The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Monday, November 15, 2010

Don't Touch My Junk!

Have you tried to travel anywhere lately? The Transportation Security Agency (TSA) makes and views “Nude” photos of all airline passengers. They also sexually assault many passengers by fondling your sexual organs and private parts.

Mr. John Tyner refused their assault and recorded the assault today on video. One on video, one man standing up for his rights, our of a million Americans assaulted. If you did that to anyone you would be thrown in jail for 20 years. AOL Report Mr. Tyner told the TSA criminals, "If you touch my junk, I'll have you arrested."

We have a fundamental law that prohibits government search without criminal process, its called the “4th Amendment of our Constitution, part of our CITIZEN'S Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was created to LIMIT the government.

Many Americans feel that we can no longer travel until and unless government sexual assaults are discontinued. The TSA agents should be sent to prisons, or hanged. The PEOPLE have rights. We must stand up for our rights. We must stop allowing the government to search everyone for no reason.

Half of the US Congress was just fired for not listening to the people. If TSA, Obama, and the Congress are still not listening, we need to get rid of the rest.

Here is how Thomas Jefferson taught us to protect ourselves from our government:

"God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. ...

And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."

Here is what you can do today. Phone an airline, any airline that flies in the US. Call and tell them that you are not going to fly until rights of the people are restored at airports. Call your Congressman and tell his clerk the same thing. Tell your Congressman that if the government doesn't listen, we will fire another bunch of them. And send a message to Obama. We The People have rights even if Obama doesn't understand that the Constitution limits his power.

Labels: , , , , , ,

18 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.americablog.com/2010/11/female-traveler-claims-tsa-sexually.html

November 16, 2010 10:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.feministpeacenetwork.org/2010/11/15/does-tsa-think-tampons-are-a-security-risk/

I guess the women don't like having their junk touched either. Not a men's rights issue then, but a citizen's rights issue.

November 16, 2010 10:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.optoutday.com/

November 16, 2010 11:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why is this labeled misandry? The screenings and pat-downs are for both sexes, and women have to put up with having their breasts handled as well. I don't see any misandry in this story.

November 17, 2010 11:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah! Why aren't the feminists screaming at the tops of their lungs over this issue, anyway? The answer, of course, is that they are congenital cowards. They'll bite the hand that feeds them but lick the boots that kick them. Utterly contemptible.

November 21, 2010 1:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why should the feminists be screaming? Under the TSA policy men and women are treated the same. Women aren't being singled out for either more or less extensive screening, therefore it's not a feminist issue. Nor is it a Men's Rights issue because the ladies aren't being given a free pass.

Who should be screaming is anyone, male or female, who doesn't like a choice between being groped or irradiated. It's not a gender-based complaint.

November 21, 2010 3:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The screenings and pat-downs are for both sexes,"

But not for politicians. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/19/no-security-pat-downs-for-boehner/?nl=us&emc=politicsemailema1

"...a law enforcement official said that any member of Congress or administration official with a security detail is allowed to bypass security."

And I heard on the news Friday that airline pilots are also resisting the screenings and pat-downs. Some animals are more equal than others I guess.

November 21, 2010 3:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And another inspiring headline: http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2010/11/20/tsa-pat-down-leaves-bladder-cancer-survivor-covered-in-urine/

"A retired special ed teacher, a bladder cancer survivor, who wears a urostomy bag, was utterly humiliated and broke down in tears, because he ended up soaked in his own urine after suffering through a traumatic TSA pat-down."

Everybody angry enough yet?

November 21, 2010 3:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://consumerist.com/2010/11/cancer-survivor-flight-attendant-forced-to-show-prosthetic-breast-during-tsa-pat-down.html

November 23, 2010 10:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

On the PBS News Hour last night there was a discussion between a spokesman for the TSA and the head of a consumer rights group, I think it was flyersrights.com or .org, but I'm not sure. Anyway the TSA guy admitted that the screening equipment they're using will not detect explosives concealed in a body cavity. Neither will the pat-downs. But they're going to keep on doing it.

November 23, 2010 1:43 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

None of the news media will ever talk about glaring violation of the US Constitution, 4th Amendment, by the Obama regime's TSA. They won't even talk about Obama being responsible for the criminals at TSA. PBS is a socialist organization working to promote government control and subjugation of the people who's ancestors were once free men.

November 23, 2010 2:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Could you address the marraige age for girls.

November 24, 2010 11:04 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

"Could you address the marraige age for girls"

First we need some Definitions:

"Girl" --> A human female between infancy and puberty.

"Woman" --> A human female after puberty.

"marriage" --> the biological union that creates children and makes a family.

Throughout the middle ages Canon Law prohibited marriage of girls below age 7. That is really too young. Girls should not marry. Human females need to be past puberty and have become young women before marriage. Young women are biologically and emotionally ready to marry and begin their families. The first years after puberty is the age that human females began breeding for all of human history prior to feminism. Even today, despite huge social problems, stopping young women from breeding takes very strong controls, causes fights, and often requires abortions. It just doesn't work. They should be married and rewarded for doing what nature intended at that age.

November 24, 2010 2:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you had to choose a country to live in and your choices were: Countries that do not allow men to marry females under the age of 18. Countries that allow men to marry females of almost any age (Example: Islamic countries (down to 8)).

Which would you choose? Those actually are the choices today, it's either the western way or the islamic way.

November 25, 2010 12:02 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"government control and subjugation of the people who's [sic] ancestors were once free men."

My ancestors were Black and they weren't free men.

November 26, 2010 12:40 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

African races have a very long history of slavery. During the middle ages an estimate one million white Europeans were captured by black African slave raiders and sold into Africa's slave markets. It was common to have people taking up collections in front of churches hopting to be able to buy back a relative. Timbucktu was once a very prosperous city, and a center of slave trading across the Sahara. Several African nations still have slaves in rural areas.

In the US, there were an estimated ten thousand black slave owners by the middle 19th century before slavery was banned in the US.

Few black people in the US today know if their own ancestors were slaves or slave owners.

November 26, 2010 12:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now that we are on the subject of race relations. I was wondering if any black readers are offended by the term "Black Friday", which is used to describe the day after Thanksgiving.

November 26, 2010 1:14 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
Good question about "Black Friday."

The term does not refer to race relations. It refers to a longstanding practice of accountants for using red ink when the profit/loss balance was negative, "in the red." They used black ink when the company was making a profit, "in the black."

The term "Black Friday" comes from a myth that many businesses lose money most of the year but make up for it with big sales totals before Christmas. Company balance sheets supposedly change from red to black on "black Friday."

Still, its a good question about black racism. There is so much black racism and so little knowledge these days that there may be a lot of black racists who are offended by the term, or use it as another excuse to promote anti-white racism.

November 26, 2010 1:26 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home