The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Feminazi Censorship On The March

Feminazi “PC” censorship has come to so-called “open source” and “geek” software developers. A feminist hate group has been attacking and trying to silence men's speech in the realm of software developers and “geeks.” They have a blog run by self-proclaimed “Geek Feminists,” an obvious declaration of their ant-men sexism, misandry. On Geek Feminism Blog an October 8 article declares war on a long time free software developer, gamer, and antifeminist who goes by the Internet name of MikeeUSA. Anyone who has observed feminism in action knows that feminism is a sexist pro-women, anti-men hate program and that's all that it is.

One very common tactic of feminist hate is to pick on individual men one at a time. They claim that the man's opinions are “threats” and “violence against women.” They claim to be “victims” of his speech. They slander him far and wide and request that publishers delete his material, banish his comments and try to take away his ability to speak opposition to feminist misandry. The long standing feminist tactic is to attack one man at a time, and then the next man, and then the next. Every successful attack puts all other men on notice that our speech is not allowed unless we kowtow to feminist misandrist “PC” dogma. Opposing opinions are not allowed. A frigid chill is draped over the whole community of men as the misandrist censorship takes hole.

Since launching this particular hate campaign against MikeeUSA, they have succeeded in getting his software deleted from SourceForge, a site that exists to host and distribute free or open source software. Three years of MikeeUSA's work have been deleted. Was the deleted software hateful to women? Not at all. It consisted of map and weapon extensions of computer games that are popular among some gamers. Deleting MikeeUSA's work stops it from distribution. It effectively destroys 3 years of his work. It is a huge hammer to use basing a man for speaking against feminist misandry.

This kind of destruction goes far beyond just censorship. It is a hateful attack on someone's work product. Feminist success in destroying individual men freezes opposition to feminism. No man who wants to work in the free software or open source arena can afford to say anything negative about feminism out of fear that his other work will be deleted. It is the worst kind of hate, fear, and censorship.

According to a recent post on a blog called Armed and Dangerous, “Beth Lynn Eicher, had sought and achieved the suppression of public speech” by a man who has long been a member of the open software community but who opposes feminism. The author of Armed and Dangerous recites a lot of feminist anti-men hate dogma he got from Ms. Eicher, and seems to oppose censorship, but then he says that giving Ms. Eicher and her feminazi cohorts control over men and men's speech is a “solution.” Something is really rotten at Open Source community these days when its self proclaimed “elders” are toeing the anti-men hate and censorship line demanded by the feminazi.

This recent campaign to silence an opinion the feminists don’t agree with is a departure from the open forum nature that has made the Internet so valuable. Crossing the bridge into a censored and controlled forum allowing only ideas we agree with is a very dangerous step for all on the Internet. The ongoing hate campaign against MikeeUSA, the stalking, harassment, threats, libel, accusations, misquotes, and censorship is unfortunate and misdirected. If they disagree with his opinion they should post their own opinions and explain where he is “wrong.” The very existence of this hate/censorship campaign is a threat to everyone who uses a free and open Internet, no matter how strongly they disagree with his opinion.

The hate campaign against MikeeUSA has included but not limited to the following web sites:

Notes In The Margin

Ubuntu Linux Tips & Tricks

Geek Feminism Wiki

Geek Feminism Wiki hate page against MikeeUSA

2009 women in FLOSS discussions (a sexist misandrist site)

Deviant Art

Pastebin A collaborative web development site

FLOSS is an acronym standing for Free, Libre, and Open Source Software One might ask how “Free” any man can be when the femiNazi are watching our every word and demanding pressuring web servers into deleting any words they don't like.

Whether MEN agree with MikeeUSA or not, and his opinions are pretty radical for most MEN, the censorship of MEN's opinions should be an issuer for ALL men. When the femiNazi are allowed to silence one MAN for opposing feminism, they are a threat to all men.

Labels: , , ,


Blogger Mackenzie said...

Ubuntu ends in a "u" not an "o."

October 20, 2009 2:14 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Okay, Mackenzi.

Reading your "Ubuntu" web page, I notice you deleted Bob's comment. It was a mild disagreement suggesting that censorship is the antithesis of free speech. Obviously your misandrist campaign cannot tolerate a diversity of opinions.

October 20, 2009 2:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"mikee" doesn't oppose feminism. He promotes slavery, cruelty and irrational lawlessness based on a view that women are subhuman.

October 20, 2009 3:10 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Continuing your misandrist hate speech does not change the femiNazi tactics discussed in this article.

October 20, 2009 3:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, Thoughts? (comment by Solaris of nieguy's MRM forum)


October 20, 2009

You have no idea how much trouble we had with MikeeUSA. Our site has one of the oldest Men’s Rights forums on the net (yes, I know, boo hiss, etc) and he was erm… asked to leave… after trying to start a “discussion” about how men “should be able to rape their 12-year-old wives”. The sad thing is that Mike could really be productive if he was able to find some way to put his demons to rest.

As far as I’m able to tell, he’s persona-non-grata just about everywhere that he’s been online now. His name even came up in a discussion on Slashdot recently. What saddens me though is that he is held up as an example of the “anti-female” sentiment in whatever community he appears in. No. Mikee is Mikee and he has his own one man war going on. Let’s leave it at that shall we?

October 20, 2009 4:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: It looks like they will get me arrest and jailed. At the very least they will ruin my financial life (one arrest == never have a good job in america). Once that happens, what should I do. America's only use is aquiring wealth: there is not anything else that is good in this country for men. Once they take that they have effectivly destroyed a man's life. What should I do once they do this to me?
Their comments and plans:

October 20, 2009 5:10 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

If Bob had a dollar for every whiny femiNazi who threatened to "get me arrested" for saying something she didn't like, Bob could retire to some Mediterranean beach. Saying something "offensive" is clearly legal under US law. For examples of legal "offensive" speech and successful lawsuits against censors read ""

I don't know all of what you have said that they may call "threat" but if it wasn't a clear and specific and credible threat against a particular identified person then it probably has no legal basis for an arrest. Offhand banter and rhetorical discussion is not a credible legal threat even if it uses words that imply an immediate threat. Law enforcement agencies don't just arrest someone because some whiner didn't like his opinion.

Meanwhile you should send a notice of copyright violation to the femiNazi geeks demanding that they stop distributing unauthorized and modified copies of your code. Copyright violations can be serious and expensive. I once contracted code writer to spend a year writing custom code for an application we needed. His time was all paid for. But at the end HE owned the code, and we had to pay him big bucks for permission to use his code. Send them a notice of copyright violation and unless they stop immediately contact an intellectual property attorney.

Don't just post a note on their comments. Send the copyright notice to the feminist who runs the blog, and copy Google or whoever hosts the femiNazi geek distribution site.

October 20, 2009 5:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The code is licensed under the GPL. That allows anyone to do whatever they want with it aslong as they keep their modifications under the GPL.

Even if the criminal lawsuit fails it costs money to defend against and once you are arrested (if you're a man) you can never get a well paying job in this country: you only can get minimum wage jobs. Also you are thrown out of whatever professional organizations you are a member of and whatever academic institutions you attend: your life is _over_.

Since you can never get a good little wife in america the only thing valuable in your life is the wealth you can aquire.

October 20, 2009 6:01 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

First: Intellectual property laws in the US were written by some very expensive lieyers who worked for some very rich owners of intellectual property, Mickey Mouse, Microsoft, United Artists, etc. You licensed YOUR code under an agreement that included a PARTICULAR distribution, and THEY have breached your contract/agreement. That voids your half of the agreement. Notify them that their breach of contract voids all rights to distribute, and assert your legal right to YOUR code.

Second: Criminal arrests are not "lawsuit" in the US. They are only done by government law enforcement agencies who may be sued for "false arrest" and generally don't arrest a man for speaking his mind. Exceptions to 1st Amendment rights are very narrow. Child pornography and imminent threats, and continuous malicious harassment of a particular person are just about the only exceptions. Meanwhile making a false report to the police, filing a false accusation, is a crime and also a cause for civil lawsuits against them.

October 20, 2009 6:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

mikeeusa continually rants on and on about raping women. and this isn't hate speech?

cry me a river. feminists didn't take down his work, sourceforge did because it violated their TOS.

October 20, 2009 7:20 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to "dirtyfilthy:"
First, I have never seen Mikee advocate rape. I have often seen lying femiNazi make such accusations about Mikee and other men.
Second, The common femiNazi attack strategy usually relies on mangina, pussy boys, and other assorted castratti riding to their "rescue" like so many white knights. The femiNazi use them as useful idiots to do their bidding. SourceForge is either run by more femiNazi or the assorted castratti. Same difference.

October 20, 2009 8:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

First, I have never seen Mikee advocate rape.

O rly?

The “penalty” for the rape of a young unmarried female should be that she is awarded to the man as a permanent wife of his (As stated in Deuteronomy 22)
Men should rape their wives at will.

Gee, that sounds like advocating rape to me, Bob.

October 20, 2009 9:56 PM  
Blogger MarkyMark said...


Though I think MikeeUSA's opinions are extreme, what stands out is the feminist HYPOCRISY here. The SCUM Manifesto, written by Valerie Solanis (tried to kill Andy Warhol) and lauded by feminists everywhere, is just as extreme as anything Mikee ever wrote. The feminists are fucking hypocrites! That isn't news to us though, is it?


October 21, 2009 3:31 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to MarkyMark:
You are absolutely right. Feminism IS hate. Their accusation of Mikee of "hate" is incredulous.

Note to Anonymous:
Despite Mikee's poor choice of words, Mikee is clearly talking about sex between husband and wife which is not "rape" by definition.

If you read Cosmo's relationship questions web site (Answerology) the preponderance of wives are asking how to get their husbands to do MORE sex, not less. Mikee's admonition to husbands to fuck wives more often would be a benefit to most wives.

October 21, 2009 6:35 AM  
Anonymous Feminist Scum said...

I almost never agree with MikeeUSA, but the attacks on this guy are sick.

Taking down his work is just another way or oppressing other people's views.

What these type of people do is not openly attack you with violence, they have a "nicer" way of destroying you, and if you fight against that, then they use state violence against you.

October 21, 2009 9:52 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Feminist Scum:
Bob doesn't agree with most of MikeeUSA's opinions either, but that is not the point of this article. Bob supports a MAN's right to speak his mind about feminism, even if his speech is "offensive" to feminists. Its not up to feminists to decide what opinions MEN may hold or say.

October 21, 2009 10:19 AM  
Anonymous Feminist Scum said...

I agree, Bob. Since these are private sites, I think they should have the right to remove what he has put up, but I don't agree with them doing it.

I watched a video with Phyllis Schlafly accepting an award from a university. A load of the students turned their back on her while she was accepting it. Now I support their right to turn their backs if they want, but what these filth do is try to make you feel like you are evil for going against them.

What these filth do is classic cult behavior.

These scum just want to exclude you from everything for disagreeing, and if they really don't like you, then they want to throw you in to a cage like these feminazi filth.

October 22, 2009 9:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

question for feminist Scum,,

What exactly are your disagreements with Mikee? I am in agreement with this man.

October 22, 2009 4:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look at this:

"Pete says: 1. We can all agree that mikeeusa has “initiated force” (at the very least the felonious threats count as such)."

Also on there and on the other post ESR is fine with having me jailed for "felonious threats".

These people are scum.
They are the reason why we all need to be well armed: when they or their proxies come for us we need to make our lives cost something.

Unfortunatly they always use proxy-violence by the state so random mercenaries get hurt rather than those who want the violence done.

October 22, 2009 5:35 PM  
Anonymous Feminist Scum said...

I don't like the way he uses the bible to justify he desires. As an atheist libertarian, just keep the crap away from me.

He has spoken of killing wives who disagree with their husbands, which is ridiculous too.

He thinks people should be able to threaten each other, and make others feel unsafe. Totally disagree.

So while I disagree with Mikee, I support his right to say these things. I'd say the filth who are trying to get him thrown in to a cage just for speaking are worse than him.

October 23, 2009 4:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

""Mejia said after she gave birth to Mathew last spring, she was kept in the hospital with complications. Twelve days after giving birth at Orlando Regional South Seminole hospital, she was transported to Orlando Regional Medical Center where she became a quadruple amputee. Now she can not care for or hold her baby.

"Yeah, I want to pick him up. He wants me to pick him up. I can't. I want to, but I can't," she said. "Woke up from surgery and I had no arms and no legs. No one told me anything. My arms and legs were just gone."""

Why do peeps even go to hospitals for birthing?

October 23, 2009 10:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A little more on MikeeUSA here:

I support the idea of him debating with one of the GeekFems. I think a lot of people in the Open Source movement would be interested. It could be done online if necessary.

October 30, 2009 3:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another ITwire article for those who are interested:

ESR pressure made feminists host detractor's code

The discussion section has a comment:

"This is not a "detractor". This is a very sick, very dangerous man who does all he can to denounce women's rights at every level. Did you even read his source code? Have you seen his threats? How could any rational person defend his actions?



November 02, 2009 8:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thoughts on this?:

by tomhudson (43916) on Tuesday November 03, @01:11AM (#29960450) Journal

civil annoyance - pay a fine (parking violations, let your dog crap on the sidewalk, etc.)

As a dog owner, I want people who don't pick up their dog shit to do more than just pay a fine. Put up a big sign on their lawn, declaring it to be a "public doggie comfort zone" for one year.

The punishment SHOULD fit the crime. And it should be creative, so people can't say "well,if I get caught, it's just a fine." It should have some relation to the original act, and it should benefit the community.

Driving too fast in a school zone? You just volunteered for crossing guard duty.

Beat your wife? Welcome to the Lorena Bobbitt School of Body Modification.

Rapist? We have some mine fields we need mapped out.

Killed your mother-in-law? Gee, that's a toughie. How about $10 plus time served.
(just joking ... $10 might be too high ... )

Seriously, make slum lords live in their buildings, make the banksters who did the fraudulent mortgages live in the communities they've wrecked, etc., because fines are not punishment, they're the price you pay for permission to continue to shit on people.


November 02, 2009 10:57 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

In general there are way too many laws and way too much "punishment." We live in what could be accurately characterized as a "police state" with more men in prisons than any other nation at any other time in the history of humanity.

Victimless "crime" is not a crime at all. The government should mind its own business. If the prosecutor can't find a victim to appear in court and demonstrate their injuries, then the prosecutor should be slapped with a penalty. And police don't count as "victims." They aren't there to create "crime."

Annoyances are not crimes. The government should not get involved.

That leaves crimes against other people, murder, robbery, assault, etc. Again, if the person isn't harmed, then no crime is committed. Most fights are offsetting penalties, no government penalty involved. Robberies and other property crimes need restitution, not punishment. The criminal needs to be an indentured servant to the victim until the debt is paid back.

That leaves serious injury or death crimes. If its a whiny MIL he should get a medal, not a punishment.

November 03, 2009 6:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What do you think of 's opinion on "women's issues":

"Beat your wife? Welcome to the Lorena Bobbitt School of Body Modification.

Rapist? We have some mine fields we need mapped out."

November 03, 2009 7:32 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous;
Most so-called "domestic violence" confrontations are initiated by the female. When she isn't doing actual violence against the husband or his children she's deliberately insulting and "pushing buttons" to start a fight. The man who gets arrested is more often than not defending himself or his children from a violent female. The government should not get involved. A husband should be sovereign in his family. Anything else is misandrist feminism. Females who do permanent physical damage to husbands or children should be hung.

As for rape, its not much of a crime. Most rape accusations are total fiction. Of the rest, most are just sex with some disagreement about who will decide this time. Even when true, its not much of a crime. She gets laid one more time than she planned on. Often rape "victims" report "The best sex I ever had," from rape-crisis center training manuals. The crisis center counselors often have to teach "rape victims" that they are victims because they had a fucking good time getting laid. If its a crime at all, a fine about equal to the local price of sex on the street would be reasonable compensation for her efforts.

November 03, 2009 7:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

FWIW, I can't get Mikee's blog to load right now. It was working ok this morning. It might be a temporary thing, or he might have taken it down. Sometime last week a supporter (ironically) posted a link that may or may not have led to MikeeUSA's real name. I don't know if that's true or not, but if it is he may have some problems because of it.

November 03, 2009 2:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is your opinion on the man with the email address
, that he avocates cutting off men's genitals for hitting their wives, and men getting their legs blown off for raping girls? What do you think of the man who advocates that.

November 03, 2009 4:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon: I didn't take down the weblog.
I cannot access it either now.
Nor can I access
Maybe they are under a DDoS attack, or are having ISP issues.


November 03, 2009 4:12 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Anyone who advocates extreme violence against men should suffer the fate he advocates.

Note to Mikee:
You have all of Bob's sympathy. Bob got "banned" from another "Sound Off" media blog today. They only accept advocates who agree with their misandrist "PC" opinions.

November 03, 2009 6:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting stuff in the news today. The DC sniper is asking not to be executed. Good luck with that. The justice of the peace in Louisiana who refused to marry a black man to a white woman has been pressured into resigning. What a shocker.

And let me get this straight. A SUPPORTER of MikeeUSA posted his personal info? With friends like that... So much for his finding a job now.

November 04, 2009 2:11 PM  
Anonymous Feminist Scum said...

As far as I know, Mikee has yet to kidnap any women, and throw them in to a cage for years at a time for no good reason.

Feminists and their state thug enforcers would do this to Mikee if they had their way.

Those shit heads claiming to be moderate are some of the most radical hate mongers there are. They just got their radical hate to be widely accepted as moderate.

If the state thugs ever come for Mikee only for speaking, I hope he wipes them all off the Earth.

November 05, 2009 12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you want unpopular change then the last thing you want is your supporters having it easy. If the men's rights activists want change they'll have to get themselves all riled up for a fight and then have nothing for themselves to do other then fight.

What you people support is unpolular. Most men would silently execute you if they knew what you believe. The only thing that you could do to create the society you want is bring about a dictatorship of yourselves and opress anyone who were opposed to your mysoginist belief system.

November 05, 2009 3:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

>The prerogative of a Man is to find for
>himself a mate."

"Is that all? Then what a sad, sad little creature you make him sound."

This is always the counter-argument of pro-women's rights people. It can't be effectivly counter argued. Men get nowhere through arguments.

Enemies are enemies.
Arguments are for your allies, to hash out an effective plan. You don't argue with enemies: you destroy them.

November 05, 2009 3:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A Muslim just fucking killed 13 US servicemen in the USA.


The muslims on the internet are very happy, especially the saudi arabians.

Should we kill them all?
Should we nuke them to death?


Should we evacuate mecca and medina and grid-nuke those cities to weaken their religion.

Should we then beat the face in, with bats, of any muslim cleric after that?

Should all muslims be deported?

November 05, 2009 9:55 PM  
Anonymous Alex said...

Wow, Bob, your articles are great. Your writing style is very unique. I laughed the whole time! You truly are a great comedian. Keep up the good work.

November 15, 2009 5:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: RMS, the founder of the freesoftware movement, has apologised to feminists for offending them

here the women celebrate like the worthless bitches they are:

I dunno, maybe ask him to reconsider these apologetics? Appeasing women helps noone. Especially appeasing lesbians.

His email.
rms AT gnu DOT org

November 15, 2009 5:21 PM  
Blogger slade666 said...

it amazes me the amount of spineless men i see these days if a feminazi opposes what you just say fuck off or i'll come round and give your cunt a good kicking

December 21, 2009 3:32 PM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

Beat your wife? Welcome to the Lorena Bobbitt School of Body Modification.

What if a wife hits her husband?

Rapist? We have some mine fields we need mapped out.

What punishment should we use for false rape accusers?

December 24, 2009 2:36 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

MasculistMan asked: "What if a wife hits her husband?"

Elin Nordgren is a ‘Heroine’ in Sweeden for clobering her husband with a golf club. Its not about "violence," its about destroying men. Cunts who beat their husbands are "heorines."

December 24, 2009 2:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

From 1978 till 1993, I wrote militantly anti-feminist op-eds in my Midwestern rural city newspaper. I can say modestly I was the most hated person in our city, and I was proud of it. You wimps have no idea how masculine you can feel when you stand up like a man on your back legs and tell the man-hater exactly what you think of them. Bob knows.

At lunch in the cafeteria, I was usually sitting in the midst of a large group of women, all enjoying my presence. Women do not respect rear-end kissing wimps. Men wondered why on earth those women enjoyed my company. It was easy. One of them told a man who asked her why she was my friend, that women knew what I stood for. He had no idea what she meant. I did.

Most women want a man who can take care of them. Wimps who can't even stand up to nasty women can't take care of anyone, not even themselves.

Anonymous age 67

January 18, 2010 9:56 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous age 67:

Your experience with the cows flocking around a strong man is typical. The cows who succeeded in pushing around the open source establishment won't respect any of the butt kissing manginas, and neither will any real man.

January 19, 2010 7:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home