The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

THE PILL for men!

This could be the biggest discovery for men of the 21st century. At long last, after a century of total sexist discrimination against men in medical research, scientists are inventing birth control pills for men.

During the entire 20th century all the funding on birth control was provided only for women. Men's health and reproductive needs was totally ignored by the sexist bigots in the medical industrial complex. Feminazi organizations like Planned Parenthood blocked pills for men. The first female birth control pill became widely available almost half a century ago in 1962 after research funding was provided by Planned Parenthood. In succeeding decades Planned Parenthood has received millions of dollars from the government for birth control research, but has blocked all research for men. Part of the reason for the total discrimination against men was because feminazi who control the medical industrial complex don't consider men to be real people. Feminism is, after all, the radical theory that only women are people.

The other huge reason that feminists have worked so hard to block birth control for men has been the feminazi demand for total control over our children and families. As long as only females have birth control pills, a woman is the only one who can decide not to have a baby, or to have our baby. She can lie to her husband or lover that she is taking pills, and then get pregnant without his permission. She can “forget” a couple of days, or stop entirely, and make a baby which she will keep and he will have to pay for, all without his permission or consent. Even the crude 19th century mechanical devices that men have tried to use are often rescued from waste bins and emptied of their contents as soon as his back is turned. Thousands, or perhaps millions of females have made a career out of finding a rich sucker, getting pregnant, and then slapping him with “child support” payments for the next 20 years.

For more than half a century the feminazi and their medical industrial complex have repeated their usual lies to excuse bigoted discrimination against men. They have claimed 1) That a pill for men would be too hard to develop, and 2) that men wouldn't take one if available. Both of these complete lies were based on nothing but their own sexist misandry. Despite being totally false, these were the standard lies of the birth control business for more than half a century. The real reasons were those stated above, females wanted total female domination of families and sex, and they didn't consider men to be important enough to merit any benefits or even concern.

But all that is changing. A decade or so ago some pharmaceutical company was doing research on a new drug intended to reduce heart attacks by promoting circulation. Quite by accident they discovered a very interesting side effect of increasing blood circulation in male sexual organs. Viagra was born. Viagra soon became a boom market, surpassing all their other products in total sales. A very clear lesson began to become apparent to pharmaceutical companies that had ignored men for a century. Men can be a very large market – SURPRISE! After Viagra, some pharmaceutical companies began looking around for other products to sell to men. Some government regulators and research funding administrators even noticed that men exist, a fact that had somehow slipped out of their vision.

Beginning early in the 21st century, with comparatively minuscule funding in Australia and the UK, some researchers started experimenting with possible approaches to a contraceptive pill for men. At first they mostly still believed the standard century old lies they had been taught in medical school, pills for men are too hard to invent. But a few researchers were willing to actually look at the old lies to see if they were true. With only a very small amount of research it became rapidly apparent that a pill for men might turn out to be easier to make than a pill for women. The old standard sexist lies are not only wrong, but backwards. Pills for men are easier to make, not harder. For half a century men have been prevented from access to effective birth control pills by bigotry and lies. For half a century men have had to support millions of unwanted children because of bigotry and lies. And millions of men are a very willing and ready market. The new pills for men will sell like Viagra, and wrest control of our children back from total female domination.

In the past month there have been news stories on two different new contraceptive products for men. One is a combination of testosterone and some other ingredient. CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta says a new birth control pill for men is as effective as the pill for women. Side effects from long term use of testosterone may lead to small increases of muscle mass. A lot of men would call that a side benefit. It is already available in several other countries and may be available in the USA within a couple of years. Read story

Another men's birth control pill is hormone free. The hormone free pill stops ejaculation of sperm. British scientists say it leads to “dry” sex. It may be taken just before a date, a few hours before sex. Read Story

This news is a radical change for men and every female we associate with. No longer will a female be able to unilaterally decide to get pregnant by seducing some schmuck and then live on his “child support” for 20 years. No longer can she “forget” her pill and get pregnant without his permission and agreement. No longer will she be able to use that old female lie “I'm pregnant so we have to get married.” Just as the first marketing of “THE PILL” began a whole new “sexual revolution” during the 1960s and following decades, a new PILL FOR MEN will bring revolutionary changes to the relationships between men and women. It will end a century of female domination of decisions on sex and children, and put men and women back on an equal footing.

The century of complete female domination of birth control is about to end. It will usher in a revolutionary change we can only guess at today.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought the birth control pill was first established in France.If so how could the research have been funded by Planned Parenthood?Could you please clarify this. Other than that it was another eye opening article.I have heard many women say that all the responsibility for birth control has been placed on the woman, Now when that debate comes up I will be able to explain what the actual facts are.

March 26, 2008 8:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What do you think of this statement:

" by Le Kangourou de Kataroo is... at 12:27 PM
Reply by Email

I was a girl scout for 13 years. When we were older (the last 6 years), we spent most of our time as a troop doing 'nonactivities' such as shopping and sleepovers. We also saved all our cookie money over the years and went on a cruise our senior year. You can make girl scouts relevant, you just have try. 2 of my fellow troop members are still 2 of my closest friends. All 8 of us together have been through bad breakups, teenage pregnancies, and one of us proclaiming lezebelism. Girl Scout troops can be exceptionally relevant if the leaders let it be."

March 26, 2008 10:51 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
I've noticed that the yonger generation is hesitant to join anything. Maybe the internet has given them a sense of belonging.

That comment about Girl Scouts sharing "teenage pregnancies" and lesbianism is a good reason for parents to keep their girls out of such organizations. GSUSA has been dominated by lesbians for quite a while.

March 26, 2008 11:04 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
My understanding of the history of "The Pill" is that it was first developed in the US by research funded by Planned Parenthood. It hit the mass market in 1962 after overcoming objections by some religious zealots. In the following two generation of men and women, all the research was given only to products for females while denying any research funding to the needs of men.

March 26, 2008 11:07 AM  
Blogger Feminist Scum said...

30 percent of the girl scour leaders are dykes? Hmm, along with the 40% of NOW being dykes, I'd say it's quite clear dykes love poisoning the minds of our young.

March 26, 2008 12:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I stand corrected in regards to my earlier comment about the pill being created in France. Upon further research it was the morning after pill that was created by the French.

March 26, 2008 12:54 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
The females have their "morning after" pill. Men will now have a "Day Before" pill, according to the news.

March 26, 2008 1:07 PM  
Anonymous adobegila said...

none of you bitches will need it though cause no female wants anything to do with you, admit it.

March 27, 2008 10:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

actually, one of the main reasons the male birth control pill has been slow to develope is because...

previous attempts have resulted in IMPOTENCE AND DECREASED SIZE.

as you can imagine, there would not be much of a market for an impotance pill, given that there are already numerous forms of birth control on the market.

March 27, 2008 11:40 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Feminism is, after all, the radical theory that only women are people."

Wrong wrong wrong, wrong wrong wrong wrong. You're wrong! You're wrong! You're wrooooong! Ba-dum-PSH!

Right then. With that out of the way, while that belief is obviously held by some feminists--the same way some guys (like you) are incredibly misogynistic a-holes--all that it's really supposed to be is equal rights for women.

And if you think the world is so bad for women, you should have read Good Housekeeping magazine from the 1950's. A teacher handed a photocopied page out to his students. I read it. It contained such amazing gems as "Don't question him if he's out a few hours later, or even all night. You have no right to question him," & "His topics of conversation are more important than yours."

It was clear that people thought of women as nothing but property and housemaids. How can you POSSIBLY think the situation for men today is any worse?

The last time I got persecuted for being a male was when a crazy teacher kept writing me up for allegedly harassing some girl. That's sixteen years of life, one instance of misandry. [sarcasm]Your logic is infalliable, Bob.[/sarcasm]

The Lithp hath thpoken!

March 27, 2008 5:18 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Anonymous lied, "all that it's really supposed to be is equal rights for women."

How many time do you have to repeat that lie before it becomes true?

Anonymous continued, "you should have read Good Housekeeping magazine from the 1950's..."

Like the rest of your feminazi hate lies, that one has been debunked a long while ago. Good Housekeeping never published any such article in the 1950s. It's a modern feminazi hate lie, like all the rest of your crap.

Do you really think you can spew lie after lie and not just be relegated to the pile of sow shit? Take your lies and pound sand.

March 27, 2008 6:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whatever happened to the good old days? Men loved it when their women were carrying their babies. Women loved their husbands and babies. I loved being barefoot and pregnant. I can't wait to do it again.

March 29, 2008 12:23 AM  
Blogger Dax said...

Unfortunately the male pill is "oops see you later"
It's been around for ages. It's very effective for men.
In fact I can't think of one instance in which this has failed excepting the stupidity of the male involved to be caught "in the cookie jar"

March 29, 2008 10:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What do you think of this:

My juror experience in a computer forensics trial (Score:1)
by Scorpinox (479613) on Monday March 31, @03:38PM (#22924122)
Just a couple weeks ago I was a juror in a child pornography case, I was in the unique position of being the only geek on the jury in this case that was all about computer evidence.

The case was simple, the defendant had been caught by his wife viewing the explicit material, the wife took the computer tower to the police along with several floppy disks (this was 6 years ago). The defendant had deleted all the materials, but the forensics expert found the recently viewed material still on the hard drive.

The computer forensics expert detailed how he recovered the material, by imaging the hard drive and recovering the access dates. The floppies also contained some explicit materials, again which were deleted but then recovered, apparently it was impossible to recover the access dates on the floppy files, the forensic expert testified that some of the dates were in fact accurate, and some not, when from my brief overview, it was obvious that most of the dates were innacurate, so basically the forensics expert screwed up and didn't know what he was talking about in regards to the dates recovered from the floppy.

The interesting part of the case was that the defendent was charged with 53 counts of "sexual exploitation of children, possession" (having child porn) and 2 counts of "sexual exploitation of children, creating, making, or preparing". Those last 2 counts were charged because the defendant copied the pictures onto a floppy disk, not because he filmed it or put it on a website, he was making a backup of the files. I'm relieved to say that the jury agreed that making a backup of the files is not the same as "creating, making, or preparing", but we did find the guy guilty for possession.

For anyone thinking about getting into this field, you're likely to have to view a lot of really f*ing disgusting photos, then look at them closely and document everything about those photos. You really are going to need a good stomach for viewing that stuff, I know I probably couldn't do it because just seeing the photos submitted as evidence was enough to almost make me sick, I couldn't imagine having that guys job and have to be exposed to those things all the time.

March 31, 2008 6:30 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (March 31, 2008 6:30 PM)
1. The post is off topic. Bob does not generally allow off topic discussion to continue.

2. In general the blue gun thugs will stop at nothing to find an excuse to send a man to hell. Far too many men are destryed by the AIS already.

3. The accused man had no intention of "possession" of anything. He had deleted all the files he was accused of posessing.

4. The "juror" said that the blue gun thug "expert" witness didn't know what he was talking about, testified to nonsense. But they found the accused guilty anyway. If the star witness is not credible the man is not guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." It was a very wrong verdict.

5. In general no man should be convicted of "crime" unless the County Persecutor can point to a particular person who was hurt by the "crime." European "football," or Soccor in the us, rules say "no harm, no foul. That's a good rule. In this case there was no person harmed, yet the man's life was destroyed. There was no justice there at all.

March 31, 2008 7:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, I realize this is off topic for this particular post but thought I would throw it out there, it may be something for you consider commenting on?

Chelsea Clinton surprised at sexism in America. See above link.

Well get over bitch! There are few of us left who have not handed our balls over on a silver platter to be sacrificed on the feminist alter!

April 01, 2008 8:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What did you think of the computer techi that happily convicted the man even though he was in a position to inform the rest of the jury not to?

April 01, 2008 9:31 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (April 01, 2008 8:01 AM)
Ms. Clinton is a typical feminazi. She defines "sexism" as objecting to women, and voting against Hitllary because she is female. She accepts voting FOR Hitllary because she is female as "not sexism." She accepts Hitllary's speech at a female only college where Hitllary ranted sexist comments about "Old Boys Club" as "non sexist." Young Ms. Clinton does not consider advocacy for Hitllary by NOW as sexist because she is so very sexist.

Unfortunatly, Hitllary is sexist and advocates sexism. She deserves what she advocates. She belongs at home taking care of her private sphere.

A man does not vote for a cunt.

April 01, 2008 10:16 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

note to anonymous: (April 01, 2008 9:31 AM)
Sounds like the computer tech was willing to ignore the lies and ignorance of the persecution's star witness in order to send a "not guilty" man to hell. He is a partner in a horrid miscarriage of justice and a willing participant in the feminazi holocaust.

April 01, 2008 10:24 AM  
Anonymous Rash said...

Is it really worth prosecuting someone who looked at some pictures - however objectionable they may be - and then deleted them six years ago? Especially if the pictures happened to be of teenage women who willingly posed for them?

Back on topic, I would be concerned where the testosterone in one of those pills came from. According to an episode of 'Millennium' I saw last night, the oestrogen in HRT comes from horses.

April 01, 2008 2:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you noticed that most computer techies are like this. Why is that? They are some of the most feminized men I know.

"Blogger Bob said...

note to anonymous: (April 01, 2008 9:31 AM)
Sounds like the computer tech was willing to ignore the lies and ignorance of the persecution's star witness in order to send a "not guilty" man to hell. He is a partner in a horrid miscarriage of justice and a willing participant in the feminazi holocaust."

April 01, 2008 4:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The other bunch of feminized men, the MOST feminized men I know are the "REAL MEN" the blue collar people. They will beat you or try to send you to an insane asylum for being against feminism while they rant on and on about the jews and the corporations.

April 01, 2008 4:37 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

You are hands-down the best and funniest parody on the web. I LOVE your site. Better than Colbert. You should have your own show on Comedy Central!

April 02, 2008 9:56 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Occasionally a man wants to become pregnant and according to a recent report, one actually did.

April 04, 2008 12:35 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (April 04, 2008 12:35 PM)
You may want to go back to your 1st grade teacher and review basic concepts and word definitons. You seem to be having a deep inability to understend basic concepts like "man" and "woman."

April 04, 2008 12:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Beatie was born female but was transgendered into a man (however kept the uterus). Scientists can do all kinds of things; not really so strange. Mr. Beatie is young and strong and could tackle old Bob anyday - and whip old Bob.

April 04, 2008 1:29 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (April 04, 2008 1:29 PM)
You may want to go back to your 1st grade teacher and review basic concepts and word definitons. You seem to be having a deep inability to understend basic concepts like "man" and "woman."

Gawd, they are making the fat sows stupid these days.

April 04, 2008 3:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beatie's a chick without tits, that's it. The working parts are still female, even if it takes hormones and dresses like a man. Stop the hormones and it becomes another chick playing dress-up.

The fat sows have always been stupid, Bob.

April 08, 2008 12:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beatie can whup you "men"!

April 09, 2008 11:54 AM  
Blogger Bob said...


Plenty of fat sow squealing today.

April 09, 2008 12:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you serious?
A woman can decide whether or not to bear a child because she has to carry, give birth to, and support it. Why would a man be entitled to make that decision for a woman?
I really disagree with all your viewpoints. We are human beings, not animals, and we can differentiate between the two. Believe it or not.

April 10, 2008 2:05 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous (April 10, 2008 2:05 PM)
That is the typical feminist domination argument. Feminist sows always demand that females should have total exclusive authority over OUR children because women are women and men are not women. So much for "equality." It's always been a total lie.

April 10, 2008 2:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

no, Bob says we are just animals. then he complains about smut and violence.

April 11, 2008 11:43 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (April 11, 2008 11:43 AM)
Bob never said that, but its nice of you to again affirm that those with other opinions are lying scum.

April 11, 2008 5:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're funny. Block the poduction? Heck, I love the idea. Even if it's just to be able to say, "My boyfriend's on the pill." Maybe not the best of reasons but w/e.

July 21, 2008 7:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home