The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Friday, February 09, 2007

The Rewards of Feminist Society:

A life of whoring, media whoring, and drug addiction finally caught up with Anna Nicole Smith this week. In a feminist matriarchal utopia Anna's life was the epitome of success. She began life as a "liberated" girl in a poor family, and soon found that the sex trade paid better than any other job an uneducated southern white trash could get. Anna worked the seedy side of Houston, stripping and whoring in dance clubs. During those years she whelped a bastard son, Daniel in 1987. A few years later, still working the sex trades, Anna sold her nude female image to Playboy Magazine, and she became Playmate of the Year in 1993. Despite her growing fame Anna continued to work in the Houston sex trade where she kept an eye out for johns with money. The following year, 1994, she caught the eye of a very rich and very old man, Mr. Howard Marshal II. Keeping her greedy feminist eyes on his bank account Anna professed her love, and there is nothing a feminist female loves more than a large bank account. She soon married Mr. Marshal and became co-owner of his entire fortune under feminist "equal property" laws.

Community property is one of the most important feminist revolutions ever to befall modern men. Community property is why women now own 65% of all wealth in the United States and 85% of personal wealth. Under feminist community property law, Anna became a full equal partner in ownership of Mr. Marshal's half billion dollar fortune that he had amassed through a lifetime of hard work and skillful investments. Within a few months after Anna's half billion dollar blow job, 89 year old Mr. Marshal passed on, and Anna became sole owner of his fortune. Before feminism, a man's fortune went to his sons who are part of his family, who he has raised, who know how to carry on his businesses, and who had taken care of him for years. Before feminism a man's late in life sex toy wife would be granted some further support out of his estate, but the estate would belong to his family. But all that changed under feminism which has always sought to destroy families and gain wealth for females. Anna's whoring faux marriage gained her ownership to the entire fortune. And ill gotten gains generally bode ill.

Anna's new feminist entitlement to Mr. Marshal's fortune so shocked his family that a series of lawsuits followed. The agents of Satan in black robes of hell, all the way to SCOTUS, affirmed the feminist mantra that a white trash whore is entitled to take over a man's fortune and send his family out to the street. While the lieyers and agents of Satan in black robes of hell argued over her ill gotten fortune Anna craved limelight and began pandering more and more to media, becoming a media whore. She launched a "reality" show on TV featuring her own sordid life of drugs, sex, and sleaze. Of course all the mass media TV filth, tabloid readers, and other scum ate it all up. Her ugly puss was featured regularly on all the "talk" shows and "entertainment" that pacifies the ignorant masses as Gladiator death in the Coliseum once did. But Anna was still poor white trash and she was unable to handle her ill gotten wealth and fame. In public appearances her speech was becoming slurred and sometimes incomprehensible. A bad life of sex, alcohol, drugs, and shame were taking their toll.

Her pathetic sordid life began to unravel in 2006 when she became pregnant again, father unknown. In ancient Celtic law there were several kinds of marriage. The last kind was that of a pregnant whore, and Celtic law provided that support of a whore's child is her own responsibility. Regular readers of The World According to Bob will understand that a whore making a baby is, in essence, a marriage because it is the sexual union that creates a child. However, a whore's marriage is the lowest level of marriage in Celtic law and creates no further obligation on the father. That was then, this is now. Under feminist law, even a whore may claim "child support" if she can figure out which one of her multitude of sperm donors is the biological father of her baby, and in some jurisdictions even if he is not the father.

Anna's pathetic sordid life was unraveling rapidly early in 2006 when she and her bastard son Daniel, now a 20 year old drug addict, traveled to the Bahamas where she intended to deliver her new bastard out of sight of paparazzi and TV cameras. In one day her bastard daughter was born and her bastard son died of drug overdose. Hangers on, lieyers and body guards had become her excuse for a life. A few months later it ended. Anna Nicole Smith died in a Florida hotel after only 40 years. All her life she had admired Marilyn Monroe, and finally followed her idol into an early death.

The fortune that Mr. Marshal amassed by a lifetime of hard work will probably pass to Anna's infant bastard daughter. She is "empowered" by feminist law, and it will destroy her as well, but probably not in as much of a spotlight as the sordid life of Anna Nicole. Feminism and the mangina legislatures who pander to feminist voters gave her Mr. Marshal's hard earned fortune for a few months of blowing an old man, but they did her no favors, and in the end it killed her. Another whoring scum sucking feminist bitch returns to room temperature. Goodbye, and good riddance.

The story of Anna Nicole Smith's capture of Mr. Marshal's life's savings, taking it away from his family, is only one of a landslide of dishonor among inheritance disasters. In a similar widely publicized feminist takeover by another feminist the Rams are now in St. Louis instead of Los Angeles because the young slut who inherited the fortune didn't like Los Angeles, and had no loyalty to her departed husband's friends, family, or city. For the sake of our children and families, and even for our late in life wives, we men need to eliminate the feminist "community property" laws and restore primary inheritance to the oldest son. Feminist community property law female inheritance destroys property and families, and hurts everyone involved.


Blogger Aeropepe said...


As usual, I take issue with many of the points you make in this post. Now, make no mistake... I would not with Anna Nicole Smith's lifestyle on my own daughter. That being said, of the many points I disagree with, I will focus on one and let the discussion go from there.

Don't you think the J. Howard Marshall knew what he was doing when he married Ms. Smith? You make it sound like she is the villain for going after his money. But let's be fair here: Marshall was desperate for the affection of a woman, and Smith filled that role. He was being just as greedy and shortsighted, the only difference is that he was after sex and companionship while she was after money! I do not approve of this type of marriage any more than you do, but let's be honest about the lacking integrity on the part of both parties involved. This ridiculous marriage was no more her fault than his. Remember, prostitution would not be the world's oldest profession if men were not supporting it out of their pockets.

February 09, 2007 5:02 PM  
Blogger The Geezer said...

Hey, Bob.

You missed discussing who the father is of her 8 month old?

Which of the two (er, ah, now maybe three) guys.

I know which one it is!!!

It is the richest one. Must be, to preserve poetic harmony.

The Geez

February 10, 2007 10:10 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to the geezer: Its like the Montel show. "I'm sure he's the father of my baby." Not! Whores like Anna screw so many men they are lucky if they can list 2 or 3 that might be the father, and she probably doesn't know the names of the others. It is strange that her intended husband refuses a DNA test for paturnity, and the guy in California is demanding a DNA test on the baby compared to the mother to find out if the babies have been swithced. It is merely the most recent sordid example of the human tragedy that "community property" causes. All the money is turned over to an emotional hormone driven female.

February 10, 2007 11:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Say what you will about her, but please don't call Daniel a bastard. His father was Billy W. Smith; Daniel shared his father's middle and last name. Anna Nicole Smith was actually married to his father, for a time. They were young, but at least they married.

February 10, 2007 5:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

gawd, bob, can't you find anything other than tabloids to read? u sure must have free time on your hands!!

February 10, 2007 5:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Speaking of sleaze, here's a whopper of a story about hormones out of control:

February 10, 2007 6:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Better to have 10 retarded sons than one genius daughter.

February 10, 2007 6:38 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (February 10, 2007 6:20 PM) Good link. The Blue Gun Thugs call out their paramilitary "SWAT" gang of thugs because someone threw a snowball at a very offensive and aggressive TV nomind. Now he's charged with "assault with a weapon" for throwing a snowball. He's lucky the blue gun thugs didn't beat him to death. Or, since this is Canada, the blue gun thug cunt might have unloaded pistol at the wall just for drill.

February 10, 2007 7:14 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (February 10, 2007 6:38 PM)

The chance of a genius daughter is very small. Since the bell curve for female intelligence is about 5% lower than for men, the number of very high intelligence females is only a fraction of highly intelligent men.

It is generally better to have sons than daughters. However it is also unlikely to have 10 retarded sons unless the mother has severe genetic defects.

February 10, 2007 7:18 PM  
Anonymous remagnotiadglu said...

Well I think Mr. Marshall was thrilled to have Anna Nichole Smith sucking his dick. So there!

February 11, 2007 7:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For every cruel man, there is always a woman or a dog who will love him. (recall Hitler?)

Name one cruel man who didn't have a woman or dog to love him.

February 12, 2007 4:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is also a paternity rights issue. The likely biological father has not been given access to his much-wanted daughter, despite months of legal pursuit and much financial expense. The mother is dead; custody should be an easily and quickly settled issue with immediate testing.

February 13, 2007 12:06 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (February 13, 2007 12:06 PM)
Indeed, the paturnity of the child should be immediatly determined by DNA testing, and in fact should have been determined months ago. Every child has a fundamental human right to his or her fahter. It has become complicated by feminist rejection of fatherhood, relogating fathers to "sperm donters." They created the lie of "father figures" and convinced courts than any available man whom the mother chooses is as much of a "father" as the man who is actually the child's father. There is a lieyer in the Bahamas who selected the Bahamas because feminist law there assumes that whomever the mother puts on a birth certificate is the father. The lieyer is on the birth certificate and is fighting DNA testing which would probably determine that he is not the baby's father. Since the baby now owns half a billion dollars, and it's father will be guardian of that fortune for the nect two decades, the lieyer it claiming himself a fortune.

February 13, 2007 1:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Happy Valentine's/Valor Day, Bob.

Eva Ellsworth at mnd wrote that to counter the fems hostile misuse of Valentine's Day, it should also be known as Valor Day in recognition of ordinary, hardworking family men.

February 13, 2007 11:41 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: Valentine's Day. See Bob's latest article about Lupercalia.

February 14, 2007 8:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The fiend is actually ugly as sin, if you look at her face.

As disgusting as it might be that trailer trash gets all that money, stop and think what the message would be if they make that impossible.

Men get screwed enough, but if an old man can't leave his life earnings to a woman who has given him what he thinks is good sex in the last days of his life, that means once again someone else owns us.

Enough already. Our property should be our property to keep or give away until we die, not the property of our ex-wives or our sons and daughters. We men should own what we have earned, to do with as we wish.

His descendants had years to make their own fortunes, instead of just waiting for him to die so they can take what he earned by himself. It amazes me when even men claiming to be for men believe his property belonged to someone else, just like property settlements in divorce.

I guarantee you that as little as I have, if some dollie with big **** comes in my last days and gives me a good time, she gets it all, and so she should. That sure beats what most of us get in our marriages before our divorces which also take away most of our assets, past and present and future.

Anonymous age 64

February 14, 2007 12:05 PM  
Anonymous peter charnley said...

Anonymous said:
"For every cruel man, there is always a woman or a dog who will love him. (recall Hitler?)
Name one cruel man who didn't have a woman or dog to love him".

At least with a dog the love is unadulterated. And they don't suffer 'Norma Jean delusions' and leave the toilet seat down - RIP!

February 14, 2007 3:31 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to peter: There are hundreds of thousands of men who are now in debtor's prisons for being unable to pay the indentured servitude (a form of slavery) payments called "child support" by feminazi. Their families and lives have been destroyed by the feminist society, and they don't even have a dog.

February 14, 2007 6:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is true though, that every cruel man who ever lived, always had a woman to love him.

February 14, 2007 7:29 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Mpte to Anonymous: (February 14, 2007 7:29 PM) Generalizations are generally wrong because somewhere there is someone who is an exception. What is your point?

February 14, 2007 7:53 PM  
Anonymous peter charnley said...

"It is true though, that every cruel man who ever lived, always had a woman to love him".

And the same applies to every cruel woman who ever lived. The love is of herself.

A childlike narcissistic selfishness, with contemptous feelings of disregard for other human beings is the primary trademark of feminism and, increasingly, of the modern female per se.

February 15, 2007 2:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

are men really stupid enough to love cruel women?

February 16, 2007 12:46 PM  
Anonymous peter charnley said...

anonymous asks:
"are men really stupid enough to love cruel women?"

And is anonymous stupid, or naive enough to believe that during the process of falling in love the cruel man or woman has been wearing their cruelty on their sleeve?

February 17, 2007 1:57 AM  
Anonymous C said...

Her death is a parable for all ameriskanks out there today.

A.N.S. was a host for all the parasitic, perverted, disgusting things that ameri-con women do.

It just shows you where it all ends up.

I hope justice was served for all Men and her devilish presence is now burning in hell.

February 17, 2007 3:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


An intelligent person can read between the lines. They can detect, early on, clues that someone has a cruel streak.

February 18, 2007 5:35 PM  
Anonymous peter charnley said...

"And is anonymous stupid, or naive enough to believe...."

It is apparent the answer is yes.

During the period of courtship and of falling in love people do not 'read between the lines', as you suggest, and treat the object of their often passionate infatuation and desire to psychological and moral scrutiny.

'Love is blind' is a very old and true saying. And that is very often applicable to a situation in which one party makes little effort to conceal their real persona non grata.

From a wider perspective, that is why feminism has, to date, been able to get away with it's own cruelty and now blatant message of division and hate.

Many men feel spiritually compelled to protect women (and children). They instinctively adore them and their natural infatuation has resulted, to date, in a large proportion of men morally forgiving women and absolving them from the consequences of the true meaning of feminism's ridiculous and diabolical message. Many men, because of this psychological and spiritual achilles heal, find themselves, without thought, encouraging and agreeing with women when they continously deliver their absurd and vile feminist rhetoric.

But, unbeknown to these very foolish women, feminism is totally dependent upon the compliance of men. Indeed the ingenuity of men originally created a technologically sheltered world in which women were able to set up their paranoid theater of imagined victimhood and childlike fantasies of absolute equality.

But, during the process of perpetually screaming out their infantile and imagined woes, whils't ridiculing and demonizing the very people who originally, and unwittingly, handed them their license to behave in this manner, women are effectively sawing away at the branch upon which they sit.

For women are inceasingly alienating men, more and more of whom are finding the behaviour and attitudes of modern women increasingly intolerable and loathsome.

And whils't the West continues to undermine itself politically, professionally, educationally and, consequently, technologically to appease the demands of feminism's egalitarian fantasies, whils't once third world Tiger economies are increasingly taking their place on the starter's blocks for that race for economic, technological, military and cultural world supremacy - consider this fact.

Not only is feminism is wrong. But whils't it still plagues the lives of millions of human beings in the Western hemisphere, it is totally dependent upon the compliance and tolerance of men.

In the long term, economic, political and demographic reality will eventually and inevitably burst feminism's foul bubble of demented fanaticism.

But in the medium term, the patience and tolerance of more and more men is rapidly running out.

So thankyou anonymous. Whether you are a woman or a brainwashed drone, your stupid little reply about personal relationships somehow led me off on somewhat of a tangent in which I gave vent to rather more important concerns.

Good practise though.

Have a nice day, as you say in the US.

February 19, 2007 4:40 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Work on your skills for understanding people. Learn to recognize the good or bad traits lurking in others. You are too trusting and have obviously been wounded many times.

Or perhaps you want too much?

February 20, 2007 5:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Peter Charnley's right.

February 20, 2007 11:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I hope God took Anna Nicole Smith to Heaven and that He will bless her baby daughter.

February 24, 2007 5:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home