The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Friday, February 20, 2009

“Greenhouse Gas” is a Fraud!

The left wingnut theory about “greenhouse gasses” has two fundamental lies. First, despite the old myths, greenhouses do not get warm by reflecting heat energy, infrared light (IR). Second, CO2 and other gasses do not reflect IR light.

These facts of physics are not new revelations. Any scientist worth his PhD knows or should know that they are both untrue. The scientific experimentation and research was published in scientific journals a century ago. Here are the facts:

According to the “greenhouse gas” myth, and that commonly misunderstood by generations of gardeners, a greenhouse gets warm by allowing heat energy from the sun (IR) to pass into the greenhouse but reflects some of it back when it tries later to escape. According to the popular myth a greenhouse gets warm as more and more IR is trapped by being reflected by the glass. That’s still a common belief by gardeners, but its wrong. A century ago, in 1909, physicist R.W. Wood disproved the thesis that greenhouses stayed warm by trapping IR. Woods set up test greenhouses using glass which reflects IR, and sheets of rock salt which does not. Woods demonstrated that greenhouses get warm by trapping warm air, not by trapping IR. The popularly believed theory about trapped IR is not how a greenhouse works. Sometimes an actual experiment is better than a century of myth. Wood's experiment was originally published in the Philosophical magazine , 1909, vol 17, p319-320. Advocates of “Global Warming” now sometimes claim that the so-called “greenhouse effect” of the whole world is “different” from an actual greenhouse. There has been no experimental or physical evidence to support that claim, and in fact experimental evidence is all on the other side. There is no “greenhouse effect” that works by reflecting heat energy.

The other lie in the “greenhouse gas” bullshit is that CO2 reflects IR. Once again, that was disproved almost a century ago. This time by no less of a famous scientist than Niels Bohr.

Bohr demonstrated that CO2 gas molecules to not reflect light, including IR wavelengths. When a photon hits an atom the atom may absorb the light particle or allow it to pass through. If a photon is absorbed, an electron will jump to a higher orbit. When all the electrons are at their highest orbit’s the atom will allow all further photons to pass through. Eventually the atom will emit a photon in a random direction and the electron will drop back to its previous state. The emitted photon may be up, down, or sideways, in any direction. Bohr was one of the most respected physicists of the 20th century. This property of molecules of gasses was published in Philosophical Magazine Series 6, Volume 26 July 1913, p. 1-25

The “greenhouse gas” theory that supposedly causes the fraud of “global warming” is total political bullshit. Its based on lies based on lies. Competent physicists have known for a century that greenhouses do not work by reflecting heat and CO2 does not reflect heat. Only in the twisted words of a political liar and the feeble minds of sheeple who blindly follow the left wing political scum can any of it be conceived.

Read article here.

Labels: , , , , ,

4 Comments:

Blogger bruce said...

bob is right about the greenhouse gas bullshit.when the dinosaurs lived there was lots of green stuff to eat there was also a lot of c02,1800/ppm you need c02 to grow things. today we have less than400/ppm of c02. we need more green stuff which means we need more c02 not less.the envirocommies need a good coat of tar and feathers followed by rail transportation out of town.

February 23, 2009 12:39 PM  
Blogger C2ShiningC said...

Bob, I believe the bullshit gets even deeper when one looks at the optical properties of CO2. Can anybody explain how the IR satellite 22,000 mile up can see the contrast between cooler clouds and the cloudless warmer surface if "greenhouse gasses" were "blocking" and "re-radiating". The answer is easy to find in most handbooks of chemistry and physics. CO2 gas is transparent to LWIR with the exception of two narrow absorption bands at the extremes (-100F and +600F). Like the "greenhouse effect", "GHG" is a misnomer, a political construct, and a con artists dream.

March 05, 2010 8:12 PM  
Blogger C2ShiningC said...

Bob, I believe the bullshit gets even deeper when one looks at the optical properties of CO2. Can anybody explain how the IR satellite 22,000 mile up can see the contrast between cooler clouds and the cloudless warmer surface if "greenhouse gasses" were "blocking" and "re-radiating". The answer is easy to find in most handbooks of chemistry and physics. CO2 gas is transparent to LWIR with the exception of two narrow absorption bands at the extremes (-100F and +600F). Like the "greenhouse effect", "GHG" is a misnomer, a political construct, and a con artists dream.

March 05, 2010 8:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The real science is that only mass can hold heat and co2 has a very small mass contribution. Water is the big factor especially when it makes the phase change near the ground absorbing approx. 1000 BTU/hour/pound and takes that stored heat without a rise in temp. to the upper atmosphere and releases it with another phase change into outer space.

May 01, 2010 1:59 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home