Dear Dr. Laura,

I was listening to your radio program lately and I am appalled at the contradiction and hypocrisy in your condemnation of young men who physically attracted to young women. You call the young women, "girls," despite thousands of years of Jewish tradition and religious ceremony that you claim to support. You espouse that "all sex with (young) women is rape" a classic misandrist feminist dogma while in the next breath you are railing against feminism. Lady, you need to get your act together. Are you a feminist supporting feminist misandry, or a religious woman supporting thousands of years of religious traditions and families?

Last week I was invited to attend the Bat Mitzvah for a young Jewish WOMAN. I say "woman" because her whole community followed thousands of years of Jewish religious tradition and declared her to be a woman under Jewish law. The age of a Bat Mitzvah, the age when a girl is declared to be "woman" under Jewish law is around 12 or 13. In New Mexico where I lived for 20 years the legal "age of consent" in that Catholic traditional state was 12. Until feminism declared "all sex is rape" in the middle of the 20th century, everyone knew that teenage women were ready to be married with children. Until feminism, it was the standard of Jewish and Christian alike. Only during the feminist domination of the last half of the 20th century have laws been re-written to make it a serious crime for men to marry or do sex with teenage women. You continually ignore the religious tradition and preach the feminist revisions.

A few years ago I was friends with a traditional Italian family from a traditional Italian neighborhood. The 5 generations of women who still were a family had averaged 16 years between generations. That meant that they had been married and getting pregnant at age 15. Before feminism that was the standard, that was NORMAL, that was how everyone lived. Before feminism everyone knew that a young women should get married and start a family of her own.

You often complain loudly about abortions, and about young women who do sex without husbands. Those behaviors are the inevitable result of feminist dogma and feminist social revisions. The highest rate of "teenage pregnancy" in the US since statistics have been kept was in 1957, one of the last years before feminism changed our culture. In 1957 almost all the "teenage mothers" were married and having their families. In 1957 there were a few "unwed mothers" but they were very few compared to the NORMAL behavior of waiting until marriage for sex. And waiting until marriage did not mean waiting decade after decade for young women full of mommy hormones. It meant getting married and getting on with their lives when their Jewish or Christian church and their bodies said they were ready. It did not mean postponing marriage to follow the false feminist goal of education and career.

Biologically, women are most ready to bear their children from about age 14 or 15 until about age 26. A widely published recent major study shows that female fertility starts to decline after age 26 and declines rapidly after age 30. Women who follow the false feminist goal of education and career before marriage aren't even beginning to have their families until their fertile years are already past, and their ability to bear children is in decline. Look around you at all the "fertility clinics" that now cater to 30-something women who have finally figured out the emptiness of a business career, and are trying to have the children they put off for feminist goals until it's too late. One of the saddest and most screwed up women I know is a NYC lawyer who put off her family while she went to school, went to college, went to law school, went to the city to practice law, became a film producer, and became a successful lawyer. When she finally got around to being a WOMAN, it was too late. The fertility clinics could do nothing for her. Now in her late 40s she cries almost every day for the children she never will have, and for the lost life she chose not to have.

Biologically, and by religious law, young women are ready for their families when their bodies are ready. Yes, young women are often emotional basket cases. Yes they are not as mature as they will be ten years later. But women in their 20s are not as mature as women in their 30s, and women in their 50s are not as mature as women in their 60s. So where should we as a society draw the line. By Jewish law the line is drawn at the Bat Mitzvah. Yes, the young woman who had her Bat Mitzvah is still immature by several standards, but a lot of that is because her body is full of mommy hormones and she wants badly to have her babies. Forcing her to wait usually doesn't work. Millions of young women still get pregnant because hormones take over from judgement. Millions of these young women are getting abortions because they have not been permitted by the feminist culture to have a husband and family. Millions more become "single moms" for the same reason, they weren't permitted or encouraged to have a husband by a feminist dominated culture. It's really hard to fight biology. Half a century of feminist dogma and social revisionism can't change the biological drives of young women who's baby making years are in full swing.

The false feminist goals of education followed by a career and then think about family doesn't work for all the reasons mentioned already. Young women are declared to be adults by Jewish and Christian law, but kept confined in an extended childhood for longer and longer periods. Instead of being supported in marriage as respected mothers, they put off their families while satisfying sexual drives and making unwanted babies. It's a societal disaster of monumental proportions, with millions and millions of kids and abortions paying the huge price. Conversely, the Italian women I mentioned above were grandmothers in their middle 30s. They still had 50 years to go to college, get that Masters degree, and pursue any intellectual interest they wanted to pursue. Their married daughters were looking after their grandchildren. Any woman can postpone her college education until her 30s, but most can not postpone their families until her 30s. Biology and sex drives don't work that way. Fighting mother nature doesn't work no matter how strongly women believe the false feminist dogma.

Often I have heard you advising a mother that she should report a young man to authorities for criminal prosecution because her 16 year old daughter had been intimate with a young man. I am greatly offended by the radical feminist misandry in that advice. It's right out of "all sex is rape." It criminalizes young men for acting like normal men and being attracted to normal young women. It is raging feminist hate dogma, and that's all that it is. It is often proceeded or followed by your loud condemnation of feminists. That claim, to oppose feminism, falls way short when you so loudly preach and follow the misandrist dogma criminalizing young men and condemning parents who haven't done the feminist thing by running to police to make a normal young man into a criminal "sex offender" for the rest of his life.

It is entirely NORMAL for young women to be attracted to older men, men who are old enough to support them and their child. A man's role is to have a career and to have amassed skills and resources sufficient to provide for the young mother and her children while she stays home and takes care of them. A young man just starting out, just after his Bar Mitzvah is not old enough or experienced enough to take on a wife. It is normal and traditional for young women to mate with men a few years older than they, men who are educated, in a career or trade, and who can support them. It's normal for a young Jewish man to live with his parents until his middle 20s before being established enough to take on his own wife. Yet you, Laura, call them "rapists" for wanting to mate with the very women who nature and society has made into the women they should be mating with. Once more it's raging hypocrisy and blatant feminist misandry.

It's time to re-think your attitudes and morals, Laura. Are you a religious woman who follows thousands of years of Jewish Law, or a 20th century fem-nag who condemns men because "all sex is rape?" Are you a traditional religious woman who supports families and women who choose to be mothers, or do you promote the faux feminist dream of postponement of family in favor of college and career? Are you in favor of the abortions and single mother children that are the inevitable results of the feminist attempts to confine young women during their biological breeding years, or are you willing to give up the feminist misandry and dogma and support young women who give up the career path to choose the mommy, married with children, life?

Sometimes, Laura, you offer good advice, but I get so tired of the raging hypocrisy. Jewish law declares girls to be WOMEN at the Bat Mitzvah, but Dr. Laura calls them "children," condemns their lovers and demands young men be called "criminals." It's time to re-think your positions. Do you follow tradition and religious law, or are you another feminist demanding that people follow the feminist dogma you continually preach?
Bob

Dr. Laura's reply:
_________________________________________________

Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:25:36 -0800
"Dr. Laura" <116@drlaura.com>
"Bob Allen"
Re: Feminist hypocrisy

misinformed, incorrect and just silly. have a nice day. We don't forward silly stuff to DrL - she is the only true supporter of men (rights and respect) in the media today. For anyone who listens to her - you look nutty. For those who have not yet heard her/read her books (like THE PROPER CARE AND FEEDING OF HUSBANDS) you damage her ability to help/support them...shame on you. Have a nice day. Staff

Comment rules:

Comments from readers are generally welcomed on Bobstruth. Comments must be germane to the topic. If you wish to comment, make sure your comment is about the topic, and preferably adds information or reflective views about the topic. Comments which amount to ad-hominem insults or criticism of either Bob or one of the other comment authors will be deleted summarily.

To the feminazi who read Bob's truth, I'm glad you are pissed off, and I expect that you don’t have the mental capacity to offer any comment other than the usual feminazi attack on the person. Too bad, toots. I get a laugh from your hisssy fit, and then it gets deleted.

Angry dangerous men.

A couple of days ago on a men's discussion group some well meaning man criticized other men, and demanded that the men's movement hide our anger and play the victim like feminists do. He asserted that becoming known as angry dangerous men would set the men's movement back for years. I had been avoiding that argument for some time. However, it seems to me that the men's movement would be much more effective if it became known that we are, in fact, a very large bunch of angry dangerous men.

There are many characteristic names for milquetoast men. "Pansy," "pussy whipped," "wimp," and "panty waste" come to mind right off. The men's movement will get nowhere, and has never gotten anywhere, not even to slow down the feminazi onslaught, buy whining about "men are victims too." Nobody cares if men are victims too. Even men don't care for feminazi victimology. We can't ever win playing the feminist victimology game.

MEN have to win by being MEN, by being angry and loud and strong and DEMANDING that we be respected -- or else. If we can learn nothing else from 5,000 years of history it must be that the loud, angry, strong men always triumphed while the wimps were obliterated.

You who work hard to position men as panty wastes and victims who are not "angry and dangerous" are working against MEN. Whatever you've done today favors female feminists and opposes respect for MEN. Real MEN are much more than whiny victims.

Bob

A joyous Yule to all.

Last night was the longest night of the year, Yule, winter solstice, midwinter's night. Today the sun starts it's journey north again. For many thousand years midwinter's night has been celebrated throughout the northern hemisphere, thousands of years before the Johnny-come-lately religions. In ancient tradition people give gifts in celebration, and lit a fire, or put up candles or other lights against the dark, little lights to grow into the return of the sun. The new religion has taken over the holiday, adopted the lighting of lights and overlaid their religion on the ancient celebration. The 12 days of Roman Saturnalia became the 12 days of Christmas. But old tradition dies hard, and everywhere you go people still light their lights on the darkest night, a Yule fire, a candle, or 10,000 little lights against the dark.

For all you of every faith may your little lights grow into brilliance in the coming months. May you have a joyous and festive midwinter feast, however you choose to celebrate.
Bob

PBS Misandry continues

In response to thousands of loud complaints by MEN who are fed up with PBS's blatant misandry and hate propaganda film, Breaking the Silence," PBS announced that they will produce another documentary next year.

PBS has now issued the following statement in a dismal attempt to satisfy critics and appease men who have demanded changes in PBS sponsored anti-men political propaganda:
PBS Programming Statement on BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN'S STORIES
BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN'S STORIES chronicles the impact of domestic violence on children and the recurring failings of family courts across the country to protect them from their abusers. In stark and often poignant interviews, children and battered mothers tell their stories of abuse at home and continued trauma within the courts. The producers approached the topic with the open mindedness and commitment to fairness that we require of our journalists. Their research was extensive and supports the conclusions drawn in the program. Funding from the Mary Kay Ash Charitable Foundation met PBS's underwriting guidelines; the Foundation had no editorial influence on program content.
However, the program would have benefited from more in-depth treatment of the complex issues surrounding child custody and the role of family courts and most specifically the provocative topic of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS). Additionally, the documentary's "first-person story telling approach" did not allow the depth of the producers' research to be as evident to the viewer as it could have been.
PBS has received a substantial body of analysis and documentation from both supporters of the documentary and its critics.
It is clear to us that this complex and important issue would benefit from further examination. To that end, PBS will commission an hour-long documentary for that purpose. Plans call for the documentary to be produced and broadcast in Spring 2006. We expect that the hour-long treatment of the subject will allow ample opportunity for doctors, psychologists, judges, parent advocates and victims of abuse to have their perspectives shared, challenged and debated.


PBS has neither apologized for showing a blatantly misandrist hate propaganda film, nor even acknowledged that it was blatantly misandrist, nor taken it off the air. Their feeble promise to produce another similar film next year without gives no credence to fair non-prejudicial propaganda. Shame on PBS and their badly sexist bigot management. MEN will continue to DEMAND restitution and apology.

Bob

Candy or Hitllary? NOT!

Every other web site I visit lately seems to have a "Condi for President in 2008" link. Their premise seems to be that the next US President will be female, either Hitllary or Condi Rice. Hello? A pussy has no balls. A cunt is NOT capable of being US president. A cunt will NOT be the President for men. Every cunt elected to every public office to date in the US has proven herself to be an anti-men bigot who supports misandrist laws and the oppression of men.

We need a cunt for President like we need to surrender the US. The whole "Condi in 2008" campaign is more proof that the GOP is no more viable as a party that MEN can support than the Dems. Both parties have utterly failed men. Rather than support either flawed misandrist parties, either Hitllary or Candy, real MEN should contact their political party and demand a President who represents MEN be nominated and elected.

Bob

Gun thugs shoot on sight.

It's okay for blue gun thugs to shoot on sight -- even if it's another gun thug.

A recent murder by the blue gun thugs was excused by state and federal juries because the blue gun thugs claimed that they "thought" they were murdering a "civilian." It turned out that the dead man, Gun Thug Sgt. Cornel Young Jr, was an off duty member of their own gang of thugs, not wearing his blue outfit while off duty. But he was "acting suspicious," which in gun thug lingo means being alive in their sights. So it was "justifiable" to murder him on the street. Click here to see the CNN story.

Protection is one of the oldest forms of organized crimes. It begins by preventing people from protecting ourselves, and then pretending that an organized criminal gang is there for our protection. In truth, they are there to keep us under the government's control and domination. The blue gun thugs are so violent and so dangerous for the community that even they would be better off if they were put out of business and decent citizens once again allowed to protect ourselves. We are not free people, and obviously not safe, while our lives are dominated and at risk by the murderous gang of gun thugs in blue suits. We would all be much better off without them.
Bob

Global Warming Strikes AGAIN!

Just when you were starting to believe the environmental wackos, that "global warming" must be true because they have repeated it the required million times, we find record cold. We read that there is a "coming mini-ice-age." What a total crock. Next time an environmental wacko or their friends, the talking heads, tell you the world is coming to an end, you better believe them. Global warming has frozen solid in West Yellowstone, and clear south to Texas.

"Record low temperatures strike across U.S.Bitterly cold weather reaches as far south as Texas panhandle
DENVER - Bitterly cold air poured southward across the nation's midsection Wednesday, dropping temperatures to record lows from Montana to Illinois.
The mercury dived to a record 45 below at West Yellowstone, Mont., the frequently cold spot at the west entrance to Yellowstone National Park, the National Weather Service said.
The old record for Dec. 7 was 39 below, set in 1927.

Color me cold. Brrrr!
Bob

Faux men's activists protect daughters.

The so-called "men's movement" has always been fractured and disconnected. Every time MEN start to get motivated we find out that the enemy in our midst is the man who pretends to be our leader. For example, one popular on-line group supposedly for fathers rights activists is led by a father who devotes his time to protecting the feminist privilege and education of his daughters. He regularly bans any man who speaks aggressively against feminists or actually suggests taking strong action against the feminist domination of our society. Here is his message yesterday, "Mr. X has been removed from (men's activist group), and has been Banned. We need to send a very clear message that, as the father of three wonderful daughters, I am disgusted by this message. It will be removed," Wayne Cook (group owner)

Men often wonder who is worse, the enemies of men at NOW who openly campaign to promote hatred of men and to destroy or enslave men, or the hidden fathers of daughters like Wayne Cook who pretend to be men's activists but secretly sabotage any success to protect their daughter's feminist privileges and education. Quisling "activists" protect the feminazi by interfering with the ability of men to get together and discuss issues. They protect and promote feminism by demanding that their daughters have all the special legal privilege which feminazis have bestowed upon them at the expense of men. The men's movement does not need quislings like Mr. Cook who sabotage men and protect daughters. Being a man's daughter is not special qualification at all. Every dyke lesbian man hating ball buster is some man's daughter. And every one of them ought to be returned to their place as the wives and helpmates of their husbands. Which is worse? The evil we can see or the enemies in our midst? Lying traitors like Wayne Cook are always worse then honest enemies.

Bob

Earth to Weather Dudes? Hello?

Weather.com says that the temperature outside this morning is 6 degrees, and today's low is 12 degrees. HUH? Hello? Earth to weather dude? If it's 6 degrees, that IS today's low, or colder if it drops more. Why are weather dudes such idiots?

In three weeks the weather idiots will proclaim, "The first day of winter." What a crock of Shinola. If they can't read any history and don't have the sense to comprehend even basic knowledge, at least you would think they could look out a window. Hello? Earth to weather dude? It's been WINTER for weeks already. The fall colored leaves fell and went away weeks ago. SNOW has fallen. Rivers have frozen. It's been WINTER since late November. DUH!!

And on December 21, again this year as usual, the TV "news" talking heads will announce "The first day of winter." Forget that the longest night day of the year has been celebrated as "Midwinter's night" for at least 6,000 years, TV idiots can't be expected to know any history or culture. Forget that the same TV idiots have been reporting snow, ice, traffic snarls, power outages, and frozen facts for weeks, TV "news" idiots can't be expected to understand anything of what they speak. They very obviously haven't got the mental capacity of a garden slug. Put a little salt on their head and they are liable to shrivel up. Every year on Midwinter's Night, led by their "staff meteorologist" they demonstrate their total lack of knowledge and observation by declaring "the start of winter."

Of course they can't figure out summer either. Every June 21, Midsummer's Day for ten thousand years, the talking head idiots can be counted upon to declare "the start of summer." If they had any brains at all they would be dangerous. No wonder nobody believes a single word they speak. When they aren't deliberatly lying they haven't got enough brain power to understand the word "winter" and relate that to the snow and ice they've been scraping off their car on the way to work for the past 6 weeks. Bloomin' Idiots.

Bob

One Father's success story.

Elian Gonzalez, the Cuban boy thrust into the center of an international custody battle six years ago, celebrated his 12th birthday Tuesday. here
The US media, CNN, FOX, and their talking head jackals, made a crusade of preventing Elian from being reunited with his father after his adulterous mother had almost killed him by taking him along while running off with her latest lover in a boat that wasn't safe. Elian's mother and her lover both died when the boat sank and Elian was left clinging to debris where an American fisherman eventually found him. American media desperately fought to do anything and everything but return a child to his father. Conservatives and liberals alike hate fathers, hate men, and will lie, cheat, steel, cry, whine, and destroy a child to prevent boys from growing up with their fathers. Whipped into a frenzy by constant media attention and prodding, the Cuban community in Florida demonstrated for days to keep Elian away from his father. The misandrist media had a feeding frenzy. Fortunately for Elian, Janet Reno followed the law instead of the misandrist whining media, and Elian was eventually reunited with his dad. Now, 6 years later, he is apparently growing up and making good progress toward becoming a man like his father.
One boy, one happy ending. Up yours CNN, FOX, ABC, NBC, CBS. Your hatred of fathers failed to destroy this one boy.