Not only NO, but HELL NO!
Old line politicians and talking head pundits are reeling today, trying to figure it out. The voters sent a message to Washington, DC, yesterday. Half of the US Congress, the House of Representatives, went from a solid Democratic majority to a solid (Tea Party) Republican majority. Tea Party candidates were also elected to the US Senate, but the Democrat/Socialist party still holds a majority in the Senate.
All the media talking heads, from CBS to FOX, keep reporting the Tea Party victories, but obviously the talking heads don't GET IT yet. Hour after hour they keep blathering about how the Tea Party Congressmen and Senators will have to "work with" or "compromise" on spending cuts. They just don't GET IT.
Government spending takes a positive appropriation that has to originate in the House of Representatives. According to the Constitutional process of the US Government, and the House of Representatives originates all appropriations bill. The House is now dominated by a Tea Party elected majority. Once the House passes a spending bill it goes to the Senate for approval and then to the President. It needs approvals of both the Senate and the President to become law. The government cannot legally spend any money not authorized by a law originating in the House.
The House of Representatives now has a (Tea Party) Republican majority, all of whom have promised to cut government spending. When the Tea Party members of the House only approve a much lower level of spending, and the Senate refuses to accept it, then NO MONEY GETS APPROPRIATED. If no money is appropriated, Obama won't be legally able to buy gas for his limo on a government account. Spending government money without an appropriation law is grounds for immediate impeachment and removal from office.
The usual pundits and political hacks are all about more and more spending. They have been watching millions of angry Americans form the Tea Party, and now we have elected many new Representatives to the House, and some Senators. But the pundits and hacks still don't get it. They assume that all Congressmen are there to “work with” and “go along.” They need another lesson.
If NO money is appropriated, no money is spent. No money being spent would be the ULTIMATE VICTORY for those who are angry about government spending. Tea Party Congressmen DO NOT HAVE TO COMPROMISE. They are, in fact, compromising to accept any government spending at all. If the Senate won't approve the cut spending bill, or Pretender Obama vetoes it, then NO money gets appropriated. VICTORY! WE WIN!
No spending at all is the ULTIMATE VICTORY for the Tea Party. If Obama or the Democrats want ANY spending, then they will have to accept what is acceptable and appropriated by the House. We The People don't want to be robbed for Obama's “Czars” or his “Obamacare” or his “EPA' or for his junkets to India, or any of the rest of his evil.
If he vetoes the House spending bill,
WE WIN ULTIMATE VICTORY!
There won't be legal money to buy gas for Obama's limo.
For all you Democrats and talking heads who may read The World According to Bob, try to keep up. Angry Americans do not have to compromise with evil power mad politicians who take our money.
All the media talking heads, from CBS to FOX, keep reporting the Tea Party victories, but obviously the talking heads don't GET IT yet. Hour after hour they keep blathering about how the Tea Party Congressmen and Senators will have to "work with" or "compromise" on spending cuts. They just don't GET IT.
Government spending takes a positive appropriation that has to originate in the House of Representatives. According to the Constitutional process of the US Government, and the House of Representatives originates all appropriations bill. The House is now dominated by a Tea Party elected majority. Once the House passes a spending bill it goes to the Senate for approval and then to the President. It needs approvals of both the Senate and the President to become law. The government cannot legally spend any money not authorized by a law originating in the House.
The House of Representatives now has a (Tea Party) Republican majority, all of whom have promised to cut government spending. When the Tea Party members of the House only approve a much lower level of spending, and the Senate refuses to accept it, then NO MONEY GETS APPROPRIATED. If no money is appropriated, Obama won't be legally able to buy gas for his limo on a government account. Spending government money without an appropriation law is grounds for immediate impeachment and removal from office.
The usual pundits and political hacks are all about more and more spending. They have been watching millions of angry Americans form the Tea Party, and now we have elected many new Representatives to the House, and some Senators. But the pundits and hacks still don't get it. They assume that all Congressmen are there to “work with” and “go along.” They need another lesson.
If NO money is appropriated, no money is spent. No money being spent would be the ULTIMATE VICTORY for those who are angry about government spending. Tea Party Congressmen DO NOT HAVE TO COMPROMISE. They are, in fact, compromising to accept any government spending at all. If the Senate won't approve the cut spending bill, or Pretender Obama vetoes it, then NO money gets appropriated. VICTORY! WE WIN!
No spending at all is the ULTIMATE VICTORY for the Tea Party. If Obama or the Democrats want ANY spending, then they will have to accept what is acceptable and appropriated by the House. We The People don't want to be robbed for Obama's “Czars” or his “Obamacare” or his “EPA' or for his junkets to India, or any of the rest of his evil.
If he vetoes the House spending bill,
There won't be legal money to buy gas for Obama's limo.
For all you Democrats and talking heads who may read The World According to Bob, try to keep up. Angry Americans do not have to compromise with evil power mad politicians who take our money.
Labels: Constitution, government, Government Bankruptcy, government tyranny, Obama, Obamanation
posted by Bob | Wednesday, November 03, 2010
8 Comments:
But there is alot of cunts in that tea party who ran. Remember no man votes for a cunt.
Christine O'Donnell lost so that's one.
Yeah NOBODY VOTES FOR A CUNT
Vote for a Socialist man.
What if Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin gets the nomination in 2012 and the election is Obama vs Palin?
Then we must vote for Obama because he is male and worthy.
Well Bob, I did not bother to vote in this election. There were no Ron Pauls' on the ballot in my part of the US, so it matters little to me at this point.
The Republican congressional candidate did oust a Democrat that had been there for 27 years.
I'm just waiting for the damn thing to collapse. I won't take joy in it since I'll be suffering to, but I don't see any other outcome.
The problem with throwing out the old bastards at election time is the new bastards thrown in. Both their campaign war chests are filled from the same sources.
Post a Comment
<< Home