The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Friday, April 06, 2007

How many children will DIE?

UPDATE 4-8-07
Even while Bob was writing this article the blue gun thugs in Alvarado, Texas were chasing another child to death. Alexxus Riza was a passenger in a SUV when the murderous blue gun thug Dub Gillum and the rest of a murderous mob in blue monkey suits chose a violent end to her life. Not surprising. Violent death by car chase is one of the most popular ways that blue gun thugs murder innocent people, including children. Stoked up on illegal steroids, pumped with adrenaline, a chase is every blue pig's dream. One in every 25 chases ends in death. One in 5 ends in serious injury. Almost all results in property damage. The blue gun thugs love them. They get to destroy, maim, and kill people.

How many children will die. How many deaths will it take till we learn that too many people have died.


How many children will die before the public says that's enough? How many men and children will be murdered by the blue gun thugs? Every day good men are beaten to death, shot, or chased to death. And often its children who are dying with the blue gun thug at their backs. This week another story, another family ripped apart, another teenager dead in the streets, and more teens hurt and suffering.

The blue gun thugs are out every night looking for victims, someone to rob, someone to chase, someone to beat up, someone to destroy, someone to kill. Last night it was three innocent teenagers who were chased down and injured or killed.

A 1960s song once asked, How many deaths will it take till we learn, that too many people have died? The answer is blowin' in the wind.


Blogger Craig said...

I am offended on Bob Dylan's behalf that you would be so presumptuous as to call on his work to help you make your point. The songwriter Bob was against almost every value that the blogger Bob espouses on this site. Though, as you obviously have realized, the right of free speech creates no obligation in bloggers like yourself to respect the values and intentions of those that you would lean upon.

April 07, 2007 8:27 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to craig: Bob Dylan's work in the 1960s and 1970s was strongly opposed to government tyranny and police state domination of a free people. He supported freedom and opposed hate, all values that Bob advocates.

If you are trying to say that Bob Dylans body of works would ever advocate the murder of men, women, and children on our streets by blue gun thugs, you are sadly mistaken.

April 08, 2007 7:36 AM  
Blogger Craig said...

I wonder how many murders, assaults, rapes, and other crimes the police have stopped in the history of this country.

What is it that you are against Bob? Are you against tyranny? If so, there are much bigger fish to fry, for instance, the current presidential/political regime that ultimately controls policy over law enforcement in this country. Are you against murder? If so, major conglomerates put out cigarettes and other drugs/chemicals that kill way more people in a year than do the police. Are you against people in uniform? If so, why don't you ever criticize the military that currently is illegally occupying another independent country and forcing us to live in fear by increasing tensions between our beloved country and "terrorists"?

Some of your arguments have a solid base, and the police should not be allowed to break the law any more than you or I, but your premises are flawed. You don't know for what you argue, and in trying to maintain your points, you subvert any meaningful opportunity that you might otherwise have had to make a difference.

Would you rather live in a world with order and a few flawed men and women, or in a world with no order where there can be no recourse against those that would transgress against you and your family?

April 08, 2007 9:52 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to craig:
Ben Franklin said, "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."

I seriously doubt if the number of peole saved by the blue gun thugs comes anywhere close to the number of men who's lives have been destroyed by them. Millions of men are even now rotting in hell hole prisons. In some US cities there are now MORE men who have spent time in the hellholes than than those who have been allowed to live free, Cleveland, for example. Police state oppression, control, and domination protects nobody. It only takes away our ability to protect ourselves, and turns millions of good men into "criminals." And every day the gangs of crimnal thugs in blue monkey suits assault, rob, and murder men, women, and even children.

You are far more likely to have a blue goon come to your door and take your children, destroy your life, or stop and rob you on your travels than you are to suffer from any other terrorists. They are the ones you should fear.

How many deaths will it take till they learn that too many people have died?

April 08, 2007 11:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


I agree with Craig.

Not for one second do I believe the majority of American police are murderous "thugs". They do a great job defending our safety, promoting law and order. Personally I have never had a bad experience with a cop.

You think "Blue Goons" will come to every man's door? And arrest, beat, jail Husband/Father for minor, or imaginary, offenses? (Like the "tyranny" of making a kid do homework? giving a moderate spanking after fair warning to a rambunctous kid?)

Come on!

Cops arrest men for no reason? Then why hasn't the Reverend Fred Phelps had HIS kids taken away long ago? And Phelps locked in jail?

Now there's a REAL macho tyrant. Rev. Phelps bragged of being a wife-puncher. His kids testify he severely beat them in fits in rage.

If ever the cops had a REAL reason to arrest a "family man", they sure could have done it with Phelps.

Never happened.

April 08, 2007 4:25 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous; (April 08, 2007 4:25 PM) The violent blue thugs cause far more murder and mayhem than they prevent. Many examples have been cited in The World According to Bob such as James Chasse Jr. who was beaten to death for taking a leak. here

San Diego Chargers linebacker Steve Foley was chased down and shot. here

Thurston County Sheriff Gary Edwards focused on and attack US soldiers. here

Mr. Otto Zehm was beaten to death for "looking suspicious" while buying a soda. here

These are but a very few examples of the kind of vicious brutal violence that goes on day after day in every city and town in America. Whatever YOUR problem with Reverend Fred Phelps might have been the freedom of a free people ought not be subjugated by roving gangs of blue goons robbing, beating, and murdering hard working Americans by night and day.

April 08, 2007 5:29 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous; (April 08, 2007 4:25 PM)
I looked up Reverend Fred Phelps. He's the guy who's web site says "God hates fags."

Its good to know where you are coming from. You want the police state to protect fags while destroying freedom of speech by destroying men who speak their minds. You want Reverend Phelps arrested and destoryed because he speaks his truth.

April 08, 2007 5:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Would you rather live in a world with order and a few flawed men and women, or in a world with no order where there can be no recourse against those that would transgress against you and your family?"

I would rather live in the latter (anarchic civilization) where I could atleast aquire rather young wives and control them.


April 09, 2007 8:59 AM  
Blogger Craig said...


Fair enough. At least you are up front about your intentions. However, in an anarchic society, someone who disagreed with your misogynistic worldview would, I am sure, happily excuse you to the afterlife, particularly if the young woman you tried to control were his sister or daughter. The police in our ordered society offer YOU a level of protection by helping ensure that there are consequences should such a man impose his will on you. The police protect your right to espouse your values just as much as they help to protect my right to espouse my values. It sounds to me like your concern is not with the police, per se, but with a society, such as the USA, that would assert a set of social values on all citizens. These values are (in theory) determined in an ordered fashion through elected representatives. If you want the rules or the social values changed, you are wasting your time ragging on the police. You should be getting involved in the process of change through activism and by making sure your vote gets counted.

To both Bob and MikeeUSA: You are blaming the messenger here. You have a right to hold your own values, but the police are responsible to the society's better interests, not to your personal interests. Don't hate the playa, hate the game! It is a minimally developed sense of morality that would lead one to blame those whose job is simply to enforce the rules that society at large has created. Guess what: Change the laws and I bet the police would enforce them in turn.

April 09, 2007 11:43 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to craig: Your repetiton of the usual blue gun thug propaganda lies doesn't work here. The blue gun thugs exist to dominate and control the population. They DO NOT protect anyone. Your claim of "responsible to the society's better interests" is utter rubbish. Feminist domination, and political tyranny are the antithisis of the best interest of society.

Ben Franklin said, "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." Americans didn't have blue gun thug gangs for a century after Ben and his friends created what once was a free country where free men proteted themselves.

April 09, 2007 4:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1783 - new nation -- America.

Was it really a free country? For whom?

April 09, 2007 6:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Riza was observed driving in an erratic fashion long before police pursuit began, maybe using the vehicle to act out a tantrum. Her driving caught the attention of fellow motorists. They called her in. Any parent worth their salt would avoid having their child involved in a high speed chase, PIT manuever, tire shoot-out, or tasing. Why not stop the car and remove Alexxus from the melee altogether? Is there an immigration issue here?

April 10, 2007 5:56 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (April 10, 2007 5:56 PM)
Let me get this straight. Are you are saying that next time I drive erratically, the blue gun thugs should come along, beat me up, destroy my car, and kill my child?

Somehow I thought that killing my child would be reserved for the most serious crimes like overtime parking or an armed insurrection. I suspect that many parents are going to think that destroying my vehicle and killing my child is a little severe of a penalty for erratic driving. Its nice to know how you blue gun thugs think though. No child is safe when you are "protecting" us from our own erratic driving.

I'm really glad that my child wasn't selected to be killed by the blue gun thugs. Maybe my erratic driving wasn't reported at the time. Sheeeesh! My sons dodged a bullet.

April 10, 2007 7:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, just not willing to let the woman off the hook for her part in her daughter's death.

Riza crashed her car and the child got thrown from the vehicle. Riza was already endangering her child by driving recklessly. Why? Who knows. Is being a bad driver enough to merit a chase by police? Probably not. The point: She could've stopped, moved away from the vehicle in order to draw police attention away from the vehicle and the child. She might have counted on female legal priviledge in the end.

April 10, 2007 8:13 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (April 10, 2007 8:13 PM)

I understand your position, but the fact remains that no matter how "erratic" others may have described her driving, she had not damaged property, nor killed anyone when the blue gun thugs chose to chase her down, destroy her SUV, and kill her child.

How many children have to die before people figure out that killing men, women, and children does not "protect" any of them.

April 10, 2007 9:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

America is a POLICE STATE. If you are inprisoned in it (just living in it is prison, and the prisons of stone and concrete are hell itself) you must act always as America (the woman's country) demands that you act. If you do not you are liable to be executed.

We have to bury what this country has become under the earth.


Death To women's Rights.

April 11, 2007 10:55 AM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...


I've heard a lot of MRA's have banned you from their blogs. Too bad,their loss. You,Bob and myself are the militancy that they want to believe doesn't exist and yet we are the ones that will get somewhere and get things done.

To Craig,

You need to take your boyfriend's dick out of your mouth because it is really hard to understand you.

April 18, 2007 5:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have a son who is a teen, and he was chased,beat up,tazered three times and shot at by the police. My son is an A student and has many awards by the community as well as awards from the sheriffs department. An innocent kid who is afraid of the police, a church going kid who has many friends and is always helping others even he has his last dollar he will give it to some one who needs it more than him. The police officers think they are above the law because they have a badge. They almost killed my son, because he fled from them for fear of them. Our children are not safe anymore. there are other choices police can make.

April 18, 2008 1:46 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

anonymous said, "there are other choices police can make"

No, there really isn't any other choice that a violent gang of killer thugs can make. Killing and violence is who they are. The tiger can not change his stripes.

The people who must make other choices are the voters, the good citizens, who allow these violent gangs to operate in their neighborhoods. They are not there to “protect” you as the lies they tell. They are there to destroy you and me. We don’t want them, we don’t need, them, and our families would be a lot better off if they were all rounded up and impaled by angry mobs of decent citizens.

April 18, 2008 6:45 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home