The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Potential Rapist

A few years ago feminazi men-haters at UMass Amherst posted "wanted" photos of random men students who were accused of being "Potential Rapists." It would have been funny if it weren't a libelous criminal act that seriously harmed the men so accused. To the mind of the rape-hate feminazi all men are "rapists." Some of us men haven't been locked up, but they are working on it. Unknown to most Americans is that there are now laws to lock up men for the crime of "potential rapist." Such a feminist hate crime carries a sentence of life in prison without parole.

In Spokane, WA, one such "potential rapist" trial is currently underway. The alleged "potential rapist" is Mr. Kevin Coe. Mr. Coe was convicted of a rape more than two decades ago with questionable evidence and no DNA testing. The alleged victim described an attacker who looked entirely different from Mr. Coe. For his alleged crime he was sentenced to 25 years in prison and was repeatedly denied parole. Most men would think that 25 years in hellhole prisons is long enough for a crime that causes no injury or loss of property, only the hurt feelings of a female. Most men would think that 25 years is a really long time for taking something which is readily available on the street in any city for less than $100, petty theft. But the hate mongering feminazi and their mangina misandrist bigots of the American Injustice System (AIS) know no limits to the hate that froths at their mouth and rots their minds.

In the tormented hate filled mind of the rape-hate feminazi, no punishment is too severe for a man who takes away the females' "right" to control and dominate all sexual encounters with men. Mr. Coe was scheduled to be released from prison on September 8, 2006 after serving his full sentence in prison. But no prison sentence is good enough for rape-hate, because rape-hate is not about crime and punishment. Rape-hate is only about hate, feminazi hating men, all men, and every man. Most men are beginning to understand that the great preponderance of rape-hate accusations are false. Recent DNA evidence has cleared the names of dozens of wrongly convicted men, but thousands of innocent men still rot in feminazi hate hellholes. The rape-hate industry is so full of lies and false convictions that we need a cooling off period to restore reason where hate now rules. It would be surprising if 8% of rape-hate accusations had any factual basis at all. Bob has previously called for a moratorium on rape persecutions and hate until cooler heads can prevail.

The rape-hate feminazi of the AIS didn't release Mr. Coe at the end of his prison sentence. They are now holding him for trial on the new charge of "potential rapist." Read story. If convicted on the new charge, Mr. Coe would be sent to prison for the rest of his life without any time limit. The State of Washington has a special prison for "potential rapists" and other future criminals. The State of Washington took over McNeil Island Federal Hellhole when the federal government closed their prison. McNeil Island is now a special prison for future "potential" criminals and especially for "potential rapists."

The Spokane, WA, media is having a feeding frenzy spewing misandrist hate against Mr. Coe. The Spokane network TV stations, KREM, KXLY, and KHQ compete with each other to inflame the most rape-hate. Reporters have gone to film the facilities at McNeil Island where they expect to sentence a "potential rapist." They interrupt regular programming with tidbits of hate as it progresses through the AIS. The Spokesman Review, the largest newspaper in the region, joins the hate fest. At the time of his original conviction, Mr. Coe was a young reporter for a compteing newspaper, the Chronicle, who publicly criticized the Spokesman Review's rape-hate exaggerations. The Spokesman Review was fanning the flames of rape-hate in exaggerated stories called "South Hill Rapist." Mr. Coe was stopped by blue gun thugs one night while driving through Spokane's South Hill area, doing his job as a reporter looking for the story. From there, with the Spokesman Review frothing hate day after day, and no hard DNA evidence, it was an easy railroad job to send Mr. Coe to prison for 25 years. The rape-hate media at the Spokesman Review and TV stations still froth with hate whenever his name comes up. Are they afraid that the truth will eventually get out?

Maybe they are afraid that the truth will eventually get out. At the time in 1981 when Mr. Coe was railroaded on a phony rape-hate conviction, he was the primary witness to the black-widow serial killing murder of Spokane's Fire Chief Al O’Connor. The county persecutor was, for unknown reasons, sweeping the Fire Chief's murder under the rug, declining prosecution despite high levels of poison in his body and a witness to the argument prior to the death. It seems that serial murder of husbands is not a crime in Spokane, but sex without permission is extremely serious. There are a lot of questions about murder, extortion, bribery, and other crimes in Spokane's power structure that young reporter Mr. Coe was getting too close to when they decided to railroad him for the false rape-hate conviction. Now he's supposed to get out, and be free to talk. Now they are keeping him under forever lockup and charging him as a "potential rapist" which unlike black widow murder is a life sentence crime.

Mr. Coe has always maintained his innocence. His conviction was done in the days before DNA testing, and the evidence was destroyed by the blue gun thugs before the new science became available to exonerate his name. Even if he was guilty, a trial was held and a sentence passed. Mr. Coe was sent to hell for the full 25 years. That ended three months ago, but the rape-hate industry and their feminazi blue gun thugs and agents of Satan in black robes of hell have not released him. Retired Spokane Blue Gun Thug Roy Allen, 68, who was the lead detective in the investigation that led to framing Coe back on March 10, 1981, cringes at the idea of a free Coe. As a life long anti-men gun thug, evil scum Allen knows where he'll end up after death, and it ain't pretty.

In the most recent AIS proceedings, evil feminazi agent of Satan, Kathleen O'Connor, ordered Mr. Coe held captive in their hellhole prison until July 16, 2007 before the phony trial even begins. His 25 year sentence will have stretched to almost 26 years without having committed any other crimes. Feminazi hate of men is the only criteria that Ms. Kathleen O'Cunt needs to send men to hell. Being impaled on the Division Street bridge would be too good for her. The good people of Spokane, if there are any, should put her out of her misery, and out of our misery, post-haste.

Students of logic know that it is impossible to prove a negative. No man can prove that he is not a "potential rapist" because the definition of "potential rapist" is "a man." Every man is at risk of the whim of the feminazi. If they haven't sent you to hell for 25 years for not stopping within 10 seconds after the female says "I think I need to go home now," then they will send you to hell for the rest of your life for being a "potential" rapist. Men can not stop these evil hate-mongering feminazi and their blue suited Gestapo in anything less than 0.223 caliber. May they all be sent to their evil reward a lot sooner than they had planned on. May the Gods of mercy and justice ride with you.

By now you might be wondering what "evidence" it takes to convict a man of "potential rape," and send him to hell for the rest of his life. From watching the court hearings so far, all that is presented is the opinion of a shrink who thinks that he might rape in the future. That's it. Just her opinion makes him a criminal "future rapist." And both the shirnk and the Agent of Satan in black robes, Fem O'cunt, graduated from feminist hate school at Amherst (or equivalent). Be afraid men, be very afriad.

(See legal notice on left margin.)

24 Comments:

Anonymous C said...

Potential morons who thought this crap up should be lined up and stoned to death.

American women are desperate for love when they have to lie about sex to get attention.

In general college girls are schizophrenic, narcississtic and histrionic.
They are there so every one can "look at them", show off, be psychotic, anything goes on campus for these spoiled bitches.

The worst thing any man in college could do to himself would be to marry one of these nutcases.

Men need to preserve their principles and just do some proactive natural selection.
this means just let these bitches rot away on their own personal selfish path to destruction.
No Mercy.

Forget about ameri-con women they are screwed! The best thing to do is to give them no attention!
They are just like spoiled brat 6 year olds. They are not the only person on the planet.

General piece of advice: Stay away from ameri-con women.

Sincerely, C

December 19, 2006 7:08 PM  
Anonymous C said...

Another thing this Potential Rapist propaganda does not surprise me.

But it does prove a point about how desperate ugly, schizo women are to get attention.

And it proves another point about how much women these days enjoy flattering themselves/ stroking their egos.

December 19, 2006 7:14 PM  
Anonymous C said...

For men who want to watch an awesome movie: High Plains Drifter with Clint Eastwood. See the unedited version, not the censored, mainstream "TBS" version that messes with the screenplay.

December 19, 2006 7:18 PM  
Blogger Martha said...

Too bad we cannot take all women who are pregnant and lock em up as "potential murderers". Then once their babies are born they are free to go. Except they must sign a waiver that says they can never collect chil tax(support). Then no liberal dyke hag could murder her unborn child!!

December 20, 2006 7:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This must be the same irrational campus femscabs who told the lacrosse men that Sunday was a day to confess their alleged sins. Dumb skanks jump to all sorts of hysterical conclusions without an iota of evidence or fact.

December 23, 2006 2:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

C:

Who killed JonBenet Ramsey?

December 23, 2006 5:22 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (December 23, 2006 5:22 PM)

Does anyone really care who killed a pathetic little trollop?

For more on Jon Benet see Bobstruth

December 24, 2006 11:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It takes a big MAN to rejoice over the murder of an innocent 6 year old child.

December 24, 2006 4:45 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (December 24, 2006 4:45 PM)
Cry me a river. Another femorrhoid won't be voting for Hitlarry, nor supporting the notorious misandrist government of Colorado. One down, another hundred million to go.

And BTW, its not up to stinkin cunts to decide who is a MAN and who is not. Pound sand, cunt!

December 24, 2006 7:48 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

This was posted by an anonymous female on answerology.com earlier today, "Anyway you look at it, getting dicked is fun...Thank goodness for cocks and balls!!!!!!"

Bob has to wonder if rape should even be a crime.

December 28, 2006 7:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wouldn't it be great if there were no women in the world?

December 29, 2006 4:05 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (December 29, 2006 4:05 PM)

Perhaps you meant to say that it would be good if there were no men-hating feminists. Men welcome and enjoy the company of real women.

December 29, 2006 6:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gentlemen:

This "rape" issue is not something we men can fight against through legal reforms. In fact, the law is totally useless for men, as those interpreting the law do not have men's best interest at heart.

No, what is needed - what is inevitable - is something drastic.

Because this ability of a woman to accuse a man of "rape" is just one aspect of a very serious problem. It gets to the heart of what is very wrong today.

The ability of a woman to accuse a man of "rape" happens to be a woman's right. And women's rights by its very nature is directly and unavoidably hostile to masculine authority over women.

And in today's society, women are indeed very hostile to men, able to show disrespect to men as they never have before in human history, challenging us with impunity.

None of this would be possible, of course, were it not for the existence of women's rights - rights which by necessity shield women from the consequences of disrespecting and challenging men.

It's precisely because of women's rights that a dirty, worthless American woman can set her sights on virtually any man she desires vengeance upon, scream "rape," or "sexual harassment," or "domestic violence" and be taken seriously by the authorities.

In other words, she has exercised her women's rights to its logical conclusion: the spiteful, vengeful destruction of a man with impunity.

And that is why the solution to this "rape" issue must (and I believe will) result in taking away many of the rights and freedoms women have today.

Because a woman who has no rights can no longer act on her free will, which she should never be doing in the first place. Her free will is infantile, self-centered, morally unreliable, irrational, and whim-based.

And being unable to act on her free will, she therefore cannot call on thuggish police power to get her way. She must instead rely on mercy from the larger community of men who must watch women carefully for any signs of bad behavior, and decide accordingly whether she is the kind of woman worth saving or not.

Men, we must understand that not all women are worth saving. From now on, it is vital that we know from the outset which women to save - and which women to throw to the wolves.

- Mr. Anon

January 03, 2007 4:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Mr. Anon,
Kinda sad there's not one woman on earth you'd consider worthwhile to save. No wonder you're an unhappy fellow.

Meanwhile on a happier note, an example of a REAL MAN and he's not sitting whining, writing blogs about how to enslave women (which would make nobody happy):

***
A Black man jumped onto the NY subway tracks to save a man from an oncoming train:


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/05/nyregion/05life.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

January 05, 2007 4:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Men,

Although this individual (Anonymous January 05, 2007 4:28 PM) doesn't say whether he/she is a man or woman, it seems obvious this individual is a woman. Her response has no logical connection whatsoever to what she is responding to. She makes no attempt to respond with a defense of modern western women that men can understand or sympathize with.

And neither does this individual respond rationally, logically, or thoughtfully against the argument that taking away women's rights is:


1) an actual solution to women's bad behavior towards men, and

2) beneficial to men and in their self-interests.


All she does is demonstrate her lack of intelligence (which is what one would expect of a woman), and throws irrelevant distractions our way.

If there are any men who still feel that instinct to "save" women from the "rapists": have more confidence in yourself. Have more confidence in your capability to make morally right decisions about women, who are child-like, less logical, over-emotional - and therefore do not have the same capability you men have to make the right decisions beneficial to both men and women. Feeling guilty about being men, or about controlling women, or worrying about what women will think of you only makes men look foolish and unmasculine. Women are weak, pathetic creatures whom men traditionally didn't take too much time making up their minds about.

In any case, women will not be grateful to you for "saving" them. Look at this woman who just responded. She has all the freedoms and choices and comforts provided by men who built society and made it free.

And she cares nothing about you men - NOTHING. And she is not alone either.

Her views are the mainstream of female thinking today: western women as a whole care nothing about false rape charges against you. Or female vindictive behavior based purely on hatred and spite against you men - think of your fellow man dragged away by the police or who lost his job and good name because of "sexual harrassment" or "domestic violence."

The fact is, modern western women today value women's rights far more than they do men. And they will never voluntarily give up the very real power they have to destroy you men - which is the whole point of women's rights. How have women shown gratitude to you men for granting them women's rights, and for providing them with all kinds of freedoms and choices?

The answer to that question is all the justification I need to take away women's rights from them.

But ultimately, even the women will appreciate you for having their rights taken away. Women are children in adult bodies: weak, stupid, and forever dependent on men to protect them. And for women, security and protection are more far important values than any "rights" or freedoms, which they don't really fully understand, and are just meaningless abstractions to them.

Women are not capable of handling true freedom anyway - just like children. A woman will eventually acquiesce to whatever conditions you, the man, set for her - provided, of course, that you enforce them.

~ Mr. Anon

January 06, 2007 4:26 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

-Mr. Anon,
1) So far, what have you actually done to take away legal rights from various groups such as women?

2) Why are you scared to identify yourself?

January 06, 2007 3:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Anon is a funny fellow. He is always angry; you can set your watch by it.

His only recourse is calling women weak, stupid, irrational, etc - the same slurs slapped on females since time began. And always by disgruntled men who wallow in self-pity, fantacizing alone about what they'd like to do to women.

I like women. I find them the opposite of Mr. Anon's description.

This blog is a free, diversionary comic book. Thanks.

January 06, 2007 4:05 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: Bob notes that it took organized feminism 150 years to take over our univerisities, and to become dominant in our governments. It took that long for organized feminism with no organzied opposition and a great deal of help from men. Masculism, by contrast, is perhaps only 10 years old and is strongly opposed by feminist institutions and governments. We can not expect any real changes for a generation or so. It takes that long to educate and inform. The feminist rhetoric "what have you done" shows that feminists know they are vulnerable. So far we have begun to educate and informed.

January 06, 2007 6:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Civil rights, education, professional opportunities are the norm for people in general, not just women, in Western society. Those changes slowly occurred with the Enlightenment, abolition of slavery, advancements in technology, science, education, etc.

Unless society could be returned to the way it was prior to the early 1700s, you will likely never change women's current status.

However, one possibility remains. US and Western Europe may well be outbred by Muslim immigrants. By 2050, Muslims could be in the majority.

Muslims' age-old goal has been to convert the world to Islam. Should that happen, women will once again be reduced to near slave status. Violence, rape, beatings, torture, warfare, beheadings, Koranic honor killings, whippings, will be the norm. And most likely a decline in living standards will accompany that.

January 06, 2007 6:53 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
History teaches us that the triumph of evil is a fleeting victory. The victory of feminists will not last, and order will be restored to society. The social disaster destroyed families, massive prisons, and government tyranny will colapse, probably a lot more rapidly than anyone believes possible now.

January 06, 2007 8:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Anon - you forgot "cruel" in your list of adjectives describing women (weak, irrational, pathetic, stupid.... ).

January 07, 2007 3:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous (January 07, 2007 3:34 PM):

Thank you for pointing that out. Yes, women are by nature cruel. And when women are free, this natural cruelty is allowed to run virtually rampant with disastrous results - another reason that women are not meant to be free and must have their women's rights taken away. Female cruelty will be drastically reduced only when women are controlled and disciplined by men - which is not possible under women's rights.


Men:

It is too soon to close off the many other possibilities we cannot yet foresee or predict. To believe Muslim savagery is the only alternative to a feminized society is to concede spiritual and moral defeat. Constructive ideas and solutions only come from an imaginative mind.

And there is no need to go back in time to change anything. The dramatic changes in store for western women are already in their future: they have made their bed and they will soon have to lie in it.

Men, I ask you to think of your fellow man. A man who simply wanted a decent home filled with the warmth of his family. A man who wanted children to come home to, and a loving, devoted wife whom he could adore and who would in turn respect him.

This was a world that was once available to us - and it is now gone, thanks to women's rights. The damage done to men and women as a result is now so great and deep it will take many generations to recover.

Men, you know perfectly well what women's rights has done, in its many different manifestations, both to men and to families. There is great, destructive evil in the hearts and minds of western women today - and it must be confronted with firm male anger and resolve.

~ Mr. Anon

January 07, 2007 10:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Watch the cruelty here.

Bob had touched up on this subject before, but I believe it has to be resurfaced to show the merciless souls of women.

January 08, 2007 10:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Anon,

When my ex filed for divorce I was in for not one but many shocks of my life. I ended up defeated and hindsight is no help.

There must be more info to get prepared to fight back a legal system that hits like a club. The legal system is what hurts and destroys.

Can anybody give good websites devoted to divorce laws for men?

shaundobson@hotmail.com

January 08, 2007 11:45 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home