.

Her obsessive, repetitive behavior of asking silly questions of such minute, technical detail is a clear indication of a severely damaged psyche. But that is the all-too predictable result of women being raised in a feminist-influenced environment without male controls to guide and discipline their raw behavior.

It's very amusing and entertaining watching this worthless woman - deeply unhappy and angry at having been born female - assume a posture of "victim."

But then, a psychopath does not even try to garner sympathy or moral outrage from others. Her thoughts and perceptions are so severely impaired by having been inculcated by deviant feminist ideology that she is simply on a blind, narrow, self-absorbed crusade to "win" (whatever that means to her) by destroying men, without regard to common sense, reason, morals, or anything or anyone else.

This is your typical modern western woman today. And this is also why rape is no longer nothing much for men to feel outraged about.

To borrow the old French saying: you western women made your bed, and in time you will have to lie in it.

May 05, 2006 7:51 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous, (May 05, 2006 7:29 PM)

For a discussion on marriage, see Bobstruth: The Meaning of Marriage

May 05, 2006 8:14 PM  
Anonymous Mel said...

Hi Bob and Tim,

Bob, you never really answered the questions I asked.

Tim, I don't want to be a male. The reality is that we are living in a women's world now. Throughout the Western World, the fact is that our boys are failing. For the first time, girls are vastly outperforming boys in our education systems. It's sad, and it needs to change.

It's something that we all - men and women alike - need to take action on, because the whole point of the feminist movement (although as I'm only in my mid-twenties I missed out on it) was to create gender equality. In some areas I think that the balance has tipped too far the other way.

It is a shame that neither of you seem willing - or able - to engage in a rational, logical debate on this issue. Your opinions are completely different to mine, and I wanted to understand what you based your opinions on. I wanted to know whether you see the issue as completely black and white or whether there are some instances that even you conceede that rape causes harm.

I still feel that this is probably a giant wind-up, and that if a woman that either of you genuinely cared about was raped, this rhetoric would go right out the window and you would offer them nothing but support.

Kind regards to you both,

May 08, 2006 4:58 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Melissa wrote: "I still feel that this is probably a giant wind-up, and that if a woman that either of you genuinely cared about was raped, this rhetoric would go right out the window and you would offer them nothing but support. "

Dear Melissa,
Bob once had a female friend who was raped by her Priest. She had a f'ing good time with the sex, but the religious implications caused her some confusion. I had another female friend who asked to marry me, but her feminazi whining about "my rapist" was a real deal breaker. I had another female friend who's shrink gave her some created memories of "incestuous rape," called "recovered memories" in shrink talk. It destroyed her relationship with her family and took her many years to get over the harm the shrink had done. Over the years I have known several other women who were "raped" by the current feminazi legal definition: got dunk, got laid, had a hangover and regrets the next day. The best "support" a friend could give any of those women was to tell them to shape up, stop their whining, and get on with their lives. Rape is just sex with the man making the decisions this time. Other than hurt feelings it's not much of a big deal.

May 08, 2006 8:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: at one time, the White man had virtually unlimited power. He could rape, beat, control his wife, his children, servants, slaves, dogs, concubines. He had freedom to inflict as much pain upon others as he wished.

Nowadays, in the modern civilized world, that power has been drastically diminished.

May 12, 2006 4:07 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (May 12, 2006 4:07 PM)

I allowed your post so the world can see the kind of hate propaganda that racist feminazi are taught in "women's studies." Those racist, sexist LIES don't hold water around here. A VERY FEW white men in a VERY FEW places at a VERY FEW moments in history had power over other white men as well as others. So did a few women and men of other races in a few places and times. MOST white men as well as most othere men and women did not have such power, ever. You can take your racist sexist feminazi hate propagnada and stuff it up your ass. Lying hatemongering bigots like you make the world a much worse place for anyone to live.

May 12, 2006 7:24 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tomorrow is Mother's Day. Let us express our contempt for those females known as our Mother.

May 13, 2006 3:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Singapore must stop flogging men only. Call their embassy and demand they either eliminate flogging, or include women lawbreakers and rapists as well.


May 13, 2006 4:35 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (May 13, 2006 3:00 PM)

For the past couple of decades, news organizations around the US have run a week long series of anti-men hate articles every year on the week of Father's day. If we were to express hate of mothers on Mothers' Day it would be a small shadow of what the feminazi media has been doing to fathers for decades.

See Bob's article on The Myth of Motherly love

May 13, 2006 9:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, i found being raped to be very painful. Isn't my blood proof enough of pain?

May 15, 2006 1:08 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (May 15, 2006 1:08 AM)

You switch casually from "pain" to "blood" and back to "pain." Most women who talk of rape say "hurt" or "pain" when they mean that their feelings were hurt. You toss in "my blood" casually without description. Tell us, how does sexual penetration cause "blood" injury when the man forces it, but not when she wants it? Or, are you, like so many others, casually tossing in "blood" to exaggerate your injury? The world wants to know.

May 15, 2006 8:54 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob does not accept that the shedding of blood is usually related to pain having been inflicted.

Bob believes that forced sex (rape) is entirely about sex, which it is not. It is more an expression of a male's hatred for women, his violence, his desire for revenge, his inability to control himself.

If Bob could actually BE the victim, he would experience first-hand the pain, both physical and psychological, that is inflicted.

May 15, 2006 4:52 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (May 15, 2006 4:52 PM)

Hello? Women bleed, shed blood, all the time. It is hardly ever related to injury. Your rape-hate, "shedding of blood is usually related to pain having been inflicted," is absurd nonsense. Do you know anything about female anatomy at all?

Secondly, your standard rape-hate claim that rape is not about sex is another popular feminist lie. Those old tired feminazi hate propaganda lies hold no water here. Try them in your "women's studies" hate training class. I'm sure you will get a better reception from the femorrhoids.

And lastly, you speak of "psychological pain," in other words, hurt feelings. That's what Bob said in his blog page. So your feelings were hurt. Boo Hoo!

As a crime rape is usually worth a fine about the street price prostitution, about the cost of overtime parking. That is, when it was actually rape, which is very unlikely in about 94% of the claimed rapes.

May 15, 2006 6:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd like you to congratulate you on having the most unpleasant blogspot on the web. Well done. You have a lot of competition.

June 21, 2006 1:12 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (June 21, 2006 1:12 AM)

I just love it when the feminiazi have a hissy fit over reading the truth. Your century of repeating the same old tired lies don't make them true. You are wrong, and you are crazy. You already made Bobstruth:

June 21, 2006 12:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I worked on an ambulance for many years and responded to many (not all)of the "rape" calls (which appeared to me to be more of a way to "get back at" one of their baby daddies who she may have been angry with at the time) with THAT I can see where you are coming from, HOWEVER rape exists & psychological pain can be far worse than physical pain...for both women AND men. One particular rape case I'm going to share is that which happened to a doctor's family right in my town years back. About 5 burglars broke into his house, tied up the doctor, his wife & daughter. The 5 men proceeded to rape the wife and daughter in front of him. I have seen you skirt around other posts' questions, but I really want you to think and answer HONESTLY about these next 4 questions...even if not here, but answer them truthfully to yourself.

Are you married Bob

you have a daughter?

If so, do you think, as a MAN, you would be able to ever forgive those 5 men for the way they treated you and your family?

Would you rather watch this happen to your own female family members right in front of you as you sit there tied & helpless, or would you rather suffer a physical pain?

It doesn't seem to me that an act such as this would be for "sexual" reasons. It appears to me that this was a great act of disrespect.

June 25, 2006 7:35 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (June 25, 2006 7:35 PM)

First, Bob is not the topic of this blog. Whether or not Bob is married is irrelevant to the topic. Your question about Bob's personal life is a side step argument intended to obscure the meaning and validity of the truth about rape.

Second, your story shows that even with a gang bang rape the women's feelings were hurt but they were not significantly injured. On a quantitative basis their hurt feelings are probably equal to those of a man who is arrested and spends a night in jail for a false DV accusation, it happens to thousands of men every night in the US. Actually, the night in jail lasts much longer so it is quantitatively much worse.

As to what would be the less injury to a relative or any other female, an hour or two of discomfort is far preferable to any kind of physical injury.

Incidentally the story sounds fishy. In all my years of reading crime reports and university classes in criminal psychology I can't recall any actual cases of 5 men working together as burglars doing residential burglaries. It's always a 1 or infrequently 2 man operation. You report it as "some years back," not as a case you responded to as an ambulance driver. It is therefore obviously a misandrist urban legend designed to propagate the feminist rape-hate campaign. Before you demand "HONESTLY" answers you need to start with HONEST stories. Fictional hate propaganda like that crap you posted doesn't fly here.

And finally, yes gang bang rapes are done for sexual reasons. Posting phony rape-hate urban legend stories masquerading as real occurrences are acts of disrespect and those who repeat them deserve no respect.

June 25, 2006 8:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When I was 16 I went out on a date with a boy whom I thought was my best friend. He raped me, and I am permantly injured. I didn't understand why my 'period' wouldn't stop, and nothing was done about it untill I passed out the next day. I didn't report him, even under pressure because for one I was a coward, and for two my parents didn't want my reputation ruined. We just moved. You see when a waman gets turned on, her genital area fills with blood, just like what creates a man's hard on. It literally changes shape on the inside and the outside. He did not beat me, or anything like that but he did trap me and physicaly prevent me from getting away. My body was not prepared. and I was torn and damaged on the inside. I am not a man hater, I am a that guy hater for sure though. I don't eleive that a drunk man is any more responsible for sex then a drunk woman is. I also don't beleive that having consenting sex with a teenger is morally wrong. but I was raped, and To this day I simply can not have intercourse with a man because my insides are damaged from forced insertion. I cannnot have children, and I am not gay, so I am just non sexual. I can't even masturbate. This sucks. and you are just plain mean and heartless. I'm not whining all over the place or screaming for sympathy every damn minute, that day is long gone. but how can someone like me just get over it, and how could you say this boy was innocent and in the right? Yeah I would have put out had he waited untill I felt safe, but now I can never join in this popular sport, because my feelings weren't considered. I'm permanantly wreaked!

April 23, 2007 10:54 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (April 23, 2007 10:54 PM)
Why is it we don't believe you? 1) 16 year old virgins are fucked every day without suffering permanent sterility. 2) Getting "turned on" does not make physical differences other than lubrication. Without lubrication penetration is difficult or impossible, hence lubrication if penetration. 3) Some virgins suffer some tearing but their cunts are not permanently destroyed. 4) It is almost impossible for a man to penetrate a woman who seriously resists, hence you didn't seriosuly resist. 5) The average age for women to begin doing sex is 14.9 years. A 16 year old woman who gets laid is not a family shame so the family doesn't move away. 6) If you haven't gotten laid since your first time its not because of your first time.

Sorry Toots, that same old crap doesn't fly here. You obviously have the that "my rapist" story well rehearsed. Boo Fucking Hoo!

April 24, 2007 7:09 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

NOte to "James":
YOur comment had a couple of interesting thoughts, but it was loaded with ad-hominem insults, feminazi hate dogma, and irrational nonsense. The ad-hominems are right out of the 1960s feminist standard hate speech list of insults, old, tired, and pathetic. You claim to be a "man" but you write like a feminazi cunt. If you want any of your thoughts to be posted on The Truth According to Bob please read Bob's rules for comments and act accordingly.

September 25, 2007 6:18 AM  
Anonymous James said...

Bob, I apologize for my previous post. I admit I may have been a bit over zealous and should not have attacked certain people with it.
However, I still stand by what I said before. I a male, and I can honestly say that I do not mind women being equal to me in society. And on the subject of rape, I really think you just need to sit down and think about it man. Seriously, whether you still semi-support or not, you have to admit that rape will hurt women. Like previously stated in this thread, most of the women here have been seriously injured physically, and if not that, mentaly.
Being stabbed is definetly grounds to claim that you have been hurt in my opinion.
I think we live in a new society bob. I'm not sure why you don't support the growth of equal society, but I think it is the most beneficial thing for everyone. Women are just as good at men at everything, if given the proper training.
This whole crusade you have against women almost reminds me of racism and the KKK. You seem to be very sexist against women, and I wonder how you feel about other races? Imagine, if you will, how the African-Americans felt during the civil rights era. Whites murdered, terrorized, beat, raped, and scorned them for the color of their skin. I think that this is what you are doing to women (though not as extreme of course, and hopefuly all on the interweb).You seem to think they are lesser beings than men because of the geometry of their chest and crotch.
Now, to be fair, I do agree with some things you say Bob. Yes, their are insane crazy "feminozzi bitches" out there that plauge our world with the belief that men will be our doom. But if you think abut it, most people are normal. There aren't that many extremeists out there. Also, I think some of the laws such as affirmative action and such, are a bit unfair to men in some cases (though my knowledge on this matter is signifigantly less).
Bob, I am an advocate of peace (save for the occasional violent post =P). I do not believe in the war we are in now (America). I don't like to get into big arguments with people. I like peace. I think one of the first steps to getting world peace is to get over eachothers differences, and have love toward your fellow men and women.

But back to this thread, and the closing of my rant. Bob, plain and simple, rape hurts. I have never raped or been raped, but seriously, just think about it. Please.

I think everyone can change Bob, I hope my post has some kind of positive change on your views.

September 27, 2007 4:31 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to James: You have the feminazi "victim" hate lies memorized. You compare rape to "being stabbed" but that's a fraudulent comparison. Female sex organs are functioning in their normal designed and intended purposed during rape. Sex is not a wounding for a woman any more than for a man. Ra[e os a very strong and persistant sexual fantasy of women. One raped woman categorized it as, "The best sex I ever had." A young Catholic female I dated had been a virgin when she was raped by her priest. She loved the sex even though she was confused by the theological contradictions. Rape crisis centers counselor training instructs phone answerers on how to convince raped females that they are "hormed" even after they had a fucking good time being raped.

Hate mongering feminists know that there are no actual injuries from rape, so they make up invisible pretended "mental" injures, cry salty tears, and spew hate against men. Pathetic wusses like you, James, haven't the balls to stand up to any whiny female.

You mention "equality," James, but the hate you recite is about female domination of sex and familes, the antithisis of equality. There is hope for you, James, but you need to grow some balls first, and take a real look at all that feminazi hate dogma you've been forced to learn.

September 27, 2007 7:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

how bout i put a gun to your head and make you suck my dick? you won't experience any physical pain so it's not a crime.

December 16, 2009 9:33 AM  
Blogger Christopher said...

This whole topic seems very awkward to me. Animals have somewhat random sex and are directed by their hormones.

Humans can think and realize that it isn't nice to force someone to do something they don't want to in order to make themselves happy. Unfortunately hormones are pretty strong and if you become addicted to a certain behavior it can be hard to break it.

IMO it's wrong to cause someone else pain in order to make yourself happy, but this applies to a lot more then rape. This is just a general rule in life. If you can't control sexual urges I suggest going to porn websites and pretending instead of hurting someone else.

A lot of human life is being healthy mentally. Not many people are healthy because most of us are very selfish and society in most parts of the world promote this selfishness. A lot of us are also very lazy and are never taught and discipline by our parents growing up.

Perhaps one day humans will learn to control their emotions better and care more about each other as a whole. One can hope.

August 11, 2010 11:39 AM  
Anonymous Mandy!XD said...

By this argument, then, most crimes aren't really crimes.

After all, if you are mugged, beaten, and your money is stolen, it benefits them.

And your money doesn't really matter anyway because you'll earn more.

October 22, 2010 10:05 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to readers:
You can't fix stupid.

October 22, 2010 11:32 AM  
Blogger khani said...

I like this blog, good luck ..! also visit hotel in bandung or nikon digital camera cases

October 22, 2010 11:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am amazed to read your comments Bob. Amazed that I totally agree. I have long held these views, and to myself questioned this whole 'rape' furphy amd found the wuole thing to be a crock of shit. But I have never had the courage to verbalize them thinking I would be crucified. What you say makes 100% sense to me.
Keep it up!

June 26, 2011 11:49 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Please review Bob's Comment Rules in the left column of The World According to Bob

October 14, 2011 4:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob you are the man. These bitches fuck any guy they "like" and even have fatherless children because the attraction of said male is justifiable. Bitches are dumb. ( p. s. I would never" rape "anyone)

June 10, 2013 5:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home