The National Socialist Labor Party (fascist)
A Republican congressman is now speaking of (Der Fuhrer) Obama in terms similar to that which Bob warned you about before the recent election.
Republican congressman Paul Brown from Georgia is calling President-elect Obama a Marxist and warning that he might be planning to form a Gestapo-like security force so he can rule as a dictator.
The overwhelming emotional and irrational support that fawning masses of females has given to the new US “Fuhrer” is very, very scary. The parallels with the Nazi takeover of Germany in the 1930s are everywhere you look. Can it happen here? You better be stockpiling your guns and ammunition, bro.
Read news story here
Other headlines today talk about Obama a/k/a Soetoro planning to issue many “Executive Orders” to consolidate his power the first day he takes office. He has no intention of waiting for Congress to act. Be afraid, be very afraid.
UPDATE November 17, 2008
Bob has learned that there is a severe shortage of guns and ammunition at gun dealers in many parts of the US. Particularly hard hit are assault rifles and military style ammunition. One North Idaho store sold a whole pallet load of "NATO" ammunition in 2 days and hasn't been able to get any more yet.
Meanwhile there are disquieting rumors from Texas to California about succession or civil war. Several black racist groups have been attacking white people and appear to be trying to ferment a new race war. Be afraid, be very afraid.
Bob does not advocate any illegal or criminal acts. Bob is merely an observer of the human condition and advocate for the rights of men.
Republican congressman Paul Brown from Georgia is calling President-elect Obama a Marxist and warning that he might be planning to form a Gestapo-like security force so he can rule as a dictator.
The overwhelming emotional and irrational support that fawning masses of females has given to the new US “Fuhrer” is very, very scary. The parallels with the Nazi takeover of Germany in the 1930s are everywhere you look. Can it happen here? You better be stockpiling your guns and ammunition, bro.
Read news story here
Other headlines today talk about Obama a/k/a Soetoro planning to issue many “Executive Orders” to consolidate his power the first day he takes office. He has no intention of waiting for Congress to act. Be afraid, be very afraid.
UPDATE November 17, 2008
Bob has learned that there is a severe shortage of guns and ammunition at gun dealers in many parts of the US. Particularly hard hit are assault rifles and military style ammunition. One North Idaho store sold a whole pallet load of "NATO" ammunition in 2 days and hasn't been able to get any more yet.
Meanwhile there are disquieting rumors from Texas to California about succession or civil war. Several black racist groups have been attacking white people and appear to be trying to ferment a new race war. Be afraid, be very afraid.
Bob does not advocate any illegal or criminal acts. Bob is merely an observer of the human condition and advocate for the rights of men.
Labels: Blue gun thugs, Candidates, liberals, Misandry, Muslims, Nazis, Obama, police violence, Politics, race war, Racism, revolution
posted by Bob | Monday, November 10, 2008
27 Comments:
Bob, I don't have much money but I would like to buy a reliable and powerful (able to pierce body armor and preferably steel plate if possible) weapon for protection. What do you suggest?
$300 is alot of money to me.
Note to anonymous:
Bob is not a gun expert at all, however here is one suggestion. Sometimes you can still find a model 1903Springfield rifle at a yard sale, Craigs list, or gun show for a reasonable price, perhaps as low as $100. The Springfield fires the powerful 30-06 ammunition. With armor piercing rounds rather than soft lead rounds it will penetrate as much as anything. The US Army still uses the 30-06 round for their light machine guns. Short of going to a .50 caliber which is very expensive, its about as good as you can get.
The 03 Springfield was the standard US Army rifle in WW I, and was still being used as a sniper rifle into Viet Nam. They are rugged, powerful, and very accurate. There is still a lot of them around and they are bolt action instead of semi-automatic, so they don't get premium prices any more.
A lot of them were sold as surplus after WW-I. The long range accuracy of the 03 SPringfield makes them excellent hunting rifles. My father had one for deer hunting.
I have another suggestion, try finding an old (Pre-1898)rechambered military rifle. I have seen Turkish Mausers in Sportmans guide,(I believe that's what they were?)and I have seen the same guns elsewhere on other sites.
Now here's the beauty of these old bolt action military rifles, they were pre-1898! Under the 1968 gun control act any pre-1898 gun is not considered a firearm. In other words, you can buy them right through the mail, no paper trail, no background check! This is a very important thing to consider if Obama does what we are told he plans to do!
One thing I failed to mention about these old military rifles is that in addition to being rechambered to fire a more commonly available round, they were also capable of firing modern smokeless powder rounds. Keep this in mind when buying an old 19th century gun as most were designed to fire the old "Black powder" that was much weaker by todays standards than modern smokeless powder, you cannot safely fire smokeless powder in a gun that was not designed for it!
Of the pre-1898 guns, the Turkish Mauser is about the only one you can find for under $300. They're chambered in standard NATO 7.62, but they're on the weak side. Stick with ONLY military surplus ammunition.
A much cheaper, and more reliable option, is the Russian Mosin-Nagant. They're all over the place, for under $100. Since they're over 50 years old, you can legally buy one without paperwork, in most states, if you're not buying from a licensed dealer. The ammunition is roughly the power of a .30-06, and you can commonly find it for under 30 cents a round.
In general, any bolt action will be cheaper, more accurate, more reliable, and usually a bit more powerful, than a semi-auto, firing the same round, from a comparable barrel. The trade off is, of course, the speed with which you can fire.
Also remember, you can't walk around with a rifle all the time, unless full scale war breaks out. That's why a handgun is important. Since price is your concern, it's tough to beat Hi Point. Under $200, brand new. And they're surprisingly accurate and reliable. If your state limits you to 10 round magazines, go with a .45ACP. If not, you'll have to decide between more power, and more shots. Each has benefits.
Note to Bob:
The US army no longer uses any significant amount of .30-06. They've switched all the light machine guns over to the slightly less powerful 7.62, or the much weaker 5.56.
Here's another helpful suggestion,
"The Poor Mans James Bond" by Kurt Saxon, recipes for weapons. Also,
http://www.deltapress.com/catalog/
The above link has many books similar in nature to the above mentioned book.
Don't buy guns: you can't get the one you want because it's banned and if you settle then you are respecting the power of the state to rule over you as you are a worthless peon subject.
Get or make them some other way.
Note to readers:
Bob suggests that you all review Bob's article on the 2nd Amendment.
I had recently read someone stating that the second ammendment has gone from our basic fundamental right to now being a privilege in which we must receive permission from the government to now have a gun, and they tell us what type and wether or not we can have one? I guess this sums it all up rather neatly!
This might seem obvious to most readers here, but I feel that one should always try to aquire a gun with out the necessary government paper trail, even if you are legally able to purchase a gun you should avoid doing so through legal channels if at all possible! At this point in time many states still allow the private transaction of guns between citizens with out any necessary filing of legal papers, this of course is the most desirable route! In my home state of CA you cannot, at least not legally! You must go to the police station, pick up a form, fill it out and send it back in, and of course, this is exactly what you want to avoid!
Fuck the law (the law is not just).
Evicerate those who enforce the law with your illegal items if need be.
Anonymous November 12, 2008 9:28 AM:
I also live in the PRK. The laws here aren't quite as bad as you've been led to believe. No, you can't even possess a handgun without signing your first born son over to Barbara Boxer, or something like that. But rifles are better. Assuming it's not on the banned list, you can bring one in from out of state, without any paperwork. Also, rifles classified as "Curios and Relics" (usually 50+ years old) only need paperwork if you buy them from a licensed dealer. And rifles made before 1898 can be bought from anyone without paperwork. You can even get them through the mail, legally. They simply aren't classified as guns.
Go to any gun show, and you'll see a few tables full of old bolt actions. If that seller doesn't have ANY new weapons, that usually means he's not a licensed dealer. Go ahead and ask if paperwork is required. Everyone at the shows understands the desire for legal, undocumented, purchases.
Why should you care about legalities? Only slaves do.
What you really want is a nice powerful select fire weapon. Why don't you get one? Why obey the law?
Anonymous November 12, 2008 3:40 PM
Yes , I was aware of the pre-1898 loophole, and of course muzzleloaders fall under the same category, all covered under the 1968 gun control act I believe? I would have never questioned the part about bringing a gun in from out of state as I would think it would be no different than bringing any other private property across state lines? The only problem I can see here is when a modern firearm is purchased from out of state and then shipped across state lines with out an FFL, unless of course we are again talking about the pre-1898s and muzzleloaders of course. I have lived in CA my whole life but have not heard of the 50 year old curio and relic clause, not doubting what you are saying, had just never heard it? I will look in to this, it sounds like a wonderful loophole!
I guess my original overall point was that it is very wise to avoid that very entrapping legal paper trail that is the equivalent of a big neon pointer pointing the police and the Feds to your front door!
Thanks for the info!
After a bit more thought, I'm not certain that the 50+ guns are completely unpapered. It might only be that the waiting period is waived, which I AM sure of. But without a waiting period, a fake ID solves that problem.
Unfortunately, we CAN'T legally bring in handguns from other states. The PRK requires all handguns to be registered, regardless of age, or where/when they were bought. They also require registration of any person in possession of a handgun. Basically, it's best to stick to shotguns and bolt action rifles in the PRK, IF you're worried about the law.
at the risk of possibly going off-topic...what does Bob recommend that a young woman, about 18 years of age, do during these turbulent times?
Currently said young woman has no access to any sort of firearm.
Note to anonymous:
Bob recommends that an 18 year old woman should obey her husband and rely on his guidance. If she's still an old maid she should look to her father for his protection and guidance.
http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs.php
“I want to sell a gun to another person, i.e., a private party transfer. Am I required to conduct the transaction through a licensed California firearms dealer?”
Yes. Firearm sales must be conducted through a fully licensed California firearms dealer. Failure to do so is a violation of California law. The buyer (and seller, in the event that the; buyer is denied), must meet the normal firearm purchase and delivery requirements. "Antique firearms," as defined in Section 921(a)(16) of Title 18 of the United States Code, and curio or relic rifles/shotguns, defined in Section 178.11 of Title 27 of the Code of Federal Regulations that are over 50 years old, are exempt from this requirement.
I think you were right the first time anonymous, (November 13, 2008 9:49 AM)According to what I have found it sounds as if a perfectly legal transaction (Curio and Relics) is possible between two citizens. If I am reading this correctly there would not be any waiting period or background check? But again, like you have said, this does not include handguns! The section above does seem to indicate that dealers have to abide by a different set of rules, as the question specifies “private party transfer.” Now I do not know if the merchants (Non FFL holders) at the gun shows have to abide by a different set of rules, but I would think that it’s the same and they can sell to you with out any waiting period or paper work, but perhaps they are required to keep records of whom they sell to? I do not know but you could always ask them out right!
http://www.latimes.com
/news/opinion
/commentary/la-oe-
scheffer13-2008
nov13,0,4968269.story
Rape as genocide. Bob, the UN is out to get men. With Obama in power, this could actually be prosecuted. He'll be on the side of women all the way. Why aren't you on Bill O'Reilly or similar shows, telling the truth about rape? About men's rights? How come I never hear anything except on blogs, where they don't do any good? Men will be prosecuted under this proposed UN thing! They could go to prison for having sex, just because the women say they didn't consent. Why don't men speak up where they can be heard?
Note to anonymous:
The LA Times is a leftist hate sheet. It's proceeding toward bankruptcy because nobody pays for hate any more.
Rape can not be "genocide" because it doesn't kill anyone. Only a fool of an idiot leftist would believe crap like that.
Our communist fascist from Kenya, Obama, will probably support support the Swahili's (his native tribe) which are traditional enemies of the Tutsis who are the "victims" of this hate fiction.
Fucking the women is one of the historic spoils of war that victorious armies have always claimed. Genghis Kahn, for example, is said to have taken 1 wife in every city he slaughtered. It's not "genocide" and the lying communists at LA Times need to stuff it where the sun doesn't shine.
As for FOX and O'Really, he's as much an enemy of men as anyone else. He uses his forum to attack any judge who dares to stand up for the rights of men against lying rape-hate scum.
Rape is not killing. But civilized, moral people recognize it as an act of extreme cruelty, an assault against a human being, a selfish misuse of one's sex drive that should be reserved for a holy marriage. Jesus Christ would not rape.
Note to anonymous:
Boo F'ing Hoo! Cry us a river.
The poster who talked about the LATimes has a point. Why aren't you or Mikee or Masculist Man on TV talk shows? Or Rush Limbought or whoever? You'd be a good ratings draw so why not go on and talk about rape and Obomas real name and all? You could get on with out a problem.
"Bob is merely an observer of the human condition and advocate for the rights of men."...
....and the rescinding of the legal rights of women.
"The overwhelming emotional and irrational support that fawning masses of females has given to the new US “Fuhrer” is very, very scary"
----
What about the men who admire and voted for Senator Obama? Are they emotional and irrational as well?
What about those women who voted as Bob did? Are they emotional and irrational?
Fags with guns?
Bashback.
Chicken shits
"Bob does not advocate any illegal or criminal acts"....
but he's overjoyed when they befall his many enemies.
One should be flexible and open-minded with regard to acquiring and deploying weaponry. For instance, one can emerge from any hardware store well-armed with the right mindset. With the wrong mindset - believing simply brandishing a weapon will intimidate a predator - one will definitely succumb to said predator.
Post a Comment
<< Home