Scandal or no scandal
So lets compare the Foley case with that of Democratic faggot Congressman Gerry Studds.
Instead of just sending suggestive e-mail like Foley, Studds was openly having a sexual affair with a 17 year old page, humping him in the arse and all the sordid, sick rump rider sexual filth. And did the Democrats get upset. Nope. Studds didn't resign. The Democratic Speaker of the House didn't ask him to resign, nor hold hearings, nor evict him from his seat. His Democratic district reelected him to several more terms so the sick faggot could continue riding the rumps of teenage pages. Innocent young men had gone to Washington hoping to learn about our government, and what they learned was to bend over for Congressional power up their rears.
Once again the raging hypocrisy of the major media and liberal Congresscreeps is flauted for all to see. No telling how loud they would have screamed if Rep Faggot Foley had acted like Dem Faggot Studds and actually humped a page's ass.
Once again we learn that there are no moral values in Congress. Moral outrage is totally dependent on who's ass is getting reamed.
3 Comments:
In a sense, Crane was done in by the feminist movement.
The Congressional Page program started way back in the early 1800s, when local young men were hired as messengers for members of Congress.
Females were allowed in the page program starting in 1970 - around the time the feminist movement and the push for "gender equality" started to take off in American society.
Barring women from traditional male roles prevented (or at least, greatly reduced) the possibility of temptation and scandal on the part of male public officials.
Had they still been barred, Dan Crane very likely wouldn't have been involved with a teenage girl - a female page, who herself admitted she was more to blame than he was.
They gave Studds a standing ovation.
Just what were men doing in 1970 about this Second Wave insanity among their female "peers"?
Post a Comment
<< Home