Most of what everyone knows is backwards.
A few decades ago a feminazi writer pointed out a basic truth of human nature, most of what "everybody knows" is not only wrong, its backwards. The stuff that people take for granted all the time is often more than just in error, it is opposite of the truth. For example, everyone "knows" that "police protect citizens." Not so. In a SCOTUS case with briefs from blue gun thugs from all across America, SCOTUS ruled that blue gun thugs do not protect anyone. That is not their job, their business, nor responsibility. Backwards.
Everybody knows that a good education will prepare you for success in life. Not so. What passes for "education" today is training in zombie like regimentation. It destroys your initiative and creativity and prepares you for a life of mediocre struggling instead of success. Backwards.
Everybody knows that women should wait until their mid-twenties to marry, after college. Not so. By her middle twenties her biological fertility is already declining and her psychological ability to bond with a husband to form a strong family has been seriously diminished. Backwards.
Everybody knows that women were the "victims" of evil "Patriarchy" for thousands of years. Not so. For thousands of years women have been pandered to, provided for, protected from the violence of war and the risks of daily work. Backwards.
How do all these backward myths get into our beliefs? Because we are taught them as children, like Santa Clause or the Tooth Fairy. They are repeated so often as "truth" and never questioned that unlike Santa Clause we go on believing them. Many people still believe in Santa Claus deep down too, even while they know that its just a children's myth. We are told, we are taught, our media assumes the knowledge that "everyone knows," and it goes on and on.
How, you might ask does a thinking man ferret out the truth in a world where myth is dominant. Well, its not easy. One technique is to try to catch the underlying myth of some news story or statement. What assumption is it based on. Once you have identified a blief that "everyone knows" try turning it inside oud and backwards. If the news story is based on the belief, for example, that fathers beat and abuse their children, try reversing it and see where that would lead. Assume for a moment that fathers protect their children. Is "fathers protect children" consistent with reality more than "fathers abuse children"? Many studies and huge mountains of real life data shows that children in two parent families, those children living with their fathers, suffer much less child abuse than children living only with their mothers or with mother and her latest fuck. Can it be that fathers really do protect children from abusive mothers and their otherwise sordid lives? Keep the reverse of what "everyone knows" in mind for a while, comparing it to facts and physical reality instead of myths. Most of the time the backward assumption fits real life and real facts much closer than the myth that "everyone knows." There is no such person as Santa Clause. Time to get over the children's myths they taught you in school.
Everybody knows that a good education will prepare you for success in life. Not so. What passes for "education" today is training in zombie like regimentation. It destroys your initiative and creativity and prepares you for a life of mediocre struggling instead of success. Backwards.
Everybody knows that women should wait until their mid-twenties to marry, after college. Not so. By her middle twenties her biological fertility is already declining and her psychological ability to bond with a husband to form a strong family has been seriously diminished. Backwards.
Everybody knows that women were the "victims" of evil "Patriarchy" for thousands of years. Not so. For thousands of years women have been pandered to, provided for, protected from the violence of war and the risks of daily work. Backwards.
How do all these backward myths get into our beliefs? Because we are taught them as children, like Santa Clause or the Tooth Fairy. They are repeated so often as "truth" and never questioned that unlike Santa Clause we go on believing them. Many people still believe in Santa Claus deep down too, even while they know that its just a children's myth. We are told, we are taught, our media assumes the knowledge that "everyone knows," and it goes on and on.
How, you might ask does a thinking man ferret out the truth in a world where myth is dominant. Well, its not easy. One technique is to try to catch the underlying myth of some news story or statement. What assumption is it based on. Once you have identified a blief that "everyone knows" try turning it inside oud and backwards. If the news story is based on the belief, for example, that fathers beat and abuse their children, try reversing it and see where that would lead. Assume for a moment that fathers protect their children. Is "fathers protect children" consistent with reality more than "fathers abuse children"? Many studies and huge mountains of real life data shows that children in two parent families, those children living with their fathers, suffer much less child abuse than children living only with their mothers or with mother and her latest fuck. Can it be that fathers really do protect children from abusive mothers and their otherwise sordid lives? Keep the reverse of what "everyone knows" in mind for a while, comparing it to facts and physical reality instead of myths. Most of the time the backward assumption fits real life and real facts much closer than the myth that "everyone knows." There is no such person as Santa Clause. Time to get over the children's myths they taught you in school.
posted by Bob | Tuesday, November 28, 2006
10 Comments:
"You must unlearn what you have learned.."
That is what Yoda tells Luke in The Empire Strikes Back; that the way most people see things is based on gut-reactions or worse: assumptions, not the way it really is, but backwards, upside-down and wrong!
"You must unlearn what you have learned.."
Just ponder that for a while and let it sink in to appriciate it.
"You must unlearn what you have learned.."
Indeed. It's what men must do today - such as unlearning the assumption that men must accept women's rights in order to live as free men.
- Or the assumption that it is evil for men to control women's behavior.
- Or the assumption that the only possible way for men to love women and treat them humanely is to unconditionally grant women the power to inflict harm and destroy men (i.e., women's rights).
- Or the assumption that women are blameless, harmless, and innocent in their treatment of men - a key assumption of women's rights.
- Or the flip side of that assumption: that men are inherently abusive and guilty in their treatment of women - another key assumption of women's rights.
- Or the assumption that the goal of women's rights is virtuous and morally good.
Whether these assumptions are true or not... that's another question.
What men choose to believe virtually becomes truth itself.
They can choose to believe without question what women (and their feminized, castrated male allies) tell them is true. And then that belief becomes the basis of women's rights.
But when men start to consider what women's rights has actually done to men, the infallibility of that belief starts to crack immediately.
And if men consider it long enough, it crumbles altogether.
Note to Anonymous: (Tue, 5 Dec 2006 04:21:22 -0800)
I deleted your comment because you are too stupid to post anything sensible. It was just a list of 3rd grade name calling, so typical of mindless idiots like you. Among other nonsense you said, "Well, I have to go. I'm gonna go get head from my incredibly hot girlfriend, kiss her, then make her breakfast in the morning."
You are shacking up with an unmarried slut, and haven't the balls to insist that she does the cooking in your home. If you ever grow some balls and become a man let us know. It is unlikely. You haven't the mental capacity to understand how pathetic you are.
Bob, celebrate Marc Lepine Day 12/6. He is in a blissful paradise with his lord, where he will know no more pain or sadness such as he experienced here.
We know Marc Lepine was a son any parent would be proud of.
It is well with his soul for eternity.
http://www.cyberhymnal.org/htm/i/t/i/itiswell.htm
Women's rights (human rights for all human beings) has harmed NO ONE.
If you really wanted to destroy women's civil rights, you would have done so already. Or be in the process of accomplishing that.
Instead, Bob, C, Pete et al. have sat at their desks, writing blogs, whining, griping, slinging obscene insults for over half a century.
On the other hand, Women and Minorities ACCOMPLISHED their goals. And they don't sit behind ANONYMOUS blogs, whining. Every feminist writer, in fact, has come out in the open, identified herself in print and on tv, and promoted her views. And gotten things done!
Not Bob et al. They have FAILED to turn this nation back to the days of patriarchy (pre-20th century).
Utterly FAILED.
Note to Aonymous (December 10, 2006 5:36 PM)
Thanks for the demonstration. All that feminazi propaganda crap that you and your slime sisters believe is not only wrong, its backwards. Thanks for posting such fine examples.
Female Anonymous said: (December 10, 2006 5:36 PM)
"Women's rights (human rights for all human beings) has harmed NO ONE.
If you really wanted to destroy women's civil rights, you would have done so already. Or be in the process of accomplishing that.
Instead, Bob, C, Pete et al. have sat at their desks, writing blogs, whining, griping, slinging obscene insults for over half a century.
On the other hand, Women and Minorities ACCOMPLISHED their goals. And they don't sit behind ANONYMOUS blogs, whining. Every feminist writer, in fact, has come out in the open, identified herself in print and on tv, and promoted her views. And gotten things done!
Not Bob et al. They have FAILED to turn this nation back to the days of patriarchy (pre-20th century).
Utterly FAILED."
Gentlemen:
A person who talks like this is not deserving or worthy of rights. The proper punishment for a childish, spiteful creature like her is to take away her freedoms and regulate her behavior with stern discipline and threats of punitive action if she chooses not to behave like a respectful, courteous lady.
Unfortunately, she has women's rights - and thus she is protected (by the police) from proper punishment and discipline. Women's rights in fact reinforces a woman's childish, irrational, psychotic behavior.
Let's cut the nonsense, men: women are not worthy of possessing rights, because they are naturally self-centered creatures who have no protective instinct for the welfare of men. This is the key to understanding why women ultimately cannot handle responsible behavior. Nor can they be allowed to handle such behavior. They are second-rate, inferior creatures, pathetically helpless and forever dependent on man's strength, wits, and intelligence to survive in the world.
And a man who knows all this, but yet still believes a woman is "equal" to men and advocates giving her the same freedoms and choices as men, is stupid and emasculated, an utterly disgusting failure as a man.
Do you men advocate granting children "equal" status as adults? I'm sure a clever lawyer could come up with a well-written, rational argument in support of such nonsense. But you men would find such a notion so obviously ridiculous, even if an argument could be made.
IOW, it was ultimately your CHOICE as men to decide that children not be treated as equals to adults. The power lies with you men. The choice comes down to knowing what is in your best interests as MEN.
Female Anonymous said: (December 10, 2006 5:36 PM)
"Women's rights (human rights for all human beings) has harmed NO ONE.
If you really wanted to destroy women's civil rights, you would have done so already. Or be in the process of accomplishing that.
Instead, Bob, C, Pete et al. have sat at their desks, writing blogs, whining, griping, slinging obscene insults for over half a century.
On the other hand, Women and Minorities ACCOMPLISHED their goals. And they don't sit behind ANONYMOUS blogs, whining. Every feminist writer, in fact, has come out in the open, identified herself in print and on tv, and promoted her views. And gotten things done!
Not Bob et al. They have FAILED to turn this nation back to the days of patriarchy (pre-20th century).
Utterly FAILED."
Gentlemen:
This low, repulsive, worthless woman has no argument to back up her assertion that "women's rights has harmed no one." And neither does she try to back it up.
Do you really believe what this desperate, hate-filled woman is telling you? That "women's rights has harmed no one"?
In fact, women's rights by its very nature is nothing less than a direct assault on masculinity. Because what makes men who they are is their natural masculine role as authority figures over women.
But then, women who support women's rights don't care anything about you. Your freedoms, your well-being, your desire, your hopes - NOTHING.
And the reason they don't care is that you are men.
Listen to the voice of this woman. Look at what she wrote. She hates men with a fierce passion.
And what's more, she is actually quite representative of Anglosphere (US, UK, Australia) women - probably the most detestable, worthless creatures currently on the planet.
She takes sadistic pleasure taunting you men for your powerlessness to stop a woman from exercising her "women's rights" - IOW, her exclusively female privilege to inflict suffering and pain on you men.
And she is able to talk this way to you...thanks to women's rights.
Because with women's rights, if you were a husband trying to discipline her bad behavior, she would promptly dial 911 and sic the cops (i.e., armed, violent force) on you men.
With women's rights, your wife would divorce you on the flimsiest pretext and confiscate through armed force (i.e., the police) your hard-earned money, your home, and your children.
With women's rights, you are at the mercy of a stupid, weak woman who has virtual license to give cops the go-ahead to shoot you or imprison you.
And don't fool yourselves, men: she wouldn't bat an eyelid doing all this to you with her women's rights.
Just look at the many men around you for proof of that. The many decent, hardworking, honorable men, devoted to their wives and family, whose lives (not to mention their children's) have been destroyed by women invoking their "women's rights."
Anonymous said... "Women's rights (human rights for all human beings) has harmed NO ONE."
The feminazi lies go on and on. It would take the whole Sunday NY Times in small type just to list the millions of families destroyed, the millions of children badly hurt, and the men who's lives have been destroyed by feminism. "NO ONE" turns out to be the majority of children, including girls, who's lives are badly messed up. The lies of the feminazi never end.
Post a Comment
<< Home