The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Thursday, December 27, 2007

No Cunts for President

Pakistan voters won't have no stinking cunt for their next President. This morning a suicide bomber killed former President Ms. Benazier Bhutto at a speech. Since Ms. Bhutto's return to Pakistan there have been several assassination attempts by Islamics who won't be governed by a female. With all the political events ongoing in Pakistan we can't yet know who is actually responsible. Pakistan still has provinces where terrorists like Bin Laden can hide out among supporters, and former Afghanistan Talinban find refuge. Pakistan was created when England divided their former India colony. They split the country into predominantly Hindu India and predominantly Islamic Pakistan.

Ms. Bhutto had previously been President of Pakistan some years ago but was run out of office for extreme corruption. Her shoe bill alone forced a budget deficit. She recently returned to Pakistan after several years exile amid very deadly suicide bombings. She was held in house arrest by the government for her own protection, but that limit on her movements was lifted. Today she and numerous supporters died in an attack which included shooting and a bomb by a suicidal assassin. While she had numerous supporters, many MEN in Pakistan won't have a female President. Over here we still have Senatrix Hitllary.

47 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder if this is God's will. Did He lift His hand and allow this to happen? Has He started to hear the desperate prayers of men around the world and thus dullened the senses of the protectors of women who seek power over men.

(I must note that I am a Christian).
I am sad for the supporters who died and were hurt but not for the woman who sought power.

December 27, 2007 9:50 AM  
Blogger darksidzz said...

Bob, I heard about this on the radio today. You've gotta admitt one thing, the men in that region are mostly jerks and stupid shits with no real understanding of anything. Centuries of pathetic worship and ideals make them the worst plight on humanity ever, next to that this women wasn't very bad.

I'd have preferred her being a governing power there instead of what they have to look forward to now :P ur crazy if you think that's good, this is totally a disaster for that area.

I do however support your ideas in regards to how this country needs to head :S~

December 27, 2007 2:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I'd have preferred her being a governing power there instead of what they have to look forward to now :P ur crazy if you think that's good, this is totally a disaster for that area."

Musharaff is a pretty good leader. Why would you want him or his friends to be traded for a woman? You know that the Bible demands that women not have power over Men, the terrorist here did the right thing in making sure that didn't happen (even if they are of another religion).

December 27, 2007 3:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, it's so much better for Pakistanis to have a psychotic military dictator rather than risk a democratically-elected female as head of state. Rights and order are nothing compared to the risk of a female as president. Musharrif is better than a woman, surely. Riots, suspension of human rights, chaos in the streets, all nothing compared to the horror of the possibility of a woman being democratically elected in a repressive state. Yep.

December 27, 2007 3:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Get used to it. USA could possibly have a woman President.

btw Bob, when did you starting writing this Blog?

I've noticed your name on many other discussion forums, going way back. You have certainly spouted your frustration but so far, have done NOTHING concrete to rearrange the world the way you'd like it to be.

December 27, 2007 4:11 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Anonymous asked, "when did you starting writing this Blog?

Bob's answer: All of the previous posts of The World According to Bob are available on the left margin, arranged by month.

Anonymous said, "have done NOTHING concrete to rearrange the world the way you'd like it to be."

Bob’s response: On the contrary. A man even speaking out against the feminist hate machine was virtually unthinkable for several decades. During the past several years Bob has educated thousands of young active men. Education and ideas, the truth of feminist oppression, are more powerful than the best swordsman. That is why the femiNazi are to afraid of The World According to Bob. The Men’s Movement is making huge and rapid inroads into the conscious of American MEN. The tide is moving more rapidly than the femiNazi would have thought possible. It scares them.

December 27, 2007 5:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have to laugh at Bob's obsession with women's alleged shoe-buying. Guess Bob has a foot fetish. Don't know where he read that Bhutto spent inordinately on shoes? But it wouldn't make sense since Muslims don't need to focus attention on their feet since they are swathed in medieval robes.

December 27, 2007 5:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The assassination of Bhutto was political. Gender had little to do with it.

Had she been male, same thing would have happened. In that part of the globe, violent males are the norm. When they want to change political leaders, they just shoot you. That's all they understand.

December 27, 2007 5:17 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous. (December 27, 2007 5:13 PM)
Ms. Benazier Bhutto was educated in London, where she undoubtedly learned more than literature. Islamic females don’t get to wear their stuff in public often, but they are as obsessed about fine gowns and clothing as any females anywhere, according to published reports. Arab harems often were bedecked in fine cloths and jewels. The shoe reference was an assumption that, being female, she would have behaved similar to Imelda Marcos of the Philippines. After the Marcos family fled, Imelda was found to own 1060 pairs of shoes.

December 27, 2007 6:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If this had nothing to do with "gender" then the other opposition leaders would be dead. They are not. They attacked this woman multiple times. They, God bless them, do not want Men to be ruled by a woman.

--MikeeUSA--

PS: It was bhutto and her people's party that was causing the rukus in pakistan, not so much Musharref.

December 27, 2007 7:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Benazir Bhutto was educated at Harvard and Oxford. And was the preferred Candidate of the US. In other words she would promote Feminism in Central Asia. Which is a bastion of Male Domination. This was one of the reason that the Islamic Fundamentalists dispised and hated her. And why she had to go. She said she was their worst nightmare.

Her personal ambitions and personal corruption had her removed from office twice. She was however a very good politician and got back into Pakistan. Who needs a moderate but Strong Male Leader to deal with the Islamic Radicals.

Khankrumthebulgar

December 28, 2007 4:36 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Ms. Benazir Bhutto was the darling of western media and feminazi infiltration. Despite her personal ambitions and personal corruption she was a force for feminization of Islam just as Indira Gandhi had feminized the government of India and destroyed so many million families there.

Bob does not sympathize with the Islamic terrorists who attack NYC and other places, however it is obviously a boon to all men everywhere when a feminist scum is removed from the public sphere. A female does not belong in public office.

December 28, 2007 10:49 AM  
Blogger darksidzz said...

Bob calm down, don't you know anything about Yin/Yang? There has to be some balance and because of her death that area of the country will be all men that want death / power. Without a little femaninism there can be no peace there. You really outta know that by now :S

December 28, 2007 2:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Men's Rights Activists (the people who are pro-women's vote, pro-marital rape laws, pro-women being able to divorce husbands, pro-women gaining custody of children 'sometimes') are now claiming that we (me, bob, masc man) do not exist and are infact "feminist strawmen used to discredit our movement". They also threaten a defamination lawsuit against us for being "feminists trying to discredit the men's movement".

http://www.the-niceguy.com/forum//index.php?showtopic=32708
(Scroll down a few posts).

For their proof they show some email sent to an email address that is _not_ mine from robin steel. This email address was apparently registered and used by "MySpaceMen'sMovement" to impersonate me and pertend to be me to robin steele:


========================================================
MySpace Mens Movement
post Today, 08:44 AM
Post #3


Yeoman


Group: Rookie
Posts: 14
Joined: 20-April 07
Member No.: 3,311




Back when I played that prank on Robin Steele, in which I half-heartedly attempted to join the "sisterhood", for a period of a couple of days, I received a few messages sent by Robin to her sisters.

Have a look at this one:

QUOTE
==============================
To: mikeeusa@myway.com
Subject: Faggot POS? Mikee tone it down already! (sist.list 2.4)
From: "Robin" robinsteele@myway.com Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:27:39 -0500 (EST)

Mikeeusa: the Masculist Man comment rant is really really funny shit. you had us crying laughing so hard i almost peed myself. But like we said before you got to tone it down. This was a bit extreme: Faggot pieces of shit is what you Yohan and Feminist_Scum are. KellyMac get's the title too.

What good is it if everybody blocks mikee? its a waste. And stop saying you're not MRA (for the 15th time!) or we'll have somebody else take over mikee.

The Bob Allen character could use some serious livening up. those last posts were some boring shit. have him mix it up with steele again. The cop shit's played out.

I'm not saying it wasn't funny, it was. If any of you missed it, here are some highlights. Stay Strong! Robin

Who's doing antimis next week?
==============================

Read carefully:

QUOTE
==============================
What good is it if everybody blocks mikee? its a waste. And stop saying you're not MRA (for the 15th time!) or we'll have somebody else take over mikee.


The above excerpt appears to suggest that MikeeUSA is a fictional creation by members of the sisterhood, that exists to give the men's movement a bad reputation.
==============================

Look at this excerpt:


QUOTE
==============================
The Bob Allen character could use some serious livening up. those last posts were some boring shit. have him mix it up with steele again. The cop shit's played out.
==============================

This comment appears to allege that they also created Bob Allen for similar purposes.

Finally:


QUOTE
==============================
Who's doing antimis next week?
==============================

"antimis" can surely only mean Anti Misandry.

If the content of the email is genuine, then it means that they are creating fictional characters such as MikeeUSA in order to discredit the men's movement.
========================================================


Here is what "Muse" has to say (begging for us to be sued because Lab Milktoast Mike and Myspacemen'smovement think that we are "too extreme" to exist in reality):
========================================================
Muse

... Well fuck me sideways.. I KNEW IT! They've been attacking us with fake trolls for years after they found out that the troll-trolls weren't getting past our barriers!..... And they think they're so f'in' clever... pft... sleep.gif

As I've said once before Khan... Class action lawsuit? It'd be the first of it's kind. Class action for defamation.
========================================================



Here is what Labrotory Mike has to say:
========================================================


I knew it, I KNEW IT!

After the last encounter with Mikee I knew that someone like him could not exist in the manner he presents himself. At first I thought he was the type who wanted to come in and try to stir up a bunch of guys to his cause, but I had this feeling that someone who wrote like a 14 yo could not be 20 and hang around us for an extended period of time. And now we have proof, MikeeUSA has been a feminist strawman all along.

All the being said, the fact that we can pick off these trolls in short time is a good sign for us. They can't blame us for being misogynist because we are not mysogynist, and in fact kick out all the feminist trolls who pretend to be. Maybe we should come up with a "Do not engage" list and a list of famous trolls who parade around as fake MRAs. That way, no one can blame us for hosting them.
========================================================


So basically MySpaceMen'sMovement impostors as me to robin steele, she sends him emails, therefore I am actually a feminist somehow. Then Muse comes on and begs khan to sue us for defamination because she and the rest of the nice docile MRAs cannot FATHOM that some Men would be opposed to women's rights in it's entirety. Then Labrotory Mike wets himself in happiness at the news that me (MikeeUSA) and you (Bob and MasculinistMan) are just long time pro-women's rights sockpuppets.

December 28, 2007 4:54 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Anonymous said..."The Men's Rights Activists (the people who are pro-women's vote, pro-marital rape laws, pro-women being able to divorce husbands, pro-women gaining custody of children 'sometimes') are now claiming..."

Let's get something straight. Anyone who advocates any of that list of feminist acheivements IS NOT a Men's Rights Activist. All of that list is feminsim, feminism, and femimism. Those are feminists and feminist dupes, not Men's Rights Advocates. Anything a feminist says should be ignored if not pissed on. Whatever those feminists said after that is irrelevant to MEN. Real MEN don't care what feminists and their dupes have to say.

December 28, 2007 5:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nutty men who make men look bad:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22419664/

It's possible that two nuts taunted the tiger in the SF Zoo, setting off its deadly rampage on Christmas day.

Why do men taunt dangerous animals? Some Muslim in Afghanistan taunted the lion in the Kabul zoo some years back. The lion killed the idiot. Then that guy's brother returned to the zoo and lobbed a grenade at the lion, wounding it.

Muslim males love violence.

December 28, 2007 5:42 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
In American zoos, half the people wave, "taunt," or do stuff to attract the attention of the animal. An animal taking a nap is boring. So they all do stuf trying to get it to walk back and forth at least. Zoo managers ought to put up barriers to keep people and wild animals separated. They know that people tap on the glass in the snake cage, wave at the rhinos, and "taunt" the cats. Whatever these men did is nothing more than a hundred thousand others have done.

What is going on at the zoo, and at MSNBC, etc., is blaming the dead man for his own death. Men=bad. It never changes.

December 28, 2007 5:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Decent people leave animals alone and are content to observe them doing whatever is comfortable/natural for them. Some immature people can't resist taunting or harassing the animals. Sometimes human antics go too far and humans get what they deserve.

December 28, 2007 6:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, nobody said men are bad. Cruelty is what's bad.

December 29, 2007 3:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Muslim nut who taunted that lion in Kabul actually jumped into the lion's enclosure. Then wondered why the animal attacked.

December 29, 2007 3:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Muslim nut who taunted that lion in Kabul actually jumped into the lion's enclosure. Then wondered why the animal attacked.

December 29, 2007 3:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Question for the Christian who posted this:

(I must note that I am a Christian).
I am sad for the supporters who died and were hurt but not for the woman who sought power.

December 27, 2007 9:50 AM

* * *

How did you drift over to this Blog? And as a follower of Jesus Christ, are you comfortable with Bob's use of obscenities like Cunt?

Just curious. Thanks.

December 29, 2007 3:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Assassinations, suicide bombings, terrorism, etc. are prevalent in the Muslim world and will never stop. Recall the killing of Massoud (Northern Alliance leader) on Sept. 9, 2001. He had rightly predicted that upon his death, attacks on America would begin.

It's not because a leader is female that they are murdered. Muslims despise females in general and consider them slaves. But strangely, these most Macho of men will accept certain females, often because the latter are widows or kin to some male they esteemed. This was true in the ancient world as well.

December 29, 2007 5:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"How did you drift over to this Blog? And as a follower of Jesus Christ, are you comfortable with Bob's use of obscenities like Cunt?

Just curious. Thanks."

I like the Bible, not your churches and your worship of women. Go to hell smug piece of shit.

December 29, 2007 6:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I like the Bible, not your churches and your worship of women."

But do you love Jesus, aside from organized religion?

December 30, 2007 4:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Female leaders do not "seek power over men". They may have some degree of power, but it is checked by other branches of govt. Nowadays it's a matter of men and women sharing power, using it wisely to benefit all.

December 30, 2007 4:11 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

note to anonymous (December 30, 2007 4:03 PM)
Theology is not the topic of discussion on The World According to Bob If you want to argue about religion there are plenty of other blogs and forums for that discussion.

December 30, 2007 6:14 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous (December 30, 2007 4:11 PM)
If a female leader EVER represented the interests of men as well as females it would be a whole new day. Such has never been the case yet.

December 30, 2007 6:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"But do you love Jesus, aside from organized religion?"

I love the Bible, what is written in it, how it is opposed to women having liberty and puts them completely under the control of Men.

December 31, 2007 10:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

" Female leaders do not "seek power over men". They may have some degree of power, but it is checked by other branches of govt. Nowadays it's a matter of men and women sharing power, using it wisely to benefit all."

women sharing power over men or with men is just as bad as having a monopoly of power over men. women should never have power.

December 31, 2007 11:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those without power are, by definition, slaves.

December 31, 2007 4:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Neither male nor female political leaders represent "men's interests", as defined by Bob Allen.

In other words, they'd never rescind female or Minority Civil Rights, as Bob so desperately yearns for.

Nor would they push us back to the 1800s when child marriages, slavery, spousal rape and assault, and vigilante violence were acceptable.

December 31, 2007 4:31 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (December 31, 2007 4:31 PM)
If you ever find a political candidate with a "Men's Issues" page on his or her web site, please let us know.

[Hint: Politicians represent majority voters --> females]

December 31, 2007 5:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Men's issues" are adequately addressed by the civil rights we all enjoy as Americans. Any particular inequities can be remedied without returning to the 19th century.

December 31, 2007 7:23 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: (December 31, 2007 7:23 PM)
Those old tired feminazi hate lies weren't worth crap when they were created more than a half century ago. Your hate speech demonstrates the depth of your prejudice.

December 31, 2007 7:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And as you angrily write this tiresome blog, bob, you continue to enjoy your civil rights.

December 31, 2007 8:37 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

NOte to anonymous:(December 31, 2007 8:37 PM)
The civil rights of men in the US and many countries are starkly limited compared to females' rights. Men are continually treated as 2nd class citizens under law, by every part of law.

January 01, 2008 6:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, if you and other males were truly lacking Civil Rights, you'd be in jail now for writing this Blog.

Also, you would never have been able to get a good job and/or good retirement pension that has enabled you to pursue your goals. Nor live in a nice home, drive a truck, eat well, afford good medical and dental care. And pursue your leisure hobbies.

Bob has much to be thankful for.

January 01, 2008 5:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How is Donald Trump being treated as a second class citizen?

January 01, 2008 5:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mention was made of the irrational lunacy of men in the Arab world.

Another example: there was an incident in Saudi Arabia where a school caught fire. Girls came running out. But because they hadn't had time to tie on their headscarves, they were sent back into the burning building. Many perished in the flames.

The religious men didn't care. Their only concern was their power, granted to them by their Holy Bible.

January 01, 2008 5:13 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous: [January 01, 2008 5:09 PM]
Like all cunts, you lack a basic understanding of the difference between anecdote and data.

Donald Trump is one rich man, and has enough money to buy privilege. Millions of ordinary men are not so lucky.

However, even Donald Trump no longer have an exclusive Men’s Club in NYC. Such exclusive clubs were sued out of business by aggressive feminism some years ago. Meanwhile, Senatrix Hitllary still frequents an exclusively Female Only Club in the same city. Men no longer even have the right of association with other men.

January 01, 2008 7:13 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous [January 01, 2008 5:08 PM]

There are millions of men rotting in hellhole prisons for less.

January 01, 2008 7:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Trump seems pretty happy. And you don't see Trump boo-hooing on a Blog that he's second class.

January 02, 2008 4:29 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Whether or not Mr. Trump is making the best of a sexist culture is irrlevant to the existance of systematic discrimination against men.

January 02, 2008 6:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Trump is doing far more that "making the best of anything." Since when do billionaires do that? And I doubt he feels discriminated against as a man.

January 03, 2008 3:32 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
When you get Mr. Trump to explain his views, then your comment would be relevant only as an anecdote. Until then we'll call it what it is, your completely unfounded supposition.

January 03, 2008 4:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just to clear a little bit up, Bhutto is not much for shoes. She would probably only own 10-20 pairs for special functions, though each would be worth about as much as your typical yankee McMansion. Bhutto was les extravagance, like Antoinette, and met mostly the same fate. Though, it is a good example of herd mentality of women, that she won simply because women vote for women almost unilaterally, as she had been exposed as a fraud and an embezzler the FIRST time she was in office. She is nothing but a money-grubbing socialite, she doesn't buy much but when she buys she breaks open at least three banks. As women typically do not use their own money to fund their purchasing power, they could care little for the broken men left behind such a behemoth's reign.

February 27, 2008 2:11 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home