BC for MEN. A good sign.
When Viagra was accidentally discovered (without any research investment) the huge immediate market among MEN totally surprised pharmaceutical companies. They had forgotten that MEN even exist. They had ignored MEN for decades, but suddenly the pharmaceutical companies were making big bucks selling a product to MEN. Since Viagra I have noticed that several companies are marketing other products for MEN. For example there are obnoxious ads for some pills for MEN which claim to reduce having to pee too often. The TV ads are obnoxious, and I've not been aware that having to pee is a problem for very many MEN, but the good news is that MEN have been noticed by pharmaceutical companies.
So now at least one is working on BC for MEN. Read story For fifty years we have been told the LIE that BC for MEN wouldn't work, and is more difficult than female BC because MEN are less complicated. A little research shows that the LIE is not only wrong, but is backwards. Simple male reproductive systems are easier, not impossible, to develop BC for. We have been LIED TO and ignored for fifty years. The term "reproductive rights" has only meant "women's rights." Cowshit!
There is still a lot of resistance in some pharmaceutical companies. For example, it has been observed that Nifedipine, a common high blood pressure drug, sometimes causes male infertility as a side effect. The effect was noticed when couples sought treatment at fertility clinics. But the companies that produce Nifedipine haven't done any clinical trials to determine effective dosage as a contraceptive for MEN. They apparently don't believe that the market for a contraceptive for MEN will be offset by the cost of publicizing an unwelcome side effect of their blood pressure product. Story here. The lesson of another blood pressure product, Viagra's runaway market success, apparently has been lost of some companies who would rather support feminazi domination than provide for the needs of MEN.
It has been a pervasive double edged LIE. MEN are told that BC is only available for women because it's not possible to make one for MEN. COWSHIT! Men are told that women have to have "A women's right to choose" abortions, but MEN have sufficient equivalent choice when deciding to do sex. COWSHIT! Men are told that we should rely on the BC being used by our partners because females don't lie about important decisions such as pregnancy and the creation of our child, COWSHIT! When taken together, all their LIES amount to a declaration that only females have rights, only females matter. COWSHIT! When some bimbo or mangina tells you any of those LIES, confront her LIES with the truth, its COWSHIT!
But the signs are good. MEN have been rediscovered by some companies who are now marketing a few products for MEN. At least one is even doing research on BC for men. Keep up the good work guys! We do exist, we deserve equal BC products and we deserve equal control over our fatherly reproductive rights.
14 Comments:
Dear Bob
Great but, remember the golden rule: they are totally sneaky bastards. BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE!
These are NOT the right goods.
These are the sneaky castration-style goods that some American feminist cow said she wanted to inflict on all unemployed men, by force, at an east-coast conference five years ago.
The male contraceptive pill, which is reversible at will by the man involved, was invented and proved safe 20 years ago, but has NOT been sold because...
Wel, google on these leads and you'll see what I have. They don't want us to breed - because the world is overpopulated. You know that and you know they are trying to stop us. And you can prove it's true... because you have just done so with your post...
Note to anonymous:
Its not that they are so opposed to breeding, its more that they want females to control all breeding. It is true that the BC method under test is only a small step better than vasectomy, however it is a sign that the medical industrial complex has some small recognition that men are a potential market for new products. Viagra (etc), the TV ads for urination problems, and now this. Its only a small improvement, but its a leap from where we men were a decade ago.
If it doesn't hurt men and it helps eliminate abortion, then fantastic.
The key is to increase the choices and freedoms available to men (male BC), while reducing women's (eliminating abortion). Abortion is women's rights, which should be reason enough for all men to oppose it.
- Pete
"Abortion is women's rights, which should be reason enough for all men to oppose it."
Good sentence! Thgis pill will indeed change who get to control the reproductive game and if there is opposition, this is why. Here is what I forsee: Women will start complaining about this pill for some reason and lawmakers will seek to outlaw it. This is the way it goes in America. You'll notice the illegalized Internet gambling, which men do, but not the zillions of porn sites women are marketing to (let's admit it) teens.
What is "women's rights"? It's controlling sex - how much (and when) to give or withhold it.
When enough men use male BC on a wide enough scale, it puts men in control of the reproductive game. And when that happens, "women's rights" is going to take a hit.
Men must not be fooled by "women's rights." It was never meant for men. It was in fact meant to act against men - to destroy man's liberties, to take away his natural role as leader over women, and to insult his masculine dignity.
Technology is always a good thing when it serves to eliminate "women's rights" - or at the very least, make it completely powerless to have any effect whatsoever on men's liberties and authority over women.
Human rights is a more accurate term, feminism being a part of human rights.
Men can have their dignity and their civil rights, without robbing women of theirs. To think otherwise is to be a selfish tyrant.
Note to Anonymous (November 02, 2006 1:38 PM)
Feminism is to "human rights" in the same way that the German National Socialist Party supported human rights. Men under feminism have civil rights in the same way that Jews gained civil rights under German National Socialism or a black man gains civil rights at a KKK lynching. Nazis, KKKs, and Feminazis all claim to be protecting civil rights of all. They are what they do, not what they say.
"Human rights is a more accurate term, feminism being a part of human rights."
Notice how this female tries to replace "women's rights" with the term "human rights."
She uses the term "human rights" to imply that men's rights and women's rights are one and inseparable - IOW, women's rights is necessary in order for men to be free and have rights.
Total BULLSHIT.
I have yet to hear a convincing argument that I would be robbed of my liberties if "women's rights" were removed from society. Or that men would be robbed of their natural role as leaders over women and society if "women's rights" were removed.
OTOH, it's easy to imagine the opposite scenario: men would be free individuals, able to lead and control women's behavior in a situation where "women's rights" was non-existent.
The fact is, "women's rights" has no value or usefulness whatsoever in men's lives.
Look at all the laws today that protect women at men's expense; that allow women to get away with selfish, tawdry behavior. All the laws that either send men to prison or force men to perpetual financial servitude to the state, all because of the whim of a
selfish, stupid woman.
Abortion rights. Domestic violence laws. Sexual harassment laws. Alimony/no fault divorce/child support laws. Marital rape laws. - ALL "women's rights."
And they're all laws created specifically to aid and benefit women - by granting them the power to cause harm to men.
Moreover, none of these laws that aid women take into consideration men at all. They were never meant to aid or benefit men whatsoever.
"Women's rights" has nothing to do with how women should behave. It has everything to do with expanding women's freedoms and choices, regardless of men, regardless of the consequences, regardless of whether women behave rightly or wrongly.
By taking away a man's ability to regulate women's behavior, "women's rights" enslaves men. Men are robbed of their freedoms, their livelihood, their ability to raise stable families, and their dignity as men in a society that recognizes "women's rights." No, bitch: Men can NOT have their dignity and their civil rights as long as "women rights" exists.
How many of you men know of other men who have been destroyed or humiliated by pro-female laws, laws that regard YOU men as the enemy to be either shot, imprisoned, or enslaved? Maybe you are one of such men yourself?
It is time for men to wake up and finally see "women's rights" for what it is: a destroyer of men. And when men are destroyed, so also are societies and civilizations.
Note to Anonymous: (November 07, 2006 11:37 PM)
You are right on. Under feminism, only females are "human." Therefore in feminist logic and world vies, female rights => human rights. Under feminism, men are sub-human animals, not human, who's lack of rights is irrelevant to human rights. A feminist "family" is "a mother and her child." It's all sexist cowshit, but that's how they think.
Note to all:
International Marc Lepine Day is less than a month away. Its time to start puting up the decorations.
Hi, I do believe this is a great web site. I stumbledupon it
;) I may come back once again since i have saved as a favorite it.
Money and freedom is the best way to change,
may you be rich and continue to help other people.
my homepage: グッチ 財布 メンズ コピー
Green group have already complained that Mr Crosby's links
to david cameron the group. And we will continue to
raise our concerns at every opportunity, making it highly unlikely.
my blog: david cameron a arrogant
I know this web page provides quality based posts and additional information, is there any other web site which presents
these kinds of stuff in quality?
Also visit my web-site - montaz klimatyzacji warszawa
Post a Comment
<< Home