Empowered and dangerous
Empowered young whores beating the hand that feeds them would be news if it hadn't become normal. All across America young "empowered" female gangs are beating up young women and men for no reason other than the thrill of violence. Often they brazenly film their assault and even post the videos on youtube or myspace. Read story
Who are these violent females? They are the second and third generation of fatherless single mothers. They have been taught from birth that there are no limits on their behavior. There has never been any limit on their behavior. As little girls they were never given any discipline. Their mothers have been raised fatherless with no understanding of what discipline might be, and had no knowledge of morals, ethics, or restraint to teach their bastard daughters. The total lack of morals or ethics, unrestrained emotional empowerment given to the female bastards by irrational whore mothers was reinforced by a culture of total female empowerment. Schools, television, film, blue gun thugs, and every other social organization continually teaches them that they are absolutely exempt from social responsibility for any violent or offensive act. Flagrant sexuality, killing babies, whelping bastards, assault, and even murder is always the fault of the nearest available man. They have been taught that the society owes them food, shelter, spending money, and an endless supply of feel good drugs. Instead of control, discipline and punishment for violent crime, the society has taught a whole generation of female whores that they are "empowered" and can do no wrong. Their irrational feelings are the legal and moral definition of right. They can call in an entire army of blue gun thugs to destroy any decent man who tries to stand against them, or who fails to provide them with whatever they "feel" that they deserve. And of course, the next generation of bastards, those innocent babies being brought into the world by today's out of control feminist raised whores, is raised even worse than this generation was.
The rampant and wanton destruction of society by a generation of "empowered" female whores will continue to get worse unless a complete reversal happens. Instead of being supported and rewarded for their violence and destruction, young pregnant whores should be stoned to death, cast in the river, or otherwise eliminated as required by ancient religious law. The good and decent men of our society must recapture control to save our children and our future.
29 Comments:
Great post, Bob.
Too bad they and other females like them are afforded the luxury of anonymity, while innocent young men like those in the media these days aren't.
So true, Bob.
Great post, Bob. Totally on the mark.
What about this for an option... Instead of killing young women who get pregnant, why don't we castrate the young who are doing the impregnating? Now, I am a man, and I enjoy sex as much as the next guy, but sex is a two way street, it requires the mutual consent of two individuals (except, of course, in rape, in which case the man should be the one put to death for choosing to violate another human being that way). If a young woman gets pregnant, it is just as much due the actions of the man than of the woman!
Also, for every story about women committing crimes like this, there are hundreds about men committing such crimes. The entire logical basis for your conclusion ("kill the whores") does not add up. Maybe we should kill all the men... there would be a more significant decrease in the crime rate, and a more significant decrease in the youth pregnancy rate, since men tend to have more sexual partners than do women.
Note to Aeropepe:
You are right. There is a great level of discrimination in under reporting of crimes by women and over reporting crimes by men.
In addition, the century of feminist discrimination in research has given women, but not men, a variety of birth control options, which you commented on in another post. Women, but not men have the power to decide whether or not to get pregnant because, due to misandrist discrimination, only women have birth control power. With exclusive power comes exclusive responsibility for the exercise of her power.
But if you want to be castrated, go right ahead. It will make your body consistent with your mind.
Hey Bob.
Howcome none of your comments have links to suggest they are real people, save for me.
Of course, you don't post my sheyt, so it figures. I am not afraid to admit I read your stuff, though only occasionally agree. I do love to read the results of getting a full head of steam on.
The Geezer
www.hatemalepost.blogspot.com
Dear Bob
I think society is partially to blame for this. Not all girls should go to high school, a lot of them should simply mary a loving young decent guy (20-32 years old)
when they reach the age of 14-16. Even if you call me a pedophile, I believe that a lot of women would be happier when they embrace motherhood when nature intended to
(at around 15, it depends on the girl of course, coud be a year more or less) to a young, but established man (around ten years older)who would care, love and truly guide his wife.
Offtopic. Just loaded up WABC in NYC to stream audio. The Linux player also shows the news in text format. The first item that scrolled across was that a Dallas man who spent 10 years in prison for assaulting a boy had just become the 12th person in that county to be proven innocent by DNA tests.
GRRR!!!!! GRRR!!!!! I'd sure like to put the cops and prosecutors in prison for a few weeks with nothing to wear but pink lacy negligees.
Anonymous age 64
Note to Anonymous (January 20, 2007 2:46 PM)
You are right. The age old traditional age for women to marry is about 14 to 16, and usually to men who are ten or more years older, men who have become financially established well enough to support her and her children. Young women have a biological attraction to older men because of millions of years of marrying older men. Feminist "marriage oppresses women" dogma seeks to prevent marriage and pushes young women into whelping bastards instead of marrying a good husband during their biological baby making years.
Note to Anonymous (January 20, 2007 3:59 PM)
You are right. Probably less than 8% of rape accusations have any basis in fact. Even if true, the crime empties no purses nor breaks any bones. The only damage is the woman's hurt feelings caused by losing her assumed control and domination of sex. For once the man is making decisions. If a crime at all, the value of the crime is about equal to the current street price of sex. Criminal sentences for rape are the most egregious possible because of rampant misandry unrelated to the severity of the crime. Bob has called for a moratorium on rape-hate persecution of men until sanity can be restored.
To Bob:
Biologically, it makes complete sense that women have more options for birth control. The pill and the patch work on a particular biological function to lower the risk of pregnancy. But men have these little things called condoms!!! Condoms are generally available in every supermarket, gas station, and public restroom in the US, and if you look around a bit, you can get them for FREE!!! I don't know how much more access to birth control you want! There is, by the way, a male birth control pill in production, but it is simply a more complicated process, and more difficult to produce. However, besides condoms, there is always getting your tubes tied, or simply abstinence! You see, the great benefit of being an evolved species is that we are not innocent victims of biological urges, like the animal world. We get to CHOOSE whether we have sex, and we get to CHOOSE whether that sex is with a condom or without.
Question: If you CHOSE to have unprotected sex with a female, and that female got pregnant, how much of the responsibility is on you as a consenting partner?
To Bob:
The "power" of birth control benefits men just as much as women. For instance, I benefit from the fact that my partner uses birth control because that means I don't have to worry about supporting a baby anytime soon. If we (emphasis on the "we") ever decide to have a child, then she will willingly stop using the pill and I will willingly stop using condoms. The only situation I can think of where women have "taken power away from men" in the sense that if someone were to rape a woman, and she were on birth control, then she would not get pregnant. But any man who would rape a woman to try to impregnate her is not a man at all, but a weak (and probably socially non-functional) individual. I know that you have advocated for rape in other posts, but how would you feel if you were overpowered and forced to have sex with another man? I bet you wouldn't feel too great. At least you wouldn't get pregnant.
aeropepe said...Question: If you CHOSE to have unprotected sex with a female, and that female got pregnant, how much of the responsibility is on you as a consenting partner?
Let's rephrase this to reflect today's reality...
If you CHOSE to have protected sex-or what you were promised was guaranteed protected sex- with a female, and that female got pregnant, how much of the responsibility is on you as a consenting partner?
Answer: If you are a man, be prepared to take on the entire financial responsibility without benefit of many visits. In fact, you may never even see the child. He or she will call another man "daddy" while your checks are being cashed.
Note to aeropepe:
The Pill has transfered control of sex to women and given them all the power. Your are able to recite all the excuses for a century of discrimination against men. Those lies and misandrist propaganda no longer are acceptable among honest men.
There sure are a lot of anonymous author out there...
To Anonymous:
If I CHOOSE to have "protected," I am still SMART enough to understand that there is a risk of pregnancy, regardless of the pill and condoms and everything. Try talking to your partner, please, and I bet the two of you can come to an agreement about fair use of birth control. If you can't, then maybe you could, um, find another partner!
You'll get a pat on the back for being "smart" over using protection, particularly if you aren't your partner's first or only. But even with protected sex, Pepe, you will not be given first or even second consideration about the final outcome should protection fail.
To Anonymous:
So you are telling me that if you get a woman pregnant, it is 100% her fault and 0% your fault? The decision to have sexual relations with a female implies a risk of pregnancy, by its very nature. You accept that risk by choosing to have sex. You don't get to go blaming it on the woman like it's her fault when you accepted the risk in the first place! This is like when a professional athlete signs a contract to play sports professionally. If that person breaks their leg in a game, they can't go and sue the team for their pain and suffering. They accepted the risk of injury (implicitly) as a condition of playing a contact sport for a living! When you have sex, you accept (implicitly) the risk of pregnancy. The fact that you "tried" to prevent pregnancy with a condom means nothing to the gods of morality.
Note to Aeropepe: (January 21, 2007 10:04 PM)
Your comments make many mistakes, and base illogic on them. For example, the phrase, "you get a woman pregnant" blames the man for the woman's choices, actions, and responsibility. It is only she who has a wide variety of pills and other products to choose from in deciding to get HERSELF pregnant or not. Seducing a man for that purpose in a society where women control sex is very easy, many mothers seduce lots of men and don't even know who the father is. Your blaming men for her choices, actions, and responsibilities is offensive misandry.
Your accusation that a man assumes the risk of a child by doing sex is another misandrist falsehood. It is only the female who has the long list of birth control products, only the woman who has the "woman's right to choose" to produce the child or not, only the woman who has abandonment laws in most parts of the USA. His real risk is no from lying with the woman, but from you and bigots like you who blame him for her choices and actions.
Your feminazi, "blame the nearest man" crap doesn't cut the muster here.
To Bob:
Alright, let's use your logic... The woman has all the birth control options, eh? I dare you to tell me that men do NOT have birth control options of their own (of course, you can say it, but it is simply untrue, no matter how much you want to believe it.) One more time: CONDOMS! ABSTINENCE! ORAL SEX! If a woman refuses to let you use a condom, then refuse to have intercourse with her! You are telling me (and the world) that you have no control over who you have sex with, as if any woman in the world could approach you and you would have to have sex with her against your own will. This also is simply untrue; life does not work that way (unless you were forcibly raped by a woman, which, while rare, is possible...) Instead of calling me a bigot (a man bigoted against men, I suppose), why don't you evaluate the lens through which you view women. They have not taken power from you, you have ceded your power to them so that you can play the victim and blame everything wrong in the world on them! Life is much easier when you create false scapegoats for yourself, I will give you that (like when early Americans justified slavery by saying Africans were too stupid and immoral to survive in the world on their own, so taking them into slavery actually was helping them to become more like "real" human beings).
And as to your other point, this has nothing to do with "blaming the nearest man." This has to do with stopping the blame altogether and just owning up to our own responsibilities in this "civilized" world. In the ancient jungles before homo sapiens, I might agree with many of your points, but the fact is that we live in a conscious, thinking, civilized world now, and holding these kind of extreme, fascist views only leads to violence, hate, and pain. Why live that way when we have a choice? You (Bob and others) need to be comfortable with your masculinity before you can ever be comfortable with the world's femininity.
Note to aeropepe:
Real men will never be "comfortable" with your femininity. Manginas are not welcome among real men. Time to confront the feminist misandry you have been taught. Until you can do that, your femininity will continue to discomfort you as well.
Note to aeropepe: Get back to us when those crude 19th century devices and total lack of legal "choice" are sufficient for the females you defend and empower. We'll be waiting. But we don't expect you to begin to question your anti-men hate for another 20 years.
When a "man" rapes a total stranger, he has acted selfishly and more like an animal than a human. The victim suffers more than "hurt feelings". Your attitude is the REAL hate.
Note to anonymous: What injury other than hurt feelings did the "victim" suffer, counting the orgasm, etc.? Broken bones? Empty purse? Physical injury? Usually not any of those. According to the counselor's manual at Rape Crisis Centers she often has to be convinced that the hot orgasms don't offset the "crime" she suffered by not being in control. Other than foaming hysterical misandry, its not much of a crime.
Probably not a good idea to go around grabbing human beings and doing things to them -- even if you feel like it. You know -- respect the humanity of a woman.
Note to anonymous: Only when women respect the humanity of men instead of promoting the worst kind of misandrist hate that they and their media lackys can spew.
I cannot wait till aeropepe gets a cunt pregnant and she takes his ass to the cleaners for 20 years. He will change his mangina tune then. And I will be glad. The ignorant pathetic little weak man.
Hi,
It is really scary what is happening to our female youth.
The "humanity" of men? Men who lack self-control? Who hurt people?
Post a Comment
<< Home