The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Monday, October 16, 2006

Lying whores in court

A Seattle newspaper has uncovered yet another case of blue gun thugs and county persecutors lying and falsifying evidence to convict numerous people and send them to hellhole prisons. Blue gun thug detective Dan Ring was supposed to be investigating "vice." Over a period of several years he started fucking several whores who worked for "escort services" in the Seattle area. Like archetype blue gun thugs taking an apple to eat from a local merchant without paying while walking a beat, this blue gun thug's beat was the seedy side of prostitution, and he took many "apples" without paying.

A detective needs to get "convictions" to look good to his evil gun thug bosses. In a rash of sordid lies, sex, and perversion, the lying gun thug, Dan Ring and his several whores filed fraudulent charges against many people involved in the escort businesses. Using a huge pile of taxpayer money Ring set up a phony "money laundering" scheme. When real evidence was not found, probably because the "criminals" had not actually violated a law, Ring got his whores to lie to juries in order to convict the accused and gain him job approval for successful investigations. Read story.

The county persecutors failed to disclose the close sexual relationship between their star witnesses and the blue gun thug, a fundamental legal violation of due process. In the sordid world of evil blue gun thugs and scum sucking lieyer county persecutors its never about crime and punishment. Its never about justice. Its always only about getting as many convictions as possible and sending as many people to hell as they can. That is the bottom line, was the bottom line, and in their twisted minds justified violating all the basic rights of citizens.

Something like 86 convictions were obtained by fraudulent illegal court process, a lying blue gun thug, and his lying whores giving false witness. Now that the real story has been revealed, many of the victims will sue the county for damages, and the taxpayers who had to pay for the fraudulent investigations will now have to pay for the damages done by their crooked blue gun thugs. The good people of Seattle and King County would be far better off if they rounded up all the blue gun thugs, had them each tarred and feathered, and run out of town on a rail.

In the mean time, the lying scum county persecutor who failed to inform the accused that the witnesses were in bed, literally, with the blue gun thugs, will pay no penalty and will be rewarded for his high conviction rate. The whoring blue gun thug got paid a large financial reward and got an early retirement (read: stop working but still get paid his salary for the rest of his life) for his illegal acts. Crime pays very well when you wear a blue suit.

To answer questions about Bob's position on the prostitution business, Bob notes that laws against prostitution were promulgated in the USA by misandrist feminists a century ago. Even though anti-prostitution laws make female sex workers into criminals, the feminazi are willing to sacrifice large numbers of their own kind in order to increase their control and domination of men. In their worldview, a wife or girlfriend has less control of her man if he can hire a whore at his favorite pub on his way home from work. In an alliance with religious fundamentalists the feminists of the late 19th century and early 20th century successfully outlawed prostitution and most kinds of sex work. It was done during the same era that outlawed alcoholic beverage. Its purpose was to control and subjugate men, to prevent men from enjoying our lives, and subject us to the control of wives. In Bob's view, if a man objects to prostitution on religious grounds he has the option of avoiding prostitutes. Bob has never desired to hire sex workers, there are so many willing free females, but neither does Bob object to the practices of willing participants. Bob generally opposes all laws that have the purpose of control and domination of an otherwise free people. Freedom, including the freedom of sexuality, is a very valuable thing. Freedom is worth defending. Bob objects to the feminazi, their evil blue gun thug army, and their lying county persecutors who work every day to control, oppress, and deny freedom to good MEN.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

No laws or freedoms that enable women to eschew responsibility and common sense.

October 16, 2006 12:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: Should there be a law prohibiting a Father from having sex with his daughter?

October 26, 2006 1:43 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

When I was growing up the kids in our neighborhood used to put it this way, "Mind your own bees wax!"

Why is it that the self-righteous are always looking for excuses to mind everyone else's fucking business? It's perhaps a form of pathological sexual dysfunction, looking into their neighbor's sex life. If a 30-year-old female comes along and wants to ride the rod that knocked up dear old mom, whose business is it but hers? It's not what I would do, but neither is it my place to meddle in my neighbor's sex life. Nor should I try to make my neighbor into a criminal and send him to hell.

Time to mind your own bees wax.

[I also note that you don't suggest a law prohibiting a daughter from having sex with her fahter. Your misandrist sexism is noted, bigot.]

October 26, 2006 5:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob: Should there be a law prohibiting a Father from having sex with his pre-pubertal daughter, if he so chooses?

October 27, 2006 4:19 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (October 27, 2006 4:19 PM)

Your continued posting of rhetorical questions continually twisted to justify persecution of men and based on misandrist bigoted assumptions do not cut the muster here. Your feminazi victimology is hate speech. You can shove it up your ass. Women/mothers do twice as much child abuse as fathers, and boys receive twice as much of their abuse as do girls. Mother's latest fuck is the second most likely perpetrator of violence against children. In general, fathers protect girls from other's violence more than they commit violence.

If we want to stop sexual violence against children we should start by enacting laws against mothers who mutilate the sex organs of their little boys, a heinous violent crime that outnumbers all other violent crimes against children and all other sex crimes in the United States combined.

Your continual posting of misandrist bigotry is beginning to be an annoyance. In future such misandrist bigotry will be deleted from the comments.

October 27, 2006 5:52 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home