Another False Rape Fabrication
In West Haven, CT, a female ran screaming to a blue gun thug crying "rape" because she didn't want to pay her cab fare according to a local news story. The blue gun thug saw a chance to destroy the life of another MAN, and arrested the cab driver without bothering to investigate the female lies. Honest MEN know that females lie all the time, lie more than they tell the truth, and in fact no longer even know the difference. A "truth" to a feminist is whatever she "feels" should be true. Blue gun thugs lie all the time too, and have proven that fact to the satisfaction of the US Supreme Court numerous times. So they accept the lying feminist as "true" or as true as a blue gun thug's lies, and took the opportunity to brutalize another honest hard working MAN.
"The reason she ran off was she didn’t want to pay the cab fare," police spokesman Officer Angelo Moscato said. "But on the other side, here’s an officer and you see someone running, screaming. … We have to act quickly, because (what if) we have someone who is a predator out there?" [For more on the usual gun thug lie, "have to" see Had To is the Biggest Lie on Bobstruth]
There were several predators out there, the blue gun thugs and the evil bitch who cried RAPE! to avoid paying her cab fare. Unfortunately for MEN, the blue gun thugs are not concerned with arresting an evil predator, they only are looking for excuses to destroy MEN. The evil predatory false rape bitch was believed immediately and the man's life destroyed. Even after charges were later dropped he had already suffered far more than the evil bitch claimed to have suffered if the charges had been true. A brutal arrest, days and night in cages, being shackled and handcuffed and deprived of even the most basic human dignity are far more devstating than an attepted rape. His reputation was severly damaged among his family and friends, and now he has a "police rcord" which may be used against him in the future. Even if the story was true, and it immediately should have been suspected since probably less than 8% of rape accusations have a scrap of truth in them, there was no immediate reason to arrest the MAN before a thorough investigation had been conducted. The blue gun thugs acted with intolerable knee jerk, head jerk, total jerk thug mentality and immediately rushed to deliberatly hurt the accused, the real victim, as much as they could.
Yes, they eventually dropped the charges, but huge damage had already been done. The female false accuser should have to serve the twenty year prison sentence he would have served if her accusations were true. The knee jerk misandrist bigots in blue suits ought to be summarily fired for their incompetence and excessive brutality. The county persecutor ought to be sentenced to a year in prison for filing the false charges without being damn sure they were true. Everyone involved except the victim, Mr. Otunba-Payne, should have to pay personal damage settlements to him of many thousand dollars out of their own pockets, not at taxpayer expense. The blue gun thugs, persecutors, jailers, everyone who deliberately hurt him out of misandrist bigotry without doing a decent investigation into the bitch's false rape accusation first needs to pay a personal fine to compensate him for his suffering because of their individual and collective misdeeds.
As it stands, the evil lying bitch still hasn't even paid her cab fare. She has been rewarded for her crime. They won't even publish her name under so-called "rape shield" laws, so she is excused from public shame which she richly deserves.
They do publish the name of the MAN who was falsly arrested. Misandrist hate rules the news business. Lies that defame a MAN always make their news. The New Haven Register is misandrist filth.
Lesson: Whenever you hear a lying scumbag like police spokesman Officer Angelo Moscato you know that evil misandry is afoot, and decent men are at risk.
"The reason she ran off was she didn’t want to pay the cab fare," police spokesman Officer Angelo Moscato said. "But on the other side, here’s an officer and you see someone running, screaming. … We have to act quickly, because (what if) we have someone who is a predator out there?" [For more on the usual gun thug lie, "have to" see Had To is the Biggest Lie on Bobstruth]
There were several predators out there, the blue gun thugs and the evil bitch who cried RAPE! to avoid paying her cab fare. Unfortunately for MEN, the blue gun thugs are not concerned with arresting an evil predator, they only are looking for excuses to destroy MEN. The evil predatory false rape bitch was believed immediately and the man's life destroyed. Even after charges were later dropped he had already suffered far more than the evil bitch claimed to have suffered if the charges had been true. A brutal arrest, days and night in cages, being shackled and handcuffed and deprived of even the most basic human dignity are far more devstating than an attepted rape. His reputation was severly damaged among his family and friends, and now he has a "police rcord" which may be used against him in the future. Even if the story was true, and it immediately should have been suspected since probably less than 8% of rape accusations have a scrap of truth in them, there was no immediate reason to arrest the MAN before a thorough investigation had been conducted. The blue gun thugs acted with intolerable knee jerk, head jerk, total jerk thug mentality and immediately rushed to deliberatly hurt the accused, the real victim, as much as they could.
Yes, they eventually dropped the charges, but huge damage had already been done. The female false accuser should have to serve the twenty year prison sentence he would have served if her accusations were true. The knee jerk misandrist bigots in blue suits ought to be summarily fired for their incompetence and excessive brutality. The county persecutor ought to be sentenced to a year in prison for filing the false charges without being damn sure they were true. Everyone involved except the victim, Mr. Otunba-Payne, should have to pay personal damage settlements to him of many thousand dollars out of their own pockets, not at taxpayer expense. The blue gun thugs, persecutors, jailers, everyone who deliberately hurt him out of misandrist bigotry without doing a decent investigation into the bitch's false rape accusation first needs to pay a personal fine to compensate him for his suffering because of their individual and collective misdeeds.
As it stands, the evil lying bitch still hasn't even paid her cab fare. She has been rewarded for her crime. They won't even publish her name under so-called "rape shield" laws, so she is excused from public shame which she richly deserves.
They do publish the name of the MAN who was falsly arrested. Misandrist hate rules the news business. Lies that defame a MAN always make their news. The New Haven Register is misandrist filth.
Lesson: Whenever you hear a lying scumbag like police spokesman Officer Angelo Moscato you know that evil misandry is afoot, and decent men are at risk.
posted by Bob | Thursday, May 25, 2006
28 Comments:
Bob,
This is an awesome rant.
You're really good.
I learn a lot from you.
Bernir Brauer, Vancouver, BC
She's 15-years-old. What is she doing riding around alone in a cab with a curling iron? Guess the permissive parents won't be handing out any punishments either. Poor man should seek recourse with the brat's parent(s).
Note to Anonymous: (May 25, 2006 9:14 PM)
Good point. They won't tell us who she is because of "rape shield" laws that protect lying false rape accusers, but it's a safe bet that it's "parent," not "parents." A young lady with a father's love and guidance would not be in that situation. She's the product of single momism, a lying irrational, mean, self centered whore. Like mother, like daughter. Fair law would give her the punishment that the MAN she falsly accused would have received.
Bob said...
Anonymous, when a female refuses sex with a man, she's telling him that she has no respect for him as a man. She receives what she does to others. Of course he won't respect her.
April 18, 2006 5:48 PM
* * *
Therefore: The young girl who had sex was doing the right thing, in Bob Allen's opinion.
Note to anonymous: (May 26, 2006 2:02 PM )
For most of human history young women were seriously thinking of starting their marriage and family during their middle teen years, and that's very old compared to any other mammillian species. But, there was nothing in this story about a young female doing sex. She LIED and accused the hard working MAN cab driver of attempted rape, but it was a LIE. There was no sex involved, like the large majority of "rape" accusations.
Absolutely agree, Bob...this permissive behavior is typical of the single parent (matriarchal)household.
Charles Whitman, Ted Bundy, Adolf Hitler, John Fedders, Charles Starkweather -- all grew up with strong male role models (either fathers or stepfathers).
Note to anonymous (May 26, 2006 7:31 PM)
Your argument makes at several errors. First, you don't know the difference between anecdote and data. There are good people and bad people who come from all kinds of backgrounds. You can always find 1, 2, or a handful from any particular background. But 1 or 2 examples is not data, it's just an anecdote and irrelevant to a conclusion. To raise a valid argument you need data. You need to show that more people from traditional homes went bad, and the reverse is true. There is a mountain of studies that show that more kids from traditional homes succeed, and more kids from mother headed homes fail in life. Your anecdotes, even if true, are false arguments typical of feminist crap.
Second, you equate stepfathers with real fathers. NOBODY protects a child like his or her real FATHER. You argue from the place of anti-father misandry. You are a sexist bigot.
Third, you make wild unsupported assertions that the fathers (or stepfathers) provided "strong male role models." That kind of wild claim is also typical of feminist crap. You have no evidence showing that the fathers (or stepfathers) of the men you mentioned were strong rather than weak, nor that they provided role models.
Fourth, you make the misandrist feminazi claim that a "male role model" has some validity. It's a feminazi myth that anyone other than a real FATHER is relevant in the lives of children. Your misandrist feminazi bigotry is becoming seriously offensive. Pound sand.
Ted Bundy? Ted Bundy was illegitimate. Mr. Bundy was bio father to Ted's half siblings, but Ted was conceived before his mother even met Ted's step-dad. Ted was emotionally-detached from his step-father and it was said he always resented his mother for his illegitimacy.
Back to the point of the post...any girl raised with a loving bio father is more likely to be raised appropriately than one who is raised in a situation without a biological father. Girls in close relationships with their fathers are less likely to become desperate attention-seeking tramps. Fathers can provide a strong moral compass and daughters will be loathe to disappoint their fathers in a way they would not be with their mothers. Fathers are -and should be- the first men that girls learn to trust and love.
No woman can fill the role of father.
with or without a father, the law should protect men from woman who consciously and deliberatly accuse innocent ppl, destroying a mans life is no joke, what about his wife and kids, what would have happened to them, does anybody care ?!! i guess not.
if a rape victim have the right for justice, a false accusation victim does to.
Feminists have engaged in a deliberate disinformation campaign. Their Media Allies assist them in their fraud. Example Charlize Theron in the Movie Monster. The truth is far different. Aileen Wurnos own Mother stated she was violent and dangerous and wanted her out of her house. She is according to the Pathologist responsible for torturing her Male Victims.
This fact was left out of her Shit movie. But Hollyweird gave her an Academy Award for portraying a violent Serial Killer of Men. Screw the Bastards in Hollywood.
Khankrumthebulgar
Wournos has been executed and is no longer here to harm you.
Be happy.
Bob, don't worry about bitches who lie. All liars will have their place in the lake of fire. That should comfort you:
Revelation 21:8
"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death."
Men rape women, because men lack self-control.
Note to anonymous: (May 31, 2006 6:10 PM)
ROFLMAO!!! Just keep spewing your rape-hate lies. It makes our day.
And sometimes anon (May 31, 6:10 p.m.), women who continually obsess and carp about the topic of rape and men lacking self-control, are women who secretly harbor fantasies of rape and a loss of control.
Reply to anonymous: (May 31, 2006 11:03 PM)
You are right. Most females fanaticize about rape a lot. It's the most common theme in female erotic fiction. And, rape is about the MAN being in control of sex, not losing control. Real rape is sex when the MAN decides and the woman loses her control over men. Most women want men to be strong and in control which is why rape is such a powerful fantasy for females. That bimbo who repeated the feminazi lie about the man not being in control is just nuts. See Bobstruth: Has ANY female EVER been hurt by rape?
A man's fantasy is that women fantasize about rape - a violent act where women are hurt.
Men rape women because they (1) hate women and (2) they lack self-control. (same as kids taking candy)
Note to anonymous: (June 01, 2006 4:11 PM)
Repeat that feminazi rape-hate propaganda as often as you like, it will never make it true.
1. WOMEN fanaticize about rape, not men. Rape is the most popular theme in women's fiction. So-called "bodice ripper" books sell millions of copies every month. In contrast, most men rarely if ever fanaticize about rape.
2. In the small percentage of alledged rapes that have some factual basis rape is done because men have biological drives for sex to impregnate women. A man who is raping is in control of her as well as of himself. All your femorrhoid nonsense about "lack control" is feminazi hate propaganda. It is you and other lying feminazi who hate, and you hate men. Your hate has noting to do with real rape.
Women who deny that women have rape fantasies, are women who feel shame for having those fantasies. Those disquieting feelings are diametrically opposed with the politically-correct feminist rhetoric they embrace, so they deny its very existence. In fact, I'd bet that the more feminist a woman is, the more she fantasizes about rape because she's so tired of being "in control". It's a secret, guilty pleasure for a feminist. All one has to do is go back to literature and the feminist writings and surveys of the 1970's to understand and accept it is a universal truth.
Why are there laws against rape?
Bob makes it sound like a REAL man (in total control of himself), has a perfect right to go out and rape any woman.
And if a man has a desire to impregnate a stranger, does he have a corresponding desire to see her through the pregnancy, delivery? Then support the stranger's child for 18 yrs?
So you just pick women at random b/c you feel like impregnating her? Isn't a man's immediate orgasm (i.e., his candy), far more important?
Note to anonymous: (June 02, 2006 4:15 PM)
Your typical feminist inability to read and comprehend is again demonstrated. Bob said nothing at all about "rights." You are either to stupid to understand what you read or so stupid that you think you can insert that lie without it being noticed. When God was handing out brains you thought he said "trains" and you weren't going anywhere.
The biological desire for sex comes from evolutionary success. Those who breed were our ancestors, those who didn't breed were not. Male biological breeding behavior is increased in evolutionary terms for males (of all species) that impregnate more females. The chance of survival of a random unsupported child is not great, but it is higher than zero. Even a 1% increase in breeding success will eventually become dominant. A good book on the subject is "A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion" by Thornhill and Palmer. The concept of "rights" is irrelevant in biology and evolution. Biology and evolution are about sex and breeding, not about the "rights" of individuals.
Rape is about the man being in control of sex. The female's feelings get hurt when she loses her control. Boo Hoo.
Lying about rape, on the other hand, is about the female trying to take control of men without sex, trying to hurt and destroy men. It's about hate, not about sex.
If a man is a criminal he should be destroyed.
Note to anonymous: (June 03, 2006 4:22 PM)
Your call to destroy men is about as misandrist as any hate message that has been posted. On Bobstruth we object to hate, especially misandry. Shame on you and the sow you rode in on.
Why are there laws against rape?
An interesting foot note to this discussion is what Tammy Bruce has to say about Rape. The former NOW President of the Los Angeles Chapter of NOW. She maintains that the Group Consciousness Meetings are in truth Group Man Hating Meetings. That Feminists who have been abused refuse to get help and emotionally heal from their wounds. Instead they prefer to wallow in their Victimhood. And hate All Men for the actions of a very few Men.
Khankrumthebulgar
If I were that taxi driver I would hunt that bitch down and do what she had falsely accused me of. And I wouldn't let her go until she'd paid the cab fare (plus interest).
What she did was wrong and she should be punished for it. I feel sorry for the cab driver in question. But you can't say all women are liars because some are. I know some men who are liars but I am perceptive enough to realise that not all men are the same.
Post a Comment
<< Home