The Hate Media Reprisal
UPDATE 4-20-07
As a reprisal for the Innocent decision by the NC Attorney General, MSNBC and CBS have fired Don Imus. The anti-white/men hate media was strongly invested in crucifying "rich white men" at Duke University. Jackson, Sharpton, CBS, and NBC had all invested heavily in the hate fest in Durham. They and others were all outraged when charges against their intended (innocent) victims were dropped. In retaliation for the dropping of charges against three innocent young white men, the hate mongers in NYC attacked another white man. They went after Imus with a vengeance, and he's' been sacrificed on their altar of hate. The NC Attorney General said that many people owed the young men an apology. Instead of apologizing, the hate media turned and vented their rage on another white man. Don Imus was near at hand. He was sacrificed.
It's not about "nappy hos." Its not even about Don Imus. He's the sacrificial goat. Its about anti-white/men hate and the outrage when their intended victims got off the hook.
--------- Original Article -------------------------------
Don Imus' criticism of the nappy hos at Rutgers happened several days ago. Why did it finally become the front page, prime time item you might ask? Can you say, "Duke Hate University story goes bad?"
At the start of this week, MSNBC, CNN, and other major media were about to be severely criticized for their anti-white/men hate speech in rushing to judgment and condemnation of innocent men at Duke Hate University. What's worse, a black ho was going to end up being the villain. The black racist organizations, Jackson, Sharpton, and the others were desperate to drum up another story to take the lying black ho, and their previous racist attacks on innocent men off of prime time.
The Don Imus scandal was created by the usual anti-white/men hate organizations, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, Rainbow Push, etc., etc., to distract the prime time audience during a week their previous racist attacks on innocent white men might otherwise draw the largest audience.
It's not about Don Imus. It's not about "nappy hos." Its about racist sexism at Duke Hate University and the fallout of their previous racist attacks. That's what the whole Don Imus thing is about. If it weren't for this week's announcement from North Carolina we never would have heard "boo" about Don Imus and his stupid inane (and boring) remarks.
It's about racism. Its about sexism. Its about hate. And that's all that its about.
As a reprisal for the Innocent decision by the NC Attorney General, MSNBC and CBS have fired Don Imus. The anti-white/men hate media was strongly invested in crucifying "rich white men" at Duke University. Jackson, Sharpton, CBS, and NBC had all invested heavily in the hate fest in Durham. They and others were all outraged when charges against their intended (innocent) victims were dropped. In retaliation for the dropping of charges against three innocent young white men, the hate mongers in NYC attacked another white man. They went after Imus with a vengeance, and he's' been sacrificed on their altar of hate. The NC Attorney General said that many people owed the young men an apology. Instead of apologizing, the hate media turned and vented their rage on another white man. Don Imus was near at hand. He was sacrificed.
It's not about "nappy hos." Its not even about Don Imus. He's the sacrificial goat. Its about anti-white/men hate and the outrage when their intended victims got off the hook.
--------- Original Article -------------------------------
Don Imus' criticism of the nappy hos at Rutgers happened several days ago. Why did it finally become the front page, prime time item you might ask? Can you say, "Duke Hate University story goes bad?"
At the start of this week, MSNBC, CNN, and other major media were about to be severely criticized for their anti-white/men hate speech in rushing to judgment and condemnation of innocent men at Duke Hate University. What's worse, a black ho was going to end up being the villain. The black racist organizations, Jackson, Sharpton, and the others were desperate to drum up another story to take the lying black ho, and their previous racist attacks on innocent men off of prime time.
The Don Imus scandal was created by the usual anti-white/men hate organizations, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, Rainbow Push, etc., etc., to distract the prime time audience during a week their previous racist attacks on innocent white men might otherwise draw the largest audience.
It's not about Don Imus. It's not about "nappy hos." Its about racist sexism at Duke Hate University and the fallout of their previous racist attacks. That's what the whole Don Imus thing is about. If it weren't for this week's announcement from North Carolina we never would have heard "boo" about Don Imus and his stupid inane (and boring) remarks.
It's about racism. Its about sexism. Its about hate. And that's all that its about.
posted by Bob | Wednesday, April 11, 2007
14 Comments:
Bullseye.
Ho is a garden implement.
Media, feminists, and the rest of the anti-Whites will keep Imus on boil and avoid admitting wrongdoing to the Duke lacrosse men and others. This should serve as a wake-up call to White men.
The old media is a tool of the politically correct braindead zombies and the masters that control them. I ignore the propaganda that passes for "news",I don't give a shit about some alledged rapist when women don't give a fuck about the plight of men today. Why the fuck should I when they couldn't give a flying fuck about us? Fuck 'em.
With the exception of sporting events and some movies,I generally spend a little time on TV compared to the many hours I spend on the net.
MM,
Men are not really in a plight. You got it better than you realize and for some reason, just want to whine. Wait till you really DO have trouble.
Anonymous April 19, 2007 1:04 PM,
Men are held accountable whereas women are not. Men receive longer prison sentences than women do for the same crime. Male murderers are more likely to get the death penalty than female murderers. Male murders are more likely to get an indefinite sentence than a woman would. Women have "women only" legal defences. Feminists/women insist men have 1950's obligations while they themselves demand 21st privileges.Women have chivilary to use on men and they are called "liberated women" but if you demand old fashion behavior from women then you are called a "sexist pig". A woman's word alone can get a man thrown in jail and when the accusation is deemed false nothing happens to the false accuser.
So how are men NOT disadvantaged again?
HO -- Chi Minh.
mm,
which of those abuses have YOU suffered from?
which of those abuses have YOU suffered from
I've been falsely accused of sexaul harassment,lost my job and found I had no legal recourse against my accuser.
If you are here to defend feminism then go right ahead.
What is so great about it?
I've told you my philosophy,what's yours?
Anonymous April 19, 2007 7:42 PM,
Don't gloss over my questions. Answer the motherfuckers.
MM,
Falsely accused of sexual harassment? What had you said or done (allegedly) taht was construed as abusing some woman?
I bet a high paid lawyer could have won the case, countersued the woman and got you awarded damages.
Curious, were you the only man the "victim" filed charges against?
True - if somebody files false charges against one person, chances are they've pulled that stunt before and will do it again.
I'm not answering another thing until you answer my questions.
Exactly what question does Mr. Masculist want answered?
Post a Comment
<< Home