The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Friday, January 05, 2007

For the Women.

"For our Daughters and our Granddaughters," Nancy Pelosi. With these sexist words Ms. Speaker Pelosi opened the House of representatives. When a cunt is elected she doesn't represent the people, she represents only the females, "our daughters and granddaughters." The US Congress was once, "Of the people, by the people, and for the people." It is now, "Of the women, by the women, and for the women." Read CNN Story

30 Comments:

Anonymous Paul Parmenter said...

Yes Bob, that is the normal practice of women who assume power. Take a look at another who has just confirmed this rule:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070104/hl_afp/whohealthunchan_070104163428

Also note in the same article

"The WHO's objective, as set out in its constitution and published on its website, is the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health."

But clearly Mz Chan cares nothing for the constitutional objective of the organisation of which she has just become the head. She has arbitrarily decided in her almighty female wisdom that the objective has to be switched to the attainment by those with a vagina of the highest possible level of health.

January 05, 2007 10:25 AM  
Blogger Martha said...

Just like the way Oprah built a school just for girls and now is getting praise about it. If a good man built a school and said it was just for males he would be mad a "sexist" and if he built it in a predominately white are(just like she put hers in a negro area) he would be labeled racist. The American public deserves to fall!!

January 05, 2007 11:04 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Paul: WHO has been racist for a long time, now it's sexist too. It is interesting to note that We've only had a Korean running the UN for a couple of weeks and now we have "the first Chinese" in charge of the WHO.

January 05, 2007 11:20 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Martha: Indeed, Ophra's generosity is completely sexist. She's a complete bigot. The media fawns over her bigoted school. It will, of course, eventually fail.

January 05, 2007 11:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, grow up and quit whining. Pelosi specifically referenced women because they have for so long been denied political power. But she in no way excluded men. They will as always go on making big bucks on Wall Street, being CEOs of major corporations, and wielding power, etc.

And a man will always head the Vatican.

As for Oprah Winfrey establishing girls' schools, why not? Boys have always had excellent schools and don't need her help as females do.

Quit crying and work.

January 05, 2007 1:44 PM  
Anonymous Paul Parmenter said...

Anonymous 1.44 pm: Sorry, your shaming tactics don't wash here. It is very common for people who don't have an argument to just try to shame others into silence instead of answering the charge.

Pelosi specifically referenced women because she is a sexist and wants to look after her own, like the selfish bigot she is. Wait and see if she ever proposes any changes or sponsors any programme that would benefit men. I bet you will wait a hell of a long time. We all know her type.

And don't give me any more nonsense about women being denied political power. America is a democracy, right? How long have women had the vote in America? And are there more male or female voters? I don't live in the US so others will have better knowledge of these things than me, but I know enough to tell you that this old "oppressed women" crap is just that - utter crap. Women have had full voting power, the right to run businesses and to form their own organisations etc etc for generations, in some cases for ever. So stop hiding behind lies and come out and face the truth.

January 06, 2007 2:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anona-mouse:

Women have never been "denied" power. The reason women have never achieved much in the ten thousand years mankind has lived in organized societies is that they are quite clearly inferior to men.

Look around at the world we live in: The skyscrapers in our cities, the highways and the automobiles that travel on them, the planes that wisk us across previously unimaginable distances, and know that women played nearly no role in any of it. From the architects who designed them to the construction crews who built them to the engineers who designed and executed their HVAC, electrical and sewage systems - women played nearly ***NO*** role in any of it. Or in civilizing the world. Were if left to women, we'd still be living in caves and sh!tting in the woods.

What's amazing is, Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Paul, and so many others figured out quite clearly 2,000 years ago an obvious wisdom we seem to have misplaced today: Women are inferior in nearly every way; they are, to quote Napoleon, "nothing but machines for making babies".

Women serve men in three roles: ornemental, procreational and recreational. Those are their only purpose on planet earth, and this little 50 year experiment we have with EE-KWAL-EE-TAYYY! is a mere blip on the radar screen. You will soon revert to your natural role.

Now, go get me a sandwich.

And drop your panties...

January 06, 2007 6:04 PM  
Blogger Sue McPherson said...

This is a little apart from your topic, but it might be relevant. This news story (follow link) is about a man and a woman who were found stabbed and dead in their shared home. No one else seems to have been involved, apparently. The article focuses on the dead police officer, because, well, that's what society does, focus on the one who is more important, I suppose.

Police officer stabbed to death
BBC News 6 January 2007
Police found the officer stabbed to death at her home. A 28-year-old policewoman has been found stabbed to death in her home, police have revealed. continues on http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/6237023.stm

January 07, 2007 12:56 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Yes its a little off topic, but we can always use some good news. Another gun thug is pushing up daisies. She and her "partner" both died. Obviously she was an unmarried slut pretending to be a man. The blue gun thug report says that they were both stabbed to death, and no other person was involved. Sounds very strange. Must have been quite a fight. Or more probably she tried to murder her lover in his sleep and he woke up just long enough to pull out the knife and turn it around before he died.

She should have had a nice husband and been home taking care of her children. Now her body is as cold as her heart. Thanks for the good news.

That URL was:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/
leicestershire/6237023.stm

Also see:
http://www.leics.police.uk/news/
1027_death_of_a_police_officer_in/

January 07, 2007 1:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anona-mouse and Parmenter:

1) What have YOU personally contributed to society?

For example, did you ever contribute a patented invention? Improve airplane parts/structures? Make a discovery in a biochemistry lab? Produce better medical technology?

2) Explain what this means:
"Multispectroscopic Studies of the Electronic Structure of Complex Vanadium-Oxygen Compounds with Tetrahedral and Octahedral V-O Coordination."

January 07, 2007 3:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anona-mouse:

1) Answer honestly: Have you ever spoken to women in person, the way you did here?

2) Would you identify yourself?

January 07, 2007 3:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anona-mouse views all women as his "inferior". Yet when smart women enter engineering school (clearly demonstrating otherwise), they are to be SHOT by the miserable Marc Lepines of the world. You hate women when they are uneducated, you hate women when they get doctorates.

(It seems doubtful Anona-mouse even graduated from high school).

January 07, 2007 4:37 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: When females do occupy our institutions of higher learning they waste space and resources that could be devoted to furthering the society and economy. When women eventualy are given high degrees they fail to produce for the society in a meaningful way proportional to the huge investment the society has made in them. They have succeeded in wasting their lives, and contributed little or nothing back to society.

I take it that you don't celebrate International Marc Lepine Day as the first counter attack against the feminazi war on men.

January 07, 2007 5:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Murder is sin. No decent man supports Lepine's sin.

January 07, 2007 5:47 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: Every major religion distinguishes between murder and killing in war. [Hint: It wasn't men who started the feminazi war on men.] When a few of the feminazi die in their war its death in war. Your war propaganda may fly in "women's studies" hate class but it doesn't fly here.

January 07, 2007 6:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No rational clergyman would take you seriously, Bob. Guarantee it. (If you know one, tell me).

Sin is sin. There is no "war on men", especially one worthy of causing a selfish madman to murder innocent students who were not harming him.

January 07, 2007 6:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"There is no 'war on men' " - Anonymous poster on Bob's Truth

"There was no holocaust; the concentration camps were actually day spas" - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

January 07, 2007 6:46 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (January 07, 2007 6:20 PM)
Your rant is typical of the kind of propaganda lies that are always told in a war. You claim that any clergy who fails to support your view is not "rational." You deny the existence of the feminazi war on men. You characterize the enemy of feminists as a "madman." You recite all the usual feminazi propaganda. It worked with great success for the German National Socialist Workers Party so feminazi adopted it wholesale.

I suggest you read, It Wasn't Men

When you finish that one read, It Really Doesn't Matter

January 07, 2007 6:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anony-mouse said:

1) What have YOU personally contributed to society?

For example, did you ever contribute a patented invention? Improve airplane parts/structures? Make a discovery in a biochemistry lab? Produce better medical technology?

2) Explain what this means:
"Multispectroscopic Studies of the Electronic Structure of Complex Vanadium-Oxygen Compounds with Tetrahedral and Octahedral V-O Coordination."

1) Answer honestly: Have you ever spoken to women in person, the way you did here?

2) Would you identify yourself?


What makes anyone think I any obligation to answer a question from a woman?? In much the same way, I do not stop to ask the ants what they are thinking as I walk past them on the grass. I do not ask 5 year old's who they believe should be elected to congress, nor ask my dog questions about the meaning of life.

January 07, 2007 6:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Explain what this means:
"Multispectroscopic Studies of the Electronic Structure of Complex Vanadium-Oxygen Compounds with Tetrahedral and Octahedral V-O Coordination."

Sigh. OK:

"A series of technical terms related to concepts discovered and exploited by men to advance civilization, and recently intruded upon by women interlopers who, heretofore, had no interest in or contribution to the field of study at hand but who, like chimpanzees and children, wish to emulate more successful being."

Woman see, woman do.

January 07, 2007 7:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Anon, it's good to express your disdain for women. It's like an electronic punch in the face to any woman reading.

Unfortunately your bitter hatred will be in your soul till the day you die. It is obvious that you live alone (nobody could stand your pathetic arrogance). And it's obvious you will die alone.

January 07, 2007 7:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pelosi holds office because she ran in the one area of the U.S. guaranteed to support her leanings. As long as San Francisco does not fall off into the bay, she'll be a government employee. To get the current position, Pelosi successfully self-promoted herself to the half-wits of her party. She got lucky in that voters wanted to give the other party a spanking for behaving too much like the half-wits in her party. End of story.

Now can we talk about merit? Like the men in NY who caught the toddler that fell four stories? Or the Vietnam vet who saved a man from a subway train?

January 07, 2007 7:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon (6:50),

Find a new home for your dog.

January 07, 2007 7:56 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (January 07, 2007 7:40 PM)

Your "die alone" was old when your grandmother was using that same old tired propaganda lie. Why is it that you old tired dried up old cunts are still reciting the same old fleabitten nonsense that didn't work three generations ago? You are so pathetic it makes me almost wnat to cry.

January 07, 2007 8:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shaming language used by cunts when they have no comeback to the truthful statement that "women have contributed next to nothing to advancing human civilization":

- You'll die alone
- You live with your mother
- You have a small penis
- You can't get laid
- You're gay
- This is a recording...

January 07, 2007 8:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Anon (6:04 pm):

"Now, go get me a sandwich."

What kind of sandich? Don't be vague. Specify for Mommy.

"And drop your panties... "

Remember that your loving Mommy washed your underpants and you have contempt for her today. She was a stupid female like all others.


"I do not stop to ask the ants what they are thinking as I walk past them on the grass"

Ants teach without words.

Put on your short-short running shorts. Grab that sandwich and jog over to the park. Sit down to eat next to a mound of fire-ants. Sit very close.

January 08, 2007 11:26 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The daydream of a perfect world where all women are obedient slaves is not unlike the Muslim's vision of Paradise.

It's easier said than done. Once people enjoy a high level of freedom, civil rights, and advanced technology, they will never willingly accept slavery. Can't happen. (Slavery takes different forms).

Enslavement of Blacks in early America "worked" (??) to some extent, because the victims came from a less advanced culture where slavery was not unheard of. The longer their people were in America, the more they saw the possibilities of freedom, the more they yearned for Emancipation. Black men gave their lives in the Civil War to achieve that victory.

Nowadays, you could no more return a Black PhD professor to slavery, than you could put Donald Trump in a slave pen and sell him as a field hand.

Jews in Nazi work camps were there unwillingly. They had known freedom and dignity. Many had been well educated professionals. They keenly felt the loss of their freedom and dignity, and didn't accept it or adjust.

Same is true with women as a segment of society. Once women become Phd scientists, lawyers, US Presidents (who knows) in 2009, doctors, CEOs, it will be impossible to return to the old days when women were just raped, beaten and psychologically destroyed.

Further, even if you could create an Afghanistan Paradise, rendering all females obedient robots, would you truly be happy?

January 08, 2007 11:38 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (January 08, 2007 11:38 AM)
Many of your arguments have logical validity, but they are applied wrong or backwards. The feminazi have been working to enslave men for a century and a half, and since the 1940s using the political propaganda and tactics developed by the German National Socialist Labor Party. But they have not yet succeeded in putting all men into ghettos such as in Warsaw, nor into concentration camps such as Dachau or Auchwitz. But feminazi have achieved much success. Millions of American men are now rotting and dying in hellhole concentration camps such as Fulsom, Attica, Levenworth, and a thousand others.

As you say, "Jews in Nazi work camps were there unwillingly. They had known freedom and dignity. Many had been well educated professionals. They keenly felt the loss of their freedom and dignity, and didn't accept it or adjust." You feminazi forget that part of the National Socialist program. American MEN feel the loss of our freedom and dignity and are not going to accept it or adjust. The MEN of America are beginning to form organizations to stop the feminazi war on men. The feminazi victory has not been complete enough to prevent an eventual loss as men identify the assault and fight back against our destruction.

January 08, 2007 2:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is indeed feminazi garbage (Anonymous January 08, 2007 11:38 AM). It does not merit responding except to say that western women will use sensational language to emotionally manipulate and paralyze you men towards one goal only: to keep their women's rights.

Men, when you accept women's rights, you have surrendered your power to impose behavioral expectations on women. Only men (not women) can both hold women to a high standard of acceptable behavior AND enforce that standard effectively.

Women's rights by its very nature obstructs men from doing what is right. It obstructs men from disciplining and restraining bad female behavior. It obstructs any attempt to call attention to women's behavior that is harmful or destructive to men.

Indeed, it obstructs any attempt to focus on women as individuals whose actions are therefore subject to moral scrutiny, judgment, and accountability.

In the absence of controls, female free will is infantile, petulant, resentful, irrational, amoral, narrowly self-centered with little to no regard for men.

Women's rights is female free will run rampant.

Eventually, the status of women cannot remain as it is. It cannot be the equivalent to that of men. It will have to be downgraded - below that of men and perhaps little more than that of children - if men, families, and societies are to survive. And once that happens, rules and laws will have to be drawn up accordingly.

~ Mr. Anon

January 08, 2007 10:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

" And once that happens, rules and laws will have to be drawn up accordingly."

Who will do this?

January 09, 2007 3:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home