Cotton Bale resizing.
In Washington State there is a secret legislature committee meeting this month to "re-evaluate" the state guidelines on so-called "child support." Other US states do the same reevaluation periodically. No public announcement has been sent or published in local media. None of the father's rights advocacy groups have been invited to attend or suggest comments. So-called "child support" is, after all, indentured servitude, a form of slavery, illegal under the US Constitution. All forms of involuntary peonage and indentured servitude are illegal in the United States.
In 17th century Virginia they re-evaluated the size of cotton bales and concluded that 99lbs per bale is the optimum size to get the most work out of slaves every day. Too many pounds per bale and the slaves broke down or were injured from overwork. Too few pounds and the slaves were loafing on the job. Either way production lagged. The committee set 99 pounds per bale as the standard that an average slave could carry the most pounds of cotton day in and day out without either loafing or breaking down from over work. Cotton is still sold today in 99lb bales for hand carry cotton. Machine handled bales are equal to 5 of the 17th century bales.
Washington state is re-evaluating its slave (father) working guidelines to re-determine the maximum amount of cash they can extract from each slave per day. Raise the guidelines too high and fathers break down, go broke, end up in jail instead of working to pay their masters. Set the guidelines too low and fathers get away with slacking off and paying less than the maximum amount that could be collected.
Some things never change, only the names have changed to protect the guilty. A slaver is a slaver by whatever name, in whatever century. A slaver will refrain from working their slaves to death only because it would cut into next year's production.
Slavery can not be made acceptable by re-evaluating the size of the cotton bales. It can only be eradicated and the slave masters destroyed.
Bob
In 17th century Virginia they re-evaluated the size of cotton bales and concluded that 99lbs per bale is the optimum size to get the most work out of slaves every day. Too many pounds per bale and the slaves broke down or were injured from overwork. Too few pounds and the slaves were loafing on the job. Either way production lagged. The committee set 99 pounds per bale as the standard that an average slave could carry the most pounds of cotton day in and day out without either loafing or breaking down from over work. Cotton is still sold today in 99lb bales for hand carry cotton. Machine handled bales are equal to 5 of the 17th century bales.
Washington state is re-evaluating its slave (father) working guidelines to re-determine the maximum amount of cash they can extract from each slave per day. Raise the guidelines too high and fathers break down, go broke, end up in jail instead of working to pay their masters. Set the guidelines too low and fathers get away with slacking off and paying less than the maximum amount that could be collected.
Some things never change, only the names have changed to protect the guilty. A slaver is a slaver by whatever name, in whatever century. A slaver will refrain from working their slaves to death only because it would cut into next year's production.
Slavery can not be made acceptable by re-evaluating the size of the cotton bales. It can only be eradicated and the slave masters destroyed.
Bob
posted by Bob | Tuesday, June 28, 2005
5 Comments:
See, Bob. I knew you could write rational prose.
And all true, too.
Though it is not a legislative committee. The Federales want a report from the state legislature every 4 years, and the lawmakers give it over to OSE. OSE appoints their lapdogs, who have proven ability to sit quietly, eat what is offered, and nod knowingly, never exhibiting desire to jump on the couch, pee on your leg, or other egregious behaviors.
Only docile lapdogs allowed, and those who would be feeding at the public trough by jacking up support just as high as possible, without discouraging the slaves.
For once, right on, dude!
Public Policy has created a massive Financial machine that benefits from the financial carnage of Divorce. Men have become the New Slaves and Women the New Aristocracy. Government has effectively replaced Men as the protectors of Women. This is one of the reasons Islamic Radicals are at War with the west.
Until the financial incentives to encourage Divorce happens Men need to stop having children and boycott Marriage to Western Women. And American Women are the most delusional, worst attitude, self absorbed lot of the bunch. A Yugo with a Ferrari price tag.
Correction:
Slaves were not loafing on any job. Strictly speaking, slaves had no "job".
African slaves were victims of the crime of kidnapping; held against their will when they'd done no wrong.
The lazy, criminal White man used slave labor until he murdered his victims, then bought more. He wanted money. Greed...
Are men financial slaves? Most aren't. Most White men are doing quite well. Many are content.
For those malcontents here (like Bob & Co.), why do you remain in USA if you hate it so?
Why don't you go live in Afghanistan? Islamo-Fascists live in the brutal Dark Ages and treat their women accordingly.
Those Arab males are TRUE MEN (i.e., Mohammad Atta and his superhuman courage on 9/11). You would be happy among them and never bitch again about how women hurt you. Instead, you'd be hurting THEM, as Allah (pbuh) and Jesus intended.
One question:
I'm certain little boys are treated as badly by the "Islamo-fascist" mothers as they are by the north-american mothers.
Why then do north-americans fall in love with the like of their mothers and not the Islamo-fascists ?
Could it be because of "circomcision" ?
Post a Comment
<< Home