The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Friday, April 04, 2008

Teaching Hate, Smut and Violence

Fathers who send their daughters off to college may think they are helping their daughters to learn literature, mathematics, philosophy, or art. But at many colleges she is being taught hate and violence against men. She is being taught whoring and smut. One glaring example of the filth passing for education came to light recently at Colorado College in Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.

Headed by the worst kind of misandrist filth, President Richard F. Celeste, Colorado College makes no bones about teaching young females feminism, gender confusion, whoring, perversion, and extreme violence against men. Where most colleges call their anti-men hate department by some euphemism like “Women's Studies,” Colorado College honestly calls their hate and confusion department, Feminism and Gender Studies. In this month's issue of the Feminism and Gender Confusion Department's news letter (The Monthly Rag) they advocate extreme sexual violence, “castration of men.” If extreme sexual violence is not enough to teach our daughters this month, they are promoting their invited guest whore and advocate of sexual urination, Annie Sprinkle, as their special guest speaker. Ms. Piss On Men (Sprinkle) will teach your daughters “My Life as a Feminist Porn Artist.” Some fathers may want their daughter to learn art at college, perhaps take up painting or sculpture and become an artist. But, I don't think that “Porn Artist” is what fathers have in mind for our daughters. Public urination porn may be called “education” at Colorado College, but Bob, for one, finds it to be the worst kind of filth. Public urinaton porn should never be disguised as education and taught at a college.

President Richard F. Celeste and his staff at Colorado College are working hard to destroy our society and culture by teaching hate, violence, filth, and whoring to young women. But what about young men. We see this week that two men at Colorado College protested the extreme violence against men being taught by printing a few copies of a parody newsletter satirizing the violence and smut. The parody included a quotation on manliness by former US President Teddy Roosevelt. It included helpful hints on the manly skil of using a chain saw. Evil misandrist hate monger College President Richard Celeste and his hate staff labeled the parody “violence” and slapped the young men with a disciplinary action. In the violent twisted hate filled mind of President Celeste, the most extreme sexual violence against men is just another fun filled educational day on campus, but a young man's objection to it is “violence.” If any of you readers want to explain the reality of violence and hate on campus to a twisted violent freak, his e-mail address is above.

The young man who wrote and published the parody in protest against the college hate and violence training was student Chris Robinson. He is a hero among men. He stood up and risked years of his education by objecting to the anti-men hate and violence. For his courage in the face of violent hate against men Mr. Chris Robinson is awarded the coveted Golden Bull Award.

Golden Bull Award

Mr. Chris Robinson

For Courage and Manly Action


Mr. Robinson and one other man who has remained anonymous were almost alone when they had the courage to protest, but their courage has brought the light of truth to Colorado College from many places. News media across America have picked up the story, and the free speech lieyers at The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) have brought a team of very experienced lieyers to their aid. In previous lawsuits by FIRE several Universities have had to pay big cash, appologize to the students, change their policies, and fire their Presidents. May the evil hate monger misandrists at Colorado College be so lucky.

To any students of Colorado College who may read The World According to Bob you need to resign in protest and transfer your education to another college or just abandon the feminazi colleges entirely. Neither a man nor woman can get any decent education at a hate and violence training academy. To any parents who might be paying to send your son or daughter to Colorado College. Ask yourself if hate, erotic urination, and porn art is what you want to be paying for. Then stop paying for it. Let Smutmaster Celeste know why

Colorado College is not alone in their promotion of extreme hate and violence against men. More than 700 colleges and universities in the US teach much the same kind of hate and violence. Most of them hide behind euphemisms like “Women's Studies” but they teach the same kind of violence and hate against men. Some of them are beginning to reap the rewards of hate. For more reading on this topic read The Fruit of Feminism is Death.

Bob has dealt with this general topic before in similar articles.
Professing Racist Sexism
Universies are Irrelevant.

And don't forget to send violent misandrist bigot Celeste an e-mail letting him know that promoting smut, hate and violence against men is not a valid college education. You can phone his office at 719-389-6700.


UPDATE April 28, 2008
The misandrist bigots at Colorado College have denied the appeal by Mr. Chris Robinson. They refused to rescind the reprimand in his student file nor to withdraw their assigned punishment. Mr. Robinson must complete their punishment on penalty of withdrawal of graduation. The rejection of the appeal affirms their commitment to censorship of men's voices that may be raised in opposition to their virulent anti-men hate publications and teachings. Read FIRE article

Labels: , , , ,

44 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, you have nothing to worry about. You are well protected against violence against your person. Fear not friend.

April 04, 2008 11:55 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080407/ap_on_re_us/polygamist_retreat
400+ kids taken from polygamist compound

We
Need
A
Revolution.

April 07, 2008 4:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080406/NEWS/804060343/-1/NEWS01&sfad=1

We need a brutal revolution:

---------------------------------------
"Those who peer at children in public could find themselves on the wrong side of the law in Maine soon.

A bill that passed the House last month aims to strengthen the crime of visual sexual aggression against children, according to state Rep. Dawn Hill, D-York.

Her involvement started when Ogunquit Police Lt. David Alexander was called to a local beach to deal with a man who appeared to be observing children entering the community bathrooms. Because the state statute prevents arrests for visual sexual aggression of a child in a public place, Alexander said he and his fellow officer could only ask the man to move along.

"There was no violation of law that we could enforce. There was nothing we could charge him with," Alexander said.


QUOTE
Under the bill, if someone is arrested for viewing children in a public place, it would be a Class D felony if the child is between 12 to 14 years old and a Class C felony if the child is under 12, according to Alexander.

Hill said she believes the move was necessary to correct what she called a "loophole" in the state's criminal law statutes.



QUOTE
The bill recently cleared a fiscal review, done because of the state's major prison budget crunch, and Hill said it should be heading to the Senate before long.

York Police Chief Doug Bracy said the statute would represent a fairly minor change that would help keep the public safer, especially children. He noted that York police respond fairly regularly to reports of public peepers on the town's beaches.

With ever-growing concern over sexual predators, Bracy said the arrests will also allow police to check backgrounds and determine if there is a criminal history involved.


Back in the segregation era, there was a very serious crime called "eyeballing". This was when a black man dared look at a white woman. Offenders were lynched. Now we see such concepts being pushed today against the wider populace. Please note how this law is being pushed through by a female politician. So much for the idea that womyn in power means more civil rights. And as usual, the legislature and police will roll over to get this law enacted.

What gets me is how the government is enacting all sorts of laws to "protect children" when it has nothing but contempt for children/youth. Look at ritalin, youth curfews, the attack on rave culture, and so forth."

April 08, 2008 3:14 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Those who peer at children in public could find themselves on the wrong side of the law in Maine soon”.

It's pretty scary that a person may soon be charged with a felony just for looking at another person? What has this society become? Yes, three cheers for women being in power?

On the polygamist compound invasion, I had mentioned in a previous post about how our government always seems to have a legitimate reason for invading these communities? It always seems to be an anonymous tip? In this case from someone inside the compound, allegedly a 16-year-old girl that seems to be invisible? This seems highly unlikely for many reasons, a person having grown up with that lifestyle would not view it as odd or unusual and quite likely find it acceptable, also I think that someone in that position would realize, even at that the alleged “mystery girls” age what the consequences of the Fed’s action would do to their close knit little community? The lives of all of her family and friends would be unraveled! A person in such a position would far more likely run away from home than to sabotage her own community?

Just a theory I suppose. But one I have strong feeling about!

April 08, 2008 7:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"On the polygamist compound invasion, I had mentioned in a previous post about how our government always seems to have a legitimate reason for invading these communities"?

On a further note,it always seems to be an accusation of little girls being molested? This was one of the excuses for murduring the Waco Compound! The Fed's really protected those children now didn't they? Is this the best our totalitarian overlords can come up with?

April 08, 2008 8:14 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous: (April 08, 2008 7:45 AM)
In Washington State yesterday the news told of the trial of a retired Catholic Priest who was accused of speaking to a child at a bus stop while waiting for a bus. The case was dismissed, but it demonstrates the rampant misandrist hysteria of the blue gun thugs and feminazi Gestapo.

April 08, 2008 10:00 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to Anonymous (April 08, 2008 10:00 AM)
The Texas authorities seem to be continuing their war against minority religious groups. Some of the same people are involved at El Dorado who were involved in the Waco massacre. The fictitious 16yo female is a known scam and/or a known serial false accuser. The accused man who supposedly was the excuse for the assault on the Fundamentalist Mormons is living in Arizona under the supervision of a Parole Officer who had already fielded previous false accusations from (the same) 16 yo female. The Texas authorities knew or should have known that the man who was the excuse for an arrest and search was living in Arizona, not Texas, and was under close supervision of the state parole officer. The whole thing is total bogus lies. Meanwhile they are ripping hundreds of children away from loving families and sending them to suffer the abuse, drugs, and destruction of the "foster home" industry. Maybe I'll write more about it in a day or two.

April 08, 2008 10:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm in complete agreement with you on this Bob,

Even if the opponents want to argue that some of these marriages were under age marriages, these children were far better off in their traditional old world up bringing and values system then they will be in modern day America, particularly the foster system, with all the filth and pollution that our children are exposed to today!

On a historical note, there was a time in the 19th century when the Mormon Militia kept the U.S. Government from invading the Salt Lake Valley. Later in the 1890s they were forced to give up polygamy so that Utah could join the union. Knowing what they know now perhaps Utah would have remained separate? They would have retained their freedom for a little while longer anyhow? Some of the Mormon fundamentalists were wise enough to set up a compound in Mexico, a very wise move on their part considering the events of the last week!

On a side note, having at one time been a member of the mainstream Mormon Church (The ones who no longer practice polygamy) I was very surprised at how many angry, man-hating feminists that were present among their ranks, and that many of the men seemed to tolerate it and even married some of these women? A product of being too involved with mainstream society I suppose? As a result, the divorce rate has gone up in the main church! The fundamentalists are perhaps the only chance of saving Mormonism and practicing it as it was meant to be practiced in its original form, but they will not be able to do so in peace while living in the U.S.

April 08, 2008 10:55 AM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

What upset me about the original newsletter is that it clearly shows how "feminism" has been usurped by lesbians/transgenders and is almost totally focused on sex, and I'm a pretty liberal person who is all for equal rights for gays and lesbians.

I agree with you, Bob. SHOCKING! But many of the women that are involved in these programs have major biases against men. Their biased opinions become unquestioned facts that seep into mainstream culture.

The answer is not to educate our children though. It's to teach our kids to think, and not just to swallow what a teacher or preacher or politician tells them.

The satirical newsletter was pretty low key. If you had handed both documents to me, I wouldn't have been able to tell which was legitimate to tell you the truth.

April 08, 2008 2:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob:

The Pope is coming to Washington DC in a few days. Try to get an appt. to talk with him. His Holiness will do his best to stamp out human rights for women, which is in his Bible.

April 13, 2008 4:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"His Holiness will do his best to stamp out human rights for women"

roflmfao! Why should women be seen as human anyway? What's their fucking problem? They're born slaves so who gives a fuck about the lie of their "human" "rights"?!! A bloody outrage!

April 14, 2008 5:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As I was leaving for work last night my brother was watching "Hannity's America". It was about the raid on the FLDS Compound. I openly stated that the whole thing was bullshit and brother disputed this, he made some ignorant statement about there being little girls pregnant all over the place which was the first time I have ever heard this?
Interestingly, last night on the radio, I heard that the claim of the 16yo mytery girl may have been false, but despite this, the Fed's were sticking to their guns! Also, how would this one incident even if it were true, which it appears it isn't, justify the confiscation of some 500 children from the other parents???

On a slightly different subject, we had this guy out at our house over the weekend doing some work. The subject of politics came up and I determined that this guy leaned toward the conservative side. Here in Ca where I live the liberals are doing their best to outlaw homeschooling so they can cram their sick, perverted leftwing nonsense down all of our childrens throats! This came up in our conversation with this worker and this bloke made a very interesting comment? And that was that he could see why they were doing this because a lot these Muslims are homeschooling and they are training their daughters to be subservient to men and they are not getting an equal education and we will have an entire generation of women now being raised in a America where there is no room for this kind of mentality??? or some such PC nonsense to that effect?
It was a very interesting statement to say the least? I suppose my point here is what I have commented on in the past, and that is that feminist thinking is now so ingrained in Western Societies that even conservatives are now feminists!! And in many ways, your most ardent of feminists!!! There is no opposition to feminism what so ever anymore!

My prediction? A decade or so from now most women will be earning huge wages and most men will be pathetic, dickless, Mangina house husbands!!!!!

April 14, 2008 8:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The pope CANNOT ERR, when he speaks ex cathedra. If he declares all legal rights for women must be abolished, he would be speaking for God Himself. All good Catholic men would be obliged to believe such a papal bull.

You got several million Catholic men on the planet. See how easy it would be to abolish feminism -- if you could just persuade the Pope to outlaw all vestiges of women's legal equality. (Those heretics opposing the Pope would be excommunicated and doomed to Hell unless they repented).

April 14, 2008 3:22 PM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

"And that was that he could see why they were doing this because a lot these Muslims are homeschooling and they are training their daughters to be subservient to men and they are not getting an equal education and we will have an entire generation of women now being raised in a America where there is no room for this kind of mentality??? or some such PC nonsense to that effect?"

The problem with this statement is that prior to the Taliban and other extremist Muslim groups, the Middle Eastern countries had a very liberal attitude toward women.

So before you guys run out to get your own Muslim slave/woman, know that they are not all raised to be passive creatures who live to serve their men. Many of them are expected to become highly educated and get jobs as doctors, engineers, etc.

April 15, 2008 8:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The problem with this statement is that prior to the Taliban and other extremist Muslim groups, the Middle Eastern countries had a very liberal attitude toward women".

This is quite a feminist stretch as you would be indicating that these small groups have changed the thinking in the Middle East from feminist to non-feminist within a relatively short time frame?? But then, logic and feminism never have seemed to go hand in hand!!! Actually, the problem is that feminists like you are never right about your facts! The Middle East prior to the Taliban or any other radical Muslim group has never been liberal when it comes to women! Just ask your Middle Eastern sisters living in our allie country Saudi Arabia who do not drive!

Also, as far as women being doctors, engineers, ect, all that this accomplishes is a women who has become so much like a man she is no longer able to establish any relationships with them! They are not the top Doctors, engineers, ect, men are!!!! Ultimately society gained nothing by women becoming such things!

So in the end they are lonely like you and your cats!!!!

April 16, 2008 7:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds as if “Buttercup” might be in favor of this Anti-Home schooling legislation?

Home schooling provides parents with a way to raise their children outside of an environment that crams a lot of PC, feminist, pro-faggot nonsense, and a host of other sick things that liberals like her believe in which has caused the family break down and decay of all Western Civilizations! Consequently, most home schooler’s are conservatives as it is the only way they can instill their values, not hers and others like her on their children! If the Muslims were all feminists before the event of these small radical groups as she suggests they were? Well then I suppose none of them would home school and send their daughters to a public school were they would get a first class feminist indoctrination, right???

Look at this way Ms, if the tables were turned and the Right Wingers dominated the school system and ended home schooling. They would then be teaching their far right anti-feminist, anti fag, anti everything you people believe in agenda! You of course can have no problem with this as you seem to have no problem with the same being done to CA home schooler’s, so you would not have the option to home school and instill your far left values on your children and that would be fine with you of course????

April 16, 2008 10:43 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous says :
April 16, 2008 7:32 AM


" women being doctors, engineers, ect, all that this accomplishes is a women who has become so much like a man she is no longer able to establish any relationships with them! "

Not true. Most highly educated and accomplished professional women are happily married and are now grandmothers.....

Such as my doctor, surgeon, scientists and professors I've worked for, etc. Those women do not "become men"; that's silly. Obviously you think any woman except an illiterate peasant wife, is not a true woman?

It appears you are highly uncomfortable relating to people in general. That's a shame.



"They are not the top Doctors, engineers, ect, men are!!!!"

Many are top notch.

" Ultimately society gained nothing by women becoming such things!"

It gained everything good.


"So in the end they are lonely like you and your cats!!!!"

Sorry to disappoint you, but you got it wrong again. You imagine that if women are single by choice, they must be lonely?

Not so. Those who CHOOSE a single life, dedicated to their profession, their kindness to friends, family, even pets, are some of the happiest people on the planet.

Don't be bitter or jealous towards single women. If you want to FORCE all women to enter rigid marriages, and hate them when they don't, YOU have the problem. They just go on basking in the joys of their lives, while you find more excuses to hate them.

April 16, 2008 3:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

“Not true. Most highly educated and accomplished professional women are happily married and are now grandmothers”.....

Like most feminists, you are not being truthful here and you know it!!

"Those women do not "become men"; that's silly".

Put whatever feminist spin you want on it, but whatever you want to argue that they have “become” has resulted in the well over 50% divorce rate and break down of the family unit now present in modern western societies! Yes, I know what you’re going to say, but women instigate most divorces and abuse is not the typical reason!

“It appears you are highly uncomfortable relating to people in general. That's a shame”.

It appears like most feminists you decided to choose a belief system that eventually any man will tire of and leave you in the end, that’s a shame!

“Many are top notch”.

For women yes, but men blow women away in every single field there is and you and I both know it! As an example, you wrote this on software written by a man, on a computer designed by a man, and uploaded it over the Internet engineered by man! See what I mean? If all the women left the workforce tomorrow, other than the fact that there would be many vacant jobs to be filled, the workforce would carry on without a bump, and in fact run more smoothly without women there to interfere with the men who are ones doing the real work, whilst claiming sexual harassment every time a man looks at or says the wrong thing to her!

“It gained everything good”.

Oh really? Yes, you are right if consider “everything good” to be the disintegration of the family unit, sky-high crime rate, rampant drug and alcohol use, rampant teenaged pregnancies, and the list goes on and on! All known to have come about because of the break down of the Western Family! Our work force is now largely moving over seas! A lot of this has to do with the to litigation and problems caused by so many women in the work force! Thank You!

“Don't be bitter or jealous towards single women. If you want to FORCE all women to enter rigid marriages, and hate them when they don't, YOU have the problem”.

Classic feminist shaming language as there is no jealousy involved, well mostly because there is nothing to be jealous of? Actually, here is where you are quite wrong! I don’t believe in forcing anyone or the government forcing anyone to do anything they don’t want to do the way you feminists have so successfully used the government to do! If you can get there on your own, under your own power with out the government forcing me or anyone else to have to owe you an “opportunity”, well, then all the power to you sister! Now any intelligent man who wants to get married and stay married and is wanting to marry a woman who will actually care about their children more than her career and competing against men will avoid such a woman like yourself as if she were the bubonic plague, but that is another story!

Take Care,
And hopefully you will not become victim of a brutal crime or domestic violence; something else feminism has caused a rise in!

April 16, 2008 5:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"this on software written by a man, on a computer designed by a man, and uploaded it over the Internet engineered by man! "


So who was that man? Name him?


Also what do YOU (Anon) do for a living? What sterling achievements have you given the world?

April 16, 2008 6:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"So who was that man? Name him"?

I do not not have the facts right in front of me but they are facts none the less, I recently seen a special on the discovery channel (I believe it was called "Download, The true Story Of The Internet"?)on the early development of the World Wide Web and so I know who the early developers(Software and otherwise) are but not by name? So i'll let you do the work on this if you need further details.

"Also what do YOU (Anon) do for a living? What sterling achievements have you given the world"?

I don't see how this is relevant? But if you must know I am an Electrical Engineer by profession.
My argument had nothing to do with sterling achievements, as I was not indicating that every man does nothing short of greatness, but that the people who do are men! Believe it or not I did not mean this as a put down to women, as women do achieve wondeful things,(Although different than what the feminists define as wonderful?) but to illustrate that women are not or were not meant to be like men, and that feminism has done women no favors here as pushing women to be competetive with men has destroyed the harmony between male/female! The high divorce rate for example!

Nature had a different plan for women, one that I feel feminism is in stark contrast with!

April 17, 2008 7:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Computers, internet, electronics, medical advancements, etc., came about over the years through an accumulation of knowledge, skills and abilities of many people. Women and minorities (grandchildren of slaves) contributed as well. Many were brilliant but rather than getting individual credit, remained behind the scenes.

In the long run, it's not so important that *credit*, prizes, awards ceremonies, etc. be dished out. For the human race to progress, we must all encourage everyone to contribute. And those contributions come in different forms.

April 17, 2008 1:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If 50% of marriages end in divorce, then the other 50% are successful. And successful marriages are always grounded in respect. Is the glass half empty, or half full?

April 17, 2008 1:06 PM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

"This is quite a feminist stretch as you would be indicating that these small groups have changed the thinking in the Middle East from feminist to non-feminist within a relatively short time frame??"

Actually, yes. Read the history of Afganistan. Prior to the Taliban and even Communism women were doctors, teachers, etc. Also in Iran under the Shah women were educated and held jobs. In Iraq before we invaded women were engineers. Some of the people working on the "WMD's" were women. And they did a great job, didn't they? LOL

Read some books on the subject and then get back to me.

"Sounds as if “Buttercup” might be in favor of this Anti-Home schooling legislation?"

Yes, that's sound logic. Because I disagree with one thing, it must mean I disagree with all.

Not that you actually give a poot about my opinion, but I think everybody has the right to educate their children in any way they see fit. If someone wants to teach their kid to be a plumber and never teach them to read... HEY, ok by me! If someone wants to teach their kid to be a fundamentalist Muslim that hates the U.S., GO RIGHT AHEAD.

And when the children come back to the parents' as adults and ask, "Why wasn't I better prepared for the world?", I hope they are comforted by the fact that their parents' dogma was more important than the success of their child.

As an aside, I know several very successful men who were home schooled. There's definitely a right way and a wrong way to do it.

BTW, just wondering...
who is teaching at home, I wonder...

April 17, 2008 1:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Actually, yes. Read the history of Afganistan. Prior to the Taliban and even Communism women were doctors, teachers, etc. Also in Iran under the Shah women were educated and held jobs. In Iraq before we invaded women were engineers. Some of the people working on the "WMD's" were women. And they did a great job, didn't they? LOL"

OK "Buttercup" Show me your links or sources? I want to see how much of a part these female engineers took in the development of these effective WMD's?

So your argument is that because there are some women with an education in a region of the world where feminism has the least amount of foothold, well then it must be feminist???? What are you waiting for? Move there why don't you? After all, you have all those wonderful feminist Middle Eastern waiting for your arrival?

Once again you feminists have proven that logic and your religion do not mix!!!!

April 17, 2008 3:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not sure what point buttercup is trying to make here? If she's trying to argue that the Middle East and former Eastern Block countries are, or were anywhere near as feminist as the Western Countries, or that it is some sort of a "feminist playground" over there, she is just plain wrong and I know this to be fact!

Yes, as she’s indicated, some of those countries over there are more feminist than others? (Which isn't saying a whole hell of lot as far as the Middle East goes?)
And yes, as she's said, women of the type she's described do exist there as they do in every country in the world, although not on the level I think she wants to believe?

Even when these women do exist, their husbands (Assuming they can still get one) will not allow the wife’s career to come before the household! So a good deal of these women are not practicing in their chosen field of education. This is true in the former Soviet Union and this is especially true in the Middle East!

The bottom line is that the men in these countries will not tolerate feminism on anywhere near the level that Western men so foolishly did!

April 17, 2008 5:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

“If 50% of marriages end in divorce, then the other 50% are successful. And successful marriages are always grounded in respect. Is the glass half empty, or half full?”

Well actually, the 50% statistic is based on a 5 to 7 year time frame. The divorce rate in Western Countries is actually much higher than this! How many of us have known people who have been married 10, 15 or 20 plus years who divorced?

Don’t quote me on this as I have not recently investigated this? But I believe the 50% within 5 to 7year time frame failure rate has gone up since the original statistic?

April 17, 2008 6:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some of the people working on the "WMD's" were women. And they did a great job, didn't they? LOL

LOL????

Hmnn, Proud of the fact that women took a part in the WMD program are we??? The same WMD’s that Saddam Hussein used to slaughter thousands of people with, and that will likely be used against us some day on our own home land??? You see, this would be one of those facts that you would not want others to know about?
These feminist’s make more and more sense by the day?

Yeah, let’s hear it for equality for women?

You see folks; the world really would be a better place if women were in charge?????

April 17, 2008 8:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"an illiterate peasant wife,"

I want one. A really young one. I'll pet her and kiss her.

April 17, 2008 8:41 PM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

"Hmnn, Proud of the fact that women took a part in the WMD program are we??? The same WMD’s that Saddam Hussein used to slaughter thousands of people with, and that will likely be used against us some day on our own home land???"

Unfortunately, the weapons you are talking about are the ones the U.S. government gave Saddam as a present. That would be around the time Rumsfeld was shaking his hand in that famous picture. The weapons the Iraqi engineers came up with are MIA according to Bush.

But I'm sure we'll find them sooner or later. *sigh*

April 17, 2008 9:32 PM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

"I'm not sure what point buttercup is trying to make here?"

The only point I'm trying to make is that before you guys all go looking for middle eastern wives because they are submissive, make sure you're getting one that's not been brought up differently. They aren't ALL like that as the original commentor may lead some to believe.

Someone asked for a link or source:
"Reading Lolita in Tehran" is a good book about a women's reading group in Iran after the revolution. I'm sure you'll all run right out and get that one.

Actually there is a book I've just finished that is more in line with what you guys believe as far as women go, "The Bookseller of Kabul".

As far as the source for the Iraqi engineers, you got me on that one. I saw a news show about a couple of engineers that had left Iraq (this was prior to the invasion of course). I couldn't tell you the name of the show it was so long ago. Sorry.

"Once again you feminists have proven that logic and your religion do not mix!!!!"

No matter how many explanation points you add, it doesn't make the preceding sentence truer. You make up things that don't make sense and then attribute them to me. My only point, again, was that not all Middle Eastern women are brought up to be submissive. I didn't make any comparisons to Western women.

April 17, 2008 9:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

“If someone wants to teach their kid to be a fundamentalist Muslim that hates the U.S., GO RIGHT AHEAD.”

Yes, this would be wonderful!

So when you and your family\friends\children are out for a pleasant stroll one day and a WMD goes off and kills you all and everyone else in sight, well, it was all in the name of respecting someone else’s delightfully open minded culture?

Diversity, multiculturalism and zany feminists, gotta love em?

April 17, 2008 9:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

“Unfortunately, the weapons you are talking about are the ones the U.S. government gave Saddam as a present. That would be around the time Rumsfeld was shaking his hand in that famous picture. The weapons the Iraqi engineers came up with are MIA according to Bush”.

Well, how can that be as you already indicated that they were developed in large part by those talented, feminist Iraqi engineers, if they are MIA, well, then there was never any proof that they were developed? By anyone?

Ok, all of the previous aside, as a conservative who takes no pleasure in saying so, I share some of your beliefs as far as the war in Iraq goes! We were not told the truth! We will be there for many more years to come! George Bush in not who he claims to be!

April 17, 2008 10:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"No matter how many explanation points you add, it doesn't make the preceding sentence truer. You make up things that don't make sense and then attribute them to me."

This would be a classic example of the pot calling the kettle black you silly little feminist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, I am making things up ?????????????????????????????????????????????

Of course, everything you have said so far is based in sound logic???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

I love you!

You dopey little gal!

April 17, 2008 11:01 PM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

You can't have it both ways. Would you only let people home school when they agree with your personal views of the world?

BTW, if I had the choice of living my life as a slave to my husband with no say in my own life or being blown up by an WMD, I'd take the WMD, but that's just me.

April 18, 2008 5:30 AM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

"Well, how can that be as you already indicated that they were developed in large part by those talented, feminist Iraqi engineers, if they are MIA, well, then there was never any proof that they were developed?"

If I remember correctly, the engineers had actually left Iraq because they were being forced to work on the chemical weapons project. Who knows if they ever developed anything, which is why I said sarcastically, as engineers they did a great job.

As far as Mr. Punctuation goes:
a)I'm SO sad that you didn't correct me for saying "explanation point" instead of "exclamation point". Duh.

b)I'm not sure if I'm supposed to reply to your comment or hold something over your tongue so you don't swallow it.

April 18, 2008 9:50 AM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

"Also what do YOU (Anon) do for a living? What sterling achievements have you given the world"?


What have you given the world,cuntlips?

April 19, 2008 10:10 PM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

Anonymous April 17, 2008 1:02 PM,

You fucking cunt that was the lamest post I've ever read. How dare you compare your endless screeching and nagging at work (I'm guessing you do it there as well) with the men who do the REAL WORK and then you have the ordacity to demand that they share their credit with you when you are undeserving. FUCK YOU !!!

April 19, 2008 10:16 PM  
Blogger Masculist Man said...

If 50% of marriages end in divorce, then the other 50% are successful. And successful marriages are always grounded in respect. Is the glass half empty, or half full?



Are they happy marriages or are the guys so scared that they are afraid to make waves? If they do they endanger themselves by possibly angering their wives. 50% are divorce and indebted and other 50% walk on eggshells. Doesn't so great to me.

April 19, 2008 10:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Surprise, Masculist, but there are many man out there who are happy in their marriages.

April 22, 2008 11:20 AM  
Anonymous buttercup said...

Oh Anonymous..

Don't you know that if a man is happy in his marriage he's either
a) not really a "man"
or
b)married to a woman that obeys his every command and belongs to him body and soul
?????

What were you thinking, my friend? :)

April 23, 2008 11:49 AM  
Anonymous G. said...

This is amusing. You put a post on here condemning the establishment for teaching "hate, smut and violence", but there's certainly a whole lot of hate and violent rhetoric toward women being tossed about on this blog.

I'm sorry that all you guys were somehow mistreated by a woman in your life, but there's no reason to assume and promote the idea that all modern women are "feminazis".

May 03, 2008 8:52 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to G:
Feminist definition: "Hates women" --> n. 1. A man who doesn't support the feminist war on men. 2. Someone winning a debate with a feminist. 3. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. Usually used as an ad-hominem attack.. See "misogynist."

When you meet a modern female who isn't a feminazi please let us know.

May 03, 2008 10:09 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The real feminism definition taken from an online dictionary: –noun 1. the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men.
2. (sometimes initial capital letter) an organized movement for the attainment of such rights for women.
3. feminine character.


[Origin: 1890–95; < F féminisme; see feminine, -ism]

—Related forms
fem·i·nist, noun, adjective
fem·i·nis·tic, adjective

July 05, 2008 9:29 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Note to anonymous:
160 years of feminist action shout so loud we can not hear your LIES.

Lying hate bitches like you can pound sand.

July 05, 2008 9:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home