Flu Scam of the Season
All across the US, every medical clinic and pharmacy is pushing Flu Shots. Every local TV outlet hammers it home every news broadcast --- Get a flu shot!!!!! Even Buy Mart puts signs out in front, “Flu Shots Today.” Did you ever wonder why? Follow the MONEY!
The flu shot is sold for around $30 per person. Off the top the state takes 10% or $3 more for sales tax.
Assuming that 1 of every 3 Americans gets a flu shot that is $33 times 100,000,000 people or $3..3 billion dollars. Whatever temporary benefit you get for your $33 is fleeting. You will have to buy another next year, and the medical industrial complex plans to sell another $3.3 billion in flu shots next year again. If they can terrify more than one out of three Americans into getting the shots their massive annual profits go up and up.
The actual serum cost only a few cents to produce. Its manufactured under a GOVERNMEN MONOPOLY LICENSE so the manufacture can sell it for $5, about 99% profit – less kickback to corrupt politicians. Your local neighborhood doctor, clinic, or pharmacy pays around $5 and sells for $30, making an easy 6 times their money. The scam is on.
They pay TV stations to terrorize gullible females and unthinking men to believe that they are all going to die of swine flu or some other flu unless the sheeple run out and pay $30 each. In many cities they have lobbied School Boards to require mass consumption by all children enrolled in schools. The scam gets bigger and bigger.
Now the new corrupt Fascist government is concerned that all their illegal alien immigrants don't pay the $30 each to enrich their medical industrial complex benefactors, so they have a new law to rob all Americans. Whether you want to pay the $30 or not, you now have to pay for your own and those of 3 or 4 other people you will never meet.
Regular readers of The World According to Bob will have read Bob's previous article about cutting the cost of medical care in the US. Freedom from the government monopoly would allow non-monopoly suppliers to sell $0.05 worth of product for no more than $2 to $5 at retail including labor to administer the shots. Freedom of information would eliminate the paid horror story terrorism constantly promoted by LICENSED TV outlets.
What can you do? First, you don't have to follow the sheeple to pay your $30 every year. Second, you can work with Tea Party or other groups to recapture our government and restore freedom.
Follow the MONEY!
The flu shot is sold for around $30 per person. Off the top the state takes 10% or $3 more for sales tax.
Assuming that 1 of every 3 Americans gets a flu shot that is $33 times 100,000,000 people or $3..3 billion dollars. Whatever temporary benefit you get for your $33 is fleeting. You will have to buy another next year, and the medical industrial complex plans to sell another $3.3 billion in flu shots next year again. If they can terrify more than one out of three Americans into getting the shots their massive annual profits go up and up.
The actual serum cost only a few cents to produce. Its manufactured under a GOVERNMEN MONOPOLY LICENSE so the manufacture can sell it for $5, about 99% profit – less kickback to corrupt politicians. Your local neighborhood doctor, clinic, or pharmacy pays around $5 and sells for $30, making an easy 6 times their money. The scam is on.
They pay TV stations to terrorize gullible females and unthinking men to believe that they are all going to die of swine flu or some other flu unless the sheeple run out and pay $30 each. In many cities they have lobbied School Boards to require mass consumption by all children enrolled in schools. The scam gets bigger and bigger.
Now the new corrupt Fascist government is concerned that all their illegal alien immigrants don't pay the $30 each to enrich their medical industrial complex benefactors, so they have a new law to rob all Americans. Whether you want to pay the $30 or not, you now have to pay for your own and those of 3 or 4 other people you will never meet.
Regular readers of The World According to Bob will have read Bob's previous article about cutting the cost of medical care in the US. Freedom from the government monopoly would allow non-monopoly suppliers to sell $0.05 worth of product for no more than $2 to $5 at retail including labor to administer the shots. Freedom of information would eliminate the paid horror story terrorism constantly promoted by LICENSED TV outlets.
What can you do? First, you don't have to follow the sheeple to pay your $30 every year. Second, you can work with Tea Party or other groups to recapture our government and restore freedom.
Follow the MONEY!
Labels: government, government tyranny, medicine, Stupid is as Stupid does
posted by Bob | Friday, October 08, 2010
28 Comments:
you can work with Tea Party
The Tea Party is made up of Christian extremists who want to implement a theocracy, racists and other fanatic lunatics. It's easier to just not get a flu shot. They make you get sick anyway. Avoid the Tea Party. Bigots one and all.
Note to anonymous: Have you any idea how stupid you appear when you open your mouth and start spewing nonsense?
Gotta side with anonymous above. The Tea Party favorite in my state is on record as opposing the separation of church and state. That scares the crap out of me. The fundamentalists have too much political power as it is. Keep religion out of politics, like the founding fathers intended. If they'd wanted a Christian nation, they'd have created one.
Note to anonymous:
There are religious people who are Democrats, Republicans, Greens, Libertarians, and also in the Tea Party. The Tea Party is not "made up of Christian extremists who want to implement a theocracy." That's ridiculous.
Bob, I know this is off-topic but I wanted to ask you about something that happened on the subway yesterday. There's always guys on the train who like to grope women. Always has been, in Japan they even have women-only trains because it happens so much. I remember my grandmother complaining about it so it's nothing new. Yesterday though this women yelled real loud "paws off you freak" which is code I guess for "everybody grab your cell phones and ruin this guy's life" because that's what the other riders did. They called the cops and took videos of the guy with his junk out, and when the cops took him off at the next stop they took a bunch of phones as evidence. Groping is nothing new like I said, but now this guy will probably have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life. I mean, I understand that women don't like it but I'm a man and understand the urge to grab a little flesh if she's really hot. I don't grope or anything like that, but I understand it. Women used to just put up with it. Is it that everybody has cell phones now? I asked a few co-workers and one made a good point that if it was a gay guy getting his jizz on my suit I'd want him arrested, but that's different. She says it's just exactly the same, unwanted sexual contact but it happened to millions of women and they didn't get guys arrested for it. Did they always want to and didn't have a way to get evidence like they do now? Everybody on the train practically was holding the guy, making sure he was there for the cops to arrest and videoing evidence.
@Bob:
Thanks for explaining that to ANON.
Not only is the flu shot a scam, it uses thimerosol as a mercury-containing preservative. This may well lead to autism of vaccinated children or future offspring of those vaccinated. And that's just scratching the surface. DO NOT GET THE VACCINE! Your life may well be at stake.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Novartis
Note to anonymous:
Nobody should be molesting someone else on a subway or in other public place. However, hate based penalties that are massively extreme for a relatively minor offense should be opposed by any decent person. This kind of subway offense causes no injury and no harm other than momentary unpleasantness. A civil fine about equal to overtime parking would be more or less appropriate.
On the spearhead today people are saying we need, or they rather (I'm not part of their group), need a core set of principles.
"We need a core set of principles, backed with solid unwavering facts. This will keep us focused, an our opponents on the defensive. Our demands must be fair, but unwavering."
I have suggested this, it will probably not be approved by moderation:
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/10/15/needed-male-leaders/
Political Suggestions about women's Rights:
* Females be married once they are able to have children (usually at ages: 12, 13, 14).
* Men never persecuted for having relations with a young female of childbearing age.
* The marital rape exception reinstated (So that a man is never persecuted for raping his wife).
* If a man rapes a unmarried/betrothed++ virgin girl he marries her, pays her father some money, and doesn't divorce her.
++Betrothal here meaning female living with husband for about one year before the marriage feast/ceremony.
* Females barred from bringing claims against their husband (or similar) in court.
* Females barred from divorcing their husbands.
* Females barred from collecting monies from husband (child support etc).
* Other similar things to remove all power from females and make them what men desire.
(About Child Support: A saying from Bob is: child support is a seat at a Man's table and a cot to sleep on in his house)
It angers me that my comments at http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/10/15/needed-male-leaders/#comment-47846
never are allowed through. Should I take that site down?
9:51 and 10:00, here's a thought. According to the quotation you posted, "Our demands must be fair, but unwavering" (emphasis added). Maybe they don't allow your comments because they are not fair, they are nutty. Spearhead is serious about what they are talking about. Your comments cannot be taken seriously by any sane person therefore they are disallowed.
Note to Mikee. You cannot advocate "rape." The word is loaded with hysteria. And, that is not what you mean. What you mean is that wives are obligated to sexual relations with husbands. That you can advocate.
Forget Spearhead. They're moderated and will never post Mikee's comments. He should move to the LATimes, which seems to be unmoderated. If his views represent those of men, this is where they will rally to his banner.
I saw a couple of young women out today, looked to be about 20 or so. Very pretty, both of them, with nice bodies. They both had backpacks so I guess they're from the University. One was wearing a t-shirt that read "uppity women unite" and the other had a pink t-shirt with the breast cancer pink ribbon and read "fight like a girl." What would you have done?
Forgot to say that neither one had a wedding ring but I guess that's obvious.
What's the big deal about rings? Many today don't bother with them (too expensive, easy to lose, give a wrong message about values).
Being married is an arbitrary test of a person's status. It's who you are that's important, not marital status, race, bank acct. etc. For marriage to mean anything, it must be a sincere commitment between two individuals based on respect, not busybodies holding a gun to your head to force conformity.
What do you mean, what would you have done? Why should anyone have done anything? You saw two young women with backpacks and no rings. Big deal.
I saw a Priest walk by a playground. What should I have done?
Note to anonymous:
Suicide is probably your best option.
Bob, I just got banned from the redit mens rights listing.
We're in worse shape then we were years ago. Pro-women's rights men own this "movement" now. I wish there was something we could do _against_ these pro-women's-rights men to decrease their quality of life and their enjoyment of their surroundings. Is there?
They say that mysoginistic men will not be tolerated in the MRM. They say cute things like "banhammer" etc. They support women's rights, oppose men taking young wives, and oppose the removal of marital rape laws and the reinstation of the marital exception to rape.
Is there any way we can show these men that they will not be tolerated as leaders or rulers of the earth. Currently nice traitors like them (along with women) rule the western nations and all it's communications. Is there a way we can destroy them completely and make them wish they never joined the "movement" to begin with?
http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ducw6/mens_rights_activists_dont_want_victory_what/
--MikeeUSA--
"I wish there was something we could do _against_ these pro-women's-rights men to decrease their quality of life and their enjoyment of their surroundings."
Oh, horrors. Somebody disagrees with you. Whatever can you do to make them suffer for such a terrible crime?
Get over it. People disagree every day. Learn to cope.
Mikee, I followed the link you posted and read all of the comments. Let me see if I can help.
You don't have a home in the Men's Rights Movement. We are not about enslaving women and allowing them to be bought and sold like cattle. We are not about abusing them. We are about not being abused. It's long time we spoke up about being demonized. Women do lie about rape. They do it all the time. Men do rape. Both are wrong and need to be punished. False rape accusations can and do ruin men's lives. Punish the liars the same as the rapists. The crimes are the same. Men are not always at fault in domestic violence incidents. Women are guilty of half of it. It's long past time that the courts acknowledged it. Women deserve reproductive rights. So do men. Google C4M, or Choice for Men. Women can walk away from unwanted pregnancy. Men should have the same right. In a "he said she said" dispute, men's POV should matter as much as women's. When men have to change seats on a plane because they are seated next to an unaccompanied child, it is wrong and unjust. Female sexual predators exist and this has to be acknowledged. Just because he's a man doesn't mean he's a molester for Christ's sake! Courts denying men access to their children while imposing outrageous child support payments, often greater than a man's monthly salary, is a crime. Automatic determination of maternal custody is wrong. Fathers deserve justice.
This is what the MRM is about. What you are about is making "females" chattel property to be bought, sold, raped and abused. You are more wrong than the feminist courts. The MRM isn't about denying women human rights. It's about fighting for men's human rights.
I don't know where you will find a home. I personally find your views abhorrent. But please, don't try to ally yourself with us. We want justice. You want women to live in hell. It's not the same thing.
"The MRM isn't about denying women human rights. It's about fighting for men's human rights. "
Well said.
The MRM isn't about anything, because it doesn't exist as a social force.
>>>The MRM isn't about anything, because it doesn't exist as a social force.>>>
Yes, thanks to you. The real MRM is about fairness and justice. How many fathers fighting for joint custody of their daughters ran from it as fast as they could when they read your rants? They want to be able to love and protect and be with their kids, then they see that what you want is to abduct rape and enslave them. Who can blame them if they turn their backs on allies when the first thing they see is you? The men we want are honest good men, not ones who want to legalize rape, force girls into marriage with men two and three times their age. Posts like yours Mikee, wanting to deny "females" basic rights, not allow them to go school, vote, have independence or otherwise be human beings--you aren't doing us any favours. You drive decent men away from the MRM. STFU or at least quit trying to post to MRM fora. You don't belong with us. We want fairness, not some sick fantasy or to turn back the clock to the Stone Age.
Bob, I'm honestly surprised that you posted the comments from October 23, 2010 9:10 PM and October 27, 2010 8:59 PM. I guess I owe you an apology.
I thought you were in favor of decriminalizing rape, forced marriage of pubescent girls to middle-aged men (not boys, of course), denying women the vote and other rights. Apparently I was wrong, and I apologize for that error.
I'm hope you'll work with the Men's Rights Movement. One of the biggest hurdles we face is trying to convince people (male and female alike) that we are NOT a male-supremacist outfit hellbent on controlling women. The posters above (I think one is a Brit, from his spelling) are very articulate in explaining our goals.
Bravo for posting them.
Justice for everyone.
Mitch
Correct
One of the biggest hurdles we face is trying to convince people (male and female alike) that we are NOT a male-supremacist outfit hellbent on controlling women. The posters above (I think one is a Brit, from his spelling) are very articulate in explaining our goals.
Bravo for posting them.
I agree. Thanks Bob. We need to get the message out.
Post a Comment
<< Home