The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

The Myth of pedophiles

On a men's issue discussion some feminist trained nomind posted a comment about men who are attracted to young women calling them by the feminist lie, "pedophiles." It occurred to Bob that we are constantly bombarded with feminazi fiction about young women and normal men who are normally attracted to them. Today's discussion aims to separate the cowshit from the sow manure, the misandry from criminal acts, and bring some sense about the hundreds of thousands of normal men who have been falsely accused and persecuted.

Let's look at who is and who isn't a "pedophile."
From Dictionary.com
ped·o·phile n. An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children.
child n. A person between birth and puberty


Females who have past their age of puberty are no longer children. In fact they have entered into their primary breeding years during which they are most able, physically, to bear and raise children. For all of human history until feminism young women were recognized as eligible to marry, and their families began helping them to find good husbands. Many religions, Jewish, Catholic, Islam, Protestant, etc., still hold "coming of age" rites for young women after they pass puberty. But now, instead of recognizing them as mature adults, their feminist trained families continue to treat them like children. Instead of being allowed to marry and get on with their lives, they are kept confined in state institutions, schools, for several more years. Young women are prevented from following their very strong natural desires for a husband and children. Many young women rebel against their mother who is preventing them from what they most want to do. It has become an axiom that teenage daughters are problems for parents. Of course they are. Their basic biological needs are benig blocked by force. A widely published major study reported that female fertility begins to decline after age 26 and declines rapidly after age 30. Feminist trained young women now believe that they shouldn't marry until age 28 to 30, after their primary fertility years are past. Feminists, controlled by dried up lesbian hate mongers, hate marriage, they hate young women whom they are jealous of, and they hate normal loving families. They have succeeded in creating huge disruption in the lives of normal young women.

The young women's lives aren't the worst evil that the feminazi lesbian hate mongers have wrought. Normal young men who are normally biologically attracted young women of baby making age are called "criminal pedophiles," and "sexual predators," and sent to prison. After years in hell hole prisons the normal young men are now "registered" as "sexual predators" for the rest of their lives. They become outcasts, unable to live decent normal lives in our communities. Feminazi TV propaganda hate teams broadcast reports about "sexual predators" in our communities. Gangs of blue gun thugs, the feminazi army, hound them relentlessly. Anti-men lies and hate oozes from TV news as they drool their lies and hate into our living rooms. And the mindless masses end up believeing the feminazi hate propaganda, like the man who posted on the men's group mentioned above.

Are there actual pedophiles? Maybe. According to psychobabble merchants there are. But actual pedophiles are very rare. A man biologically attracted to a female who is in the middle of her biological breeding years is the most normal man. He is not a "pedophile." Those LIES are nothing but evil feminazi hate.

Is there such a thing as a "sexual predator"? Hardly. The term has no actual meaning. It is used to impugn, to spew misandry, to claim that a man who is attractive to women is like a carnivorous animal. The term totally disregards the women's role in being sexually attracted to the man. Feminazi always blame the nearest man for whatever the hell women do. When a woman spends half a day putting on "war paint" and making herself "attractive," and succeeds in attracting a man, somehow he's a "sexual predator." A young woman of child bearing years who is following her natural instincts and seducing normal men, whoring, has not been "raped" except in the tormented hate filled minds of feminazi and their army of blue gun thugs. In a sane world her parents and society would be helping her to find a decent husband and life instead of pushing her toward whoring and seduction without marriage. Instead of attacking the normal man, who is concurrently deprived of available women for a wife, the society ought to place blame where blame belongs, on the feminazi and the feminazi trained family of the young woman who drive her to whore by prevented her from having a decent life.

Whenever you see TV talking heads spewing hate about "sexual predators" you know you are listening to one of the most vile kinds of misandry. You know you are not listening to decent honest people because they are lying scum broadcasting hate. Whenever you find someone who writes or says "pedophile" you know you have found another feminazi trained misandrist hate monger who believes that young women shouldn't marry or have children, and that normal men are criminals.

What can you do? You can phone the TV stations and let the management know that you object to their anti-men, anti-family hate mongering. You can object to hate mongers who you see in person or on discussions. You can talk to your friends who have daughters about helping them to marry when their bodies are ready instead of being caged like animals for another decade. Together MEN can win back our society.

31 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've often wondered if much of that moral outrage is fueled by jealousy and rejection because older women cannot compete regardless of how much make-up they buy or how much they spend on plastic surgery.

Maybe being 'all that' happens once in a girls life and industries depended on the pursuit of that pedophilic dream validate her feelings as being unfair or immoral rather then allowing her to get on with her life.

Maybe youthful beauty is natures deceit to reproduce and proponents capitalize on natures' disposition to promote misunderstanding.

Maybe courts and social services mistakenly uphold that 'outrage' without due consideration, perhaps undermining their credibility and ability to influence in the process. Maybe even mistakenly contribute to the real nasty stuff, the stuff that needs to be stomped out, by promoting fallacy.

There is an unhealthy obsession of image. With beauty products shaming women into malcontent consumers every three seconds on the tele, it's little wonder where all the bitterness comes from.

July 26, 2006 11:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you want an interesting insight into the Feminist mentality, read the account of attending the recent 40th anniversary of NOW on the Independent Women's Forum. She Allison states emphatically that the Speakers who were there for supporting Younger Women. Were in Fact Rude, Obnoxious, vulgar,domineering, and crude.

They acted angry, like Grumpy old Men. And they flatly stated Women were Superior to Men. So much for equality. They are interested in Dominance Equality be damned. Aging ugly over the hill Skanks and Attention Whores.

July 26, 2006 1:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If it weren't for feminism's mental and legal stranglehold on society, teenage girls could and probably would settle down to marriage and one partner -a husband- instead of spending those years racking up any number of sex partners, abortions, and diseases.

July 26, 2006 3:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you thought, marriages of young girls actually could occur.

Why does the Law always have to know about it?

If you are isolated enough in your own religious community (like remote Utah), how would the law find out? Do they have the time and manpower to snoop?

July 26, 2006 3:58 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Anonymous said, "Have you thought, marriages of young girls actually could occur."

Your feeble attempt to twist the discussion into feminazi hate won't work, bitch. Nobody here is talking about "girls" being married. The discussion is about women being allowed to marry and begin their families during their primary biological baby making years. You can cram your hateful sowshit up your arse.

July 26, 2006 6:51 PM  
Blogger Tony Sclafani said...

I assume this post was in response to Christie Brinkley's husband, why hooked up with a 19-year-old. They're calling him a pedophile. This is bizarre beyond words -- they're defining 19-year-old women as children.

Of course, when it's a 14-year-old who wants an abortion without parental consent, the feminists believe she is an "adult."

July 30, 2006 6:52 PM  
Anonymous jay c said...

Preach it, Bob! God's standard for a marriagable young woman as expressed in the Torah and prophecy throughout the Bible is the completion of puberty. (Not just menses, BTW, but grown, filled out, and able to bear children.)

We might not see eye to eye on all the details, but you are definitely going on my blogroll.

August 02, 2006 3:32 PM  
Anonymous C said...

Men who enjoy being with young women are virile and healthy with their personal choice.

Old women are just jealous and angry,
ugly and unfeminine/lesbians.

Its easy to spot anger, fear and aggression from these foaming at the mouth lesbians in denial.

August 04, 2006 11:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said, "Have you thought, marriages of young girls actually could occur."

Bob, I think this man was on your side and trying to provide a helpful suggestion. Why not indeed?
Way to attack one of your own... that seems a tiny bit paranoid.

August 06, 2006 1:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"C" states:

"Old women are just jealous and angry, ugly and unfeminine/lesbians."

A bitter, emotional statement.

You mean ALL old women? :)

How many of these people has C actually interviewed?

Or does s/he live in a windowless basement, never interacting with normal folks?


"Its easy to spot anger, fear and aggression from these foaming at the mouth lesbians in denial."

Wishful thinking. But another bitter, irrational view.

"C" probably refers to intelligent people with guts to stand up to those who'd rescind Civil Rights.

Anyone who'd push women back to the Dark Ages, is a dangerous person who SHOULD be confronted.

Sure, men should have their rights. Sure, men's problems should be solved. But solutions never lie in pushing others back. You don't help men by hurting women.

Men, women, Black, White, all races and religions, have a problem with people like C.

Our "anger" is justifiable anger. Our concerns about your worldview are valid.

If anyone is aggressive and foaming, it's the author of this Blog and his angry, miserable lackeys.

Gosh - realize how long Bob has been writing this? Posting in cyberspace?

Day after day. Year after year.

Getting nowhere - just wallowing in his misery like a tired old guy spinning his wheels in the mud. Meanwhile life goes on and happy young women get PhDs.

A man who dreams of the Dark Ages; a man who can't write without spewing toilet-words like Cunt, Bitch, Pussy --- that's the one to label "aggressive and foaming".

August 08, 2006 5:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The JonBenet Ramsey murder case (however it will be solved), will focus on attraction to pretty young females.

Were she alive today at age 16, the Ramsey girl would be a beauty that many would desire as a trophy.

August 18, 2006 3:13 PM  
Anonymous C said...

All that matters is whether I am proved right or wrong.

Ameri-con women spend their whole lives wasting away trying to "prove themselves" to their own proverbial wall. Then when they are past 23 yrs old and still pounding sand at college
getting that good for nothing expensive piece of toilet paper called a PHD they find out they can not be helpmates to any man because men do not want old women in denial for any thing.

Enoch 96:12 I have sworn to you, ye sinners, that neither mountain nor hill has been nor should be a servant to woman (Gen. 3:16-17 - women's liberation CONDEMNED).
96:13 Neither in this way has your crime been sent down upon Earth, but men of their own heads have invented it; and greatly shall those who give it (women's liberation) efficiency be CURSED.
96:14 Barrenness (infertility) shall not be previously inflicted on woman; but on account of the work of her hands shall she die childless (as a punishment - Deut. 28:18).

August 18, 2006 10:30 PM  
Anonymous C said...

I just want to tell this woman that she missed the point and it's not my fault she has no capacity to understand what the topic is about.

Here is one of the most important tips: ignore what women say, and watch what they do.

August 18, 2006 10:47 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Anonymous (August 18, 2006 3:13 PM) said...
"The JonBenet Ramsey murder case (however it will be solved), will focus on attraction to pretty young females."

The JonBenet case demonstrates several glaring examples of what is wrong with modern society. Little JonBenet was, at 6 years old, working as a model dressed up like a woman and participating in "beauty" contests held for girls her age. Her mother was sick, abusing a daughter in a role that the mother was too ugly to have succeeded in. The organizers and the whole children pretending to be women program was a perversion of reality.

The media feeding frenzy is sick, run by sick talking head bitches, viewed by sick female media gossip whores who never get enough violent sexual innuendo.

The law is sick. The man who did her in, whomever he was, didn't even get into her cunt. She was apparently too tight and inexperienced even to get fucked despite the high heels and excessive makeup. Once he had tried and failed to fuck the virgin pretending to be a woman, and had instead cum in her pants, he had to kill her because the law would have roasted him alive and made the rest of his life intolerable. He was required by law to eliminate her as a witness. It's all backward. Fucking a young whore, and JonBenet paraded before the public as a whore, should not be a serious crime, a $20 fine might be fair. It’s really a shame she was too tight, the little trollop would have enjoyed a good fucking.

So another Hitllary voter bit the dust. BFD! No loss there. Now they should send the perverts in the media and the Injustice system out for psychological help and forget the whole thing. One less whore is no loss to anyone.

August 30, 2006 7:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"It’s really a shame she was too tight, the little trollop would have enjoyed a good fucking"


Bob:

Why do you believe a 6 year old child would "enjoy" sex with a grown man?

And why call JonBenet a "whore"? Do you actually believe she had the mind, and free will, of an adult at age 6?

Is it possible the man who raped and murdered her could have CONTROLLED HIMSELF? And simply NOT broken into the house and done the deed?

August 30, 2006 7:02 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (August 30, 2006 7:02 PM)

1. JonBenet spent her time dressed as an adult whore and paraded herself as a whore in "beauty" contests. She was painted and dressed to appear as an adult and flaunted herself as a sexual female. Your conjecture as to why she did so does not alter the facts of what she did and how she presented herself to the world as a painted whore. Her mother likely bears much responsibility for converting the girl into a whore as such a young age. But, of course, no one in this feminazi society will blame a female for any abuse they do to children. Most of the blame for the eventual end of JonBenet is the responsibility of her mother, regardless of who actually ended her life.

2. Many children start masturbating even before being born, according to ultrasound observations. Many children of 6 years old enjoy sexual stimulation and often masturbate. The function of sex organs, to provide pleasure from being rubbed, is not age dependent. A girl who spends her time parading herself as a painted adult whore is very likely to enjoy sexual contact with a man. It is the nature of bodies and sexual rubbing to feel good and provide enjoyment regardless of circumstances.

3. Your comment about "controlled himself" demonstrates your very offensive feminist hate. You imply that any man who fails to act as you would control him has not "controlled himself." That's only your hate mongering demand to control and dominate men. You are NOT in control of real men, bitch. A MAN who acts outside your control has not failed to control himself. He has instead, rejected your control and domination of him. Real men reject the control and domination of hate mongering females like you and your feminazi Gestapo.

August 31, 2006 8:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why are there laws prohibiting adults from grabbing and using children for sex pleasure?

Have you asked any child if s/he enjoyed having a man insert his penis into them?

August 31, 2006 3:52 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (August 31, 2006 3:52 PM)

Women of all ages enjoy sex, which for females is having their sex organs rubbed with a male organ. Girls who have freedom and knowledge of sex frequently seek out sex with men. The term "sexualized" is sometimes used to refer to girls who know that sex is enjoyable. It is well documented in psychological and sociological texts.

The current anti-sex, anti-men hate culture works hard to prevent girls and young women from having either the knowledge of sex, or the freedom to practice sex. They hate the thought that someone, somewhere might be enjoying their lives. Pleasure becomes criminal.

August 31, 2006 7:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So JonBenet would have enjoyed the sex with the man who broke into her house?

September 01, 2006 3:44 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (September 01, 2006 3:44 PM)

JonBenet paraded herself around the country painted and dressed as a painted up whore. Whether or not she actually enjoyed sex with men as most females do is irrelevant to the life she lived and how she died. She flaunted female sexuality in her life. One less Hitllary voter is hardly worth anyone's concern one way or the other. One little trollop gone. Boo fucking Hoo!

September 01, 2006 4:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Women of all ages enjoy sex, which for females is having their sex organs rubbed with a male organ. "

"Rubbed" is the key word.

"Male organ" can be substituted with a thousand (far better) things.

September 02, 2006 4:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"JonBenet paraded herself around the country painted and dressed as a painted up whore."

She was a child of six. She had no idea what she was doing. Adults in her life dressed her and told her to perform. It was not of her own free will. Get it?

"Whether or not she actually enjoyed sex with men as most females do"

No female enjoys a psychopath's VIOLENCE, especially a 6 yr old CHILD. How selfish can a "man" be?

" is irrelevant to the life she lived and how she died."

It is entirely relevant.

Her life was at times too stressful, too public, for a normal 6 year old. But not "wrong" as such. She was a nice kid who would have become a decent productive adult.

She died because some selfish "man" behaved as an out of control barbarian. Her death was MURDER, something you advocate.

"She flaunted female sexuality in her life."

Thought you liked that. Remember?

"One less Hitllary voter is hardly worth anyone's concern one way or the other."

She would have voted Republican.


"One little trollop gone."

One human being gone, and a worthless little killer-man free to kill again.

September 02, 2006 4:21 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (September 02, 2006 4:21 PM)

1. Why JonBenet paraded herself around the country as a painted whore changes the facts of her life not at all.

2. Many females do greatly enjoy forced rape, according to counselor's guides at rape crisis centers. Orgasms during rape are fairly common. Body parts don't know or care who choose to do the sex.

3. A little trollop bit the dust. Boo Hoo. Now if the misandrist anti-men hate monger talking heads on the media would shut up instead of pandering to child-sex, violence, and hate.

September 02, 2006 4:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not sure why a grown man would rape a 6 yr old girl, when he could break into a dorm and rape a grown woman.

Anybody?

September 02, 2006 5:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Any man who'd mock and slander a murdered child, is an inhuman monster.

September 03, 2006 3:42 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (September 03, 2006 3:42 PM)

Sanity is recognition of reality. Insanity is denying reality. Recognizing the facts of JonBenet's life, her participation in parades of girls pretending to be adult whores, is sanity.

What is really sick is a parent who would display a child as an adult female whore, dress her up and paint her up and parade her around the country, That is really sick. What is really insane is to do all that and not expect that men would be attracted to what she is pretending to be. The mother of JonBenet, and all the other adults involved in the child-whore "beauty" contests are abusive nut jobs. By contrast, a man who is attracted to a female being displayed in the guise of an adult whore is NORMAL. The term "pedophile" does not correctly apply to men attracted to females appearing to be adult.

September 04, 2006 6:48 AM  
Anonymous C said...

Sanity is recognition of/understanding reality/the truth.

Insanity is (actively) denying reality/believing in lies.

That's all there is to it.

Short and simple.

September 08, 2006 8:20 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to C
You have described religion and government as insanity. You could be right.

October 21, 2006 7:34 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I bit over the top in the comments, but nothing compared to shit feminazi media pumps out every day.

Excellent blog! I will actually bookmark this.

October 30, 2006 2:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob,

I am having difficulty understanding your comments about JonBenet.

In your earlier writing, you have talked about men and women, males and females who have completed puberty.

I agree with your description of how JonBennet was presented, and so I consider her mother to be a criminal of the worst sort.

Although she was presented as a whore woman by an adult criminal in an event created and run by adult criminals, JonBenet was still an innocent child.

And it would have been immediately obvious to the criminal who murdered her and tried to rape her that she was a child who was not even close to entering puberty.

JonBenet was obeying her parents and interpreting her environment and her behavior through the understanding of a six year old. She didn't style herself as a whore (or even understand what that means) and, to her, being in a "child beauty pageant" (whore exhibit) was the same as being in an age-appropriate elementary school play.

It was not possible for her to "lift herself up by her own bootstraps" and give herself the understanding at age six that she could only acquire by living and learning for many more years.

Would you please clarify your earlier comments?

Thank you.

March 09, 2008 7:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's evident we live in a so-called "civilized", yet highly punitive society where we incarcerate people for little or no reason. Statistically, the local and federal governments prosecute and incarcerate more people here in the United States than in the People's Republic of China. That's a frighting notion! The Framers of the Constitution would vomit in disgust if they were around today. Here's a quote from one of our founding fathers that seems to allude our contemporary public servants...

With all [our] blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people? Still one thing more, fellow citizens--a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain [people] from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities. --Thomas Jefferson

It's evident that our elected officials and appointed public "servants" pander to special interest groups rather than adhere to our sacred Constitution, which was designed to preserve our personal and civil liberties. The criminals aren't two consenting adults copulating in a private environment, rather, the true criminals are special interest groups drunk from their consolidation of power. They primarily include social conservatives (the Religious Right) and feminist extremists. Such groups wish to impose their subjective moral principles upon the American People, thus we incarcerate individuals for so-called "crimes" at the expense of tax-payers.

Disagree?

Please read this article, title "Feminist Gulag" ... http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/culture/family/2705-feminist-gulag-no-prosecution-necessary

Here's an example to support the article's claims ... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/17/hofstra-gang-rape-hoax-st_n_289774.html

July 24, 2010 11:46 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home