The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Saturday, June 06, 2009

Truth Causes Problems

At radio KRXQ in Sacramento, California the afternoon talk hosts told the truth about brain damaged perverts who become eunuchs and pretend to be female. The two hosts are Arnie States and Rob Williams. On May 28, States and Williams were discussing the California Constitutional law prohibiting faggots to pretend to be married. Their conversation turned to other deranged idiots, those who pretend to be the other sex.

"If my son, God forbid, if my son put on a pair of high heels, I would probably hit him with one of my shoes. I would throw a shoe at him," States said on the air.

Williams suggested transgender people suffered from a mental disorder.

"They are freaks. They are abnormal," he said. "Not because they're girls trapped in boys bodies, but because they have a mental disorder that needs to be somehow gotten out of them."

The California pervert organizations immediately attacked them. Telling the truth to perverts is not PC in California. Pervert dominated corporations have pulled advertising from the station. Faggot loving corporations who are penalizing truth include Bank of America, Verizon Communications Inc., Nissan Motor Co. and Carl's Jr. restaurants. Bob suggests that decent people stop our patronage of these faggot supporting corporations. All it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing.

Yahoo News Story

Labels: , , , ,


Anonymous Anonymous said...


I was surprised at the various different corporations who were financially backing prop 8 in addition to the hollywood leftists which is to be expected?

What possible motivation for supporting the fags could PG&E have for example? They basically have a monopoly on the market here,
it's not like the liberals and the fags will go somewhere else to get their power?

June 06, 2009 8:49 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Economically, straight men make huge committments of time and money to support and raise a family. Fags do not bear the huge cost of providing the next generation. On average, fags have more disposable money and are a lot more able to spend extra time at work. While the straight men are taking our sons to baseball practice, the fags are climbing the corporate ladders. That translates into having a very disproportional influence on comp orations and corporate policy.

Secondly, a lot of straight liberals have bought the whole liberal guilt trip and the "fags are good" agenda.

June 06, 2009 11:05 AM  
Anonymous Bill Cruice said...

I need to take some exception to the commentary in this, because I think that while your intent is OK, I think you are operating from an incorrect understanding.

Let me explain a little, I'll give what information I can, and you can decide.
First, though, I'll state my personal position on the "gay marriage" BS. (Think I just did that...) Also, the reasons you give aren't wholly accurate of the whole gay "demographic". You can tell that just by looking at The Village People. ;-) Multiple groups, multiple motivations, etc. Not all going to want "gay Marriage" or even "Civil Unions". Add in that the ones who will truly profit are divorce lawyers and the government, as the government then gains MORE control over marriage - by DEFINING WHAT IT IS! - well, it's a Very Bad Thing.

As to the transgender/transexual part, I think you're off base there. So are the radio commentators, from the parts I read. A child who IS transgendered (used as a blanket term to cover everything from those who dress as the opposite sex for fetishistic reasons, to those who want to live as members of the opposite sex, to those who undergo massive surgeries to as closely as possible physically approximate the opposite sex) has enough problems to begin with. After all, if the body is male, and the mind wants to play with "girl things", is there not a cognitive dissonance established? If this 46(X,Y) "boy" wants to wear a dress, not for "dressup" play, or for a party, or so the girls will play with him (we'll leave aside the discussions about child abuse, the last one might even BE child abuse or a feminist "experiment" in socialized gender), well - there's a REASON. If boys are seen as nasty, or antagonistic, or cruel, maybe there's a psychological issue which, if caught early, could be corrected, and you could have a psychologically healthy Male Adult.
Sometimes, that's not possible. There are theories (somewhat borne out by research) that structures within the brain more closely mimic opposite-sex structures than the same-sex norms of these structures. I don't know, but I'd hazard a guess it would extend to the Corpus Collosum, the connection between hemispheres, and even the white vs. grey matter quotient of the brain.
Add in a distinct difference from the gay or lesbian population: they identify as MEN or WOMEN who have a sexual interest in their same-sex counterparts. Transgenders may be anywhere - auto-erotic, hetero- or homo- (although I admit to some confusion on which is which...)

Let me put two more things in here, and I'll shut up. 1, if it's wrong to abuse a child, then you cannot support these people in their words. They are advocating abuse of a child who doesn't fit in. Beethoven and Einstein didn't fit in, either. Should these, among countless others, have been beaten into submission?
2, it's impossible to argue the religious BS (and I say that as a Catholic!), so that should be argued in a theological setting, more than a sociological one. While I'm certain there are MANY, MANY people who go the Trans route and should not, there are many also who feel they have no choice. Tough love only enforces their feelings of fear, helplessness, loneliness, worthlessness, and isolation. This will then lead to suicide, simply. And whether the cause is societal, internal, psychological, or simply a defect becomes immaterial. Regardless of who caused it, the person is dead.

June 08, 2009 11:13 AM  
Anonymous Bill Cruice said...

Another thing - these PEOPLE are not PERVERTS by default. (Some may be, that's another story...) A 5-year-old doesn't know it is impossible for him to be a Mommy. It's what he wants to be when he grows up. Or, SHE wants to be a Daddy. It's not biologically possible (Mostly - fusing ova was done a while back, IIRC, allowing a lesbian couple to generate a child.) But a child still doesn't know what SEX is, he or she or even IT only knows what it wants. Then, society's forces rain down hatred, approbation, disapproval, and even outright violence on a mind that is not yet mature enough to understand what it wants, let alone the reactions it now encounters.

A LITTLE compassion for what others go through. This is akin to a black man trying to be white. It's not going to happen, no matter how much bleach Mr. Jackson uses. Doesn't mean he shouldn't be allowed to try...

You don't understand the issue of the gender-dysphoric. GOOD! You're part of the lucky majority. Enjoy your good fortune. But if you condone those who would do violence to others, you build an animosity among that group. We already have that in various sub-groups. Just because the true Transsexual is not prone to violence doesn't mean there isn't some fringe wanna-be who will refrain from violence. Think "Silence of the lambs". Dr. Lector: "Bill's problem isn't that he hates his sex, it's that he hates himself." So the man was driven to murderous rage and acts of brutality, while he thinking HE wanted be a SHE.

There's more to it than just the sexual interactions, or even the social interactions. If you have a love for women, you note their (ahem) inconsistencies, and work around them. You'll note the same inconsistencies in the Male to Female transgender, except for VERY mild cases. further, you'll find the same domestic mindset; princess mindset; same daydreams, mostly, except for being the opposite sex; same preference for toys, clothing, etc.

I'm sure it's frightening for those who are "normal" to deal with it. It is frightening for those who MUST deal with it from the INSIDE even more. Advocating abuse of the children who are so afflicted is NOT "Truth", it's abuse. Same as beating a man to death for being gay is murder, or stoning a woman for showing her leg above the knee. It is a remnant of an ancient time (possibly better in some ways, but the nature of what COULD cause these problems is beyond the scope here), and treating anyone like an animal, unless they truly deserve it - E.G., murderers and rapists who have earned such treatment - does not improve society, improve yourself, or improve the lot of those in question.
It also does not change these individuals, it merely forces conformity, which could later become resentment, hatred, and open (potentially armed or murderous) rebellion. This is a VERY BAD THING.

June 08, 2009 11:15 AM  
Anonymous Bill Cruice said...

Do some research. Only takes a few minutes. Look at other cultures, such as Thailand, that allow a more fluid sexual situation. I believe that there is no issue with those who become "new women" there, at least not of this sort of social stigma. (Still on the outside edges of society, as they are often forced into sex trade to survive, though one at least made it as a Thai boxer...) But they are not looked down on as being inadequate as human beings, even though I don't believe they can marry. But they DO look passable, some look better than 46(X,X) genetic women.

In any event, these individuals aren't hurting our society overall - they want to disappear, be a "normal woman" or "normal man", with all that that entails. They want the same inalienable rights (Marriage isn't listed, BTW.), and the same right to live. They also expect to be treated the same in cases of crime, or medical need, as anyone else. Not left to bleed out because they're wearing the wrong underwear, or thrown into a men's prison after 20 years of hormone replacement, with a fully female body - set to be raped repeatedly by men...

This instance was a case of inappropriately placed feelings. It's all emotion. Fear, mostly. Fear their son is "gay". Well, as noted above, define "Gay" when one wants to be the opposite sex. If one is born male, 46(X,Y), so there are no genetic abnormalities like Kleinfelter's syndrome, then transitions to approximate a woman, including the full operation, are they then HETERO when dating a woman, and HOMO when dating a man? Or do they BECOME Hetero when dating a MAN, now that they are "female"? (In quotes, since it's still not a genetic restructuring.) Hey, if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck... Is it a woman? Or a man? Ask a stone Butch Dyke if she's a man, see what happens. :-) Could be painful. But she might LOOK more masculine than you do!

Just a mile of thoughts...

(BTW, it's similarly true in reverse, IE, Female to Male, they're just less common from my understanding.)


"I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand." -Confucius
"When you read a classic you do not see in the book more than you did before. You see more in you than there was before." Clifton Fadiman
"Maybe this world is another planet's Hell." - Aldous Huxley

"What you think is what you will become." - Earl Nightingale, from "Think and Grow Rich"

June 08, 2009 11:16 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Bill:
Bob has extensive personal experience with psychosexual perverts who become eunuchs, take hormones and pretend to be the other sex. Most are still straight men who pretend to be lesbian. Bob has even known a "counselor" who ran a psychological "help" counseling business in Chicago and encouraged people with sexual dysfunction toward serious problems.

The shrink business is of no help. They do not try to cure anyone with mental problems. They have a scam that aims at continuing the fees for "sessions."

Someone needs to tell these people with sexual questions to shape up and act like normal people. Encouraging their problems only makes it worse, and ruins their lives.

June 08, 2009 12:25 PM  
Blogger AzraeL said...

LOL, Bob!
Love the comment on the shrinks, that's very true - they cure the patient, they lose the revenue stream.

However, as to ruining lives - that's why the transition process exists, to try to stop those who really SHOULD NOT be the opposite sex. There are lots of failures, generally those who gamed the system, and then found out it wasn't what they wanted.

I think the point here is that the radio show was advocating violence against a small minority, most if not all of whom would prefer to NOT be in that minority. Costs are over $100,000, and often more, and that's just to be "close", it still doesn't change the problems of infertility (can't be a mom), or the psychological issues that arise from the transition. In other words, the judgement on the airwaves was, "shut up, freak, and toe the line." Tough love works soemtimes; not here. As children, these individuals learn to hide who they are. Is this better for them? I don't think it will be.

Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
and by opposing end them?
Hamlet (III, i)

While I can see a reason to fight with those who would rebuild society as an androgynous realm, or those who want socialized sex-changes, I see no reason to further persecute those who are constantly divorced from the world based on the physical body they were "assigned" at birth. And this leaves out the intersexed, and Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, too - people who are neither male nor female, and are "determined" based on how long their apparent p*nis is at birth.

A little bit of understanding and acceptance may feel painful, but will help those who ARE in need, even if it's only a shoulder to cry on. Hostility may be met with hostility in response. If the individual in question is not trying to subvert the government, recruit children for pedophilic relationships, or rape society's coffers for funds, then - why go out of your way to create pain and anger?

OTOH, if the above criteria is NOT met - they are engaging in evil activities - then, all bets are off, as it's not the sexuality that is the cause, but the evil, which must be rooted out of society like any other cancer.

July 16, 2009 9:01 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Azrael:
People are not "assigned" a sex at birth. They are born one sex or the other except a very few with physical deformities. There are no "intersexed" except in the psychobabble world of nutters.

Instead of promoting and encouraging those with mental problems, society should help them to accept who they are. Pretending that they are "really a woman," or "really a man" makes them into a freak and leads to a lifetime of heartache. Better to face reality and get on with their life.

July 16, 2009 10:25 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home