The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Gun Thug Torture

UPDATE 11-30-07

The Utah blue gun thugs determined that Trooper Jon Gardner was "justified" when he Tasered an unarmed man in the back twice for refusing to sign a fraudulent speeding extortion notice. Read Story For his violent assault on an unarmed man, Blue Gun Thug Gardner has been rewarded with several weeks of additional paid vacation time. If anyone meets any of the Utah State Gun Thugs, or knows where they live, please give them Bob's disregards for their obscene evil. The whole state would drive a lot safer if they were rounded up and impaled and left to rot in front of the Mormon Tabernacle.

Here is a video of blue gun thugs in action. Maybe a Taser isn't so bad after all.

Shot in the head

Blue gun thugs all across America and other western countries are using Taser devices to subdue and kill people every day. In Vancouver, Canada, they are having protests because several men have been assassinated by blue gun thugs with Taser weapons in the past two weeks. But how deadly are these Taser weapons? According to a recently released United Nations report:

A United Nations committee said Friday that use of Taser weapons can be a form of torture, in violation of the U.N. Convention Against Torture

In Vancouver a man is Tasered to death at the airport, and the next day in another man is killed for “acting erratic” in a store. On a Utah highway a blue gun thug high on steroids Tasers a passive man for “speeding.” In city after city the violence of blue gun thugs goes on and on.

We don’t need them, we don’t want them, and we would all be tortured less often if they were all caught and hung.

Read News Report here


Anonymous buttercup said...

I've never been tortured by the police. No one in my family has been tortured by the police. Is it possible for us to get tortured less often than never?

Bob, where the heck do you hang out that you have all these problems with the po po? In an earlier post you mentioned the cops pulling their guns out on you. Wow! You are endlessly fascinating!

November 25, 2007 6:04 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

No, of course not, buttercup, the blue gun thugs do not torture females.

But men are randomly selected for violence even when some female doesn't ask blue gun thugs to select a particular man.

Mr. Jared was a mild manner every American man driving his family down the road when he was arrested and tortured by the blue gun thugs. A man who only spoke Russian tried for 12 hours to find his relative at the Vancouver airport but nobody could speak Russian and he couldn't speak English. Instead of finding a translator the Airport thugs attacked and Tasered him to death.

It's not who you hang out with, it's a random selection that could happen to any man. Even for criminals, the blue gun thugs should not be judge, jurry, and executioner, killing some man for "acting eratic" in a store.

But don't worry buttercup. The feminazi Gestapo won't attack a female except rarely -- like the dead female they strangled in the airport in Phoenix.

November 25, 2007 6:34 PM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

Why wouldn't I worry about that Bob? I have quite a few fella's in my life that I wouldn't want to be tasered to death.

You see, I care about my male loved ones just as much as my female loved ones.

November 25, 2007 7:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, you might want to Google search "Pistol-Packing Positivists: Our Enemy in Blue"

It's right up your alley. It's from

This is a short cut to the article with 58 comments and counting all pretty much fed up with the men in blue:

Uzem & Luzem

November 26, 2007 12:07 AM  
Blogger MikeeUSA said...

Check it out, ChrisKey, is a true supporter of women's rights (and he has also removed my posting privleges from his forum, labeling me a troll... should I take action against his forum for this banning?):

What are your thoughts?:,2904.msg15243/topicseen.html#msg15243

I think it's more because most MRAs are for equality and are opposed to Men ruling over females.

ChrisKey Says:
MRA's are unsupportive of your ideological stance because it is impractical and draconic.

The application of your ideological stance would cause a large amount of societal problems that could endanger the species' survival. Under your system it would be legal for men to rape adolescent females, and, legally bind the girls into marrying the deviants who raped them. The relationship between the adolescent females and their rapist husbands would be as loveless as the situation between an obnoxious employer who works his/her employees into the ground.

Your system would lead to children being raised under a loveless atmosphere, and as a result, there's a good chance they'll end up being as unemotional and cruel as the Muslim savages. The boys will become lazy like the Muslim-savages. It would lead to Humanity reverting its civilisations to a state of primitiveness. Hypothetically, it could lead to the species' extinction, as it will inhibit Humans' ability to defend themselves from disease, and it will most definitely halt any NASA's progress in the field of defending the Earth against Near Earth Objects (NEO).

The Muslim-savages oppress their women and they live a primitive lifestyle. Therefore, what makes you think your "world" would be any better than theirs?


Now my response, if I could post it (maybe you could) would be:
Other then them attacking us, I have no problem with the muslims. If I had to choose between destroying sweeden and destroying saudi arabia I would destroy sweeden: both the people of sweeden and saudi arabia dislike americans as a rule, but the people of saudi arabia are less pro-women's rights then the people of sweeden.

To say that muslims have loveless marraiges is a lie and is projection of your worthless english culture onto other cultures which are superior to your own (yes, muslims culture is superior to your english culture; yes your pro-women's rights culture is THAT worthless). It's funny and retarded that you assert that if anyone was similar to what you believe the muslims are like that they would breed themselves out of existance: It is europe, england, and anyone who is sufficently pro-women's rights that have the rapidly falling birthrates and will cease to exist soon... not muslims or anyone else who is atleast a bit against women's rights (and the muslims really aren't that anti-women's rights... the Bible surpasses them by far on that count).

As for love. Every marraige between equals is a loveless marraige. For women love is submission to a husband/"bad"boyfriend/master/boss/etc. A marraige where the man is the power is full of happiness for the man. Arranged marrariages have worked well for thousands of years, new equality based marraiges continually have fallen apart for about 100 years. The marraige of a girl to the Man that raped her as deuternonmy demands would be more tranquil then the equality based marraiges that you wish to continue to foist upon all men: in the Bible's version of marraige in this case the girl would know who the power in the marriage is from the get go.

ChrisKey: you are a supporter of women's rights and basically just want more of the same for Men, you just want to tone the hate down slightly so that women's rights can continue to survive rather then being destroyed completely as it will be if it continues full steam ahead (if God wills it to be destroyed). You have even supported elf princess in her attempt to have me arrested via use of the FBI (and have allowed her to stay on your board while partially banning me).

Chris: you offer nothing that college aged Men want. You only offer more of the same. We want what is most advantageous to us and that is not women having rights.

I'd call you a facilitator of our enemies. That's just my opinion, no need to throw your polite phrases at me and your english 'reasonableness'.

As for Men being savages... Yes that would be fine with me. I would like Men to do as they wish rather then obeying the law (which is made for women, not Men). The fact that you're repelled at the thought of violent Men shows that... maybe you're... a bit of a fag? The 'respectable' Limey often comes off that way :) .

November 26, 2007 4:22 AM  
Blogger mike savell said...

I read somewhere on the links that
women were buying these tasers at tupperware parties and if so I think you are going to have problems,doesn't happen so much here in the UK but it probably will.I have read before that someone with dodgy heart fibrillation can easily die with a very small dose.
Buttercup should note that,in the UK these weapons were meant for crowd control at football games
and the wrong person can be hit.

November 26, 2007 6:29 AM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

Hi Mike,

I've seen that before. I also saw the tasering of that college guy trying to speak, and I don't think it's right.

I don't think the cops that have happy trigger fingers are motivated to shoot people in the name of women's rights. I think that the men who choose a career in law enforcement either crave military strictness or are colossal assholes hungry for power. Women have nothing to do with it. Women get attacked as well. A couple of months ago there was a story on the news here about a woman who peed in the back of a police cruiser, and the officers beat the crap out of her.

If you want to start picking out who gets crapped on more by the police, why don't you focus more on black men who get treated badly on a regular basis? Why do we have to single out anyone, and just say that unwarranted police violence against ANYONE is wrong?

I do think that the LAWS are biased toward women when it comes to domestic violence and children's custody cases. But the cops can't change the laws, they can only enforce them.

November 26, 2007 2:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

MikeeUSA you're the funniest damn guy I know, where the hell is your website, is it still up or what? Did it change?

God this is so funny, anyways I luV u all and let's rape the women of this world for our pleasures!

November 26, 2007 3:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I think that the men who choose a career in law enforcement either crave military strictness or are colossal assholes hungry for power."


"hungry for power"

Unless they're in a rich district. Around here cops get 100k a year. I haven't had problems with them (knock on wood). Fortune seekers apply for the job here too. In poor districts it's probably only power hungry people.

November 26, 2007 4:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If hitting a female will force her to obey her husband then that is what should be done.

November 26, 2007 8:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"If hitting a female will force her to obey her husband then that is what should be done."

Anon, have YOU ever hit your wife?

A "marriage" based on fear is no different than thugs kidnapping a victim, throwing her into the trunk of a car, and taking her to some remote slave-labor camp where she is beaten into submission.

If you're so angry and miserable you feel you have to HIT people to force obedience to your whims, then you're not human.

November 27, 2007 3:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Pussy me at the library, I wanna fight you like a man. Come on, your a real man right? I wanna cave your fucking skull in.

November 27, 2007 6:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who is pussy boy? What is the library? Skulls? Who are you talking to anon?

November 27, 2007 8:23 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (November 27, 2007 6:03 PM)
Thank you for the demonstration of a typical blue gun thug mind. Some readers watching the video of a blue gun thug shooting a chained man in the head may not have understood that it is typical of blue gun thug assasinations.

Your demonstration of blue gun thug thinking makes it all clear.

November 28, 2007 7:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have personally encountered the police in a variety of contexts. As far as I'm concerned they are the REAL terrorists in the so-called "War on Terror". I DO view government as essentially a mature terrorist group. Nonetheless they are simply hired muscle and maybe 2% tops have it in them to actually pull the trigger. As Machiavelli has correctly stated, mercenaries do not adequately serve the real defence interests of the principality that hired them. The biggest reason, of course, is that they are NOT willing to put their lives on the line to save those in danger. They ARE afraid to die or lose their jobs. Hemingway also aptly described the FBI as "draft dodgers chasing draft dodgers".
Their real job is to oppress the lower classes. And in a feminised society men ARE lower class.

January 05, 2008 5:04 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home