Cotton Bale resizing.

In Washington State there is a secret legislature committee meeting this month to "re-evaluate" the state guidelines on so-called "child support." Other US states do the same reevaluation periodically. No public announcement has been sent or published in local media. None of the father's rights advocacy groups have been invited to attend or suggest comments. So-called "child support" is, after all, indentured servitude, a form of slavery, illegal under the US Constitution. All forms of involuntary peonage and indentured servitude are illegal in the United States.

In 17th century Virginia they re-evaluated the size of cotton bales and concluded that 99lbs per bale is the optimum size to get the most work out of slaves every day. Too many pounds per bale and the slaves broke down or were injured from overwork. Too few pounds and the slaves were loafing on the job. Either way production lagged. The committee set 99 pounds per bale as the standard that an average slave could carry the most pounds of cotton day in and day out without either loafing or breaking down from over work. Cotton is still sold today in 99lb bales for hand carry cotton. Machine handled bales are equal to 5 of the 17th century bales.

Washington state is re-evaluating its slave (father) working guidelines to re-determine the maximum amount of cash they can extract from each slave per day. Raise the guidelines too high and fathers break down, go broke, end up in jail instead of working to pay their masters. Set the guidelines too low and fathers get away with slacking off and paying less than the maximum amount that could be collected.

Some things never change, only the names have changed to protect the guilty. A slaver is a slaver by whatever name, in whatever century. A slaver will refrain from working their slaves to death only because it would cut into next year's production.

Slavery can not be made acceptable by re-evaluating the size of the cotton bales. It can only be eradicated and the slave masters destroyed.

Bob

Respect your Neighbor. Is that so hard?

From the US Constitution: "Article VI: …This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land;..."

Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..."

From the Treaty of Tripoli in 1797: "As the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,--as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquillity of Messelmen, --and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mohammedan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinion shall ever interupt the harmony existing betweenthe two countries"

Does the 1796-97 Treaty with Tripoli Matter to Church/State Separation? Speech given to the Humanists of Georgia on June 22, 1997 and at the 1997 Lake Hypatia Independance Day Celebration.
By Ed Buckner, Ph.D.

It doesn't matter how many times the fundamentalist Christians try to change the United States from a sectarian nation to a Christian theocracy, it has always been and remains a sectarian nation with citizens of many religions and of no religion. Once again this week the US Supreme Court had to remind elected officials in some small towns that they can not adopt the religious laws and commandments of any one religion, even the most popular religion, as the established law in their community. According to CNN.com, some County officials in Kentucky bemoan religious liberty being forced on them by the federal courts. For years they have tried by various means to adopt Christian religious law as the law of their county or town, but the United States is not a Christian nation, nor a Jewish nation, nor a Muslim nation, nor a Buddhist nation, nor a nation founded on any other religion.

George Washington learned the art of war as a young officer in the Protestant British Army fighting Catholic French troops. In one battle Washington was the only officer to survive uninjured. By the time of the American Revolution, Washington, Jefferson, Adams, and the rest of the American patriots had had enough of wars fought over religious differences. When America was created their vision was freedom for men of all religions and of no religion. A few years later in 1797 when the United States negotiated it's first international treaty with the Muslim nation of Tripoli, now called Libya, it clearly stated that the US was not a Christian nation. Yet here we are 200 years later and there are still religious zealots who would change the United States into a Christian theocracy, who frequently attempt to rewrite history and claim that the US was founded as a Christian nation.

Once again this week the US Supreme Court had to remind them that posting religious law in their government building in a manner that attempts to establish that religion as the legal religion in their county is plainly illegal under the Constitution.

Why does the court have to keep reminding government officials that Americans are not all Christian, and even the Christians come in many different denominations and variations. We have citizens who are Buddhist, Muslim, Protestant, Hindu, Yaruba, Shinto, Wiccan, Native American Traditionalist, Atheist, Catholic, Jewish, Mormon, Druid, Baptist, and a thousand more variations. All citizens are to be welcome and respected at every government building all across our land. Why is that so hard to comprehend for these backwoods sheriffs? It's not about cramming your religion down everyone else's throats no matter how "right" you believe that your religion is. It's about respecting your neighbors, folks. It's about being neighborly and equal with your neighbor. It's about respect. He respects you and you respect him. Neither of us makes the other follow our version of religion. George Washington got it. Thomas Jefferson got it. John Adams got it. Why couldn't Paul Worthington, of the American Legion get it when he hung the Christian commandments in the Kentucky court house in 2000?

It's about respecting your neighbors. Is that so hard to do in Kentucky?

Bob

Bob scores high on the NERD TEST

Bob was reading someone else's blog today and there was a link to a "Nerd Test" web site. Having nothing better to do I spent a few minutes taking the test.


Your Score Summary
Overall, you scored as follows:
3% scored higher (more nerdy), and
97% scored lower (less nerdy).
What does this mean? Your nerdiness is:

All hail the monstrous nerd. You are by far the SUPREME NERD GOD!!!


Of course Bob has no idea why he scored so high. Maybe it's because he recognized the photo of Max Plank. Maybe it's because he resorted to Google to look up a couple of answeres - real nerds look stuff up on the Internet all the time, it's a nerdy thing to do. Maybe it's because Bob was programming computers in assembly code before any of those programming languages were invented.

I you don't have much else to do today here's the link to the Nerd Test.

The evil that lurks at the US Court House

This was a reply to a question posted on my previous blog entry about the murder of Perry Manley. See Had To.

To the Dark Goddess of Replevin -- an evil lying attorney who has her own blog.

Q. How do you know if an attorney is lying.
A. Because her lips are moving.

There are several problems with your comments on Perry Manley. You accuse him of being "nutty" because he rightly believes that slavery is unconstitutional and peonage is illegal in the US as are debtor's prisons. He was right about that. His real insanity was to think that the evil minions of Satan who wear the black robes of hell would ever do anything but protect each other and enforce the ongoing governmental oppression of the people. That's their job. That's what they do.

You are also badly wrong in your statement "got the federales to shoot him." The shooting was cold blooded murder, complete with fake police training hand grenade planted after he was dead. Killing is what the blue gun thugs do. They train for it every day. When any situation comes up they react as they have been trained. It was foolish of Manley to believe that a "civilian" could become belligerent in front of the courts and not get blown away by the blue gun thugs. But that is a far cry from having any intent to be shot. The blood is on the hands of the murderous blue gun thugs. Blaming the victim is typical lying tactics from an organization with SCOTUS approval to lie every time they open their mouths.

Perry Manley's problems with the court are exemplary of why so many Americans have so little faith, and so much justifiable animosity toward the American Injustice System (AIS). The evil minions of Satan in the black robes of hell live in a fictional world cut off from any sense of reality and serve only themselves. Most of their "decisions" are wrong on their face, and only have any validity inside their fictional fantasy world that belongs more on the Sci-Fi channel than in real life. Manley had the lack of wisdom to think that they would ever do anything than beat him to death with their legions of blue gun thugs. He was wrong, of course. Evil does as evil is. The AIS is about control and domination. It is not about law or justice, and hasn't been for a long time.

The real mental illness is people like you who work for the evil that oppresses people. You are like the Jews who helped the Nazis load other Jews on trains for "work camps." It may buy you a little extra bread for a while, but it's insane to do their evil work for them. You spread oppression and destruction everywhere your kind goes. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

Bob

History and Supidity in Retail

I read recently that Winn-Dixie market chain is in bankruptcy. Not too long ago the Furrs market chain in the west went under. Retail and grocery stores from mom and pop operations to large chains all across the country are under pressure and many have vanished. Some people blame competition from Wal-Mart for their demise, but I blame management by history and stupidity.

For years it seem that every time I find a brand of product that I like and become a loyal purchaser, it soon is discontinued. For example, my wife likes that French sparkling water, Perrier. It's pretty expensive so I'm sure they make a good markup on it. It's distributed all over Europe and North America. Last month it vanished from the shelves of our local Safeway sores. She asked the management several time, and after being lied to 3 or 4 times we finally learned that some other distributor had paid them more for the shelf space and was distributing a brand-X product that nobody has ever heard of.

That's right, the shelf space at Safeway (and most grocery chains) is sold to the highest bidding supplier. Safeway management does not control it. They have no control over their shelf space when a loyal customer gets screwed by not being able to buy the products we go to Safeway to get. If you go into many grocery and other stores, especially early in the morning, you will see rout men from a dozen suppliers stocking the shelves. These people do not work for the store. They work for distributors who have purchased the shelf space on a highest bidder basis. It's sold to the supplier who can extract the most money out of us, the customers, without regard to what we want to buy. Often a good product is replaced with a poor quality product because the poor product has a higher markup. So just when you and me find a product we like and become loyal customers our store sells the shelf space to some higher bidder, takes the product we like off the shelves, and offers us crap.

Some years ago I worked in a retail store for a year, not the big grocery chain but a small retailer of specialty products. The management brought in a line of Chinese made products that were an imitation of a name brand. I asked why we didn't just obtain and sell the name brand. The answer was because the name brand had only a 25% markup while the Chinese knockoff had a 50% markup. So they gathered a lot of dust. In the year I worked there I think we maybe sold 3 units in total. People would come in and look, notice the cheap imitations, and not buy. Instead of selling 100 for 25% we sold 3 at 50%. But our manager thought he was making more money.

Let's look at the economics of the purchased shelf space at your local market. There are route delivery men who have to purchase their routes from the distributor. They are not hired drivers who stock shelves. They have had to pay for the privilege of having the job of stocking the shelves. One of two things are going to happen, or both. Some delivery routes won't earn enough to pay decent wages plus pay back for the purchase cost. These routes will have a turnover of failed drivers, men who have been suckered into a losing investment of time and money only to be screwed by the system. They will leave and a new sucker will be recruited to take over by more lies and false promises. Some delivery routes will earn good money and be able to pay the driver back for his investment. But that means that the products you buy are being sold for higher prices to pay more for distribution than is necessary. All of these distributors and individual drivers have a huge cost that has to be passed on to us, the consumers.

Another thing that has always pissed me off is their disregard for selling quality products. They care more about image than taking care of customers. For example in the bakery department many stores feature fresh "French" bread. It never is sold with plastic wrappers because "French" bread comes with paper bags. Forget the fact that bread gets old, dried, and hard as a rock by the next day in a paper bag, that's not their problem. They intend for you and me to waste half the loaf because it gets dried out, and then come back tomorrow and buy another. Big chain bakeries, the ones who have purchased space on your market's shelf, always put their bread in plastic bags. But the store bakery does not. They have plastic bags, and will frown and give you one if you pester the baker, but they don't want your bread to last 2 days.

Let's compare the history and stupidity management model used by your local market to that used by Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart has been phenomenally successful by disregarding all the "rules" of retail. They are now the largest grocery retailer in the US. Wal-Mart does not sell their shelf space to the highest bidder. Instead of selling space Wal-Mart tires to figure out what we want to buy and then put it on the shelf. Wal-Mart does not have a fleet of route men stocking their shelves who had to purchase the routes. Instead, Wal-Mart buys truck loads of products from manufacturers or large distributors and hires employees to put them on their own shelves. Instead of a series of insane sales followed by inflated prices that you find at your local store, Wal-Mart always has a reasonable markup of the wholesale price without all the expensive hoopla.

Could Winn-Dixie, Furrs, Safeway, Krugers, and the rest adopt the Wal-Mart model and improve customer service while avoiding bankruptcy? Of course they could. But it's hard for the managers to give up that $2,000 that they are getting paid for a few feet of shelf space. Often the individual managers are pocketing a kickback from the route men under the table while the customer and the store owners get screwed. Of course it's a system that leads to corruption and double dealing all down the line. Big chains and local independents go bankrupt, shuffle around and are taken over by other chains, employees and customers get screwed, and the system of stupidity and history goes on and one.

Many people blame Wal-Mart for it's success when we should be blaming our local market for it's failure. I blame my local market when we go there and no longer can purchase Perrier water. I blame my local market when the French bread only comes in paper bags designed to dry out the product. I blame my local market when the price of a pack of Coca-Cola varies from $2.50 to $4.79 and back in two weeks. No, Wal-Mart isn't perfect, but they do almost everything in their business better than my local market chain. If any of you readers are in retail or grocery, get off your butts, drop the history and stupidity, and ask your customers what WE want. In any retail endeavor WE are the secret of success. Getting paid more for shelf space to offer a line of crap is a false economy. We'll go to Wal-Mart and pay less.

Bob

Title IX -- More LIES while colleges flout the law

From the National Review

Bush administration has provided a real reason to celebrate the 33rd aniversary of Title IX

June 24, 2005, 7:57 a.m.
Happy Birthday, Title IX
The Bush administration has provided a real reason to celebrate.

By Carrie Lukas of Independent Women's Forum.
Put this week's celebration of Title IX — the federal law intended to prevent discrimination based on sex on college campuses — in the "it's my party and I'll cry if I want to" category. Instead of simply acknowledging the 33rd anniversary of the creation of the law, prominent Democrats used the occasion to bellyache about new regulations that clarify how schools and universities can comply with Title IX.

Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, Sen. Ted Kennedy, and House minority leader Nancy Pelosi were among the liberal worthies at a press conference on how the Bush administration is denying athletic opportunities to women. These political luminaries were joined by female athletes, including 1996 Olympic gold-medal gymnast Dominique Dawes and 1984 Olympic gold medal hurdler Benita Fitzgerald Mosley, who spoke about the importance of Title IX in protecting their sisters in sport.

Yet the administration's recent actions on Title IX hardly constitute an assault on female athletes. In March, the Department of Education merely issued guidelines explaining how schools can assess student interest in athletics to demonstrate that are they are accommodating the interests of the underrepresented sex.

Fulfilling student interest was always supposed to be one way to comply with Title IX. But given the threat of costly legislation, few universities have been willing to risk relying on compliance through such an inherently subjective measure.


WRONG! Title IX does not mention athletics. Title IX is about educational programs. Title IX requires that men not be discriminated against in recruitment, admissions, scholarships, class and program offerings, hiring of instructors and professors, library book purchases, Feminist Theory teaching, Women's Studies classes and programs, Women's Centers, etc., etc., etc.

Virtually all colleges and universities in the US, and now all K-12 schools too, openly and notoriously flout Title IX all over their campuses. The only place where they ever have even looked to see what Title IX says is the small piece of ancillary recreation on campus, the athletic department, where men have historically been more interested.

The Bush Administration has done nothing to enforce Title IX on any campus in the country. The all still openly and notoriously flout the law.

How can National Review editors and other half witted men even republish this kind or anti-men lies and hate crap? Oh yea that's right, they are leftist whores to feminism.

Bob

"Had To" is the biggest LIE -- UPDATE

UPDATE: The blue gun thugs told the media that they "had to" murder Perry Manley because he had "a grenade." Several witnesses who were interviewed by TV stations do not report seeing Perry holding a grenade. They only report that he was holding paperwork, perhaps a legal brief he wanted to file with the court. Instead of acting aggressive, Perry sat down to talk quietly with security guards. He wasn't acting threateningly, he was sitting quietly and talking with the guards. The guards were not acting as if they expected explosives. Instead of backing away from a potential explosive they approached and sat down to talk quietly with Perry. While Perry was sitting there talking calmly with the guards, the blue gun thugs shot him to death and reported that it was "suicide by cop."

Now it turns out that the grenade is the type used by the blue gun thug in their training. The blue gun thugs first shot him in the head and chest, then prevented any medical personnel or media to approach for about an hour afterwards, until they had placed one of their practice grenades in his dead hand.

The murdering blue gun thugs who shot down Perry Manley and their Chief ought to be rounded up and hanged by decent citizens.
Bob


----------------- original post --------------------------------------------
For 15 years Perry Manley has been prevented from seeing his sons. His wages have been garnished, his life in turmoil. His ex wife continually ignored visitation while collecting so-called "child support" and living in nice homes with a parade of sometimes abusive new lovers.

Perry lived in Washington State, in King County where the "family" court is long known to be among the most bigoted in the nation. About 10 years ago law students from the University of Washington reviewed 200 cases selected randomly from each of the "family" court minions of Satan who wear the black robes of hell in the 3 most populous counties in Washington State, King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. The law students found that the father was granted custody of his children in only 1 of 1,400 cases, a case where the mother was serving a long prison sentence. A few of the minions of Satan granted faux "joint" custody in a minority of cases, but still awarded residential custody to the female in every case. Some of the minions of Satan who wear the black robes of hell on "family" court benches in Washington State just awarded full custody to the female in all 200 cases regardless of circumstances or evidence. So-called "child support" awards to pay females for breaking up families exceeded the state guidelines on average. When the law students posted the findings on the Internet a formal protest was filed with the Washington State Supreme Court which has the responsibility to ensure that fair and equal justice is done in Washington. The misandrist minions of Satan on the State Supreme Court denied the protest and the University of Washington removed evidence of the study from their web site. To this day the minions of Satan in "family" court continue to illegally exercise their authority to destroy families, trample the rights of children, bind men into indentured servitude - slavery, and reward females with any damn thing they asked for. A legion of state bureaucrats continued to feed out of the pockets of desperate fathers who's lives and families had been rent asunder.

For 15 years the minions of Satan and their blue gun thug army had ten thousand chances to listen to Perry and hear his pain. Time after time they denied him and his children their basic rights to equal justice under the law. Time after time they turned him away and refused to even hear the evidence of child abuse, financial abuse, and family abuse that was being done. Time after time, year after year, a distraught father was prevented from seeing his children and his children were denied their fundamental human rights to their father.

On June 20, 2005, the day after Father's Day Sunday, the blue gun thugs army took aim and murdered Perry Manley in cold blood in front of the US court house where he repeatedly had gone asking only for justice, asking only for a father's fundamental human right to see his sons. Happy Father's Day in US Court.

The blue gun thugs came to a podium and spoke their evil words. They "had to" murder Perry Manley they said. But the LIE of "had to" is their most common LIE. They fool nobody. They had ten thousand chances to make a different decision. Ten thousand times they CHOSE to do violence. Blue gun thugs are trained to do violence. Day after day, week after week, year after year, they practice shooting, practice killing, practice hurting "civilians." It's what they are trained to do. When a "civilian" is confronted they are trained to escalate the situation, and escalate, and escalate until they have an excuse that they "had to" murder him. On June 20 they could have de-escalated the situation and sought a peaceful ending with everyone going home. They could have chosen to listen to his pain and arranged for a visit with his sons. But that's not what they are trained to do, they are trained to escalate, they are trained to kill. They "had to" kill Perry Manley because killing is their job, it's what they do. The blue gun thugs are killers, they are not justice. Click here for the media whitewash.

So Perry Manley went one last time to the US Courthouse on the day following Father's Day asking for simple justice, asking that he be allowed to see his sons. Asking that his sons be allowed to see their father. The blue suit wearing gun thugs CHOSE to murder him instead. Whenever you hear a blue gun thug claim he "had to" kill, you know he's LYING! The murdering thugs and their murderous officers all ought to be rounded up and hanged by decent citizens.

May the blue gun thugs and the evil minions of Satan who wear the black robes of hell be returned to their master and burn in his fires forever.

Bob

Suicide by Citizen

In response to the MURDER of Perry Manley, see Had To in bob's blog, the media and many milquetoast men's activists such as Glen Sacks are saying that Perry died by "suicide by cop." To say that the media are police whores would be to understate their relationship. Local TV and newspaper reporters feed on "news" releases from the blue gun thugs for half their time filler. Every lie the blue gun thugs ever tell is repeated ad-nasium by the talking heads on "News at 10." Besides "had to" discussed previously, one of their more recent excuses is "suicide by cop." It's always a huge LIE. Nobody suicides by cop. Nobody forces the blue gun thugs to murder anyone. They never "have to" kill. But the blue gun thugs are trained killers. They have shooting ranges in the basements of their offices where they practice shooting "civilians" every day. The blue gun thugs call us "civilians" in their quasi-military lingo making us into "the other" so they can kill us without regret. We, you and me, are "them," "civilians," "bad guys" Whenever the blue gun thugs beat up, terrorize, or murder another "civilian," that's person to you and me they issue a public statement that they "had to" make the CHOICE to kill instead of talk. Killing is what they do. Killing is who they are. They don't protect anyone except themselves. They do kill many.

Media reports since the MURDER of Perry Manley focus on making him out to be a nutcase who deserved to die. Everything is twisted into justification for the illegal indentured servitude system that has destroyed the lives of 25 million fathers and seriously hurt 50 million children in the US in the last 10 years alone. Even while readers loudly inform the media bigots of their revulsion over what was written and published it makes not one dent in their anti-men, anti-family, anti-children focus.

In the news articles about the murder of Perry Manley it says that the blue gun thugs spent the 20 minutes demanding that he "surrender." That translates as allowing himself to be immediately brutalized by a gang of thugs and then put in a cage for years of hell. No mention is made of any attempt at all to negotiate a peaceful solution such as promising to review his petition on it's merits, offering to schedule a meeting with a judge, or just allowing everyone to go home and cool off. Defusing a hot situation is outside of gun thug training. Instead of working for a peaceful ending, the blue gun thugs only know how to escalate the violence until the "civilian" is either murdered or otherwise destroyed. That's who they are. That's what they do.

Many people today believe that the blue gun thugs protect people from crime and have always been part of the social fabric of human life. That erroneous belief is the LIE that the blue gun thugs keep telling us, and the police whores on "News at 10" keep repeating without question. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The blue gun thugs have proven in federal court upheld by SCOTUS that they protect nobody and have no obligation to protect anybody. They rob us when we drive, they come to our homes to destroy our family, they prevent us from defending or protecting ourselves, and they often gang up on someone and destroy his life. But they never protect anyone. They are also a fairly recent invention. When the US was created in the last part of the 18th century, there were no blue gun thugs in every town and city. When Jefferson and his friends wrote the Constitutional amendment about getting a warrant before an arrest or search they were not talking about the police getting a warrant. They were talking about the elders of a community protecting themselves and needing a warrant before they could search someone else's home for evidence of crime. The blue gun thugs were invented in the middle of the 19th century as armed gangs of thugs who protected and enforced the orders of corrupt big city bosses. They were born of corruption and abuse of power, and have only gotten worse. There is no such thing as a "good cop" only doing a tough job as their lie says. It's a bad job, it's the wrong job, it's a corrupt job, it's a brutal job, it's a murderous job, it's the corrupt brutal job they are hired to do.

The national death statistics collected by the federal government lists "murder and police" as a single category because they don't want us to learn that the blue gun thugs kill many more "civilians" than the "criminals" they claim to be protecting us from. In response to their LIE that "suicide by cop" is a common occurrence, blaming the victim of their murder, someone on the Seattle PI's comment page, see link above, has pointed out that citizens are now referring to "suicide by citizen" whenever one of the blue gun thugs gets the comeuppance he richly deserves.

The blue gun thugs are bad for the people. We don't need them. We don't want them. And we would all be far better off without them.

Bob

Illegal and Malicious Persecution. UPDATE

Illegal and Malicious Persecution.

UPDATE: The illegal persecution of Edgar Ray Killen has found him "guilty" in one of the worst examples of denial of the right to a speedy trial ever seen in the US. It's a hate trial, not a law trial. It only proves that the powers of injustice hate. Decent citizens ought to be outraged by this shame filled and illegal persecution. Click here for the CNN story.



----------------- Original Blog Article -------------------------------
In Mississippi they are conducting a lynching. This time it's an 80 year old cripple named Edgar Ray Killen who may or may not have participated in a KKK event during the racial strife of 1964 when so-called "civil rights workers" from New York City went south to stir up trouble and found more than they bargained for. He was accused in a federal trial for "violation of civil rights" about 4 decades ago. The federal trial didn't convict him. Click here to read the news story.

Today, four decades later, a wave of anti-white hate has taken over southern politics. The white baiters are out for blood, and a crippled old man has fallen into their sights. Whether or not Mr. Killen was originally part of the events of the "Mississippi Burning" summer of 1964 is now lost to history. Almost all the potential witnesses and other participants are dead. The US Constitution says, " the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial." Four decades later, after most of the witnesses have died, is not "speedy" trial by any possible stretched theory. It's not law, it's a white lynching. The Constitution also requires a defendant's right "to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor. Four decades later, after all the witnesses have died, he is denied that right to a fair trial. It's not law, it's a white lynching. In addition to the total denial of a fair trial, he was already tried for this crime in federal court. Again the Constitution says, "nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." This time it's State court, but only a lieyer scum bigot and an evil minion of Satan in a black robe outfit from Hell could pretend that it's not the same crime being retried four decades later.

The trial of Mr. Killen is not justice, it's not about law enforcement, and it's clearly illegal under the plain language of the US Constitution. It's a charade of the left wing anti-white, anti-men bigots, and that is all that it is. The Feminazis have joined with the white hating racists to make a show of destroying a white man. It's racist sexist hate, and that's all that this trial is about.

No MAN who gets on the jury should vote to convict at all, and in fact the jury should find the county persecutor and judge "GUILTY" of malicious prosecution, and violation of the Civil Rights of the accused.

Bob

"Had To" is the biggest LIE

For 15 years Perry Manley has been prevented from seeing his sons. His wages have been garnished, his life in turmoil. His ex wife continually ignored visitation while collecting so-called "child support" and living in nice homes with a parade of sometimes abusive new lovers.

Perry lived in Washington State, in King County where the "family" court is long known to be among the most bigoted in the nation. About 10 years ago law students from the University of Washington reviewed 200 cases selected randomly from each of the "family" court minions of Satan who wear the black robes of hell in the 3 most populous counties in Washington State, King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. The law students found that the father was granted custody of his children in only 1 of 1,400 cases, a case where the mother was serving a long prison sentence. A few of the minions of Satan granted faux "joint" custody in a minority of cases, but still awarded residential custody to the female in every case. Some of the minions of Satan who wear the black robes of hell on "family" court benches in Washington State just awarded full custody to the female in all 200 cases regardless of circumstances or evidence. So-called "child support" awards to pay females for breaking up families exceeded the state guidelines on average. When the law students posted the findings on the Internet a formal protest was filed with the Washington State Supreme Court which has the responsibility to ensure that fair and equal justice is done in Washington. The misandrist minions of Satan on the State Supreme Court denied the protest and the University of Washington removed evidence of the study from their web site. To this day the minions of Satan in "family" court continue to illegally exercise their authority to destroy families, trample the rights of children, bind men into indentured servitude - slavery, and reward females with any damn thing they asked for. A legion of state bureaucrats continued to feed out of the pockets of desperate fathers who's lives and families had been rent asunder.

For 15 years the minions of Satan and their blue gun thug army had ten thousand chances to listen to Perry and hear his pain. Time after time they denied him and his children their basic rights to equal justice under the law. Time after time they turned him away and refused to even hear the evidence of child abuse, financial abuse, and family abuse that was being done. Time after time, year after year, a distraught father was prevented from seeing his children and his children were denied their fundamental human rights to their father.

On June 20, 2005, the day after Father's Day Sunday, the blue gun thugs army took aim and murdered Perry Manley in cold blood in front of the US court house where he repeatedly had gone asking only for justice, asking only for a father's fundamental human right to see his sons. Happy Father's Day in US Court.

The blue gun thugs came to a podium and spoke their evil words. They "had to" murder Perry Manley they said. But the LIE of "had to" is their most common LIE. They fool nobody. They had ten thousand chances to make a different decision. Ten thousand times they CHOSE to do violence. Blue gun thugs are trained to do violence. Day after day, week after week, year after year, they practice shooting, practice killing, practice hurting "civilians." It's what they are trained to do. When a "civilian" is confronted they are trained to escalate the situation, and escalate, and escalate until they have an excuse that they "had to" murder him. On June 20 they could have de-escalated the situation and sought a peaceful ending with everyone going home. They could have chosen to listen to his pain and arranged for a visit with his sons. But that's not what they are trained to do, they are trained to escalate, they are trained to kill. They "had to" kill Perry Manley because killing is their job, it's what they do. The blue gun thugs are killers, they are not justice. Click here for the media whitewash.

So Perry Manley went one last time to the US Courthouse on the day following Father's Day asking for simple justice, asking that he be allowed to see his sons. Asking that his sons be allowed to see their father. The blue suit wearing gun thugs CHOSE to murder him instead. Whenever you hear a blue gun thug claim he "had to" kill, you know he's LYING! The murdering thugs and their murderous officers all ought to be rounded up and hanged by decent citizens.

May the blue gun thugs and the evil minions of Satan who wear the black robes of hell be returned to their master and burn in his fires forever.

Bob

Justice Served

Big news out of Washington, DC, lately has been the official apology for "lynching." CNN has been running a long interview with 90 year old James Cameron who's two friends were lynched some 70 years ago. According to Cameron's story he and his two friends went out to "lover's lane" intending to rob a white couple, whatever white couple they happened to find. According to Cameron he recognized the white woman they found so he didn't want any part of the robbery and left. His two friends robbed, and then murdered the man who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Cameron's two friends were subsequently arrested along with Cameron, and the two friends were dragged from the jail and hanged. Then Cameron was dragged out and almost hanged but a witness said that he had nothing to do with the murder, so they didn't hang him. He later was sentenced to 4 years for his part in planning the robbery.

CNN and the Senate have made a big deal about Cameron's experience as if he was some kind of victim or hero. Click here for the story.

From CNN, "Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Arkansas, right, shakes hands with James Cameron, the only known lynching survivor in America, on Monday." Call me uninformed, but the two friends were guilty of random robbery and murder and deserved to hang. They got only what they deserved. Justice was served. Cameron was also guilty of criminal conspiracy and planning a crime, and a convicted criminal for his lesser part in the murder. He didn't "survive hanging" because he was exonerated by a witness and not hanged. He also got justice. He deserves no apology or handshake from the Senate for his part in robbery and murder, not even if he was a black man who only planned to rob and murder a white man.

CNN's fine print points out that 25% of "lynching" victims were not black. I've read elsewhere that they were 20% white and 5% other races. Despite the historical truth, we now find 100% of the "victims" being depicted on CNN and the other media, 100% of those paraded before the Senate, 100% of them are black.

In contrast to the active hatred of white men currently being carried out by the left wing extremist media, the CNN story of Cameron demonstrates that justice was done quickly and without a lot of delay and obfuscation. Cold blooded murderers were hanged. I call that justice. Maybe it's the lieyers who feed on obfuscation who oppose speedy justice.

In a related political note, CNN reports, "Seven presidents petitioned Congress to end lynching. Nearly 200 anti-lynching bills were introduced in the first half of the 20th century. The House passed three anti-lynching measures between 1920 and 1940, but the Senate passed none." Over the past few months we have heard many Senate Democrats waxing loudly about how the Senate filibuster is "real democracy" and protects minorities. Senators Kennedy, Clintoon, Boxer, and the rest of the Democrats have all gone on record supporting the preservation of the filibuster rule. They went so far as to call Republican proposals for rule changes a "nuclear option." In light of recent Democratic filibusters of appointed federal judges, we need to point out that it was Democratic filibusters that prevented the anti-lynching bills from passing for close to 100 years. Which is it we don't need, Democrats or Senate filibusters, or both?

Bob

Some still print hate for Father's Day

Some newspapers continue their hate campaign against fathers and make Father's Day a focus of anti-father misandry. Among them is the Spokesman Review, a badly bigoted pile of dog crap absorber from Spokane, Washington, USA. For their Father's Day hate special the Spokesman Review used the whole center of it's front page, with a huge photo story praising the murder of a father in front of his children. The story deals with how Child Abusive Services worker Edith Vance organized an armed attack on the home of father, Bryan Russell. As a Child Abuse Services worker she couldn't accept a fathers right to take care of his own children. She organized an armed gang of blue gun thugs and stormed his Northeastern Washington home. Russell fought desperately to save his children, armed only with a crude machete, and died in a pool of blood as the gun thugs chased him down and shot him in the back. The focus of the hate monger's story is how Child Abuse Services worker Vance, a veteran of thousands of destroyed families, was struck by Russell as he defended his family and children from her malicious evil assault. Boo Hoo! The evil child abuser and professional family destroyer's assault on another father wasn't accepted quietly like so many fathers do. This father fought for his children, and the blue gun thugs murdered him in front of his children. In the hate twisted rhetoric of misandry, the Spokesman Review claims that Russell "attacked" the army that came to his door. Do they expect anyone to believe that sitting quietly in one's home is an "attack?" There was an attack, and it was a quiet peaceful family that was brutally attacked and destroyed by the Child Abuse Services and their blue gun thug army. See Criminal Gangs in the Streets in the May 2005 archive of Bob's blog.

The children's mother also had been trying to stop the Child Abuse Services, Vance, from stealing and abusing her children, "Why can't you people leave us alone?" she had asked Vance previously. Infuriated by the love of parents for their children Vance assembled her armed gang of thugs and led them out to the small rural community seeking to attack and destroy the Russell family by any means necessary, even if it meant killing them. And, that is exactly what they did, the gun thugs murdered the father and stole the children. Under state law she needed a court order to take the children, but little things like the law rarely slow down the Child Abuse Services when driven by hatred of families and fixated on taking a father's children away. She had plenty of time to go to court and get a warrent, but instead of a legal warrent she brought only three children's car seats and the blue gun thugs. When murder is your plan you don't go to court first. She and her blue gun thugs ought to be rounded up and hanged by decent citizens before they come to kill another father or destroy the next thousand families.

The attack and murder of Russell in front of his children was a heinous crime against all fathers. It is used as hate rhetoric intended to show fathers as evil criminals for protecting our children. It is this story, the destruction of a father who tried to protect his family, that the Spokesman Review chose to print in a huge photo story on it's Father's Day front page. While many newspapers have stopped using Father's Day as an occasion to run a series of anti-father hate articles, the Spokesman Review bucks the trend and continues to spew anti-men hate on it's front page. Maybe they think that only poor men in mountain cabins will ever be the object of an armed gang? Evil begets evil and violence begets violence. Hate, like that which burns in the heart of the misandrist bigots of the Spokesman Review begets hate. May they all rot in hell from whence they came.

Not all media still celebrate Father's Day by publishing anti-father hate like the Spokesman Review. See Bob's other post entitled Today is Father's Day for a breath of fresh air.

The evil anti-father hate article in the Spokesman Review was written by Kevin Graman and Benjamin Shors, two bigots who have sold their manhood for a job doing evil.

Bob

------ Contact for the Spokesman Review are below -----------------

Kevin Graman works as staff writer for The Spokesman-Review. In that position, Graman is a general assignment reporter.
He can be reached by e-mail at kevingr@spokesman.com
Kevin Graman can be reached by phone at (509)459-5433. If that is a long-distance call for you, you can use our 800 number. The number is (800)338-8801 extension 5433.

Benjamin Shors works as staff writer for The Spokesman-Review. In that position, Shors covers social issues.
He can be reached by e-mail at benjamins@spokesman.com
Benjamin Shors can be reached by phone at (509)459-5484. If that is a long-distance call for you, you can use our 800 number. The number is (800)338-8801 extension 5484.

You can also write complaints about their anti-father hate campaign to editor@spokesman.com

Today is Father's Day

In the newspapers around the world one can see winds of change beginning to happen. For many years newspapers large and small have celebrated Father's Day by running wire service hate articles about dads abusing children, fathers abandoning familes, men hurting women in faux "domestic violence," so-called "deadbeat" dads being rounded off to debtor's prisons, and fathers being sent to prison for "kidnapping" their kids. Years after year they ran a week long series, fed by national wire services, to promote hatred of men. But this year the wind is starting to blow the other way. A fresh breeze can be seen in some papers. Here and there is a story of Fathers taking care of their children. Some have printed articles about the misery of children who have lost their fathers in divorce.

A few papers have run stories of men's activists protesting mistreatment and demanding equal parenting under the law.

We still have a long way to go. TV networks like FOX, CNN, etc., spew hatred of men every day. Legislatures have mostly rejected men's demands for equal rights under law for fathers while listening to misandrist hate messages from anti-father lobbyists. The minions of Satan in the black robed outfits of hell still routinely destroy families for feminism and ignore the rights of fathers and children. We still have a long way to go, but the world is beginning to notice that men are angry with the abuse we are getting. Even the badly misandrist Washington Post has slowed it's spewing of hate after a flood of angry men complained about it's support for renewal of the horribly anti-family VAWA hate law. Even the usually misandrist Post has a positive Father's Day story about a son following his dad's profession.

The Post still hedges it's bets with a story about "Mr. Mom" which alleges that fathers turn into "mom" when we take care of our children.

Search CNN.com for "Father's Day" and the first line of the only current article listed starts out about "Mother's Day." Then it goes on about single fathers, not fathers who have wives and normal families.

FOXNEWS is worse. Search FOXnews.com for "Father's Day" and the first article listed is about a man accused of murder, men=villain. (See Bob's blog about Illegal and Malicious Persecution). FOX, it seems, can't bring themselves to mention anything positive about fathers, even on Father's Day.

Some newspapers still celebrate Father's Day by printing anti-father hate. Bob is preparing another post entitled Some still print hate for Father's Day. Check back if it's not already posted. We have a long way to go before the media gets over their misandrist hate and begins treating fathers as real people, but there are a few signs of change especially in some of the print media.

Happy Father's Day to every one of you.

Bob

Frothing at the mouth hate

I turned on FOX news last night, Saturday. It's been 5 days since the jury held the line against anti-men hate and declared that Michael Jackson was NOT GUILTY of the fraudulent accusations against him. The misandrist media, led by FOX, Court TV, and CNN, tried to use Jackson as a "poster boy" for the feminazi hate campaign, "men are bad." It didn't matter that there was no real evidence of guilt, and the only witnesses were known bunco artists with a history of similar fraud. In the minds of those who hate men with a burning flame he was a man, and therefore "GUILTY!" regardless of whether or not he did whatever he is accused of.

Here it is almost a week after the jury of honest men and women turned back the emotional appeals of the hate mongers because there was no evidence other than hatred of men. On FOX TV, Cal Thomas and the others are still having a hard time coping with the defeat of hate. On his "After Hours" show last night Thomas couldn't stay calm, his hatred still burned hot in his heart. With his voice displaying raised emotion he ranted on and on about how "bad" Jackson is. He got up from his chair and spoke standing up, so heated was the anti-Jackson, anti-men hate within his heart he couldn't sit still. His eyes burned and his raised voice quivered. "Don't buy his records" Thomas advised. After all he was accused, he must be guilty, the media circus all condemned him, he must be guilty, the media circus all hate him for being a man, he must be guilty. Thomas's display was reminiscent of historical accounts of Hitler after his army was lost at Stalingrad, he couldn't believe that his evil forces were not invincible. Thomas, couldn't comprehend that decent people don't share his boiling hatred of men.

The anti-men hatred at FOX is so palpable that it's a wonder they don't fire Geraldo. He's been saying all along that there wasn't any evidence against Jackson, and he has never expressed the kind of hatred of men that is the standard at FOX. He'll probably get fired.

Cal Thomas and his ilk need to take some chill pills and go see a shrink to deal with their anger. For the blond bimbos the hatred of men is simple but disgusting bigotry. For Thomas hatred of men is psychotic hatred of himself. Hatred of one's self is a well diagnosed psychosis. Any shrink could help him deal with his seething anger. Despite their trade mark claim, these frothing FOX hate mongers are definitely "unbalanced."

FOX TV badly needs to clean up it's act if they want MEN to watch their crap!

Bob

Illegal and Malicious Persecution.

In Mississippi they are conducting a lynching. This time it's an 80 year old cripple named Edgar Ray Killen who may or may not have participated in a KKK event during the racial strife of 1964 when so-called "civil rights workers" from New York City went south to stir up trouble and found more than they bargained for. He was accused in a federal trial for "violation of civil rights" about 4 decades ago. The federal trial didn't convict him. Click here to read the news story.

Today, four decades later, a wave of anti-white hate has taken over southern politics. The white baiters are out for blood, and a crippled old man has fallen into their sights. Whether or not Mr. Killen was originally part of the events of the "Mississippi Burning" summer of 1964 is now lost to history. Almost all the potential witnesses and other participants are dead. The US Constitution says, " the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial." Four decades later, after most of the witnesses have died, is not "speedy" trial by any possible stretched theory. It's not law, it's a white lynching. The Constitution also requires a defendant's right "to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor. Four decades later, after all the witnesses have died, he is denied that right to a fair trial. It's not law, it's a white lynching. In addition to the total denial of a fair trial, he was already tried for this crime in federal court. Again the Constitution says, "nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." This time it's State court, but only a lieyer scum bigot and an evil minion of Satan in a black robe outfit from Hell could pretend that it's not the same crime being retried four decades later.

The trial of Mr. Killen is not justice, it's not about law enforcement, and it's clearly illegal under the plain language of the US Constitution. It's a charade of the left wing anti-white, anti-men bigots, and that is all that it is. The Feminazis have joined with the white hating racists to make a show of destroying a white man. It's racist sexist hate, and that's all that this trial is about.

No MAN who gets on the jury should vote to convict at all, and in fact the jury should find the county persecutor and judge "GUILTY" of malicious prosecution, and violation of the Civil Rights of the accused.

Bob

Not Guilty!

Lesson for men from the Michael Jackson case and other court proceedings.

First some known facts.

1. The blue gun thugs lie all the time. They have proven in several SCOTUS cases that lying is part of their jobs and a citizen has no right to assume anything they say is the truth. It's been proven in the highest court by the blue gun thugs themselves that everything they say has to be assumed by the public (you and me) to be a lie.

2. Most "crime" is false charges created by the blue gun thugs for the purpose of fighting crime. It's done to justify their jobs and bloated salaries.

3. Blue gun thugs routiely falsify evidence, plant "evidence," and torture or browbeat innocent men into confessing.

4. Instead of doing a real investigation the standard practice of the blue gun thus and the persecuting attorney is to frame the nearest available man.

5. Men are badly discriminated against in every step of the Injustice System. Men are much more likely to be reported to the police than women. The police are much more likely to respond to a complaint about men. Men are much more likely to be arrested in the same circumstances than women. After arrest, men are much more likely to be prosecuted and less likely to be offered a sweet deal. Men are more likely to be convicted in court. Men are routinely sentenced to much harsher penalties. Men are sent to much more severe and hellish prisons. Parole boards keep men in prison for longer times than women on the same crimes. As a result men are about 25 times as likely to be in prison as women though overall men do only about as much crime as women. 24/25 of the men in prison are there for the "crime" of being men.

6. The US now has more men in prison than any other nation at any time in the history of the human race. The US government Department of Injustice admits over two million men in prison, but other estimates say that the real number is closer to 4 million. Cities like Cleveland, for example a third of the entire male population are men who have been convicted of "crime." It's become insane, the whole Injustice System. The real criminals are the ones with the badges and the agent of Satan in the black robes from hell.

With 2 to 4 million men now in prison and the number increasing daily, we need an Affirmative Action program to restore eqality in the American Injustice System. No more men should be convicted and sent to prison hell until the law restores equal justice. Men who are called to jury duty are the last line of defense against the evil feminazi hoards and misandrist bigots that now control the Injustice System. The only defense that justice has is the jury. It's time to start sending them a message. MEN won't sit there and be abused or allow any more men to be abused by a badly sexist anti-men hate machine out of control. See Bob's blog on Criminal gangs in the streets

If you ever get called to serve on a jury trial of a man accused by the lying gun thugs of a "crime" the verdict is "not guilty." It doesn't matter what lies the gun thugs tell you, the verdict is "not guilty." It doesn't mater what lies the misandrist bigot persecutor lieyer tells you the verdict is "not guilty." It doesn't matter how many salty tears the whining bitch sheds on the witness stand the verdict is "not guilty."

If any man is ever called to jury duty and another man is accused by lying misandrist bigots looking for another lynching. The verdict is "NOT GUILTY!"

Bob

Patronize men-friendly businesses.

I was down shopping at Safeway today, and there was a large banner out front which advertised a joint Coca-Cola and Safeway promotion to fund research on prostate cancer. I want to encourage all men to shop at Safeway and buy Coca-Cola products. It's not enough to boycott companies like Ford that fund feminism and misandry, we also have to support companies who support men.

I started reading about this topic when my own doctor recommended against the PSA test and explained why. I'm not going to look up all the references to link here, you can find them easily enough, but I've done a lot of reading and it confirms my doctor's advice. Prostate cancer kills about as many men every year as breast cancer, yet gets only about 10% as much research funding. As a result there are now effective cures for women with breast cancer, but none for men with prostate cancer. Women who get regular breast cancer screening and detect the cancer early have a very good chance that it can be cured. Not so for men who get prostate cancer. A century of very badly sexist funding in medical research has left men with very few options and none of them either safe or effective.

To start with you may have heard of the PSA test for prostate cancer screening. It's the only test available and it's worse than useless. Microscopic autopsy studies have proven that the PSA test misses more cancers than it detects. And worse, it finds as many false positives as cancers. A man who gets a false positive on a PSA test goes through a whole series of painful emotions, it's close to a death sentence. Usually he undergoes invasive and painful surgery to take a tissue sample for a "biopsy" laboratory analysis. Much of the time the biopsy of his tissue samples shows no prostate cancer and he's greatly relieved. But the same microscopic autopsy studies show that common biopsy procedures are grossly hit and miss for finding prostate cancer. The cancer usually doesn't infect the whole prostate for years, and the biopsy frequently samples the uninfected part. You might as well flip a coin.

But suppose you got a positive on the PSA and had the biopsy and it actually did find cancer, what then? Not very much! The medical industrial complex is likely to recommend costly and painful debilitating surgery such as removal of your prostate. Is that a cure? No it is not. Longevity studies show that men who had the surgery have no better longevity expectations than men who walked away. The surgery destroys your sex life forever. It often destroys your ability to pee normally and you live the rest of your life with a urine drip bag on your leg, but your likelihood to die from cancer is not improved. Well, you ask, doesn't surgery have to be safe and effective? Nope. You're thinking of drugs. The government requires medications to be proven safe and effective before they can be marketed. But there are no legal limits on surgery. Surgery is done with no more assurance than the opinion of the guy who stands to pocket $10,000 from doing the surgery. Prostate surgery is not safe, it always causes serious life long physical injury, and it is not effective, there is no demonstrated improvement in the health or longevity of the patients. Anti-cancer chemotherapy without surgery is no better. None have been shown to be either safe or effective for prostate cancer.

The only good news is that the large majority of prostate cancer goes along for years and years without ever causing serious health problems. A small percentage suddenly becomes active, grows out of control, and causes death, but most does not. If you do find out that you do have prostate cancer with a PSA and biopsy, your chances of dying from it are only a little higher than any other man of your age. Far more men die with prostate cancer than from it. Usually it just sits there until you get really old and die from something else first. Until they find a real cure it's far better to avoid the whole medical industrial complex. Don’t get a PSA until there is a cure. It will only make you crazy.

So huge amounts of research is very badly needed. I applaud Coca-Cola and Safeway for their effort to support prostate cancer research. I urge every man to shop there and buy their products.

Bob

Ending the slavery called "child support"

The ideas behind the radical feminist social experiment called "absentee child support" began at the first women's rights convention at Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848. Women, they said, should be able to leave their husbands, take his children, and still be supported by him. Feminazis have always opposed marriage, believing that "marriage oppresses women." Yet they always believe that women have a "right" to have men support them in the manner they want to be accustomed. In the last half of the 19th century, after Seneca Falls, the divorce rates in the US began increasing as more feminazis left their husbands. Organized feminists began lobbying for judges and legislatures to require that the ex-husband be required to "pay" for the support of the children that the female stole from his home.

Two major social changes profoundly affecting children happened in the 19th century. Prior to the middle of the 19th century children were assumed to belong to their fathers. A mother who left her husband had to leave her children. Far fewer women were willing to abandon their children and marriages generally stayed together. Click here for the case for father custody published by Fathering Magazine. In addition children were a labor asset until the 19th century. As late as 1900, 90% of Americans still lived and worked on family farms. Most of the rest worked in family owned shops or small businesses. All members of the family old enough to walk were expected to do a share of the work on farm, shop, or business. In cities where there were many immigrants who had no farm or shop a substantial number of children ended up working in factories. Social concern began outlawing child labor, creating a dependent class of young people that has extended longer and longer through the 20th century. The dependent class of young, unable by law to work and earn their own living, now created more of a burden on welfare agencies, especially with more and more feminazis leaving their husbands to avoid the "oppression" of marriage.

Feminazis seized on the radical notion of "absentee child support" as the answer to their demand for forcing men to continually support them after they left. Organized lobbying efforts by radical feminist groups in the late 19th and early 20th century promoted the dual radical ideas of female custody and required payment of "support." It had taken them a century of ratcheted changes in social thinking to lay the groundwork, but by the 1960s virtually all of the United States had laws and judicial fiat requiring 1. Custody of minor children goes to the mother after divorces, and 2. The father must pay the mother under the guise of "support' of the children. Click here for a longer history of the radical change to a "child support" based slave state. Feminazis aggressively used the lie that fathers abandon families to convince legislatures to enact their radical new laws. The truth is quite the opposite. It was and is almost always the female who abandons her marriage vows. Mothers abandon families and wanted to use the children as an excuse to demand continued her support. Some states also had strong alimony laws, but questions were being asked about how that conflicted with feminist demands for "equality." The "child support" gave them the excuse to play the victim, claiming to be a suffering "single mother" struggling to feed her children while the brute man had run off.

The radical experimental changes called "child support" in the first half of the 20th century were greatly exacerbated in the last half of the 20th century by the establishment of "no-fault" divorce laws that were widely enacted. By the end of the 20th century more than half of US marriages ended in divorce, and about 90% of divorces are filed by women. Surveys show that the reasons so many females abandon their marriage vows have more to do with boredom than anything else. "To find myself" is a common excuse given by females for destroying a family according to studies. In public they frequently lie and blame the nearest available men for their sins. In some US States, females no longer bother to get married in the first place. In California now more than half of children are born to unmarried women. The state vigorously pursues the man who these unmarried bitches claim is the father of their bastards. It has become a powerful legalized extortion, a way for a young and uneducated female to support herself. She can whelp a couple of bastards and live comfortable on "child support" programs for decades. Hard working men who are usually unwilling fathers, only the female has "a woman's right to choose," are bound into indentured servitude, a form of slavery, for 20 years to pay her for bearing a bastard.

None of this is a good solution to anything. All of it is a badly failed radical feminazi social experiment which is destroying millions of families and hurting millions and millions of children. All of it is bad law, bad family law, and slavery. It does not get better by combining the worst features together.

So what is a better solution, some people have asked. And, Bob has frequently proposed better solutions.

First, we have to stop the fiction of "child support." It's not about supporting children. It's the radical feminazi program of forcing men to pay and support women who have destroyed their families. It's the Seneca Falls program, allowing women to leave their husbands, destroy their marriage, and still be supported.

A man does have an obligation to support his children, and his obligation is equal to that of the mother. Both parents have concurrent co-equal 100% responsibility to support his or her child. Does that mean that one parent should ever have to pay the other? NO, it does not. To support a child you put an extra plate on your table at dinner. You put a mattress and blanket in a corner for the child to sleep at night. You provide some clothing and other necessities for the child.

Paying some bimbo who stole your child IS NOT supporting your child. For millions of years females have brought their children to the fathers for his support and protection. It is a parenting system that has worked well and our race has succeeded and become dominate. The radical feminazi experiment is both badly unfair and willfully hurts all the children involved. It uses children as pawns in a game of extortion. It uses and abuses children to allow females who have broken their marriage vows and destroyed their families to be paid for doing so.

In addition, the female also has concurrent 100% responsibility to support her child. If she was not able to support her child she had no business creating one, and she ought to be held responsible for her actions. She had sole and exclusive legal choice to create the child, "a woman's right to choose." She should be held morally and legally responsible for the results of her decisions. After a century and a half of feminists, all women, demanding "equality" it's high time to demand that they take equal responsibility for their decisions, and be held accountable, as any man would be. If SHE decides to make a child, SHE bears 100% responsibility for her decision. The father also has co-equal responsibly to support his child, but in no way does his responsibility relieve her of her responsibility. SHE is 100% responsible to support her child. If she can not, or will not, support her child let her bring the child to his father and beg for his support as females have been doing for millions of years. That system worked. The radical social experiment in slavery of men to pay women for breaking up families does not and can not work. It's high time it be recognized as the monumental social failure that it is and completely abandoned.

The radical experiment called "absentee child support" can not be fixed by adjusting the formula for pay to a more equitable formula. You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. A mountain of research shows that children taken from their father's care by divorcing or single mothers badly hurts children. Every decent person who cares about children needs to become aware and demand that this radical social experiment be ended before another generation of children is hurt.

Steps to support families help children and improve life.
1. Strongly encourage the continuation of marriage by awarding residential custody preference to the parent who wants to keep the family together, as defined by the parent who didn't file for a divorce.
2. Strongly encourage the continuation of marriage by eliminating payments for breaking up marriages under "child support," "alimony," or any other legal euphemism.
3. Provide strong social stigmatization to single mothers who bear bastards. Stop making bastards a manner of earning a living for uneducated women.
4. Outlaw the creation of bastards by artificial fertility clinics. (See Bob's essay on Frankenstein Kids)
5. Recognize that "support" for a child means a plate at dinner, not being forced to "pay" someone else to support the child.
6. Recognize the 100% co-equal responsibility of the mother to support her children.
7. End all "absentee child support" laws. No parent should be forced to "pay" the other parent because both are fully responsible.
8. Scale back the dependency of children by allowing youth to work when they are able and desire to do so.
9. Encourage females to take their children to the father for his support as females have done for millions of years.
10. End the debtor's prisons and release the hundreds of thousands of men now in prison for failure to "pay" the female who destroyed his family.
11. End laws on "custody" awards and stop court custody decisions after divorce. Every child has a fundamental human right to both natural parents. Any "custody" decision violates the rights of the child -- who is not getting divorced from either parent.
12. Eliminate persecution of fathers for "kidnapping" their children. You can not "kidnap" your own child.
13. Dismantle the state bureaucracy that feeds on the backs of fathers struggling to survive in the social slavery called "child support."
14. Tar and feather any judge or elected official who hurts children and families by willfully supporting the insanity of "absentee child support."

Bob

Another pathetic wuss kowtows to feminism.

Bob has been banned from another faux "men's action group." This time one called "Politically Active Dads" on Yahoo groups.

Bob, You have been removed and banned from PAD, as a result of your last posts. Given the warnings issued last week, I was disappointed that you continued to post such material. You are very outspoken, and there are many groups, where such comments would be overlooked. Best wishes, Wyne Cook

An outspoken man who actively supports a men's agenda against the feminazi onslaught is not allowed to speak on many so-called "men's" boards. Too bad. It's their loss. Usually it begins by banishing men who speak out against feminists. Then their group becomes milquetoast and few active men will participate or waste their time with such pansies.

Poor Wayne. He had some promise. But now he can't even spell his own name right. Turns into a pathetic wuss!

Bob

Holding the Line against the feminazi onslaught.

Another line in the war against men was held today. The rabid feminazi attack on Michael Jackson was successfully defended. With no evidence but a lying bitch out for blood money the evil feminazis in the courthouse tried to destroy a sadly mixed up man as an international anti-men showpiece. Evil feminazi media turds like Greta Van Sustren on FOX and Paula Zahn on CNN, and male feminazi quislings like Dan Abrams of MSNBC had a hate frenzy day after day attacking Jackson for alleged "molestation" of a teenage boy. Thousands of similar media assholes lined up to feast on the spectacle of the public destruction of a famous man.

At the heart of the hate based public assault was a single man who represented all men. His so-called "crime" was his association and support of young men. When I was growing up every 9, through 12 year old boy I ever knew had done the kind of sexual exploration that the alleged "victim" had done at Jackson's place. When I was a Scoutmaster, every young Boy Scout got together with other boys of similar age and talked about sex, read (mostly soft) pornography and did the exact same kind of sexual exploration that the alleged "victim" supposedly did with Michael Jackson. Virtually every boy growing up does it, and it never hurts any of us. From what I've heard virtually every girl does the equivalent kind of sexual exploration and learning too. It's the NORMAL youthful behavior that EVERY child does, and IT DOESN'T HURT ANY OF US! Yet under feminazi hate laws primarily designed to criminalize and destroy men, normal youthful activity has become a serious crime. They have convinced millions of decent women that Jackson is a "sexual predator," a lie of a hate accusation similar to that used by the 3rd Reich when sending Jews to Auchwitz, only this time the feminazis are sending men to Fulsom.

It's all about hate, not about crime. It's about destroying a very popular media star as a symbol of the destructive power of feminazi hate. It was more about hating all men than about Michael Jackson. He was the focus, the public symbol, but the feminazi hate of all men was universal. Jackson was at the center, but the hatred of all men spewed forth day after day, night after night like diarrhea from the mouths of shit filled douche bags like Sustren, Zahn, and a thousand more.

Many men have been buffaloed by the feminazi media into believing that it's about crime and punishment. Lots of men try to believe in "law and order" and that Michael Jackson was somehow guilty for "inappropriate touching" of a teenage boy. Well even if he was so what? Is behavior that is NORMAL, STANDARD, and UNIVERSAL for teenage boys somehow a life and death crime if a man hating feminazi says it is? Not on your life, and not on Michael Jackson's life.

The victim here is Jackson. I'm not a fan of Michael Jackson, and I never was. I never listened to Jackson Five records, nor after he grew up to Michael Jackson records or shows. He never had a normal teenage years. At about age 5 he was shoved into the spotlight of the entertainment business. He apparently never got to go through the normal teenage sexual experimentation out behind the garage or behind the barn that most boys go through. His life and his Neverland ranch is modeled after the Peter Pan story, "I'll never grow up." So he's both famous and kind of weird, an attractive target for the feminazi war on men. Jackson, they though, would make an easy target. After all, their hate laws make it a "crime" for men to act like teenagers, and Jackson openly acts like a child. So the feminazi war machine mounted a frontal attack, spewing hate out of all barrels, flaming any man who stood up to their hatred.

But the feminazi war machine lost this battle. A few brave men in the media, Geraldo and Stossel among them, failed to leap on the anti-men hate program. Cautiously they suggested that Jackson wasn't "guilty" of the evil he was accused of. Perhaps, they said, Jackson had only been acting to protect and take care of children who had cancer. Jackson supporters turned up by the thousands and started hurling insults at the hate mongering feminazi media turds, and good citizens began blaming the evil lying scum county persecutor. The fat feminist buffoon, O'Riley hedged his bets predicting that Jackson would only be convicted on some charges, and once the verdict was read he's backpedaling as fast as he can claiming that he never predicted conviction.

A line of sanity was drawn in the California sand, instead of pleading "guilty" as less financially able men would have been forced to do, Jackson had enough money to fight them, and they lost. The jury of 8 women and 4 men didn't buy the hate machine's lies and condemnation. "Where is the smoking gun?" they asked. The jury of good men and women turned the tables on the feminazi hate machine's celebrity destruction of a man. It's only one battle in the global feminazi war on men, but it's a world wide celebrity event of their own making. They picked on Jackson who seemed like an easy target they could use as an example. After all, Jackson had even made videos where he admitted "sleeping with" boys. Surely, they reasoned, people would see how "evil" a man is for sleeping with boys and send him off to Auchwitz. Blinded by their hate and full of overconfidence after publicly destroying Scott Peterson without any real evidence they launched their blitzkrieg assault. Hoards of blue gun thugs stormed Neverland, hauling off every "evidence" that wasn't nailed down. Jackson was handcuffed and paraded before the cameras in chains, a move designed to show him as an evil and inconsequential "man," and to display their power over men before the whole world. But the minions of feminist hate lost.

The tide is beginning to turn. The feminazi war machine has become overconfident and lazy. They no longer can control all the voices, nor win all the battles. More and more few brave men are speaking out against them, and even women who believe in fairness and trust won't buy their hate. The war is not over yet, more battles will have to be fought, but this battle was one, the line held, the hate filled femorrhoid bigots spewing the excrement of anti-men hate on CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc., did not win.

Maybe next time we can take the battle to them, launch a counter attack, land at Normandy and begin the armed assault on The Motherland. The time of battle is soon to be at hand. And the VAWA is up for renewal this year. Write to your congressman and demand that he stand against the feminazi Reich.

Bob

It really doesn't matter.

The first great victory of female suffrage was the rise to power of the German National Socialist Labor Party (Nazis). The new female voters believed all their false promises of a “daddy” state taking care of them. German females voted their emotions, swooned over the little dictator with charisma rather than thinking rationally of the future. German men, by and large, voted for a sane future, but were outvoted by the new feminist female suffrage fascists who dominated German elections in the 1930s.

In 1939 the Nazi war machine took Poland, rounded up Jews, and began preparing for its invasion of Russia.

In 1940 the Nazi war machine captured France and declared war on England.

In 1941 the Nazi war machine Invades Russia and declares war on the US.

In 1942 the Nazi war machine had killed or starved to death millions of Russian people, laid siege to Stalingrad and Leningrad, and were moving on Moscow.

Any time during those years the Nazis might have backed off and negotiated peace. Instead, like today's femiNazis, drunk with power and hate, they killed millions and enjoyed the fruits of victory. The 3rd Reich ran labor and death camps where millions of enemies died, and they made slaves out of the citizens of a dozen countries.

Any time during those years the Nazis might have negotiated peace, but they, like today's femiNazis, insanely believed themselves invincible. In 1943 the Russians army held the lines outside of Moscow at a cost of millions of their dead. In 1944 the English and Americans attacked from the west at a cost of hundreds of thousands of brave men. Today there are far more than 2 million men in prisons in the US alone, casualties of the femiNazi war on men. Millions of families have been destroyed, our children killed or missing, and men's lives ruined every day by the evil femiNazi empire. The insane Feminazi killing and destruction of men and our children goes on and on.

By the spring of 1945, with over 20 million Russian dead, the Russian army had regrouped and fought back. They were advancing on Berlin. The British and American armies had crossed the Rhine and were advancing on Berlin from the West. By then it was far, far too late for the Nazis to do anything other than surrender or die. The Nazis were never smart enough to surrender. Many young and bystander Germans died in the final battles, but those are the fortunes of war.

In a very similar manner MEN have suffered millions of deaths from the Feminazi war machine. Millions of our families have been destroyed. Millions of our children have died or been lost. A hundred million boys have been sexually mutilated in the US alone. More than ten thousand American men are tormented to death by suicide every year. Millions of men have been bound into involuntary servitude, a form of slavery, and forced to pay women under the euphemism lie called "child support." Millions of men rot and die in hell holes called Attica, Folsom, Auschwitz, Dachau, Alcatraz, Leavenworth, and by similar names. Armies of blue gun thugs, the femiNazi Gestapo, wait to round up and destroy decent men whenever another femiNazi turns him in. Our homes, our jobs, our families, and our very lives are under siege. Like millions of Nazi women who cheered as the 3rd Reich marched through Poland on it's way to Russia, today's femiNazi women cheer for every femiNazi victory and are too dumb to see the horrors of inevitable future.

But the war is not over yet. Even as you read this blog, MEN now are regrouping to fight back against the femiNazi onslaught. The tide of war is beginning to turn against the feminists. A line was held outside of Augusta when an attack by the National Council of Women's Organizations was driven back. A few brave MEN are taking out the femiNazi judges, professors, advocates, blue gun thugs, or rank and file femiNazis as their lives are sacrificed. Legislatures now consider "Equal Parenting," and "Paternity Fraud" laws instead of more and more ratcheting of misandrist hate legislation.

Any time in the past 50 years the femiNazis could have backed off and sued for peace, but they are still too hateful, too stupid, and much too drunk with victory to surrender. Many innocent females will die in the final battles, but that's the fortunes of war.

The only moral of W.W.II that is worth remembering is, "If you can't finish a war, don't start one." Somehow, the FemiNazis never learned that part of the Nazi propaganda program they copied.

It's going to get a lot worse before it gets better. Many femiNazis and a lot of their supporters will die in the battles. In the end it really doesn't matter at all if these particular females were Feminazi leaders, or just some females who stood by and enjoyed the fruits of war. It really, really doesn't matter. Those are the fortunes of war that they either started, actively supported, or stood by and tacitly supported.

Let the FemiNazis hate mongers beware. The end is coming.

Searching for Sexism

One quick and fairly reliable way to determine if an institution is sexist is to use it's web site database search feature for "men" and compare the results to an equivalent search for "women." This works especially well for colleges.

As a benchmark, Google finds about 265,000,000 web hits for "women" which compares to only about 150,000,000 hits for "men." Is the web sexist?

The web site of Harvard University, harvard.edu, displays "Results for: men -- Document count: men (19733)" and "Results for: women -- Document count: women (45704)." More than twice as many web pages for women at Harvard.

In addition one can also compare the relevance or quality of the hits on a particular web site. It would be impractical in a quick survey to scan all 19733 documents found at Harvard.ecu under "men" but a quick scan of the first few pages listed is quite indicative. Are they all sports events and schedules, or are they documents with some meat in them.

The first 3 at Harvard under "men" are "men's" basketball, "men's" golf," and finally something other than sports in 3rd place, " Study finds that for young men, family comes first…" On the first page of hits there are several negative or men-bashing articles found. For example there is "Men Stopping Violence," a site devoted to promoting men-as-abusers. That's followed by " Men have distorted image…" And of course gay men feature prominently on Harvard's first page as well, "Simple screening test could detect cancer lesions in gay men…"

Comparing to a search of Harvard.edu for "women" finds that the quality of the hits on "women" is more focused on significant studies rather than sporting events. 1. " Faculty of Arts & Sciences: The Harvard College Women's Leadership Awards," 2. " FAS Handbook: Chapter 3: Women, Gender, and Sexuality, Studies of ... Women, Gender, and Sexuality…" and 3. "politics in the developing world, women in oratory, women's reproductive health ... Career Goals: international women's rights…" Women's studies is also prominently featured, but only 1 listing for women's sports makes the "women" first page at search Harvard.com. Overall the Harvard.com web site has more than twice as many listings under "women" than "men" and the intellectual depth of featured articles is much greater. It becomes rapidly obvious that Harvard is SEXIST.

A search of USC's web site, usc.edu, finds 10,022 hits under "men," and 8940 hits for "women." Looks like USC values men as much as women.

A search of Ohio State's web site, osu.edu, finds 8482 hits under "men," and 15454 hits for "women." Once again sports events, gay issues, and "bad men" pages feature prominently on the first few pages. Looks like Ohio State is badly misandrist.

I haven't used this technique on corporations as much as colleges, partly because their web sites are much smaller and are more closely controlled by corporate PR folks. Searching Ford motor company at ford.com finds 698 for "women," beginning with " FORD MOTOR COMPANY ENCOURAGES WOMEN TO 'TOOT YOUR OWN HORN' AS PART OF ITS CELEBRATION OF NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN’S WEEK." (their all-caps). Ford lists 1252 hits for "men," beginning with "Men's Health Best Man and Land Rover – a perfect fit." Scrolling down shows that "men" includes "leMans," so one needs to be careful not to assume that all the hits for "men" are really about men. Overall, it does look like Ford is as concerned about men as about women.

Government sites are interesting. The Forest Service, www.fs.fed.us, finds 1718 hits under "men," and 2196 under "women." The Department of Education, www.ed.gov, limits it's searches to the first 500 hits so you get the same number of results.

A couple of cautions using this technique. First, the word "men" has a traditional inclusive meaning of "men and women." Many documents today still use "men" in the inclusive sense and these are included in the search for documents about men. Secondly, many search engines include partial words in the hits. As a result searching for "men" also gives you all the "women" and similar, like Ford's inclusion of "leMans" when searching for "men."

A search of Yahoo Groups finds 28265 hits for "men," and 39467 hits for "women." The "men" results include "announcement" and "establishment."

Overall it's a really good quick way to evaluate the sexism of lack thereof of colleges and universities and other organizations that have large web sites.

Bob

Moratorium on rape called for.

It's become mass hysteria. It's worse then the witch-hunts of the Middle Ages. The false and grossly exaggerated accusations of "rape" and the grossly over sentencing for "rape" that is done today has convinced Bob that we need a 10 year moratorium on any criminal prosecution for "rape" so that we can all calm down and start over. It would be surprising today if 8% of "rape" accusations had any factual basis. Females compete to have "my rapist" as an entrance pass into the women's victimology club.

At the most basic level rape is just sex with a disagreement over who will decide. Females all demand absolute power to control sex. Any time she has less than full and total control she screams "rape" and the man's life is destroyed. Sentencing is far, far beyond the crime. Feminist Catharine MacKinnon said "All sex is rape," and she might be right. If that is true we have to include two billion women who enjoy "rape" every year. Sex is a normal human activity, and usually very pleasurable, not a horrific violent act. When the female loses her power over men, the power to control and regulate sex between her and a man, she "feels" violated, but she very seldom has actually been hurt. Men understand a loss of power, we give up our power for control sex to women all the time, we do sex to please her because she wants sex. It's not that big of a deal. Yet mixed with misandry, hatred of men, and aggressive persecution the feminist empire has inflated rape hysteria into a monumental "crime." It is no longer possible to have a rational discussion of rape without igniting hysterical (a well gendered term) ranting, name calling, and verbal abuse. The whole topic has become so overheated, over prosecuted, and over used that no rational discussion can even be held today. A moratorium needs to be held until we can all cool down the hate, fear, and animosity.

Bob's first introduction to the world of false rape conviction was about 40 years ago when a friend was picked out of a blue gun thug lineup by a "victim" and charged with "rape." On the night and time that the alleged crime took place, the accused and a half dozen of us friends were having pizza in our usual pizza joint 150 miles away on the other side of the state. An alibi with half a dozen witnesses in another city had no truck with the blue gun thugs and the rape hysteria of the DA's office. He was arrested for walking down a street, spent several nights in jail, and we all had to make depositions about his location on the night of the lying bitch's claim before they dropped charges against him. If he had been home watching TV that night he would have been in the slammer for 20. And even with the witnesses, he then had a "police record" for "sex crimes." To a blue gun thug, a false accusation is as good as a conviction.

It's gotten a lot worse since then. We need a 10-year moratorium on any criminal prosecution for "rape" so that we can all calm down and start over.

Bob

Feminist faux men's discussion boards.

Bob has been banished from yet another so-called "men's" site because the castrated moderators are so busy sucking up to the femorrhoids that they banish any MAN who speaks against their misandry. On a site called Stand Your Ground, , the moderator "Dr. Evil" regularly kisses the ass of feminist misandrist members, "Biscuit Queen," "NYMOM," and "typhoonblue." Why is it that so many ball less wimps get to be moderators on these groups? Is it because they are so good at sucking up and kissing female ass? Is Dr. Evil's nose so covered in female crap he thinks it's chocolate ice cream? Is it because these groups are really feminist decoys aimed at dissipating men's action advocates and heading off a masculine counter force to female domination? Did Dr. Evil take her name because she's a secret female scumbag?

In June there will be 2 or 3 competing "national" conferences for men's rights activists. There are competing conferences because the organizers have been banished from each other's groups and have gone on to start new ball free women appeasing conferences. Would a real man be caught at any of them? Stay tuned.

In the mean time, if you're looking for a real men's discussion board where a man can speak his opinion without being banished by some feminized pansy check out Our Board.

Bob

DEEP SH** AT THE FBI

The history of sometimes violent illegal power plays by the FBI is long and very scary. For several decades FBI Director J. Edgar Hover kept secret files and blackmailed the most powerful people in America. In the most recent decade only two countries have been known to use illegal gas warfare (WMD) on their own citizens, Iraq under Sadam Hussein, and the US-FBI under Clinton/Reno at Waco. Domestic terrorism by the FBI is a long and violent history that includes the following:

1962 President John Kennedy and Attorney General Robert Kennedy attempt to roll back some of the power and illegal spying activities of FBI Director Hover.

1963 Lyndon Johnson succeeds in a coup d'etat with the help and cover-up of the FBI.

1964 FBI uses its resources to investigate and persecute political opponents of Johnson.

1968 Richard Nixon succeeds Johnson and takes over the Presidency.

1972 President Nixon establishes his own White House secret investigation agency which is caught taking secrets from the Democratic party. Nixon is re-elected by a 49 state landslide.

1973 Nixon makes peace with the USSR and China. FBI counterspy budgets are drastically cut. Democrats, liberal media, and government agencies such as the FBI aggressively attack Nixon.

1974 Under the name "Deep Throat" the FBI provides the Washington Post with secret inside information, innuendo, scandal and supposition. Fueled with relentless liberal press the Democratic controlled congress forces Nixon to resign under threat of Impeachment.

Where will it end? Can any President stand against the power of the FBI when their illegal acts and their willingness to violate the law in the most despicable ways? When they can plot a coup d'etat to assassinate and replace even the President is any American safe from these gun thugs with badges?

Bob