The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

To usurp authority over the man

We had another suicide shooting yesterday. This time it was in two different cities in Colorado. Another disenfranchised and tormented young man, Mr. Matthew Murray, 24, of Englewood, Colorado, was turned away late at night from a Christian missionary organization. For some reasons that have not been made public he was refused lodging for the night. Apparently Mr. Murray had been turned away previously from the same Christian missionary organization. That rejection, the refusal of a warm place to sleep, after midnight on a cold winter night was apparently the last straw that broke his troubled and tormented mind. Mr. Murray got his pistol and killed the female who turned him away, and then also shot three of her assistants.

The next day Mr. Murray went to a large Christian mega-church. In the parking lot he shot some more members of the missionary organization that had turned him away the night before. As Mr. Murray entered the mega-church he was confronted and killed by a gun toting female, a Ms. Assassam. Read story.

Bob has observed before that modern “Christian” churches have become female dominated, even more so than in previous centuries. Females have always been the majority of Christian congregations, contributing their husbands hard earned money to support the churches, and teaching Christianity to their children. On any given Sunday females have always outnumbered men in the Christian churches. But today the females have become even more dominant. Females have outnumbered men in most Christian seminaries for several decades, and have taken over the church management committee and pulpits of many churches. In many protestant denominations the once powerful “Men's Fellowship” groups have faded out entirely. Although Bob is not Christian, Bob has to wonder if these modern feminist churches really still Christian?

“Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.” I Cor. 14:34-35.

“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.” I Timothy 2:12.

But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 1 Cor. 3:11

Several things became immediately clear when Ms. Assassin confronted, shot, and killed Mr. Murray. The first is that the females at the New Life Church in Colorado Springs were not keeping silent and deferring to their husbands in accordance with Christian teachings. Females at the New Life Church were packing heat and doing a man's job as security guards. Ms. Assassin asserted ultimate authority over a man, killing him. Bob is not sure what religion they teach at the New Life Church, but it sounds a whole lot more like femiNazi utopia rather than Christian theology.

Bob is also struck by the stark contrast between the one woman security force at the New Life Church and the vision of 600 blue suited cowards hiding behind 300 flashy light cars across the street from Columbine High School for 3 hours while children were being shot and a dozen slowly then bled to death. At Columbine High School the distraught young men first met the armed security guard – but the coward ran and instead of confronting the killers. Even when 600 “backup” blue suits arrived not one of them had the guts to step forward and stop the ongoing killing of children in the school.

At New Life Church, a single armed female, Ms. Assassin, demonstrated the power of courage when she confronted and killed Mr. Murray. She demonstrated more courage than all the blue gun thugs in the state of Colorado put together. Bob has commented previously on the cowardice of typical blue suited gun thugs. Like all gang members they only have courage when supported by the rest of their evil gang, and often not even then. The stark difference between the courage of one armed female and the cowardice of 600 Colorado men(?) shows how feminists have been so successful in taking over our whole society. Most men have become cowards, unable to take action even to save children, unable to confront feminazi hate mongers, unwilling to do what it takes for men to succeed. A long time ago the authors of Christianity wrote that women should look to their husband for his advice and direction. But today, men are cowards unwilling to take control and responsibility. We have women with guns taking responsibility to protect men, to teach men, to usurp authority over men, and to control men.

As long as the majority of men allow females to control and dominate we men will continue to slide deeper and deeper into slave status in our society. The number of distraught individuals like Mr. Murray will increase slowly because the oppression of men is untenable to men, but they have no focus which to direct their action against the real enemies of men.

The time for real leadership is near. Leaders of men need to gather those who have decided to do what it takes to overturn feminist inspired tyranny, and redirect their energy into more productive action.

UPDATE 12-11=07
It now appears that Mr. Murray's death will be ruled “suicide” by Colorado officials. Although Ms. Assassam fired several shots at Mr. Murray, and hit him more than once, it is now reported that the fatal wound to his head was fired by Mr. Murray himself. Apparently Ms. Assassam isn't a very good shot.

It was also reported that Ms. Assassam was a former blue gun thug from Minneapolis, MN. She had been fired from the Minneapolis force in 1997 for lying during an internal investigation. Sgt. John Delmonico, president of the Blue Gun Thug Officers Federation of Minneapolis, said Blue Gun Thugs were investigating a complaint that Assassam swore at a bus driver while she was handling an incident on a city bus.

It will also be reported in a few days that Ms. Assassam is the “real victim” because she “feels” bad due to the stress of the incident.

Read report


Anonymous Anonymous said...

The authorities got it wrong and the backstroke has begun.

The female security guard said during a press conference that she "took him down".

She did no such thing. He wrote the final chapter.

December 11, 2007 1:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Violent, angry man beats elderly Mother with belt :

Maybe Mom was not submissive enough to her grown son?

December 11, 2007 4:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Boo f-in Hoo. Po boy wanted a free room and board for the night and was refused. (he could as easily have gone to a regular homeless shelter).

Don't really blame the managers of that place - male or female. Some wild guy comes to your door, wants to crash for the night and your instincts don't trust him. Maybe he'd harm somebody, set fires? Only a fool takes in every homeless stranger that shows up on the doorstep.

December 11, 2007 5:12 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous (December 11, 2007 4:23 PM)
A very large percentage of boys are badly abused by mothers. It is likely that this man was returning the favor of abuse that he had suffered when she was big and he was small. Most parents who abuse children forget that there will come a day when she is old and he is strong.

December 11, 2007 5:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I could understand it, if that man's Mother had abused him when he was a helpless child.

But suppose she hadn't?

Possibly the man is deranged, on drugs or somehow not responsible for his actions. Sane men don't go around beating up people, especially elderly parents.

December 11, 2007 5:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There were several issues here. He was a member of said Missionary Group and did something to lose his membership. He posted threats online for some time. He had a grudge. He comes from a devout Family, but turned very anti Christian. The New Life Church in Colorado Springs financially supports the Missionary Center.

He committed suicide and shot himself. She did engage him in a gun battle, and is a former Peace Officer. She had some previous training.

The Anti Christian Bigotry that is spewed by the Secular Progressive Left is virulent and is hate speech.

Amanda Marcotte and other Gender Feminists refer to Christians derisively as Godbags and Christofascists. This is promoting hatred of Christians.

She lost her job as Chief Blogger with the John Edwards campaign as a result. Lots of angry Men, lots of ammunition and guns. Men on anti depressants who have lost their stake in life and the family.

This is an explosive mixture. The Shooter in Omaha also made threats, posted them online and was ignored.
He too had been on medication most of his life. But Men are the disposable gender we always have been. Only in the past at least we got some respect for our role. Now we have none at all. Dealing with someone who has nothing to lose is like dealing with a wild animal.

December 12, 2007 8:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The people at the-niceguy forum are concerned that Luke might turn into a "MikeeUSA" (who they see as an enemy). You might be getting too "hot headed" and they see this as a bad thing. Being compared to a "MikeeUSA" is one of the worst insults in the MRM: it means that you are a psycotic that needs to be shunned, turned on, banned, and kicked away to protect the "movement".

Maus is somewhat concened. nigeles175d defends Luke from being called a "MikeeUSA" and says you're not as loony as the psyco.

Your opinion?

December 12, 2007 9:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nearly, if not basically every, Christian today is a pro-women's rights "mangina" or feminist. Christianity is a woman's religion. If someone likes the Bible they should not call themselves a Christian, just say you like the Bible as it is. Too bad the Christians can't be driven out of this country, they all believe in women's rights, those who do not believe in women's rights "aren't Christian". Christians are bad.

December 12, 2007 9:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Most men have become cowards, unable to take action"

There's no reason for men to take action. If someone wants to kill members of the women's society men (even blue gun thugs) don't see the use in putting their life on the line to stop them. Why die for what you don't have a stake in; women own this country and this world, let them die for it. The police know this as much as any other man, they get divorced just like the rest of us at the hands of the women.

The purpose of the 300 police seems to be to make sure no one else can get into stop the gunmen from taking their revenge on the woman's society.

December 12, 2007 9:41 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous; (December 12, 2007 9:33 AM)
Bob has not read the "Nice guy" forum. The title sounds like mangina crapola though.

There is a fairly well organized feminist campaign to discredit and splinter men who support men. Many of them pretend to be "Men's Activists" or "friends of men," and have well funded blogs and forums on-line. The more a man supports men and opposes feminism, the more they attack him. MikeeUSA, Masculist Man, Bob, and numerous other consistent advocates for men are frequently attacked by the pro-feminist, anti-men moles in the so-called "men's movement."

It has become a little like being on the Canadian censorship list that was published a few years ago. If you aren’t being attacked by the feminists, you aren't manly enough to make them worry. If someone is attacking a real uncompromising men’s advocate, he or she is probably a feminist mole or a mangina faggot.

To use a phrase, "No more Mr. Nice Guy." It's time to attack the femiNazi with both barrels.

December 12, 2007 9:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Nice guy" poster believes age-brackets.
3rd page, last post.

at 40 if you are modestly successful you can date plenty of decent-looking women, and just dump them when they start clamoring for the guaranteed, long-term, one-way contract.

If a woman is one of the tiny minority who, today, make decent wives, the likelihood that she will be on the market beyond age 25 is very slight. The rare exceptions are typically exceptional women who really do have career pursuits that are not directed mostly at funding the fuck-for-all fest that precedes marriage to a money-mule and being in a milieu of money-making males, or women who, although of exceptional character, aren't notably gorgeous.

Seems to think that you can only marry females in your 'age bracket'.

When I say you should marry girls that just gained the ability to have children I get banned from that form and forums like it... pretty much every single men's rights / activism forum.

Same thing when I say that there is nothing wrong with raping your wives.

Same thing when I say women shouldn't be permitted to vote or hold any power.

The only non-mangina/feminist areas of the net are this weblog, masculinst man's weblog, and luke skywalkers weblog. Everywhere else bans for being anti-women's rights.

December 12, 2007 1:43 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Your are right there, anonymous. It's like Men's News Daily where their forum is run by a feminist cunt. Or K Rights where another feminist cunt runs their Yahoo discussion group.

They pretend to be Men's Rights Activists, but when push comes to shove, they adamantly support rights for cunts, even to the extent of banishing any MAN who dares speak for Men's Rights.

Bob has been banned from several so-called MRA web sites for objecting to "rights for cunts."

December 12, 2007 3:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check out what Capitan MRA sent me (my response is uptop):

"You really should consider that someone might read your comments and think that this behaviour is acceptable. I hope you will try to be more responsible in the future."

Good, I think it's acceptable too. Marrying a girl who is able to have children is not a sin, it is the correct thing to do. Killing feminists is not something I would ever condemn as feminist women hate men thus I am fine if someone were to do so*.

I am not going to stop posting these opinions.

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Captain MRA
Date: Dec 5, 2007 2:54 PM

Hi Mikee

When you answered Men's Movement's blog a while back I found some of your views disturbing.

I held back in my criticism because I thought it might be better to talk to you and try to encourage you away from these views.

I implore you not to post coments which seem to promote violence such as:

"Go to the local women's group office and liquidate it (kill the feminist women there). Wear a dark suit and drive an expensive car (these are more likely not to be suspect). Continue destroying the people who have helped to destroy countless of your fellow Men untill you are killed."

Or views that make it seem as if you are agreeing with marrying a child:

"The fact that Men get raped by prison faggots if they marry a young female of childbearing age isn't a real issue?"

You really should consider that someone might read your comments and think that this behaviour is acceptable. I hope you will try to be more responsible in the future.

Captain MRA

*IE: take said action against them.

December 12, 2007 5:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The NiceGuy's forum is a varied Men's Rights Community. With a variety of viewpoints. Some Conservatives, Libertarians, Liberals, Pick Up Artists,Players etc. There are Christians, Jews, Atheistis, Deists, Buddhists etc.

Many opinions are expressed. Manginas are usually converted or run off. The goal of many of us is not to emerge as a figure ourselves. But to advance the movement and awareness of Men.

To create a critical Mass of Men who can and will work towards a coherent movement.

David Usher is on Fox News tonight debating somebody from Last week Dr. Stephen Baskerville was on Fox News. This is real progress. Major voices in the movement are getting National Media exposure. The Lace Curtain is finally parting.

Last year Men's Rights Activist ran off the FemNags at The first time we flexed our collective muscles. We are becoming more confrontational and refuse to be silent. And Feminists are in a quandry of how to deal with it.

While I disagree with some of Bob's views. I believe he has many and varied life experiences. And he shares his viewpoints. They are not Politically Correct. Which prominent Feminist Human Rights Advocates are saying is resembling Stalinism and Political Oppression. Speech Codes have replaced debate on Colleges across America. Now dominated by Feminists.

Men are collectively storming the Bastille. And refusing to shamed into silence. So Feminists resort to the same tired, stupid, tactics.
New and Younger Voices are appearing. Some are Militant they have grown up knowing only hatred of their gender. And do not know America before Feminism.

Powerful cultural forces are at work. US Men are in record numbers rejecting US Women. Who are in a panic over it. Women weekly are calling for a return to Chivalry. Which Feminism killed. RIP.

Keep speaking out Bob.


December 12, 2007 6:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

EP will not tolerate "homophobia" on his blog now:

December 12, 2007 at 10:40 pm

Anonomouz / MikeeUSA

I think exposing feminism is a feminist.

Note: MikeeUSA is not recognised by the MRM due to the holding of extremist views.

December 12, 2007 at 10:42 pm

Exposing Feminism

Would you care to elaborate, Anonomouz?

December 12, 2007 at 11:13 pm


Anonomouz is Steele.

December 12, 2007 at 11:26 pm

Exposing Feminism

Strangely, Anonomouz’ IP address corresponds with this one exactly. It is not the same IP address as Robin Steele, who has commented here before.

It’s actually MikeeUSA, who is not recognised by the MRM due to the holding of extremist views, and who has commented here previously.

December 13, 2007 at 12:14 am

Anonomouz / MikeeUSA

Exposing Feminism is a wiki f****t? Figures, they are pro-women’s rights too. Would you like to fight wiki f****t?

Note: MikeeUSA is not recognised by the MRM due to the holding of extremist views.

December 13, 2007 at 12:17 am

Exposing Feminism

Mikee, I googled your IP address. I will not tolerate homophobia on this site. Consider yourself banned.

I support equal rights for all, that is why I am in the Mens Rights Movement.

This is a new one, now an MRA is complaining of homophobia? I know that most MRAs worship women and ban anyone that does not believe in women's rights, but usually they like to sling around anti-homosexual opinions like the best of us.

December 12, 2007 7:42 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Exposing Feminism said, "I support equal rights for all, that is why I am in the Mens Rights Movement

What? Claiming to support "equal rights" is classic feminist propaganda. It rolls off their tongues and out of their keyboards as a conditioned response. It is NOT a position of any Men's Rights Movement or Activist. Men's rights are not the same as the very, very feminist "equal rights" propaganda lie.

EF’s use of the archetypical feminist propaganda is good evidence that EP is a plant, a phony, a feminist pretending to be a Men’s advocate in order to cause misdirection and confusion.

EF also said, “I will not tolerate homophobia on this site. Consider yourself banned.

This is another archetypical feminist position, and is further evidence that EP is a hidden opponent of the Men’s Movement.

EP also said, “The Mens Rights Movement is against rape

Wrong. The men’s Rights Movement has no collective opinion on rape. Feminists are “against rape” and use “rape” as a propaganda hate weapon to browbeat and destroy men and the Men’s Movement.

This is another archetypical feminist position, and is further evidence that EP is a hidden opponent of the Men’s Movement.

Overall, It is not up to a feminist troll to decide who is and who is not a Men’s Rights Activist, nor what is and is not a Men’s Rights position.

December 12, 2007 8:37 PM  
Anonymous Gannon said...

We are touching a lot of interesting issues here. While I think rape is a crime, it's clear that the punishments assigned for it are too high. A reasonable crime for rape would be a 5 year sentence,with redemptuion for a first time offense, and not the actual 10 to 20 year sentences that are imposed. Also, having high punishments for rape is counterproductive, because it creates incentives to simple kill the woman, a very useful way to avoid jail, because in real life the police is rather incompetent. Also, the fake rape claims are a huge problem. The system needs to remind itself that every accused is innocent unless otherwise proven. Also, women must be puinished if they present rape claims which later are proven to be false. MikeeUSA has some interesting positions, but talking about his heart condition and desire to randomly kill women sometimes make it difficult to take him serious. The things do not help you Mikee. The issue where Mikee really has my support is related to ages of consent and dating age brackets. Age of consent in the US is ridiculousy high. Age of consent should be 14 for heterosexual acts (not lower than 16 for fags)and even as low as twelve if the partners are below 21. Also, girls should be allowed to marry at 14 with parental consent. A lot of people here forget that maybe the first initiative taken by the feminists was raising ages of consent. And true MRA know this. The expectation for men to look for wifes in their age bracket is ridiculous, unless we are talking about very young males here. It doesn't make sense for a man to marry a woman over 25, specially if she is divorced and already have children. I know guys who are in their early thirties and went to their churches looking for a wife. Instead of introducing them young women of around 20 for them to marry they were introduced 30 year old divoced women. When one of this guy started to date a 19 year old woman of the church, the congregation started to threaten him. It's normal for men to look for younger wifes, 5 to 15 years younger. So the ideal wife for a 20 year old man would be around 14, for a 25 year old would be around 16, for a 32 year old around 20 and for a 40 year old man around 25.

December 13, 2007 3:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't see the ads anymore.

December 13, 2007 4:01 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
You are right that the "crime" of "rape" is way over punished. Any man who has ever participated in sex knows that sex is a normal and fun activity. The only difference between normal sex and "rape" is that the man got to decide for once. The female has lost her assumed power to control and dominate men through sex. I fail to see where that is a crime of worse severity than the price of prostitution, perhaps a fine of $20 would be a fair penalty in severe cases.

As for age of consent, it was 12 years old for girls in New Mexico until the 1990s. Feminist advocates got it raised to turn normal young men into criminals and normal young females into "victims. Nevertheless, the average for young women getting laid the first time in the US is 14 years and a few months. All of their boyfriends are now "criminals" in the feminazi injustice system.

As you say, the femininazi now dominate churches aa well as statehouses. They all ought to be sent packing.

December 13, 2007 7:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

They shouldn't be sent packing, the pro-women's rights people should be killed on the spot in a very painful way.

Letting them leave would not be revenge. We need revenge. Slow brutal revenge. Those being killed should know they are being killed, it should be slow enough so they suffer for hours or days and can be talked to as they die and their doom gloated over and their allies butchered before their eyes.

December 13, 2007 11:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another congressman that needs to be murdered (wants more internet policing, filtering, etc, he needs to die):

Congressman Hollywood Wants To Make DMCA Tougher
Posted by Zonk on Thursday December 13, @01:53PM
from the who-elects-these-guys dept.
The Internet Government Businesses United States Politics
Stormy seas writes "Congressman 'Hollywood' Howard Berman (D-CA) used a House subcommittee hearing today to express his view that the DMCA was in need of a rewrite. In his view, it doesn't go far enough. During his opening remarks for a hearing on the PRO-IP Act, Berman said that the DMCA's Safe Harbor needs further scrutiny and that it might be time to make filtering mandatory. There's more: Berman also 'wants to examine the "effectiveness of takedown notices" under the DMCA, and he'd like to take another look at whether filtering technology has advanced to the point where Congress ought to mandate it in certain situations.'"

December 13, 2007 11:06 AM  
Anonymous Death to Robin Steele said...

Speaking of people that ought to be murdered, Fembitch steele just got owned and she knows it and even admits it:

Men's Rights Activist Robin Steele... Exposed!!!

Great job, Luke & Fidel, Two of Masculist Man's & bob's star pupils!

December 13, 2007 11:49 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to "Death to Robin Steele":
There is a huge moral gulf between murder and killing in warfare. The moral teaching of most religions condemn murder, but encourage or praise killing in war. The laws of most nations do likewise make that distinction.

When men are rallying to defend ourselves against the very violent femiNazi War On Men, we need to be clear that we are killing in a war, a morally and legally acceptable killing.

December 13, 2007 12:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Death to Robin Steele said...

Is probably steele as she links to her own blog in that post. She's a trollster/jokester. I could do better...

December 13, 2007 2:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, you are a member at Chris Keys forum. Why won't you log into the thread that is hidden from the public, but open to members, and expose Chris Key's censoring of Masculist Man? Show your loyality if you really do have some, as Masculist Man is a brother in arms and real man, and I am amazed you have not written an expose piece on the dictatorship that is Chris Key.

This is not a request, this is a demand, for justice.

December 16, 2007 10:08 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
I do not see where it would be advantageous for the Men's Movement for Bob to participate in a feud between MEN. I will continue to support Masculist Man. However, it will serve no purpose and have no positive effect to attack Mr. Key.

Probably everyone is aware of Mr. Key's prejudices already.

December 16, 2007 11:22 AM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...


It is us militants that are causing change,not the moderates. The moderates ran the '80's and '90's and got nowhere. Nowhere,that is until we came along.

December 17, 2007 12:17 AM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

Anonymous December 13, 2007 11:01AM,

I agree wholeheartedly.

December 17, 2007 12:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Let's all anonomyously email to show him how much we disagree with his pro-women's rights stance.

December 17, 2007 5:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Luke introduces himself on the nice guy forum and immediatly gets attacked:

He might be one of those eeeevil radical men's liberty people! Better cool his jets!

QUOTE(PlasmaSphere @ Dec 16 2007, 09:56 AM) *

A new member, specifically mentioning other members by name, in his introduction. That is suspicious, to say the least, and it concerns me.

I invite you to search my name and read my postings. "The Objectification of Men" is one of my favorites, though, for some reason, none of my stuff is in "The Best Of" section. I guess I'll have to make a shadow account like most others do in order to get posted in there.

Enough of my ramblings, though. Should you be a troll, your judgment and exile will be swift. If you are sincere, you'll be welcomed here.

Rational thought does not a conformist make.

December 17, 2007 6:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Drew J says marrying women younger then you makes you less of a man:

[quote]Bingo. It's what Paul McCartney did and now he got taken for millions. Don't marry women who are half your age. It is not smart. It's thinking with your ego and your penis. It's being a mangina. By and large, age gaps like this don't make for lasting relationships. By and large.[/quote]

[quote]It's being a mangina[/quote]

No, piece of shit, it's following the correct biological urge. The only mistake Paul made was not going for a younger female. Girls should be married off once they are able to have children, not later then they are 18, 20, 25 etc.

December 17, 2007 7:04 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (December 17, 2007 5:02 PM)
Good suggestion. Sending as much opposition to Steelrrhoid's anti-men attack is a good thing.

December 17, 2007 7:45 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous (December 17, 2007 7:04 PM)

Drew J says marrying women younger then you makes you less of a man:

Drew J misunderstands the meaning and purpose of marriage. Marriage is the biological union of men and women to make children and create families. A man needs to marry a female of child bearing age to bear his children. There is no other purpose for a man (or woman) to marry.

Real men understand that marriage is about making children. Ms. Drew need a non feminist education.

December 17, 2007 7:54 PM  
Anonymous MGHOW said...

Marriage is to form a family, and that means children. The women ideally should be younger, although, the same age or slightly older is not uncommon either depending on circumstances. In my case, my wife is older than I am and there are no issues.

I'd advice against any men marrying in femi-nut nations which have 'no-fault- divorces and the like. In the USofA, 90% of child custody goes to (surprise, surprise) the women, the remain 10% probably goes to the state, relatives and in a small amount of cases, the man (and I doubt he ever gets child support!).

If 70+% of the time a women initiates a divorce and with a divorce rate likely 60+% (once high divorce states like California are factored in) there is little reason to get married in the 'west'. Of the remaining 40% of marriages, how many men stay in the marriage out of fear of the consequences and how many are actually happy?

I'd advice men either stay single or marry and possibly expat to patriarchy nations where men have rights, marriage *IS* forever and families consist of the man, his wife and their children...and not the state. Any nation which allows for divorces is a nation I'd avoid.

There are many nations in the world, many wonderful foreign women to meet and perhaps one to marry and start a family with. Due to 'no-fault' anti-male laws in nations like the USofA, I'd avoid marriage there like the plague.


"Drew J says marrying women younger then you makes you less of a man:

Drew J misunderstands the meaning and purpose of marriage. Marriage is the biological union of men and women to make children and create families. A man needs to marry a female of child bearing age to bear his children. There is no other purpose for a man (or woman) to marry.

Real men understand that marriage is about making children. Ms. Drew need a non feminist education.

December 19, 2007 8:53 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home