The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Legally defined incompetence

Sexual Harassment laws permanently define females as incompetents who do not have the social skills to get along at work. They give females a permanent legally defined underclass status.

Despite all the feminist rhetoric about how females are supposed to be so much better at "relationships" than men, in a workplace, men have been finding ways to get along forever, but females are said to be unable to get along without special legal protection. If a man feels bad because of something that his boss said, or her sexual advances, his options are to go along or leave the company and look for a different job elsewhere. If a man is teased, harassed, or under appreciated by fellow employees, it's not the company's responsibility to pay him for his lack of social skills, and in fact the company may fire him for failure to get along. Not so for females. A female who can't get along with fellow employees may file a "harassment" complaint and pocket an extra $50,000 for her lack of social skills.

The cost of her $50,000 payment, and those of her sista's is accounted for as a very large budget item that companies have to provide for. It is part of real wages, the total cost for employing someone. For females, real wages includes the very large budgeted cost of "harassment" settlements. Unaccounted for are the also very real costs of inefficiency by all workers because communications and teamwork are badly affected. The US Army did a study in the 1990s which concluded that their combat effectiveness is reduced due to men avoiding communications with females out of very real fear of "SH" complaints if she "feels" offended. In a place where Bob worked the men would gather in small groups and chat, but we avoided any conversation when females were near. We all knew men who had their careers ruined, and some who had been fired because of an offhand remark that had been overheard and used by a greedy female employee. The "SH" laws had a very marked negative effect on teamwork and morale in our office.

One small US state budgets $10,000,000 per year for "SH" settlements. The budgets of corporations large and small are not so well published, but they have to budget for the very large cost of hiring females or go broke. When you hear feminazi whine about low wages, remember that real wages include the total cost of hiring someone, and for a female real wages includes the very large cost of risk of "SH" payments. These laws create a windfall for a few females while reducing the take home pay (real wages minus hidden wages) of all females.

After a generation of poorly written and damaging "sexual harassment" enforcement the time is long overdue to declare females as true equals at work and drop all their special legal protected status. They can't have it both ways. Either females are equals, or they are some incompetent subhumans without the social skills to do effective relationships in a work environment. Bob would like to see females treated like equals.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

The employee who initiates the bullying, intimidation, etc., is the one to blame. That person should be punished-- just as the disruptive kid in school gets punished. Bullying is similar to vandalism - it's wrong, immoral, and illegal.

May 16, 2006 4:01 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (May 16, 2006 4:01 PM)
There are so many lies, misstatements, and false assertions, and so much misandrist hate speech dogma in that one paragraph it's hard to know where to begin.

First, the assertion that "sexual harassment" has anything to do with bullying is fiction. In over 40 years of work experience I've seen many so-called "harassment" incidents and not any of them were about bullying. Virtually all were about some whiny female alleged that her "feelings" were hurt because of some unintentional misstatement. The government came down on her side, she got a big cash settlement, the company and the other employees lost, and the unfortunate man lost his job, maybe his career, and his family suffered.

The second fraud is to assert that someone should be blamed, presumably for her hurt feelings. Blaming the nearest available man is typical misandrist feminist hate dogma. Responsible people take responsibility for their own feelings and don't blame someone else. It's exactly that kind of incompetence which makes females into second class employees. Men do good relationships. Females whine, cry, and blame instead of working out good relationships.

The next real problem is the assertion that someone, presumably a MAN, should be punished. That is a very common feminazi hate dogma. Sorry, Toots, but hurt feelings are NOT justification to punish men. Greatly over punishing boys in school, and boys are punished ten times as often as girls, is one of the serious flaws in education today. You ought to be ashamed to repeat such hate.

There is nothing moral, right, or good about your misandry. Hate is wrong no matter how many times the feminazi repeat it.

And by the way, bullying is not illegal anywhere I know of. So-called "sexual harassment" is only illegal when it's a MAN who is being punished. Sexist law violates every premise of fair justice. Only a MAN hating feminazi would stoop so low. You really ought to be ashamed to post such hate mongering drivel.

May 16, 2006 5:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, YOU are wrong. Sexual harassment is done by selfish males who lack self-control. If they disrupt the work environment, such males must be punished. Just as disruptive pupils are punished in grade school or even expelled.

May 16, 2006 6:20 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (May 16, 2006 6:20 PM )
You can keep repeating that misandrist feminazi propagand as many times as you like, but lies never become truth. Your hate mongering is so common among females today. It's no wonder that employers have to greatly discount the wages paid. You demonstrate that you are a risk as an employee, and you can never create real work relationships.

May 16, 2006 8:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, Anonymous, YOU are still wrong. You've clearly swallowed all the myths and propaganda about sexual harrassment, but you don't have a clue about it in the real world.

Bob is right on target about sexual harrassment.

May 16, 2006 8:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In 2002 I was working a second Job at a "Big Box" retailer in the Millwork Department of a Home Improvement company. We had a Head Cashier a young White Female. And we had a Lesbian Asst. Manager. I overhead the Lesbian Asst. Manager bragging about "doing the younger" Head Cashier with her Favorite, Strap on Toy. This was ignored by the males in the store. As we all knew if we said anything about the Conversation the Homosexual HR Person would get us fired.

It got so bad the Men would not talk to the Women for fear of a complaint. When a hard working 18 year old Male asked the Head Cashier why she hung out with a Homosexual Guy? She called the harrassment line and the 18 year old White Straight Male was fired the next day.

Thanks to the FemNags the Sexual Harrassment has been defined as a "Hostile Work Environment" but this only applies to Women. An Attorney who marched with Gloria Steinem recently said "Men are the New Donkeys in America. They are treated like Subhumans." This amazing remarks is from a Feminist.


May 17, 2006 5:26 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why can't a woman just handle a gripe one-on-one with the person they have an issue with? Can't stand when other women talk about how tough they are and then go running to daddy to make it all better. My man tells of an incident to male friends at work about women in the military being physically weaker and some female co-worker who happened to walk into the room suddenly becomes all offended and goes running to the boss man. I could see it now...make him stop. He's hurt my feelings by talking to his friends in a room that I happen to intrude upon. We aren't weaker. We can do anything you all can do. Yeah, except stand up for yourself.

May 25, 2006 10:09 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home