Fall Hate Season at Washington Hate University

As college students return for fall classes across America, campus blue gun thugs are using fictional stories of “woman attacked” to spread anti-men fear and hate. Typical of the anti-men fear and hate being promoted by anti-men bigots on Campus is the “Woman Attacked at WSU” story that was widely distributed last week. At Washington State University (WSU Pac-10) college President Elson (Hate) Floyd offered a $5,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the fictional average man on campus. Misandrist regional TV “news” (hate) organizations rushed to publish the stories of women being attacked on campus. Meetings were held at all the WSU residences for women to spread fear of men, “go in groups,” “don't go at night,” “be afraid of men,” “men are violent and evil.” The message was spread loud and clear, far and wide. Women should fear and hate men they were told. That is the "education" that our daughters now are taught at American colleges and universities.

As the story began to fade, a second woman, a copycunt, wanted to get into the publicity about being attacked, so they had a 2nd fictional story to use in their smear campaign against men.

Finally in a 3rd story a woman claimed she was tied up and injured.

None of these stories were validated for truth. In a journalistic frenzy reminiscent of Dan Rather and CBS News, the fear agencies ran with the story without checking the source or validating its credibility. As Damn Rather said after his lies were exposed, "The story may have been fiction but the message was true." Misandrist hate mongers on campus and at media outlets don't care if the stories are fiction as long as it promotes their distorted view of "truth." They hate men and wish to teach women to hate and fear men. That is their "truth" which is now being taught at WSU and at every college and university across America.

Eventually at WSU the fictional stories started to come apart. One woman who supposedly was attacked admitted that she made the whole thing up because she wanted attention and she wanted to encourage fear of men. First and 3rd attacks fiction.

The fear and hate of men is big business at colleges. The blue gun thugs parade and squeal in a feeding frenzy, casting suspicion on every man. College Presidents lie to microphones. Nothing is too low to spread fear and contempt for men. Washington Hate University has joined Duke Hate University and others that stand in disgrace for their flagrant hate campaigns against of men. In 2007 Duke Hate University made itself into a national disgrace when Duke President Butthead and a gang of Professors called the Duke “Hate 88” joined with lying filth County Prosecutor Nifong to persecute the good MEN of the Duke University Lacrosse Team in a lying phony “rape” hate attack. Now WHU has demonstrated that it shares the same slime at the bottom of society by pandering to the lowest level of anti-men hate based on fictitious “assault” claims. Numerous hate mongering faculty of WSU have published opinions spewing anti-men hatred in the Daily Evergreen as well as in classrooms across campus. WHU President Elson (Hate) Floyd and the whole WHU faculty stand in disgrace.

The copycunt second “victim” has not admitted her guilt as of this writing, so the blue gun thugs and WHU President Elson (Hate) Floyd are still holding on to their misandrist fiction. They have not yet apologized to the men of WHU nor to the men of Washington State. Elson (Hate) Floyd should spend his $5,000 hate fund money to buy free food and beer for the GOOD MEN of WHU to show his sincere apology for his egregious slander.

The names of the alleged (FICTIONAL) “victims” are being withheld to protect them from reprisals for promoting anti-men hate and fear. They should be exposed, severely punished, registered as a “sex offender” and expelled from the University. But they will not be punished, nor even named publicly. WHU President Elson (Hate) Floyd and his misandrist gun thug staff were glad to use them to promote their misandrist fear campaign. Elson (hate) Floyd should be summarily dismissed for promoting anti-men hate and fear on campus.

Elson (Hate) Floyd , the WHU blue gun thugs, the Daily Evergreen, and misandrist TV “news” organizations owe the men of WHU and the men of Washington state a huge public apology and restitution in the form of training sessions that spread the truth about good men.

Freedom of the Press Arrested at USC

In the USA, free speech and the freedom of the press/media to cover and report on events of public interest has ALWAYS been a fundamental right of citizens. It is the first topic dealt with in our Bill of Rights.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Nevertheless, on Wednesday of this week, the Annenberg School of Fascist Propaganda, a part of the University of Southern California (USC), provided a very excellent pubic education on fascist thought control. They reward propaganda providers who pump out the approved political speech while sending the police state Gestapo to arrest and torture any journalist who may report other opinion. On Wednesday, Tax Day, while “terrorist” Americans were rallying against government tyranny, the Annenberg School of Fascist Propaganda was presenting a “Walter Cronkite Award” for excellence in leftist propaganda to Katie Cuntric of CBS. The Leftist Propaganda Award was given to Ms. Cuntric specifically for her work to trash Sarah Palin during last fall's Obama Election. Assenberg is also the owner of the Web site “Fact Check” which was often cited as verifying Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) as an American citizen by posting obviously fake “birth certificate” photos.

Author and film journalist John Ziegler tried to attend the event at the Anneneberg School of Fascist Propaganda in order to gather information for upcoming reports. One might expect that USC which claims to teach “journalism” would be on the side of the rights of journalists to report events. We might expect that, but it is no longer true. Freedom of the press only is supported when the press is pumping out left wing propaganda to support the new fascist government. Freedom that is limited to approved opinions is no freedom at all. USC claims to pride itself on the promotion and teaching of thinking and critical discussion, but we have been given a powerful lesson on their bigoted bias that allows only USC approved left wing propaganda while using a police state Gestapo to silence any journalist who may express a conflicting opinion or report news that doesn't support the fascist party line.

Even while presenting an award to Ms. Cuntric of CBS, the Anneneberg School of Fascist Propaganda called out its Gestapo gun thugs to arrest and torture author and documentary filmmaker John Ziegler. He was standing in front of the auditorium with a microphone and asking questions of people arriving for a presentation. Freelance reporter and journalist, Mr. John Ziegler has made his career of reporting on the media. One of his recently published books deals with the obvious bias at CBS, and with Ms. Cuntric in particular. He also has published a documentary film dealing with the same Katie Cuntric smear of Sarah Palin that Annenberg gave her an award for producing. Because of his previously published reports and editorial opinion, Mr. Ziegler is known to report opinions that disagree with the Fascist propaganda that the Anneneberg School teaches and publishes. Mr. Ziegler went to the award presentation to document and film the event. He carried a microphone and had 2 cameramen filming his interviews. He asked for admission to the auditorium as a reporter doing a documentary, but was denied permission to enter the building. Unable to enter, he stood on a wide open paved area in front of the auditorium. He began asking questions to people as they approached.

Mr. Ziegler was confronted by the USC/Annenberg Gestapo and accused of “blocking traffic.” In film of the event there is maybe 40 feet of open paved walking space and Mr. Ziegler standing off to one side near the bicycle racks. “Blocking traffic” was plainly another Gestapo lie. When he insists that he is a reporter asking questions in front of the school of journalism which should be promoting, rather than defeating, the rights of journalists, he was arrested and handcuffed. He is told that he will be taken down town and booked as a common criminal. The handcuffs are put on so tightly that they cause intense pain and trauma to his wrists, a common form of gun thug torture intended to force compliance.

Mr. Ziegler is held in the extremely tight handcuffs until LAPD Gestapo arrive. The LAPD offer him a choice to be escorted off of the USC campus instead of being taken down town to be booked. The LAPD also physically turns off the video camera held by his cameraman. When the camera comes back on Mr. Ziegler and his cameramen are off campus. They show where the handcuffs were installed so tightly that they have injured his wrist. The videos of Mr. Ziegler and his arrest for practicing journalism at the Anneneberg School of Fascist Propaganda is here.

You can contact Ernest James Wilson, Dean of the Anneberg School of Fascist Propaganda at the following address. ernestw@usc.edu

I read international news that the US is protesting Iran's arrest of a female American journalist, Roxana Saberi. The US Fascist Government including Pansey Obama has been protesing her arrest. Swiss President Hans-Rudolf met with Iranian President Ahmadinejad at a U.N. racism conference to ask him to intervene in the arrest of Ms. Saberi. In the doublespeak of the new Fascist America, they complain if a cunt is arrested for spying in Iran, but an American male journalist is arrested and torutred by the Gestapo in Los Angeles.

Is there any freedom left in America? Not at our “great” universities. Not in our “great” cities. Not while the gun thug Gestapo is willing to attack and destroy any man who dares speak against the Fascist Regime.

A REAL football Championship!

The so-called “championship” BCS Bowl game is being played as I write. Whichever team wins will claim to be the “National Champions.” But most people question that title and the process by which is is done. Almost every year there has not been two teams who have equal compelling claims as National Champion of college football. This year is no exception.

The two teams in the BCS Championship Game are University of Florida and University of Oklahoma.

Florida won 12 games but lost to good but not champion caliber team from Mississippi.

Oklahoma won 12 games and beat Texas Tech, but lost to a really excellent team from Texas. Texas beat Oklahoma but lost to Texas Tech. Texas Tech beat Texas but lost to Oklahoma. With those 3 way round robin victories and losses to each other, who is to say which team is the best?

In addition to these two teams there are several others that should be considered for the National Championship

University of Utah won all 13 of its games, including beating 4th ranked Alabama in the Sugar Bowl. As the only undefeated major college football team why shouldn't Utah be declared the Champion?

University of Texas beat Oklahoma, but lost to 8th ranked Texas Tech. With identical 12-1 records, and a victory over Oklahoma, why shouldn't Texas rather than Oklahoma be considered for the National Championship.

University of Southern California won 12 games but lost to Oregon State. USC has been playing very powerful football all year. Since they have no more losses than either Florida or Oklahoma, why shouldn't USC be in the Championship game?

What we need is some kind of playoff system to establish the Championship of college football. Even Barack Obama opined that if he had a chance he would establish a playoff system for college football.

It would not be hard to do. There are many fewer teams in big time college football than basketball, for example. By the end of the regular season it becomes pretty obvious to almost everyone that there are 4 or 5 or 8 teams that have none or one loss in the regular season and are playing excellent football this year. The best teams are usually ranked by various opinion systems from 1 through 25. While there is little difference and a lot of argument between team 1 and team 5, for example, there is a quite a bit of difference between the top 5 and the 20th ranked team. So we can effectively cross off all those teams that have lost 3 or 4 games. They haven't played championship level during the season, and are a step lower in overall ability this year.

So we take the top 8 teams. They can be ranked in the current BCS standings, or some other polling system. This year the top 8 teams in the BCS and other ranking systems before the bowl season were:

BCS AP
1. 1. Florida 12-1 (lost to Mississippi)
2. 2. Oklahoma 12-1 lost to Texas)
3. 3. Texas 12-1 (lost to Texas Tech)
4. 4. Alabama 12-1 (lost to Florida)
5. 5. USC 11-1 (lost to Oregon State)
8. 6. Penn State 11-1 (lost to Iowa)
6. 7. Utah 12-0
7. 8. Texas Tech 11-1 (lost to Oklahoma)

All of these are good teams, and their fans may argue with some justification, that they are the best or #1 in football.

To have an 8 team playoff it takes 7 total games on 3 consecutive game days. BCS already holds 5 games, of which 4 are of little importance other than pride.

The first 4 games should be held during the week before Christmas. They should feature the top 8 contenders for National Champion. There are already some bowl games that week. The Poinsettia , New Orleans, Las Vegas, and Sugar bowls could be played that week. If these particular bowl sponsors didn't want to be part of the championship eliminations some other sponsors could easily be found. The 4 winning teams go on to 2 bowl games to be held on New Years Day. Perhaps the Rose Bowl and the Cotton Bowl would be willing to host these two elimination games. The BCS/National Championship game would still be played on January 8th, one week after New Years Day, the same day it is played now.

It makes sense. The fans would have a REAL championship game. The teams that work so hard would have decided a REAL champion on the field of play, not in some incomprehensible BCS computer system. The winning team would not miss any more college classes than the two BCS “championship” teams do now. In fact, it makes so much sense one has to wonder who is making money by preventing it from happening.

Campus Hero Stops a Bully

In Phoenix, Arizona, the town bully got his this week. Last December, bully Isaac Smith and his two sidekicks assaulted and beat up Mr. Rodney Smith. Mr. Rodney is no relation to Isaac Smith. Isaac Smith and two other bullies punched and kicked Rodney Smith repeatedly as he lay on the ground, breaking his jaw in two places. They also punched Mr. Rodney's girlfriend when she tried to stop them. The December assault and beating was ignored by the Phoenix blue gun thugs. Beating up a man is never “wrong” when the blue gun thug gang is involved. Anyone who had assaulted a female would be spending 20 years in hell. But a man who is a victim of violent assault is left to defend himself.

For the next several months bully Smith made life hell on campus for Mr. Rodney, threatening him with more violence every time their paths crossed on the small campus. On Thursday, July 24, 2008, Mr Rodney had had enough of the ongoing assaults. When bully Isaac Smith hit Mr. Rodney in the face, he found out that real men don't just lie down forever. This time Mr. Rodney was armed for self protection. This time bully Isaac was left lying face down in a pool of his own blood. Even a couple of other students who stood back and allowed the bully to assault Mr. Rodney found out the hard way that condoning violence is not always safe. In recognition of his heroic self defense and for taking prompt manly action against a violent bully, Mr. Rodney Smith is hereby awarded the Coveted Golden Bull.

Golden Bull Award

Mr. Rodney Smith

For Courage and Manly Action

After the self defense shooting, Phoenix blue gun thugs went to the home of Mr. Rodney's parents to terrorize and brutalize his family. Both of Mr. Rodney's parents and three other people were assaulted, chained, brutalized, and hauled off to cages by the blue gun thug gang as it violated their rights to the legal protection of their own home. Read media report.

College President Ken Jerkwater said, "The safety of our students and staff is our highest priority and all appropriate measures are being taken to ensure the safety of our campus." Bob observes that College President Jerkwater had done nothing to protect the safety of Mr. Rodney while he was repeatedly being assaulted on-campus over several months. Jerkwater had done nothing to prevent the pattern of repeated assaults including the violent assault immediately before Mr. Rodney acted in self defense last Thursday. Jerkwater's lies are exposed as lies. His policy has been to ignore and allow repeated violence against students on campus. His sexist policy of tolerance of violent against men forces men to defend themselves on his campus.

Young Mr. Rodney should be immediately released from any blue gun thug custody and praised as a manly man by authorities in Phoenix. He deserves an apology. College President Jerkwaters should award Mr. Rodney a fully paid scholarship at South Mountain college as an apology for their failure to take any action to protect students from violence over the past several months. His parents should be immediately released from the hellhole cells and given a full apology from the City with an offer of monetary compensation for the violent abuse they suffered at the hands of the blue gun thug gang.

When those in power give us nothing but lies and terrorize the people, it becomes necessary for the people to take action to restore freedom and respect in our communities. More heroes like Mr. Rodney are needed to reclaim our communities, our colleges, and our families.

Bigot Colleges rushing toward Irrelevance

According to a news story published today on CNN.com, hundreds of American Colleges and Universities are abandoning the SAT test because it favors highly intelligent white men. The racist/sexist administrators at most colleges and universities have abandoned scholastic excellence in favor of anti-white racism and anti-men sexism. “Connecticut College, is one of a growing number of colleges and universities that are making the SAT optional in the admissions process. In May, two highly selective schools -- Smith College in Massachusetts and Wake Forest University in North Carolina -- decided to drop the SAT and ACT, which some students take as an alternative to the SAT, as requirements for admission.” Read Story

The stated reason given by Wake Forest University is, “as part of its efforts to increase socioeconomic, racial and ethnic diversity.” Translated, that excuse means that allowing white men to show very well in their admission policy test will not allow them to admit as many less qualified non-whites and underachieving females as they intend to admit. A SCOTUS decision a decade ago involving the University of Michigan ruled that a university can not admit a lower score applicant based on their racist prejudice against white men. The solution that many universities have found to the requirement of non-discrimination is to eliminate the test scores from consideration. Without any factual data regarding the capability of applicants, the racist universities can use prejudicial mumbo-jumbo to “determine” that the female applicant, or black applicant is the “best qualified.” If the evidence doesn't suit the racist/sexist goals, eliminate the evidence.

Over the past two decades, college attendance by men in the United states has gone from 60% men to just over 40% men, and continues in free fall decline. Graduation rates for men are even lower because many of the men who now attend are low-achieving “minority” men who were admitted based on their race and not on their qualifications.

Over the past several decades, universities and colleges across America have raced toward lower standards and irrelevance in the 21st century. They waste time on hate, mind numbing indoctrination, and mental masturbation. They reject the best and brightest students in favor of admissions based on race or sex. Many have one or often more departments designed to teach racist and/or sexist hate. A quick glance through a list of the “Duke Hate 88” shows all the hate departments.

The best and the brightest have never gone to colleges anyway. Bill Gates, Albert Einstein, Henry Ford, Abraham Lincoln, Ben Franklin, William Shakespeare, didn't become great by absorbing mediocrity. None of the best of men throughout history have been college graduates. In recent decades the situation at colleges has gotten much worse. With the few exception of small technical colleges, feminazi and racist fascist liberals have taken over the administrations and are driving their once proud institutions into the gutters as inevitably shit runs down hill. For more reading on the irrelevance of Universiteies, read Universities are Irrelevant

The latest step downward, the elimination of rigorous testing of applicants with the SAT or similar examinations, and substitution of racist/sexist bigotry to select less qualified applicants based on skin color or sex continues their headlong slide down hill. Young men should eschew their irrelevant institutions, and vote “no” on any politician or candidate who supports them. Racist/sexist hate does not deserve our support.

Universities are Irrelevant.

I heard that on a MEN's discussion the other day. Some female psychologist was flaunting her degrees and several of the men pointed out that her field of study amounted to little more than nonsense repeated endlessly. Several of the men observed that a university education has become irrelevant to a man's place in the world. They suggested that millions of young men are getting educated elsewhere and the result of their turning aside is showing up in declining male enrollment at universities.

The notion of universities becoming irrelevant intrigued me. If they are irrelevant, were they relevant previously? What does it mean for universities to be relevant or irrelevant?

Universities that we now know are pretty much a creature of the 20th century. Most of them were created as small schools in the late 19th century and became large and prosperous in the 20th. Sure there have always been centers of learning and teachers. Socrates held discussion classes for a group of students. Throughout the middle ages monks held classes and led discussions in letters. Oxford University is several centuries old, but until recently it was small and consisted largely of a few students getting together with some professor to discuss a particular topic. Harvard was founded in the 17th century as a seminary for Puritan ministers, and indeed most of the colleges of that day were primarily seminaries for religious studies. The great universities we know today began with the late 19th century ideas about universal education and blossomed into huge institutions in the 20th century. We who grew up in the late 20th century are tempted to believe that a university is the only way to get an education, but that is not the case.

Prior to the invention of universities people still got educated and conducted their affairs quite well. For example, in the early 19th century, Abraham Lincoln became a lawyer by apprenticing with a senior lawyer. My own grandfather had a long and successful career as a lawyer and judge after taking an undergraduate legal education at the University of Michigan. A century ago three years of "law school" following a 4 year university degree was virtually unheard of. Over the past two centuries, universities have been marketing their services by continually stretching out the number of years you have to devote before you are able to practice most "professions." But it was not always so, as Abraham Lincoln ought to teach us. In fact, universities have made their requirements so onerous that it's almost impossible to succeed, and so costly that many graduates are saddled with huge debts. Enough already!

During the men's discussion mentioned above it was pointed out that psychobabble degrees offer almost no useful information. None of theories and "knowledge" has any more factual basis than someone's opinion, which, if you track it down, is based on someone else's opinion in an endless circle. Many other university departments consist of "scholarship" which is nothing more than being able to cite other opinions who in turn cited someone else. If you follow the chain they have no actual knowledge or facts other than a closed group citing each other and calling that "research."

The bimbo flaunting her psychology degree displayed a complete lack of knowledge of the feelings or emotions of the men with whom she was discussing. That brings up another aspect of "relevant," it works both ways. For the entire history of formalized psychology the focus of their "research" has been on females. Almost all of Freud's customers were women, and today over 95% of psychology customers are female. They cater to their customers, females, and have NEVER investigated, understood, or cared about the psychology of men. Men, to the practice and teaching of psychology, are a side issue, not their focus, not in their database, irrelevant.

The English Department teaches literary theories. Among various literary theories is "feminist theory" but not "masculist theory." Several courses in the English Department are cross code listed with the Women's Studies department, but none cross code listed with the Men's Studies department. When English Department professors go to scholarly conference such as the Modern Language Association's annual conference, there are many papers presented on women and women's issues, but NONE on men and men's issues. They write doctoral dissertations on medieval women's rhetoric, but do you see any on men's medieval rhetoric? Sure, they still have some men studying English literature, but the Department, and the whole field of study has turned it's back on men. Men, men's issues, men's theories, men's needs, men's feelings, and about everything else, it seems, are irrelevant.

Of course English Department professors would deny that they have branded men irrelevant, after all they still have lots of men taking classes (a diminishing number that gets smaller every year). A man can still enroll, and get an English degree along with a Women's Studies like poor Jeff. He has several degrees, including Women's Studies, but really struggles trying to fit in when he's out with MEN building a home.

An then there are the speech codes, sexual harassment training, and Office of Men are Bad. They all have a "Women's Center" or equal, but not one has a "Men's Center." And their "Diversity Office" practices racist, sexist employment and only hires black women. Men are irrelevant at the Diversity Office, and men's feelings and needs are irrelevant to the administration.

If men are so irrelevant to be below the management radar at universities, how are men supposed to feel about spending 4 to 10 years of our lives and umpteen thousand dollars, going into massive debt, purchasing what they are selling? Is a university degree the only way for a MAN to become educated? Is a degree in Women's Studies an education at all for a MAN? Or the psychology of women? Or feminized filtered history?

We might also ask why people sacrifice years and a small fortune to get that degree? Half a century ago we were told that a university degree was the key to a good job and a successful career. Since then we have seen that promise turn to dust. Many companies now hire only women in many of the office jobs where college educated men once worked. My own former employer hadn't hired a man in an entry level position in 20 years, nor promoted a man from within. The few old men who still did most of the actual work were dying off or retiring. Can a university promise a good job to MEN when graduates face flagrant sexist discrimination in the after graduation job market? Not really, and the false promise shows that men have become irrelevant.

There are many ways for a man to get educated, and many kinds of knowledge that constitute education. The university monopoly would like us to believe that they have a monopoly and control the keys to education, but that really isn't so. The Internet, for example, has made knowledge universally and widely available. On-line chat rooms and discussions of all kinds can replace the discussion groups that have been part of universities for centuries.

A century ago feminism looked out and saw that many successful men were getting college education, and began trying to take over "education." Without knowing what it was about the college experience that made men successful, feminists wanted it for themselves. More yet, they wanted to change university education to feminize it. Over the past century the feminists have pretty much taken over the university. From the lowest professor to the halls of the President's office the university is all about catering to feminist females. Men, in the management or teaching have become -- irrelevant.

But, MEN are never going to go away and vanish. MEN will still be the ones who do all the real work of the society. MEN who don't graduate from college often still dominate industries. Bill Gates is an often mentioned example. In fact, a college education often only restricts a man to a modest level bureaucratic job of mediocrity and mundane plodding. Huge numbers of young men have learned that the university itself is the one that is becoming irrelevant. Huge numbers of men are voting with their feet and letting the university administrators know that they may be selling their feminized crapola, but we aren't buying. Enrollments by men are way below 50% and are rapidly declining as more and more men tell them to take their "education" and stuff it.

Does any man need to learn "feminist theory"? Does any man need female psychobabble? Does any man need the Women's Center and Women's Studies Department promoting anti-men hate? Are any of those relevant to the future of a young man?

For a century women have worked hard to take what men had in universities, and to take it away from men. They have succeeded, but in taking it away and turning it into something that is irrelevant to men's success. It's an empty accomplishment. It won't make their lives happier, nor make them successful. In the end, it isn't the circular citations that were the basis for a good education at universities several decades ago. It was the MEN who came and shared together that made it all relevant. MEN will always be the ones who make the society work, who create the homes, the food, the fun electronics, and all the good things of life. It will always be the MEN who are the center of relevance of a society. When men are cast aside and turned away, the institution itself becomes irrelevant, a shell of its former greatness. In the 21st century universities will decline, are already declining, as they have become irrelevant.

Bob