Violent Lesbian Gangs
Ultraviolent lesbian gangs are becoming more and more common. A very violent lesbian gang in Memphis, TN, is called GTO for Gays Taking Over. GTO has been around for about 10 years. Over that time they have become more and more bold and violent. They commonly attack and rape young women in schools and other places. Young decent women are forced to perform perverted lesbian sexual acts, and very violently brutalized if they refuse or report the rapes. Some of the GTO members are now in Tennnessee prisons, and are making lesbian prison rape common in women's prisons. Where men's gangs are about making money, lesbian gangs are about power and sexual perversion. And they are not just in Tennessee. Violent lesbian gangs are now common in many other places. Lesibans start by being outside of normal moral values and decent behavior. From there it is no leap at all to violate all other moral and social values. Violence, rape, beattings, assault, and murder are no further from normal behavior.
Feminism is the theory, and lesbianism is the practice.
Feminism is the theory, and lesbianism is the practice.
posted by Bob | Tuesday, July 10, 2007
125 Comments:
Unafraid, unimpressed. As usual Bob has an agenda and exaggerates. Let's worry more about violent Islamic jihadists.
Islamic jihadists are extremely weak. They can only (sometimes) destroy some of our undefended property and kill undefended people (just like any criminal or vandal).
Women's rights, on the other hand, decreases population size. Women must be forced to obey men and have babies if a country wishes to continue to expand; they won't do it if they have any other choice as we see now.
Also women's rights is bad for men; it allows women to divorce us, we are jailed for marital rape, jailed for domestic violence, and jailed for marrying young females.
My opinion on these lesbians is that they should be shot. Only men should dominate women.
I also believe that (as the Bible says) men who rape virgin girls should just have to marry said girls.
so this isn't a legit concern anon? It's funny how the biggest critics enjoy hiding behind the anon tag.
Forced rape on anyone by gangs IS a serious problem. This is especially alarming since the perpetrators are products of feminism, and the fact that this gets almost no coverage on the MSM.
This post shows the logical conclusion of feminism.
It is not about women's rights, it is about abuse, control and sexual perversion.
Right on Bob, great post.
Women's rights (human rights) are good for good men, but bad for bad men.
Why does Chicagoman hid behind his screen name?
Why not state your real identity, Chicagoman?
All Feminists leaders identify themselves when they speak, write, or appear in public. No wonder the "men's movement" has gotten nowhere, and consists only of a few lonely men glaring at their computers. And hiding behind screen names.
>> Unafraid, unimpressed. As usual Bob has an agenda and exaggerates. Let's worry more about violent Islamic jihadists.
July 10, 2007 4:00 PM
It is unimportant to me if you are unimpressed. How on earth can reporting factual news -- he got it off the newlines -- be an exaggeration? Grow up.
Note to Anonymous: (July 11, 2007 4:38 PM)
Your comment about Chicagoman would hold a lot more water if you had used your name instead of hiding behind an anonymous comment.
Note to Anonymous: (July 11, 2007 4:33 PM)
The feminazi hate war on men is hurtful and harmful to all men and women, to the whole society. Your insinuation that feminazi hate only hurts "bad" men is simply more of your bigoted hate.
To anon.
I myself have a blog, my IP can be traced as can ALL my registration information. Alot of men in the MRA movement know exactly who I am and where I live.
But once again like a typical feminist you attack me instead of my argument.
I'm not hiding from anyone or anything anon. Look who's talking, put your money where your mouth is and show yourself.
Chicagoman,
Have you gotten public air time and appeared on talk shows, tv programs, etc.? Have you submitted letters to the editor (using your real name and airing concerns you deal with here anonymously?)
Rape is a crime no matter who commits it.
I personally never encountered such "violent Lesbians" who gang up on victims and force them to perform sex. Those lesbians must be dumb to assume they won't be prosecuted for sexual assault and battery just as a man would.
Note to anonymous (July 12, 2007 4:33 PM)
Many people consider forced perversion to be far worse than normal sex. Some people even enjoy normal sex even when it isn't their idea. But forced lesbian perversion with a gang of fat ugly lesbians is a very serious trauma.
"Some people even enjoy normal sex even when it isn't their idea."
Sex, to be enjoyed by both parties, must be consentual to both. Otherwise it is mere bullying to show power over, and contempt for, your target.
How any man could force a woman and still have self-respect, is incomprehensible -- unless he is devoid of morals. Only someone with a dead conscience, and no true appreciation for the dignity of every human being, could commit rape.
That a victim might "enjoy" a few seconds of physical pleasure is doubtful. But even if she did, that physical "pleasure" would be far outweighed by the overwhelming humiliation, shock and pain of being used by a bully.
A bully could force a woman to eat gourmet chocolates at gunpoint. She'd fearfully comply. Her tastebuds would experience a brief sensation of pleasure from the chocolate.
But we don't live by bodily pleasures alone. And the overall situation of being forced to eat something with a gun to your head, is repellent and inhuman.
And criminal.
Criminal? Not according to the Bible:
Deuteronomy 22 (New International Version)
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. [c] He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.
Deuteronomy 22 (King James Version)
28If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;
29Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
Deuteronomy 22 (New American Standard Bible)
28"(O)If a man finds a girl who is a virgin, who is not engaged, and seizes her and lies with her and they are discovered,
29then the man who lay with her shall give to the girl's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall become his wife because he has violated her; he cannot divorce her all his days.
The Bible's only 'punishment' is that you must marry the girl (something that you would be happy to do if you liked her to begin with) and pay some money to her father. The Bible is pro-men's rights and anti-women's rights.
Anonomyous: who are you to say something is criminal when the Bible says it is not?
What we need in America is a civil war, a civil war to wipe out the pro-women's rights anti-men people or atleast deport them.
One of our groups has to go.
actually anon I have written to newspapers before using my real name. Likewise I have also posted on the internet using my real name before. I have written to news stations. I have called in to radio talk shows, used my name and my handle on the WIND 560AM and voiced my concerns about feminism and politics.
Have I appeared on tv shows? Right anon, because you have. That's right. I'm too new to the movement yet anon to be that far along. As soon as I publish the book I am working on you will see my ass on tv giving you the big fat middle finger for being such a coward hiding behind the anon tag.
Once again anon, put your money where your mouth is, I have.
I am done with you anon on this blog, I have too much respect for Bob to continue this here.
"Anonomyous: who are you to say something is criminal when the Bible says it is not?"
Mikee, don't pretend to honor the bible when you really don't. It's doubtful you set foot in a church, much less had the guts to air your views that rape is ok, to some Preacher.
The laws of the land make rape a crime. The bible you claim to love, mandates you to obey the law. If you doubt that, try raping some girl and tell a judge the bible gave you permission to do so.
What kind of man would rape? What does that say about him?
If we were to honor rapists, we'd have to honor bank robbers, thugs, murderers, arsonists, etc.
Note to anonymous: (July 13, 2007 5:50 P)
Most "rape" amounts to sex with the man making the decision this once instead of abbrogating all reproductive decision making power to the female. There is an evolutionary behaviorial plus for rape, it increases a man's chance of having children. And there is a strong evolutionary desire for sex, even if the female has other plans. If she really doesn't consent she can stop the "rape" but usually she only wants to be "forced."
You are very confused to equate "rape" to serious crime such as murder, robery, etc. Rape is sex with the man making a decision for once. It's not much of a crime, if a crime at all.
In addition, M/F "rape" is about sex, while lesbian gang rape is about power and control. Violent lesbian gang rapists should be caught and hung.
Anonymous: What does it matter what preachers say? They hate the Bible and it's pro-men anti-women's rights laws as much as you do.
"If you doubt that, try raping some girl and tell a judge the bible gave you permission to do so."
Why? America doesn't give a damn about Biblical pro-men laws. Just like you. You are indeed a true American.
Death To women's Rights
--MikeeUSA--
PS: Anon: yes you are a true and modern Christian: a pussywhipped pro-women's rights douchbag. That is what a good Christian is today, and it's never going to change. As a good Christian you should try to get the Bible banned as anti-woman anti-homosexual hate literature: that's what a good Christian would do today.
Rape is about violence and cruelty to woman.
That there is an element of sex involved is obvious. But it's a twisted, violent sex that has nothing to do with normal consentual relations (the religious/ethical norm).
Rape is for hurting, controlling, punishing. It is interesting that in wartime, rape occurs frequently to "punish" enemy soldiers: hurt their women, thus hurt them.
Wehrmacht troops raped every Russian woman they could get their hands on during the Nazi invasion of USSR. Later, Russian troops raped every German woman they could find, as the Allies closed in on a defeated Third Reich.
Dear readers: Please see Bob's rules for comments on the left column of The World According to Bob. Your comments are welcome when they are within the guidelines for comments. Thank you.
Note to anonymous: (July 14, 2007 5:27 PM)
"Rape is about violence and cruelty to woman."
Those old tired feminazi lies weren't true when your grandmother tried them 50 years ago, and they don't get any closer to true when you keep repeating them over and over and over ad-nasium.
Females use sex for power and money, trying to control and dominate men. But to men sex is about sex and having children. Projecting your female evil onto men is a lie. Rape is only sex with the man taking charge for once, breaking the poor cunt's expected monopoly power over men. Boo fucking Hoo!
"Wehrmacht troops raped every Russian woman they could get their hands on during the Nazi invasion of USSR. Later, Russian troops raped every German woman they could find,"
Wars are always like that. Men get killed by the millions, and women survive by fucking the winners. No matter what the situation, females always breed with the strongest men. Then the feminazi whine that it was the women, not the dead men, who suffered in wars. Boo fucking Hoo!
"Rape is about violence and cruelty to woman."
Correct version: Rape is about gentleness and compassion to women.
Anon: why do you care what it is for women. Think of Men for a change.
Mikee, I do think of you and feel sorry for you.
Mikee, why do you want the burgeoning population increased even more? With 6 billion people on the planet, why do you demand more be added? Why not focus on taking better care of people already here - eliminating hunger, poverty, disease, violence, etc.
Bob:
Do you really believe women want to be raped? And that rape is not cruel or degrading?
Note to Anonymous (July 15, 2007 7:40 PM)
When I was in my 20s, I dated a young woman who's first sexual experience was being raped by her priest. The theological implications confused her, but the sex was sex, and sex is very enjoyable. Bodies respond to sex no matter who decided to do it.
The counselor's manuals at Rape Crisis Centers insturcts phone help counselors how to convince women who have had a great fucking good time that they have been "hurt."
Rape is nothing more than sex when the man takes control of the encounter. It hurts female feelings because they are taught that females control and dominate all sexual decisions. Female domination and control is wrong.
Note to Chicagoman: You are right. The evil lesbitches ought to be rounded up and hanged. Their extreme violence and perverted sexual assaults ought not be tolerated by anyone. Put them out of their misery.
"Mikee, why do you want the burgeoning population increased even more?"
Because I don't love the earth and I do not hate people and wish them to stop "producing" more people.
The more the merrier.
Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberty.
"Mikee, I do think of you and feel sorry for you."
Thank you, I'm glad you feel sorry for me as my life could be better; I could have a nice young girl for a wife (or two) who obeys me and is sweet etc etc etc.
Females should never dominate anyone, including other females.
You are so right Mikeeusa. No man should ever be charged with a faux "crime" for the sexual union with a female. A good fucking is a gift from the man and a boon to the female. It should never be construed as a crime because she lost her power to control him.
Bob sorry but I don't believe that girl you dated was raped by a priest. They prefer boys.
Mikee, to get that nice young girl you gotta be less focused on yourself, more focused on others. Maybe get a good job? Be more cheerful. Do volunteer work to show how much respect you have for the world's billions of souls.
"Mikee, to get that nice young girl you gotta be less focused on yourself"
I will never jump through hoops so as to make myself or wallet more attractive to women. I am no slave and I do not obey the dictates of females.
"Mikee, to get that nice young girl you gotta be less focused on yourself"
I will never jump through hoops so as to make myself or my wallet more attractive to women. I am no slave and I do not obey the dictates of females. I will not change myself inorder to be "chosen" by a female (remeber: in America and any country that criminalizes the rape or capture of virgin girls the woman makes the decision or marrage and mating, and the man takes whatever he is given).
"Do volunteer work to show how much respect you have for the world's billions of souls."
No, I do not respect the world's billions of souls.
I only respect Men who are opposed to women's rights or who engineer and create great things.
I do not respect any females. At most I may like a girl but I would never respect or venerate her. She is to be a servant, not a master.
I do not respect men who are pro-women's rights.
Thusly I do not respect the majority of the human population. Since most women around the world are pro-women's rights and many men are aswell I see most of the world's population as ENEMIES.
I want my enemies to die. I will not help them to live.
No, I'm not a good pro-women's rights Christian. I'm an evil evil bad bad Man.
Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberties.
"I'm an evil evil bad bad Man"
Contradiction, Mikee. Thought you said you reverenced the Bible. How does that make you evil?
"I'm an evil evil bad bad Man"
Contradiction, Mikee. Thought you said you reverenced the Bible. How does that make you evil?
Rest In Peace David Munis
http://mikeeusa.blogspot.com/2007/07/rest-in-peace-david-munis.html
"Contradiction, Mikee. Thought you said you reverenced the Bible. How does that make you evil?"
The Bible is considered Evil because it is pro-Men's rights and anti-women's rights. It is seen as a book of hate literature today and in many western countries (everywhere except the USA infact) it is illegal to publically utter many of it's verses under hate speech laws to protect women, gays, and lesbians.
There's a lot of screaming here on this Blog. If you angry men really did accomplish anything to change society, to improve your alleged "bad situation", this Blog would cease to exist. You'd be happy for once, calm, peaceful, productive, enjoying your lives.
But no way. Your anger continues to gush like a non-stop volcano.
Pity.
Anonymous:
That is because we are completely powerless in the face of the pro-women's rights police states we live in. The only thing we can do is scream and shout. We cannot fight because we have no military weapons nor are we permitted to aquire any. We cannot run because every country in the world is going pro-women's rights. The only thing we can do is turn our thoughts into words.
I do pray, as you do however, that these words oneday are turned into actions. Women's rights must die. Will it die in our generation?, I don't think so. I am too much of a coward to take up arms in violence against women who are pro-women's rights and the government that represents them as I would surely perish.
The men in the Men's Movement want happiness in this world. We cannot achive that however if we are dead, but if we cling to life we will only ever be slaves.
I apoligise that I choose to take no action. I am a coward. I should fight physically against women's rights and the governments that they own. I should fight physically against this socialist woman's paradise. I do not for I fear death and uncomfort.
Salvation lies in the desperate.
Mikee why don't you shoot up a classroom full of female engineering students, then turn the weapon on yourself? You said you don't fear death.
Note to anonymous: (July 20, 2007 3:33 PM)
It would be wrong for Mikee to commit suicide. Shame on you for suggesting it. You are obviously very misandrist.
Bob, this fearful anonymous little girl just keeps groping and pawing in the dark hoping that she could possible hit on any cogent point at all. All we have to do is sit back and watch how she just keeps revealing her depraved self and digging herself a deeper hole in hopeless self defeat.
Tsk, tsk...
We actually don't even have to utter another word...
Note to Faustus: I've had to delete most of her comments for violaton of the rules for comments. You haven't seen the worst of her childish misandrist rants.
Bob, check this out:
● Nigerians must let go of traditional notions of male dominance. As Martin Foreman, Director of the AIDS Programme of the Panos Institute, London, has said: “...the AIDS epidemic cannot be contained until men are persuaded to reassess their traditional concepts of masculinity. Without men, there would be no AIDS epidemic.”
http://www.iheu.org/node/979
I hate humanists (remeber, human means women and children. Men are just machines/slaves). I believe they should be slaughtered.
Note to Mikee:
"Women are reported to make up 60% of HIV/AIDS sufferers in the country...Sex is the main means of infection by the HIV virus...women cannot expect fidelity from their husbands."
It is clear that it is the women who are out screwing around, like most African cultures. A double dose of AIDS will be good for them. It's a shame that misandrist bitch author, Ms. Celestina Omoso Isiramen hasn't gotten a case herself.
It's most unfortunate that such pro-women's rights anti-men's rights women such as that author is allowed to live.
We don't Muslims and Africans kill them?
Almost no one kills feminists.
The ONLY time a feminist has been killed in my memory is during the first week of the invasion of Iraq.
People and terrorists etc kill every other kind of person... why aren't women's rights activists ever killed?
The only way to defeat an ideology in the span of a life time is to kill it's adherents.
Bob seems to applaud the idea of another Marc Lepine shoot-out in some classroom.
ok let's say some angry man massacres a class of women engineering students.
Will that really scare off all the coeds? Will they all withdraw, get tuition refund, and pack their suitcases to exodus in droves?
Will they then scramble to find a husband for whom they will be perfect servants? All in an atmosphere of trust and affection? Especially after witnessing a bloody massacre by an angry man who demands that women adore and serve men?
Psychology 101 is simple: No one can feel love and trust with a gun to their head.
When a woman shows affect towards her child, why is it that so many men show disgust? rolling their eyes, muttering, dirty looks at her
Who (or What?) is this "Anonymous" nutter?
Note to Anonymous:
I suggest that you read further on The Truth According to Bob before speculating.
A good place to begin is It Wasn't Men in which Bob discusses how femimists and modern denial feminists are responsible for a very violent war on men.
Next read It really doesn't matter
After you have finished those articles you will begin to understand why many men around the world view Marc Lepine's attack on feminists as the first active counter attack against a massive feminazi onslaught. See Marc Lepine Day for more on Marc Lepine and his counter attack against feminazi oppression.
"Psychology 101 is simple: No one can feel love and trust with a gun to their head."
Psycology 304: Fear is more effective for contol then love.
You cannot get the majority of women to love men by being nice to women. A few females will genuinely love men who were nice to them and will serve them and be good girls: these females are genetic anomolies, accidents, perversions of nature (good perversions though). For the normal female fear is the only thing that can keep them from hating men and acting on that hate (murder of husbands, cutting off of penis of husbands/boyfriends etc, torture of men).
Men should use fear 24/7 against our female population who refuses to submit and who hate men.
Using fear once can be shrugged off, if it is constant it works however. ... Ask anyone who pays taxes :).
--MikeeUSA--
Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberties.
Some men hate women for demonstrating affection, being "motherly". Some men despise women for breathing. Some men hate women who succeed and are strong. Others despise women who don't succeed professionally.
Bob: How many men have you actually talked to face to face, that will tell you they approve Mrac Lepine?
YO WHAT IS UP BOB!
Check this out http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-taxevaders20jul20,0,4692524.story?coll=la-home-center
N.H. couple evade death and taxes
The Browns have been holed up, refusing to pay the IRS or go to prison. It's a battle that might end in bloodshed.
Here is a site set up by their supporters:
http://www.makethestand.com/
A bunch of people have joined them in their stand from around the country. One person who is camped out at their house is a recently retired solider with a .50 cal rifle which he recently bought named Cirino Gonzalez (his Dad who is a Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons expert may or may not join his son in the stand against the government police state).
Some of the supporters are ready to wage a 2nd American revolution (thought they are unlikely to succede). Many are waiting for the government people to attack and will fight and die to wage war against the federal and state assault.
I think that anyone faced with imprisonment should try to murder those trying to imprison them rather then sumbit.
Prison is hell.
When you die you may go to heaven, hell, or no where: you have better odds in death.
Fear does NOT keep anyone from hating their tormentor. Fear GUARANTEES the victim will loathe you, and make every effort to either kill you or escape.
Prison camps are run by fear. Saddam Hussein and his sons kept prisoners and raped, enslaved, beat and tortured them.
Note to Mikee:
I saw a TV piece about these brave Americans. I am reminded that the American Revolution involved an army in which about 100,000 men served and of which 25,000 men died out of a population of about 4 million. In today's American population of about 300 million an equivalent army of Patriots would have something close to 10 million men and suffer 2 million deaths. It will probably take an equivalent effort and the involvement of a significant part of the American citizens to overthrow tyranny. Perhaps this battle in NH can be a catylist like the Ride of Paul Revere.
Neal Boortz has a lot to say about taxes - also the Fair Tax.
For a long time, I was one of those men who believed that the sexes were essentially the same. I believed in so-called "gender equality." I used to believe that women could do all those things men could do, and should be given equal opportunity to do them.
I now know that all that I believed is bullshit.
Like many men, I had accepted without quesiton the liberal propaganda coming out of our TVs, movies, newspapers, and schools. Only much later did I realize how very different reality was from the fantasy portrayed in the news and entertainment media.
I agree with Mikeeusa. Women must be controlled and disciplined by male power. And an essential aspect of male power is anger and the ability (and possibility) to cause violent physical harm to women.
It's not important what women think of this. What's infinitely more important is that MEN come around to this view. And I believe they can. Because I myself was one of those men.
And I also know I can easily convince men through reasonable, logical arguments of the benefits of this view - which means women must counter by explaining how my views do not benefit men.
Only determined, righteous male anger - looming over women - will make them behave decently and appropriately. Otherwise, the result is what we see now: women completely out of control in society, acting destructively and without regard for others, for society, or of the consequences.
Note to Anonymous: (July 24, 2007 5:36 PM)
You said, "I now know that all that I believed is bullshit."
That is an accurate statement but the word you chose is misandrist feminism. Feminists have controlled our language to imply that all lies are male, "bullshit." They pretend that female shit don't stink. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The feminazi lies about which you write are "COWSHIT!" Your assesment of the lies is accurate, but let's put the blame where it belongs, on the females, the COWS. It's COWSHIT!
Hehe, cowshit.
I too agree with Mikeeusa. There is no question that, at a minimum, the rights of women in western society must be substantially reduced. No society anywhere can tolerate women who are free to act as men, because that society simply will not last long.
More and more men must understand that reducing (or even eliminating) women's rights is in men's and society's interests; at a minimum, eliminating women's rights does not negatively affect men or their interests whatsoever.
And as Mikeeusa pointed out, eliminating women's rights would also clean up most of the problems we have today concerning divorce, alimony, child support, sexual harassment, and rape laws.
I can now randomly die at any time.
Today I was diagnosed with Hypertropic Cardiomyopathy, which is a heart something or other which causes one to die due to heart troubles at a random time between 0 years old and 99 or 120 years old. I was given a perscription for some medicine that would slow down my heart rate (BTW, I'm 21, don't do drugs, alchohol, STDs, or other harmful substances) and make me more tired all day, it's a drug they give children who are "too hyper" in school. I'm not taking
it because I don't want to slow or dumb myself down into a zombie. I'd rather die suddenly at any random time then be the walking dead. Also I'll be going on vacation this week.
Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberties.
Fact: when men control women with violent force, or the threat of violent force, women will behave better.
The reason western women are behaving so badly right now is that men are not disciplining them with their superior physical force.
Women, left to themselves, are like children: their inherent self-centeredness means they are totally incapable of understanding right and wrong behavior without men to discipline, punish, and guide them.
That is why women cannot have the same rights (if any) as men. Women are not capable of being free individuals to the same extent men are.
And that is also why women must be threatened with the use of male violent force as a disciplinary measure.
"And an essential aspect of male power is anger and the ability (and possibility) to cause violent physical harm to women."
* * *
Has the writer ever committed an act of violence?
What were the consequences?
Did it make him feel satisfied? Solve his problems?
Did the victim become his willing slave, or react with shock and disgust and fight back?
Finally, consider anybody advocating constant anger (bad for overall heart health), coupled with violence towards those they fear:
Do they truly believe in that? If so, are they willing to go public and tell their ideas to everyone: family, neighbors, bosses, etc. ?
Or remain anonymous.
Good god, you act like women are the worst enemy on the planet. Are you really that preoccupied with women? Get a life.
Controlling by violence is naive and unworkable in the extreme. The more you do that, the more they search for ways to fight back, destroy their tormentors, or escape.
" Anonymous said...
Controlling by violence is naive and unworkable in the extreme. The more you do that, the more they search for ways to fight back, destroy their tormentors, or escape.
July 27, 2007 6:10 PM "
This of course is absolute nonsense. Violence is actually very workable and quite effective. It is what keeps countries safe and secure from invaders. It is what prevents a society from becoming chaotic and lawless.
Women have always been kept in check by male superior force. It is this superior force that is inherent in all men, regardless of temperament or background. It is what protects women as well as disciplines women. That is how it has always been, and always will be.
Any such notions of "fighting back" is childish feminist nonsense. But then, women are basically children in adult bodies who must be guided by men as to what is correct thinking.
In any case, what women think about it ultimately doesn't matter - it is what men think about it that matters.
Give examples of violence you'd use on women if you could. Are you talking about just hitting with a fist or club? Or brandishing a weapon like a gun, knife, cigarette lighter?
" Anonymous said:
Has the writer ever committed an act of violence?
What were the consequences?
(childish, feminist blathering snipped)
July 27, 2007 5:39 PM "
Nothing written above matters, of course. This is just another emotionally disturbed feminist woman - a western woman. As a woman, she lacks the capability to tackle this issue intelligently. Her opinions on the issue don't matter one whit.
Besides, a man lowers himself when he chooses to debate a woman - especially on how to appropriately punish her for her bad behavior.
Ultimately, women are by nature too self-centered to understand that they are bound by moral standards concerning men.
That is why they need a superior external force (i.e., men) to set them straight and make them behave properly towards men. More men have to understand this.
" Anonymous said...
Good god, you act like women are the worst enemy on the planet. Are you really that preoccupied with women? Get a life.
July 27, 2007 6:06 PM "
I know you are that preoccupied with this site and my comment. So speak for yourself - you get a life.
I also know that you don't have a single intelligent, logical response to refute its validity.
And that is why you responded the way you did.
Guys, be careful here...she is asking for discreet examples of preferred violence methods. Posting anything of the sort, even if they are just mental exercises, could be used as evidence of promoting hate speech and getting this blog shut down, with the very real possibility of legal prosecution; it's never worth it. We've already lost Fred X, Duncan, and Captain Zarmband. Don't hand another victory over to the enemy.
Anonymous asked "Give examples of violence you'd use on women if you could."
The best thing to do with an unruley female is for a real man to turn her over his knee and give her a good hard spanking, perhaps with a paddle so as not to hurt his hand. After her tush is warmed sufficiently to raise sufficient submission, give her a hard fucking and then send her back to her kitchen to mind her pots and kettles.
Too many men these days have no clue how to treat a female.
All posts of Bob are rhetorical in nature only, and should not be construed in any other manner. Bob does not advocate insurrection, sedition, murder, violence, assault, or any other criminal or illegal acts.
The same interpretation should be applied to all comments. All comments areare rhetorical in nature only, and do not advocate insurrection, sedition, murder, violence, assault, or any other criminal or illegal acts.
Caution:
When you want to beat somebody into submission, NEVER pick on somebody your size or bigger.
"But then, women are basically children in adult bodies who must be guided by men as to what is correct thinking"
Guided by which males? all 3 billion of them on the planet?
Well it's interesting to say the least... The Regulars -- Masculist Man, Chicagoman, Mr. Anon (who calls everybody childish), Bob Allen, Mikee with his heart ailment.
All these guys talking tough about forcing submission on females. Even beating women till they break.
Just one problem: anonymous guys who talk tough on Blogs, are usually milquetoasts at work.
Shy, hesitant to stand up for their rights, often pushed around.... polite on the outside, even courtly to women. Yet seething with anger and humiliation on the inside.
Did that describe this group?
"Guys, be careful here...she is asking for discreet examples of preferred violence methods. Posting anything of the sort, even if they are just mental exercises, could be used as evidence of promoting hate speech and getting this blog shut down, with the very real possibility of legal prosecution; it's never worth it. We've already lost Fred X, Duncan, and Captain Zarmband. Don't hand another victory over to the enemy."
When obey the enemy(feminist,women's right's activist) you are her servant and captive.
To censor ourselves under the shadow of women's laws is defeat. To obey women's laws is surrender.
We must disobey.
If Bob's blog get's shutdown I'll give him an account on my shell server (which has HTTPS (secure HTTP) space).
Death To women's Rights
Viva Men's Liberties :)
(My heart hasn't killed me yet).
"When you want to beat somebody into submission, NEVER pick on somebody your size or bigger."
I like girls who are smaller, younger, lighter, and weaker then me. I think all sane non feminist men have similar preferances.
PS: Up here in New Hampshire (I'm on vacation) at the resort I'm at I saw a nice young small and cute 13 year old girl with glasses. She seemed low key and had visible signs of being able to have children (breasts). If this were a man's country I would beable to marry such a girl. However this is a woman's federation of 50 police states: the feminist utopia of woman's freedom. I cannot marry the type of young and obedient girl(s) I want to marry... unless, ofcourse, I wish to die.
Death To women's Rights.
"Well it's interesting to say the least... The Regulars -- Masculist Man, Chicagoman, Mr. Anon (who calls everybody childish), Bob Allen, Mikee with his heart ailment.
All these guys talking tough about forcing submission on females. Even beating women till they break.
Just one problem: anonymous guys who talk tough on Blogs, are usually milquetoasts at work.
Shy, hesitant to stand up for their rights, often pushed around.... polite on the outside, even courtly to women. Yet seething with anger and humiliation on the inside.
July 29, 2007 4:46 PM "
To The Men:
you have just read the above post - by an American woman no doubt.
Now do you understand men why women like her need to be disciplined and punished with male physical force?
If she had been in the same room alone with any of us men, and if we had dealt with her appropriately (i.e., physical violence or threat of physical violence), she would have done a 180 degree turn in her entire personality and behavior. She would have apologized profusely for her despicable behavior of insulting men with malice in her heart.
That she did not get any male discipline from either a father or husband was a tragedy: she is a product (and ultimately victim) of the "gender equality" movement, a sociopath who lacks empathy or respect for men. She is an utterly worthless woman without a purpose to society. She is only its misfortune.
Men, ask yourselves this: is the above woman poster speaking for your benefit? How has she addressed your concerns and needs as men?
And how exactly does her position help men? And what do you gain by rejecting the position of using male physical force to correct female behavior?
She is a stupid, worthless American woman - an ugly piece of filth. She writes the above only to spite you because of her pathological hatred of men.
But if she had received what is only her due (a spanking, a slap across the face, or threat of either one) believe me men, she would have turned out to be a far FAR better woman and person. And then she would have been worth something to men and to society.
The above female poster perfectly illustrates why women are not meant to be free, and cannot have the same rights as men. Women cannot handle freedom responsibly. They become degraded when there are no controls to restrain their child-like behavior. They must be controlled by men, and by the use or threat of male physical force.
To Mr. Anon (July 29, 2007 11:36 PM )
The poster who got you so riled could be male. But the point was well taken: you are probably polite and shy in person. And you'd be mortified if your posts were ID'd.
There is virtually no chance of this blog of Bob Allen being shut down. That would violate free speech. And what is "hateful" here?
It's just opinions. The American way. The contents of the minds of unhappy souls who express their fury in words, not bullets. So far. (Better a blog than bullets.)
Anon, it is always OK to hit people when you dislike their opinions.
"The poster who got you so riled could be male. But the point was well taken: you are probably polite and shy in person. And you'd be mortified if your posts were ID'd."
I wouldn't care if my posts were ID'd, I espouse the same viewpoint in Real Life (TM). Yes, I'm the proto-typical anti-women's rights radical university student playing hard and fast with the rules of speech ettiquite.
--MikeeUSA--
http://mikeeusa.blogspot.com
Infact, if you dig deep enough you can indeed find my true Real Life identity.
"Anon, it is always OK to hit people when you dislike their opinions."
If it's a wife of yours and she's being disobedient, snotty, etc; yes you are correct.
Women were made for Men.
Men were not made for women.
(as stated in the Bible BTW :) )
--MikeeUSA--
http://mikeeusa.blogspot.com
Mikee would you hit people bigger than yourself?
How would you like it if somebody hit or injured you, simply because they disliked your views on religion, politics, economics, etc. ? Remember, if they are bigger than you, than can hit you without fear that you'll strike back to protect yourself.
Mikee are you able to work despite your heart ailment?
Note to Anonymous: (July 31, 2007 5:21 PM)
Intention and determination are much more important in fights than differences in size. A smaller person with intent to do hurt and determinatoin is often the dominate one in physical confrontations.
"Mikee would you hit people bigger than yourself?
How would you like it if somebody hit or injured you, simply because they disliked your views on religion, politics, economics, etc. ? Remember, if they are bigger than you, than can hit you without fear that you'll strike back to protect yourself."
More self-serving feminist blather.
It is very amusing how American women react to this issue. Now she is pleading with men, making moral appeals to garner sympathy for the "poor weak defenseless females." How utterly laughable. This woman (like American women generally) is so low she will stoop to any trick just to save her own skin.
Again, she and the other women posters here think only of protecting themselves from the consequences of thier own bad behavior.
They dont think about men, or about how their behavior affects them. They dont consider their own moral responsibility to behave respectfully towrads men.
But then, that is exactly how a child behaves: as if the whole world revolves around him/her with everyone else catering to his/her whims.
That's why we place controls on children's behavior and restrict their freedoms.
We also don't give children a pass on bad behavior. We punish them even though they are smaller and weaker than adults. Sometimes children need to be smacked in order to learn.
The only reason men shouldn't use physical force against a woman right now is that it's against the law. At the moment men should be restrained and non-violent.
But the idea that it is wrong to physically punish women is merely some strange hangup of men's that western women have taken full advantage of at men's expense. This flawed attitude in men must change first if women are to become better people.
"How would you like it if somebody hit or injured you, simply because they disliked your views on religion, politics, economics, etc. ? Remember, if they are bigger than you, than can hit you without fear that you'll strike back to protect yourself."
Every man lives under the threat of that force daily: police. Police make sure that woman's law is upheld. Police beat, kill, and imprison men who act on views (often religious) that women and their employees (the police) dislike; for example: taking young wives (under age 18 or 16, EX: 12-14 year old girls who are able to have children), taking multiple wives, not obeying women, making women obey men, ruling the family. Men who do these things that the Bible (religion) is happy with are killed and imprisoned by _Women_ through their hired employees the Police.
So, yes, I know how it feels. (And) Yes; I think men should bring their power down upon women who are rebellious (most women).
Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberties.
--MikeeUSA--
Suppose a woman's behavior is not really "bad", but some man just thinks it is? In other words, he is super-sensitive with a pathological fear of all females on earth? (hating ALL people of a certain group is irrational)
Also curious of Mr. Anon would like to beat certain categories males? For example, military cadets under age 30? Male employees who fail to demonstrate subordination?
This business of angrily desiring to inflict pain is dangerous. Hardly worthy of human beings -- unless in self-defense, or your enemy is truly obnoxious in the extreme.
When you beat up those who angered you by telling the truth, it won't make the truth go away. It will only fuel your bitterness.
The man Anon - give some examples of a woman's "bad behavior" that would so enrage you into beating her up:
Adultery?
Mocking you in front of others?
Burning the toast?
Ridiculing you because you didn't perform?
Forgetting to buy an item?
Lying in court or to police?
Stealing cash from your wallet?
Forging your name?
Having bad breath?
Forgetting your anniversary?
Converting to a religion to be true to her conscience?
Praying in a manner true to her conscience?
Having a Ph.D. in biochemistry?
Being more talented than you in certain areas such as science, literature, languages, music... ?
Not ironing a shirt properly?
Getting cancer?
Anonymous (August 01, 2007 4:05 PM) said..."Suppose a woman's behavior is not really "bad", but some man just thinks it is?"
What we have here is a failure to understand the concept.
Bob and others should define bad behavior, in their terms.
Anonymous (August 01, 2007 5:35 PM) said..."Bob and others should define bad behavior, in their terms."
What we have here is a failure to understand the concept.
What is deemed "bad behavior" to one person, is not a problewm to others.
Anonymous (August 02, 2007 12:27 PM) said..."What is deemed "bad behavior" to one person, is not a problewm to others."
I think we are starting to catch on here. According to moral and legal codes going back thousands of years (before feminazism), the husband and father has the moral responsibility and authority to determine what is right for his family. Anyone who goes against his decisions and authority is acting badly.
Bad behavior is a female not obeying her husband (her master). It's not hard to understand... unless you are a rebellious woman or a cowed and obedient man.
--MikeeUSA--
"The man Anon - give some examples of a woman's "bad behavior" that would so enrage you into beating her up: Adultery?" {rest of womanish nonsense snipped}
"Suppose a woman's behavior is not really "bad", but some man just thinks it is?" {rest of womanish nonsense snipped}
"Bob and others should define bad behavior, in their terms."
Men: the above female posters are what you can (and will) expect from American women generally when you confront them with hard truths. They behave like spoiled children, and really, that's what they are: children in adult bodies.
They have also not shown you men that they are worthy of your love, devotion, or protection. They hate you for punishing them for their bad behavior, but they show no willingness to care for you, or prove that they are decent people for you.
Men should not bother wasting time responding to women who choose to challenge men. For one thing, a woman who challenges a man is unfeminine and worthless. For another, women are not interested in men's welfare or thier concerns. Women are out only for themselves and always have been. All their responses are meant to demoralize men.
And again, a man lowers himself by responding to a woman attempting to debate a man. It is stupid and undignified for a man to debate a woman on the issue of punishing women for her bad behavior. You as adults don't debate children: you lead and discipline them and tell them what their limits and boundaries are. And you accept no debate from them, otherwise you erode your own authority and power.
Bob et al,
Think of your life experiences.... the families you knew.
Can you recall any family where the man ruled by fear, beatings, kicking, choking, verbal abuse, mockery, stereotypes, humiliations, denial of civil rights of the women and children, etc?
And did that family function with respect, trust, harmony?
Bob et al,
Think of your life experiences.... the families you knew.
Can you recall any family where the man ruled by fear, beatings, kicking, choking, verbal abuse, mockery, stereotypes, humiliations, denial of civil rights of the women and children, etc?
And did that family function with respect, trust, harmony?
Bob, many things existed for thousands of yrs. That doesn't make them right.
We've had slavery, disease, the plague, crucifixion, poverty, subjugation of women, violence, crime, child molesting, etc. for thousands of yrs. That doesn't make it right.
Leaving women and children unprotected, at the hands of some man, is dangerous to them. Suppose the husband/father is a nut? Suppose he gives orders that destroy the family? If you deny that many men are selfish, cruel, immature, you are insane.
Better for the authorities to intervene, than allow a psycho to destroy helpless members of his family.
Mr. Anon (2:25 am Aug 3)
You are ruled by fear.
No healthy person goes around screaming he wants to beat, punish and humiliate women just because he thinks they're hurting him.
Your fear has choked out any ability for you to enjoy a healthy family life. It's a shame you can't appreciate modern life in the 21st c., complete with human rights for all. Including YOU. Instead, you fantasize in some dark room about returning to the Dark Ages. That's not manhood - it's sadism.
No wonder you don't identify yourself. No wonder you troll these forums, searching for "opponents" to vicariously beat up, to feel "superior" to when you know what you really are.
Keep nurturing your fear and hate. It's all you understand.
One thing's for sure: If all women died tomorrow morning, you wouldn't have the peace you think you'd have. The demons inside you would destroy your weak little soul like termites.
Can't stand reading the truth? Try destorying the messenger. Nothing can really help you, Mr. Anon.
When you set out to bully/torture/control your victim, one of these happens:
1) The victims escapes (returns with the authorities if possible and you pay the price).
2) You break the victim in body, mind, soul. Possibly kill them.
3) Victim commits suicide (they can't stand the cruelty).
4) Victim kills you (they can't stand the cruelty).
Note to anonymous: The social disaster of today's non-families is beyond all calculation. Uncounted millions of bastard and divorce children are being seriously hurt. When a wife spends her time raising her husband's children, takes care to protect and support her family, and doesn't go off whoring because she's horney, there is no need for physical discipline. Human relations models that have nurtured a thousand generations of children should not be sacrificed on the altar of feminazi greed and arrogance.
If you can't solve problems without resorting to physical force, there's something wrong with both of you.
"One thing's for sure: If all women died tomorrow morning, you wouldn't have the peace you think you'd have. The demons inside you would destroy your weak little soul like termites."
Well, unfortunately for you, all women won't die tomorrow.
In fact, there are far too many women to go around in this world for that to happen. To put it bluntly: you American women are simply quite replaceable and disposable.
And more men are discovering that as they leave the US and the west, and head out to foreign lands where the women are of far higher quality than American and western women.
You just think that all women think and behave like you. But they don't, much to your great anger and disappointment. I'm afraid you American women are permanently damaged goods. You cannot be saved. And there is no question that you as a whole are destined for a fate of great unhappiness and suffering.
a bet for Mr. Anon:
I bet money you never had a healthy permanent relationship with any woman.
Not one from USA, UK, Arab world, Hindu world, no, not even an Eskimo.
(Maybe a temporary relationship, but nothing permanent. If you WERE happy, you wouldn't flood this forum with your angst.... despite swearing you'd never again respond to a "woman" poster who riles you).
This forum is valuable and hope it's never shut down. It serves as a high powered microscope to peer into the minds and fantasies of men who fear women.
It's also like tumbling into a time warp to study the mindset of Schopenhauer, Jack the Ripper, Frs. Sprenger and Kramer, Marquis de Sade, Comstock, Alois Schickelgruber, Haynau -- all men whose modern counterparts are amazingly similar.
Note to Anonymous (August 04, 2007 4:09 PM)
There is no such thing as a permanent relationship with a modern female. Even the best marriage lasts only until she gets bored, has a hissy fit, or gets the hots for some gardner. Then she files a "no fault" divorce, takes his house and children, and slaps him into indentured servitude (slavery). Feminism has destroyed all possibilty of any man having a permanent family relationship with modern feminazi females.
I know many couples who have been happily married for decades. Some for 10, 20, 30 years -- even longer.
Note to Anonymous (August 04, 2007 4:54 PM)
Ten years is "permanent"? In today's feminiazi land maybe that is. At the Seneca Falls Conference organized feminism declared the goal of women leaving their husbands, taking his children, and still forcing him to support her. Those goals have largely been achieved.
Since "no fault" divorce most marriages fail within a few years and none are any better than her next emotional outburst. There is no stability in vicinity of any female today. Almost half the children are now born to females who didn't even care enough about their brats to bother getting married. It is a social disaster of unprecedented proportions.
when I say that American women as a whole are permanently damaged and cannot be saved, I dont say that lightly. The signs are blatantly obvious and unavoidable to any thoughtful, observant individual.
I also believe that American and western women will not change for the better without first undergoing great suffering and pain, which is the consequence of the feminist movement of the last 4 decades.
Women's only hope now is for western men to understand women's nature as fundamentally different from man's. Society cannot pretend not to notice the differences between men and women. It must treat the sexes differently.
And that means many of the current rights enjoyed by women today MUST inevitably be reduced.
The fact is, women cannot be free individuals to the same extent men are. This is a basic truth that more and more men must understand if they wish to save their women.
Mr. Anon,
Why are you so interested in saving "your" women? They are not your property. You have enough toys. To "save" anybody, leave them alone. Trust me, destroying the freedom of ANY group of people will hurt ALL.
You will never be happy.
Anonymous (August 07, 2007 3:12 PM ) said...
"Trust me, destroying the freedom of ANY group of people will hurt ALL."
That is actually a good suggestion. If the feminazi had figured it out they would never have started nor continue to wage their very violent war on men.
Hint: It wasn't men who started the war on men. If those who chose to wage the war eventually lose the war, they have nobody to blame but themselves.
There is no war against men. You really want something to cry about?
Mr. Anon (7:40 pm Aug 7)
What steps have you actually taken to rescind women's rights?
Just writing on a blog won't help.
Note to Anonymous (August 07, 2007 4:50 PM):
That's what Hitllary said, "There is no war on the Jews, we are only protecting females from their evil conspiracy."
To Bob, Mr. Anon et al.
Who do you think you are?
Not a flippant question, but a sincere one.
Anyone who deems himself in a position to control other adults to the point of using violence to intimidate, should examine his own soul.
Who are YOU--- in relation to yourself, your neighbor, your universe, your god (however you envision an omnipotent power?
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/video/index.ssf?LC_11SPAN122
This is off topic, but Bob youshould check this out.
Comment related to topic:
12 and 13 year old girls are too young to marry, still too childish but 14 and above should be okay
"Why are you so interested in saving "your" women? They are not your property. You have enough toys. To "save" anybody, leave them alone. Trust me, destroying the freedom of ANY group of people will hurt ALL.
August 07, 2007 3:12 PM"
"Anyone who deems himself in a position to control other adults to the point of using violence to intimidate, should examine his own soul.
August 08, 2007 3:59 PM "
To the Men:
what can I say. You know as well as I do that the responses above are the childish rants of children in adult bodies, a.k.a. women.
They seem strangely unaware that they haven't refuted or challenged the unflattering, shameful descriptions I've given about them.
Instead, they keep clamoring for "rights" and "freedoms" - concepts beyond their capability of understanding.
A word of advice to men: when a woman tries to talk in a serious manner (for example, about rights and freedoms), you know immediately it's time to tune out. Women are not thinkers, since thinking is not in the female domain.
Ultimately, women's only role is to bear children, clean house, give sex to the husband, and otherwise play a supportive role to him. Beyond that, there's really no use for a woman in the larger society.
Anonymous (August 08, 2007 3:59 PM ) asked... "Who do you think you are?"
Easy babe, we are MEN
We are husbands and fathers, the MEN who have built a great civilization starting from a fire in front of our cave. We have been responsible for our families, our wives and childern since before our ancestors were swinging in trees. Our civilization is currently being rapidly destroyed by feminazi and their pussy whipped lackeys, but there are still real men in the world who will restore human decency and protect our children from their destruction.
Note to Anonymous: Please read the rules for comments in the left column of The Truth According to Bob. All comments must be germain to the topic of the article. Bob and/or other contributors are NOT the topic of the article.
Post a Comment
<< Home