Hiding Thug Violence from the public
Albuquerque citizens were arrested for videotaping blue gun thugs on a public street as they illegally harassed patrons of a local bar. With nothing better to do and no "crime" to fight the Albuquerque blue gun thugs were out Saturday night administering breath tests to pedestrians leaving a local bar. Read news story. Control and domination of people who used to be free is what they do. It's who they are. And they hate for the public to learn of how invasive and violent they really are. So when the blue gun thugs learned that employees of the bar were recording their illegal and abusive assault on citizens (See the 4th Amendment) they arrested the bar employees. Spending a night in the hell hole cage of the blue gun thugs is a horrible and emotionally destructive thing to do to a citizen. The valid lawsuit the bar intends to file will only cost the taxpayers. It penalizes the people who are already oppressed by the blue gun thugs. It will have no effect whatever on their violent, brutal, and illegal thugary.
MEN got along for all of human history without these evil gun thugs. Only at the end of the 19th century were they created by tyrannical governments to control and dominate the people. We don't need them, we don't want them, and we would all be far better off without them.
MEN got along for all of human history without these evil gun thugs. Only at the end of the 19th century were they created by tyrannical governments to control and dominate the people. We don't need them, we don't want them, and we would all be far better off without them.
posted by Bob | Tuesday, May 23, 2006
5 Comments:
Interesting. I've never considered that modern-day law enforcement is actually a recent imposition. Guess it's just there so you never question the necessity of it. Society seemed to flow well when everyone knew there were societal consequences to bad actions and there was the unspoken understanding and expectation that everyone was armed.
Slaves were not armed.
Note to anonymous: (May 26, 2006 1:30 PM)
1. Not so. Many times and places in history slaves were armed. Ever hear of gladiators? Sometimes slaves were part of armies.
2. Slaves have nothing to do with this story, the blue gun thugs, or Bobstruth about the story.
Gladiators were enslaved to do as ORDERED.
Slaves in Roman military service obeyed ORDERS. Hardly free men.
In Christian America, slaves were unarmed, uneducated, without human rights. If a Master wanted to rape your child, sell her, or whip her to death, he could. You had no right, as her Father, to even lift a hand to defend her, let alone shoot the White tormentor.
Note to anonymous: [May 30, 2006 3:57 PM]
Again, slaves have nothing to do with this topic, however such posted errors need to be corrected.
Roman gladiators and military slaves had to do as ordered, just like conscripted privates in the US Army. Roman slaves also could own property and sometimes amassed savings sufficient to buy their own freedom.
In Christian America there were armed slaves fighting for the South in the US Civil War. They had about as much freedom as conscripted Irishmen from NYC. The previous claim that slaves had no arms is plainly not always true.
During the 18th century in most of the Americas, slaves were treated much like cattle. They were often bred at the decision of the owner who selected the breeding pair. A breeding female usually understood her role as breeding stock who produced marketable slave children for her master. The selected males understood their place as "prize bulls" who impregnated selected females. Terms like "rape" and "your child" really didn't apply. Those terms reflect a modern sexist/racist political perspective. Very often there were overseers who were also slaves. Their job was to enforce rules, run the field labor, and control the others. Slaves included indentured servants who were effectively owned for a period of indentured servitude. Today we only have indentured servitude of men under the so-called "child support" laws.
Your characterization of slave owners as "tormentor" is a demonstration of ignorance and political advocacy. Slave owners generally sought to maintain happy and satisfied slave populations. Deliberate tormenting of slaves has never been profitable. The statement limiting Christian American slavery to "white tormentors" is also racist. There were around ten thousand BLACK slave owners in the US prior to the Civil War. Today the only countries where slavery is still practiced have majority black populations.
Post a Comment
<< Home