The World According To Bob

Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.

Name:
Location: United States

You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.

Thursday, November 22, 2012

A Thanksgiving Story

In 1620 a group of Pilgrims soon to arrive in Massachusetts (instead of Virginia where they intended to settle because they were out of beer) signed a historic document called the Mayflower Compact. They pledged to share the labor, produce, and government of their new village in a new land. The Mayflower Compact has been taught in American schools for almost 400 years as a "historic advance" in human government.   It was taught in school when I was in school.
 
During their first winter many of the Pilgrims died of starvation and disease. In 1621 the Pilgrims managed to put up some crude huts and plant some crops. When their meager crops were harvested they invited local natives to bring food for a feast of thanksgiving.   They teetered on the brink of starvation for 1622 as well.  Governor Bradford wrote that young men who would be able to do more work were unwilling to work as hard as they could because they were not rewarded for their labors.
 
In 1623 the surviving Pilgrims scrapped their “historic advance” in human government. It was a failure. Community ownership of property, redistribution of produce and the fruits of labor was a failure then as it always is.  In 1623 the Pilgrims abandoned their communal property redistribution system. They gave every family their own land and private ownership of the production of their labors. They instituted a free market system, and Massachusetts Bay Colony thrived and prospered.  In 1623 corn planting and harvesting greatly increased.  There was plenty of beer for everyone.  That part is NOT taught in American schools.
 
Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it and voted for Odumbo.


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, November 11, 2011

Universities Promote Fag Rape of Children -- DUH!

Colleges and Universities all across America promote and teach old faggot perverts raping children. The play Vagina Monologues promotes old homos doing perverted sex with children. Perverts using children for sick sex is said to be “beautiful.” The play focuses on old female fags raping children, but the message of perverted child rape is the same for old men fags and children. It is taught at virtually every university in the United States. Penn State University produced Vagina Monologues again in February 2011.

This week the fag perverts from Penn State University were fired for doing the fag perversion that has been taught there and at so many other Universities. This past week a scandal broke at Penn State University when numerous boys, now young men, complained that they had been raped at Penn State University by Assistant Football Coach Jerry Sandusky. Rape of boys had been going on for decades with the knowledge and acquiescence of Football Coach Joe Paterno, University President Graham Spanier, and other University officials. This past week both Coach Paterno and President Spanier were fired by the Board of Trustees.

I have to wonder where the Board of Trustees were last February when the University was promoting and teaching perversion and rape of children? Where are the Board of Trustees at 700 other Universities in the United States when they produce plays that teach sexual perversion and rape of children? Yes, we know where they are. They are promoting faggotry under the lying title of “Diversity.” This week at Penn State University the story became public, and lieyers are going to clean out their treasury for accepting sexual violence against children.

Thousands of students at Penn State University held a riot to protest the firing of faggot child rapers. Students have all been taught by the University that perversion is “Diversity.” Students don't understand why the Board of Trustees would fire the perverts over a few dozen children being raped in the sports locker rooms. Its very confusing. They teach perversion at Penn State and other Universities, and then turn around and pretend that perversion is wrong.

Universities all across America are just as corrupt, just as perverted, and just as guilty as the fired President and Football Coach of Penn State. The University near Bob produced Vagina Monologues promoting faggot perversion and child rape just last month. How long has it been taught at the University near you? How many children were raped there by old fags this year? How much will it cost taxpayers near you when it is discovered by lieyers? Are you acquiescing or protesting?


UPDATE November 13, 2011.
Another Univeristy is also dirty. The Citadel military college in South Carolina, revealed on Saturday that it had investigated accusations against a camp counselor but took no action. Almost every University in the US promotes and encourages old fags to prey on children. Not surprised that more stories are coming out.

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, July 29, 2011

So-Called “Dark Energy” is Silly

Quite a while ago when Bob was studying physics in university, we often had to do experiments and then use physical laws and math to show calculations that were consistent with observed physical results. Sometimes when our calculations didn't fit the results we got students were tempted to use what we called the “fudge factor.” Multiply your calculated results by “the fudge factor” and it matched observed data. For obvious reason the Professor did not accept calculations with a fudge factor. Either our calculations were wrong or we had not done our experiments accurately.

Over the past few years astronomers and physicists have observed distant galaxies and found interesting things. First they found that the observed motions did not fit their knowledge of physical forces so they created a hypothetical fudge factor called “dark matter.” The dark matter is said to be about ¾ of all matter, but is unseen and perhaps unsee able. Over the past 10 years physicists have spent millions of taxpayer dollars looking for dark matter, but haven't found any. Fudge factors don't exist in physical space.

The “dark matter” fudge wasn't enough. More recently the astronomers looked out into space and “determined” that distant galaxies are moving away from the earth, and the farther away they are the faster they move away. Distant galaxies appear to be accelerating away from each other and from us. That didn't fit with their known theories so they invented another, and even larger fudge factor called “dark energy.” So-called “dark energy” is said to make up about ¾ of all the mass in the universe. Between mythical dark matter and mythical dark energy, observable mass is down to maybe 5% or 10% of the universe. The other 95% is now said to be “dark,” unobserved, or just mythical. The fudge factor.

These fudge factors have now been integrated into the physics and astronomy being taught in universities. Instead of taking another look at their data, or their theories, they use the convenient fudge factors.

Here is one other theory. Suppose that the “observed fact” that distant galaxies are accelerating away is wrong. Lets look at the measurements. Astronomers measure the velocity of distant objects by looking at the color of light. Objects moving away from us are assumed to cause a shift toward red, or a “red shift.” The theory says, the more blue the light, the faster the galaxy is coming toward us. If light shifts red, then the galaxy is moving rapidly away.

Doppler shift works with sound waves in air and is easy to observe. The sound tone lowers as the speeding car moves past. But I can't recall ever seeing an experiment that demonstrated the same effect from light. Does light also shift color depending on the velocity of the source? There are some interesting relativistic properties of light that may not work the same as sound waves. Light acts like a wave, but also acts like a particle called a "photon." If any reader knows of and can cite a published experiment that demonstrates wave frequency shift of light depending on the velocity of the source please provide a citation.

Light is almost a total mystery. There is very little known about its physical structure. Is each photon made up of 10 zillion little photoids? Nobody knows. Does a photon slowly lose photoids and therefore total energy over billions of years? Nobody knows. Light color is a composite measure of the energy of its photons. A loss of energy from a photon shifts it red, but does not change its velocity - “c.” The farther away a galaxy is from earth, the more billions of years the photons have to lose energy and shift to red. Perhaps, instead of accelerating away from each other and from us, the light from distant galaxies is shifting red by some kind of degradation of he light. Its a lot less complicated theory than inventing “dark energy” making up ¾ of the universe. Use Occam's razor, a review of the observations makes more sense than inventing some huge mythical dark energy or dark matter. Lets go back to reality. Science has lost its way, and not just in pushing the fraud of “global warming.” Something is wrong with the observations. We just don't know enough about light to claim that accurate measurements have been made of the speed of the most distant galaxies. Lets get real. Lets go back to the data and the measurements. That's where the errors lie.

Labels: , ,

Friday, August 28, 2009

Fall Hate Season at Washington Hate University

As college students return for fall classes across America, campus blue gun thugs are using fictional stories of “woman attacked” to spread anti-men fear and hate. Typical of the anti-men fear and hate being promoted by anti-men bigots on Campus is the “Woman Attacked at WSU” story that was widely distributed last week. At Washington State University (WSU Pac-10) college President Elson (Hate) Floyd offered a $5,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the fictional average man on campus. Misandrist regional TV “news” (hate) organizations rushed to publish the stories of women being attacked on campus. Meetings were held at all the WSU residences for women to spread fear of men, “go in groups,” “don't go at night,” “be afraid of men,” “men are violent and evil.” The message was spread loud and clear, far and wide. Women should fear and hate men they were told. That is the "education" that our daughters now are taught at American colleges and universities.

As the story began to fade, a second woman, a copycunt, wanted to get into the publicity about being attacked, so they had a 2nd fictional story to use in their smear campaign against men.

Finally in a 3rd story a woman claimed she was tied up and injured.

None of these stories were validated for truth. In a journalistic frenzy reminiscent of Dan Rather and CBS News, the fear agencies ran with the story without checking the source or validating its credibility. As Damn Rather said after his lies were exposed, "The story may have been fiction but the message was true." Misandrist hate mongers on campus and at media outlets don't care if the stories are fiction as long as it promotes their distorted view of "truth." They hate men and wish to teach women to hate and fear men. That is their "truth" which is now being taught at WSU and at every college and university across America.

Eventually at WSU the fictional stories started to come apart. One woman who supposedly was attacked admitted that she made the whole thing up because she wanted attention and she wanted to encourage fear of men. First and 3rd attacks fiction.

The fear and hate of men is big business at colleges. The blue gun thugs parade and squeal in a feeding frenzy, casting suspicion on every man. College Presidents lie to microphones. Nothing is too low to spread fear and contempt for men. Washington Hate University has joined Duke Hate University and others that stand in disgrace for their flagrant hate campaigns against of men. In 2007 Duke Hate University made itself into a national disgrace when Duke President Butthead and a gang of Professors called the Duke “Hate 88” joined with lying filth County Prosecutor Nifong to persecute the good MEN of the Duke University Lacrosse Team in a lying phony “rape” hate attack. Now WHU has demonstrated that it shares the same slime at the bottom of society by pandering to the lowest level of anti-men hate based on fictitious “assault” claims. Numerous hate mongering faculty of WSU have published opinions spewing anti-men hatred in the Daily Evergreen as well as in classrooms across campus. WHU President Elson (Hate) Floyd and the whole WHU faculty stand in disgrace.

The copycunt second “victim” has not admitted her guilt as of this writing, so the blue gun thugs and WHU President Elson (Hate) Floyd are still holding on to their misandrist fiction. They have not yet apologized to the men of WHU nor to the men of Washington State. Elson (Hate) Floyd should spend his $5,000 hate fund money to buy free food and beer for the GOOD MEN of WHU to show his sincere apology for his egregious slander.

The names of the alleged (FICTIONAL) “victims” are being withheld to protect them from reprisals for promoting anti-men hate and fear. They should be exposed, severely punished, registered as a “sex offender” and expelled from the University. But they will not be punished, nor even named publicly. WHU President Elson (Hate) Floyd and his misandrist gun thug staff were glad to use them to promote their misandrist fear campaign. Elson (hate) Floyd should be summarily dismissed for promoting anti-men hate and fear on campus.

Elson (Hate) Floyd , the WHU blue gun thugs, the Daily Evergreen, and misandrist TV “news” organizations owe the men of WHU and the men of Washington state a huge public apology and restitution in the form of training sessions that spread the truth about good men.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, April 20, 2009

Freedom of the Press Arrested at USC

In the USA, free speech and the freedom of the press/media to cover and report on events of public interest has ALWAYS been a fundamental right of citizens. It is the first topic dealt with in our Bill of Rights.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Nevertheless, on Wednesday of this week, the Annenberg School of Fascist Propaganda, a part of the University of Southern California (USC), provided a very excellent pubic education on fascist thought control. They reward propaganda providers who pump out the approved political speech while sending the police state Gestapo to arrest and torture any journalist who may report other opinion. On Wednesday, Tax Day, while “terrorist” Americans were rallying against government tyranny, the Annenberg School of Fascist Propaganda was presenting a “Walter Cronkite Award” for excellence in leftist propaganda to Katie Cuntric of CBS. The Leftist Propaganda Award was given to Ms. Cuntric specifically for her work to trash Sarah Palin during last fall's Obama Election. Assenberg is also the owner of the Web site “Fact Check” which was often cited as verifying Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) as an American citizen by posting obviously fake “birth certificate” photos.

Author and film journalist John Ziegler tried to attend the event at the Anneneberg School of Fascist Propaganda in order to gather information for upcoming reports. One might expect that USC which claims to teach “journalism” would be on the side of the rights of journalists to report events. We might expect that, but it is no longer true. Freedom of the press only is supported when the press is pumping out left wing propaganda to support the new fascist government. Freedom that is limited to approved opinions is no freedom at all. USC claims to pride itself on the promotion and teaching of thinking and critical discussion, but we have been given a powerful lesson on their bigoted bias that allows only USC approved left wing propaganda while using a police state Gestapo to silence any journalist who may express a conflicting opinion or report news that doesn't support the fascist party line.

Even while presenting an award to Ms. Cuntric of CBS, the Anneneberg School of Fascist Propaganda called out its Gestapo gun thugs to arrest and torture author and documentary filmmaker John Ziegler. He was standing in front of the auditorium with a microphone and asking questions of people arriving for a presentation. Freelance reporter and journalist, Mr. John Ziegler has made his career of reporting on the media. One of his recently published books deals with the obvious bias at CBS, and with Ms. Cuntric in particular. He also has published a documentary film dealing with the same Katie Cuntric smear of Sarah Palin that Annenberg gave her an award for producing. Because of his previously published reports and editorial opinion, Mr. Ziegler is known to report opinions that disagree with the Fascist propaganda that the Anneneberg School teaches and publishes. Mr. Ziegler went to the award presentation to document and film the event. He carried a microphone and had 2 cameramen filming his interviews. He asked for admission to the auditorium as a reporter doing a documentary, but was denied permission to enter the building. Unable to enter, he stood on a wide open paved area in front of the auditorium. He began asking questions to people as they approached.

Mr. Ziegler was confronted by the USC/Annenberg Gestapo and accused of “blocking traffic.” In film of the event there is maybe 40 feet of open paved walking space and Mr. Ziegler standing off to one side near the bicycle racks. “Blocking traffic” was plainly another Gestapo lie. When he insists that he is a reporter asking questions in front of the school of journalism which should be promoting, rather than defeating, the rights of journalists, he was arrested and handcuffed. He is told that he will be taken down town and booked as a common criminal. The handcuffs are put on so tightly that they cause intense pain and trauma to his wrists, a common form of gun thug torture intended to force compliance.

Mr. Ziegler is held in the extremely tight handcuffs until LAPD Gestapo arrive. The LAPD offer him a choice to be escorted off of the USC campus instead of being taken down town to be booked. The LAPD also physically turns off the video camera held by his cameraman. When the camera comes back on Mr. Ziegler and his cameramen are off campus. They show where the handcuffs were installed so tightly that they have injured his wrist. The videos of Mr. Ziegler and his arrest for practicing journalism at the Anneneberg School of Fascist Propaganda is here.

You can contact Ernest James Wilson, Dean of the Anneberg School of Fascist Propaganda at the following address. ernestw@usc.edu

I read international news that the US is protesting Iran's arrest of a female American journalist, Roxana Saberi. The US Fascist Government including Pansey Obama has been protesing her arrest. Swiss President Hans-Rudolf met with Iranian President Ahmadinejad at a U.N. racism conference to ask him to intervene in the arrest of Ms. Saberi. In the doublespeak of the new Fascist America, they complain if a cunt is arrested for spying in Iran, but an American male journalist is arrested and torutred by the Gestapo in Los Angeles.

Is there any freedom left in America? Not at our “great” universities. Not in our “great” cities. Not while the gun thug Gestapo is willing to attack and destroy any man who dares speak against the Fascist Regime.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, July 25, 2008

Campus Hero Stops a Bully

In Phoenix, Arizona, the town bully got his this week. Last December, bully Isaac Smith and his two sidekicks assaulted and beat up Mr. Rodney Smith. Mr. Rodney is no relation to Isaac Smith. Isaac Smith and two other bullies punched and kicked Rodney Smith repeatedly as he lay on the ground, breaking his jaw in two places. They also punched Mr. Rodney's girlfriend when she tried to stop them. The December assault and beating was ignored by the Phoenix blue gun thugs. Beating up a man is never “wrong” when the blue gun thug gang is involved. Anyone who had assaulted a female would be spending 20 years in hell. But a man who is a victim of violent assault is left to defend himself.

For the next several months bully Smith made life hell on campus for Mr. Rodney, threatening him with more violence every time their paths crossed on the small campus. On Thursday, July 24, 2008, Mr Rodney had had enough of the ongoing assaults. When bully Isaac Smith hit Mr. Rodney in the face, he found out that real men don't just lie down forever. This time Mr. Rodney was armed for self protection. This time bully Isaac was left lying face down in a pool of his own blood. Even a couple of other students who stood back and allowed the bully to assault Mr. Rodney found out the hard way that condoning violence is not always safe. In recognition of his heroic self defense and for taking prompt manly action against a violent bully, Mr. Rodney Smith is hereby awarded the Coveted Golden Bull.

Golden Bull Award

Mr. Rodney Smith

For Courage and Manly Action


After the self defense shooting, Phoenix blue gun thugs went to the home of Mr. Rodney's parents to terrorize and brutalize his family. Both of Mr. Rodney's parents and three other people were assaulted, chained, brutalized, and hauled off to cages by the blue gun thug gang as it violated their rights to the legal protection of their own home. Read media report.

College President Ken Jerkwater said, "The safety of our students and staff is our highest priority and all appropriate measures are being taken to ensure the safety of our campus." Bob observes that College President Jerkwater had done nothing to protect the safety of Mr. Rodney while he was repeatedly being assaulted on-campus over several months. Jerkwater had done nothing to prevent the pattern of repeated assaults including the violent assault immediately before Mr. Rodney acted in self defense last Thursday. Jerkwater's lies are exposed as lies. His policy has been to ignore and allow repeated violence against students on campus. His sexist policy of tolerance of violent against men forces men to defend themselves on his campus.

Young Mr. Rodney should be immediately released from any blue gun thug custody and praised as a manly man by authorities in Phoenix. He deserves an apology. College President Jerkwaters should award Mr. Rodney a fully paid scholarship at South Mountain college as an apology for their failure to take any action to protect students from violence over the past several months. His parents should be immediately released from the hellhole cells and given a full apology from the City with an offer of monetary compensation for the violent abuse they suffered at the hands of the blue gun thug gang.

When those in power give us nothing but lies and terrorize the people, it becomes necessary for the people to take action to restore freedom and respect in our communities. More heroes like Mr. Rodney are needed to reclaim our communities, our colleges, and our families.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Psychobabble Nutters

A half century ago there was a feminazi female shrink in the small town where Bob grew up. She specialized in female clients. She convinced 100% of her clients that their husbands were the underlying problem in their lives. Their lives would be better, she said, if the women filed for divorce and became independent feminist women. 100% of her clients divorced their husbands and destroyed their families. Eventually, after decades, the people of the town figured out that she was a pariah destroying the community. Before they managed to stop her destruction she had badly hurt hundreds of men and women, and seriously messed up the lives of thousands of children.

The history of psychobabble is long and tortured (literally) and more often a horror show than a success story. From novels like “One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest,” by Ken Kesey, we learn that many of those who are branded “insane” by the shrinks are in some ways more sane then “normal” people. Shrinks have used all manner of horrible torture on the insane, and not so insane. Extreme physical torture, electric shock torture, and incredibly horrid drugs have been done to people, many of whom are as sane or more sane than the shrink in charge of the institution. From a rational perspective one is tempted to ask if the shrink doing the horrible torture to innocent people is the one with the very serious mental problems. In some places they still use electric shock torture and worse on those people who are mentally incapable of resisting.

Shrinks, in fact, usually have mental problems of their own. Most of them become curious about psychobabble in an effort to figure out their own mental problems. From “great” shrinks like the drug addicted and sexual perverted Freud to the most “modern” shrink the one common denominate among shrinks is some deep mental disturbance that makes them struggle to act rational. To this day, shrinks use their nonsense to justify all kinds of sexual deviance. In the shrink organizations, a majority of liberals and faggots have taken homosexuality out of their list of deviant behaviors, much to the consternation of the minority of shrinks trying to apply real science to the mind. They have developed twisted theories on nonsense like “gender” and convinced thousands of men to have themselves castrated, believing that they could become women. The shrinks convinced them that becoming eunuchs and pretending to be female would solve all their problems and make them sane. Nowhere but the twisted, tortured mind of a shrink could such nonsense be called normal.

In the 1970s the shrinks began experimenting with neuro-linguistic programming or “NLP.” They found that by using hypnosis techniques they could modify people's memories and even give them entirely new memories. The shrinks began using their patients to facilitate their own twisted deranges sexual fantasies and political agendas. Many of them implanting memories of sexual abuse and sexual abuse of children in patients who then believed they had been abused. The shrinks told their clients that it was “recovered memories” when in fact it was the shrink's own psychotic fantasy implanted in the heads of the clients. Thousands of lives were badly hurt, thousands of people were seriously harmed. Massive criminal investigations sprang up as shrinks taught children that they had been “molested” in the most bizarre fantasies the shrinks could imagine. The damage that shrinks have done with NLP, and continue to do using NLP techniques is very wide and very deep.

One of the most bizarre uses of psychobabble is for promotion of political agendas, or suppression of political speech that disagrees with the agenda. Feminists have long used psychobabble terms like “nuts” or “insane” or “go see a shrink” to characterize anyone who disagrees with their hate filled political dogma. Often their agendas are shared by cadres of leftists who work for universities in psychology departments, women and men with deeply disturbed minds studying psychobabble desperately hoping to find a solution to their own problems. They write scholarly articles citing Freud and Jung and mostly each other to support their circular nonsense and political agendas. Anyone who disagrees with their agenda is, of course, having a mental problem. For more than a century they have woven their twisted nonsense into the most bizarre fabric of hate, lies, politics, and self-delusion. In many ways these politically motivated producers of twisted hate masquerading as science are more scary than the other shrinks who just mess up clients.

Over several decades Bob has been personally acquainted with many long suffering people whose lives have been very badly messed up by the evil that comes out of the psychobabble profession. Bob has known little children whose families were deliberately destroyed. Bob has known men who were sent to “asylums” on false charges of insanity to further a divorce proceeding. Bob has known victims of implanted memories whose families and lives were seriously hurt. Bob has known eunuchs who were told that getting their balls and penis cut off would make them into women. Bob has seen boys encouraged to enter the twisted and deadly world of faggots, recruited for perversion by twisted sick shrinks. Bob has observed married couples who sought help but were divided by so-called marriage counselors. And Bob has watched dozens of people just waste their time and money on useless psychobabble that, at best, did no harm.

Bob is still tempted to believe that somewhere out their in the vast expanse of humanity the shrinks may have actually done some good for some people. That is still the hope. But, comparing the many horror stories and evil harm that shrinks do and have done over many years to a hope of some small good is very troubling. Can it be that shrinks actually do as much good as the massive harm that they have done decade after decade? Can anyone point to any part of shrinkology that generally does good for any group of people? Even the great Freud only managed to turn his wife and himself into hopeless crack addicts. On the whole and across many decades the harm done by shrinks greatly outweighs whatever small good they may have accomplished along the way.


The horror show of the shrinks is so absurd that the only thing one can do is to laugh at them. Here are some lyrics from a comedy song by XIV NAPOLEON “They're Coming To Take Me Away”

They´re coming to take me away,
Haha, they´re coming to take me away,
Ho ho, hee hee, ha ha,
To the funny farm
Where life is beautiful all the time
And I´ll be happy to see
Those nice young men
In their clean white coats
And they´re coming to take me AWAY,
HA HAAAA

They´re coming to take me away,
Haha, they´re coming to take me away,
Ho ho, hee hee, ha ha,
To the happy home with trees and flowers
And chirping birds and basket weavers
Who sit and smile and
Twiddle their thumbs and toes
And they´re coming to take me away,
HAHAAAAAAAAA

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, June 02, 2008

Bigot Colleges rushing toward Irrelevance

According to a news story published today on CNN.com, hundreds of American Colleges and Universities are abandoning the SAT test because it favors highly intelligent white men. The racist/sexist administrators at most colleges and universities have abandoned scholastic excellence in favor of anti-white racism and anti-men sexism. “Connecticut College, is one of a growing number of colleges and universities that are making the SAT optional in the admissions process. In May, two highly selective schools -- Smith College in Massachusetts and Wake Forest University in North Carolina -- decided to drop the SAT and ACT, which some students take as an alternative to the SAT, as requirements for admission.” Read Story

The stated reason given by Wake Forest University is, “as part of its efforts to increase socioeconomic, racial and ethnic diversity.” Translated, that excuse means that allowing white men to show very well in their admission policy test will not allow them to admit as many less qualified non-whites and underachieving females as they intend to admit. A SCOTUS decision a decade ago involving the University of Michigan ruled that a university can not admit a lower score applicant based on their racist prejudice against white men. The solution that many universities have found to the requirement of non-discrimination is to eliminate the test scores from consideration. Without any factual data regarding the capability of applicants, the racist universities can use prejudicial mumbo-jumbo to “determine” that the female applicant, or black applicant is the “best qualified.” If the evidence doesn't suit the racist/sexist goals, eliminate the evidence.

Over the past two decades, college attendance by men in the United states has gone from 60% men to just over 40% men, and continues in free fall decline. Graduation rates for men are even lower because many of the men who now attend are low-achieving “minority” men who were admitted based on their race and not on their qualifications.

Over the past several decades, universities and colleges across America have raced toward lower standards and irrelevance in the 21st century. They waste time on hate, mind numbing indoctrination, and mental masturbation. They reject the best and brightest students in favor of admissions based on race or sex. Many have one or often more departments designed to teach racist and/or sexist hate. A quick glance through a list of the “Duke Hate 88” shows all the hate departments.

The best and the brightest have never gone to colleges anyway. Bill Gates, Albert Einstein, Henry Ford, Abraham Lincoln, Ben Franklin, William Shakespeare, didn't become great by absorbing mediocrity. None of the best of men throughout history have been college graduates. In recent decades the situation at colleges has gotten much worse. With the few exception of small technical colleges, feminazi and racist fascist liberals have taken over the administrations and are driving their once proud institutions into the gutters as inevitably shit runs down hill. For more reading on the irrelevance of Universiteies, read Universities are Irrelevant

The latest step downward, the elimination of rigorous testing of applicants with the SAT or similar examinations, and substitution of racist/sexist bigotry to select less qualified applicants based on skin color or sex continues their headlong slide down hill. Young men should eschew their irrelevant institutions, and vote “no” on any politician or candidate who supports them. Racist/sexist hate does not deserve our support.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 06, 2007

Duke Hate University

Duke Hate University has proven itself to be the #1 Hate University in America in 2006. When 3 of its athletes were falsely accused in a criminal rape-hate extortion shakedown, 88 of the faculty, including all the Hate Departments, immediately published a statement of hate in the Duke Chronicle applauding and promoting hate against young white men who were the foundation of Duke University for generations and who are still its future. The gang of 88 hate professors (the Hate 88) ranted about the atmosphere they have created on campus by saying, " what is apparent everyday now is the anger and fear of many students who know themselves to be objects of racism and sexism." Unfortunately it is their anti-white racism that creates the atmosphere of anger and fear. It is their anti-men sexism that creates the atmosphere of anger and fear. Hate activists held hate rallies, made hate speeches, and published hate posters with photos of every Lacrosse player, all endorsed by the Hate 88.

The Hate 88 were right that there is an atmosphere of sexism and racism at Duke Hate University. Men students at Duke Hate University attend classes taught by anti-men sexists. White men students at Duke Hate University attend classes taught by anti-white racists. Duke Hate University has a long list of racist/sexist Departments, Women's Studies, African American Studies, Latino Studies, Asian Studies, all the increasingly common racist hate departments that have become common at Hate Universities today. The Hate 88 are the worst of the hate mongering bigots on the campus

And in case anyone is tempted to think that all the public outcry for tolerance has diminished their hate, a recent op-ed piece by Hate 88 leader Cathy N. Davidson dispels that notion. Despite the facts in the case have shown that the original incident was a case of extortion against white men, Ms. Hate Davidson still insists, "what we know happened on March 13" Like all feminazi hate mongers she "knows" from her womb rather than reading the facts and evidence of the case.

Duke Hate University is being sued for one of the most blatant cases of sexist grading, but you can be assured that a female has a full grade advantage in most of the sexist classrooms at Hate University.

Hate University President Broadhead has offered to "readmit" the Lacrosse players he expelled last spring, but it’s a feeble gesture. He has failed utterly to address the pervasive atmosphere of anti-men racist/sexism that pervades the campus of Duke Hate University. And nothing has been done about the horrible anti-white men racist/sexism in Durham, NC, that makes it unsafe for men to attend Duke Hate University. The chances of the expelled players returning are about that of a snowball in hell. In addition it is neither safe nor appreciated for any other men to attend Duke Hate University.

To begin to address the hate being taught on their campus the owners of Duke Hate University need to take the following actions:
Fire President Broadhead,
Fire the Hate 88
Dismantle the various Hate Departments such as "Women's Studies," "Black Studies," etc.
Take political action in South Carolina with various alumni to fix political hate in Durham.

Bob does not expect Duke Hate University to take any effective action to reduce its hate programs. Early applications for enrollment for next year are down 20% and still declining as the hatred and bigotry of the faculty at Duke Hate University becomes more widely known. MEN should eschew the campus and attend a different University that welcomes, not hates, white men.

The Hate 88


Abe, Stan (Art, Art History, and Visual Studies)
Albers, Benjamin (University Writing Program)
Allison, Anne (Cultural Anthropology)
Aravamudan, Srinivas (English)
Baker, Houston (English and AAAS)
Baker, Lee (Cultural Anthropology)
Beckwith, Sarah (English)
Berliner, Paul (Music)
Christina Beaule (University Writing Program)
Blackmore, Connie (AAAS)
Jessica Boa (Religion & University Writing Program)
Boatwright, Mary T. (Classical Studies)
Boero, Silvia (Romance Studies)
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo (Sociology)
Brim, Matthew (University Writing Program)
Chafe, William (History)
Ching, Leo (Asian & African Languages and Literatures)
Coles, Rom (Political Science)
Cooke, Miriam (Asian & African Languages and Literatures)
Crichlow, Michaeline (AAAS)
Curtis, Kim (Political Science)
Damasceno, Leslie (Romance Studies)
Davidson, Cathy (English)
Deutsch, Sally (History)
Dorfman, Ariel (Literature & Latin American Stds.)
Edwards, Laura (History)
Farred, Grant (Literature)
Fellini, Luciana (Romance Studies)
Fulkerson, Mary McClintock (Divinity School)
Gabara, Esther (Romance Studies)
Gavins, Raymond (History)
Greer, Meg (Romance Studies)
Glymph, Thavolia (History)
Hardt, Michael (Literature)
Harris, Joseph (University Writing Program)
Holloway, Karla (English)
Holsey, Bayo (AAAS)
Hovsepian, Mary (Sociology)
James, Sherman (Public Policy)
Kaplan, Alice (Literature)
Khalsa, Keval Kaur (Dance Program)
Khanna, Ranjana (English)
King, Ashley (Romance Studies)
Koonz, Claudia (History)
Lasch, Peter (Art, Art History, and Visual Studies & Latino/a Studies)
Lee, Dan A. (Math)
Leighten, Pat (Art, Art History, and Visual Studies)
Lentricchia, Frank (Literature)
Light, Caroline (Inst. for Crit. U.S. Stds.)
Litle, Marcy (Comparative Area Studies)
Litzinger, Ralph (Cultural Anthropology)
Longino, Michele (Romance Studies)
Lubiano, Wahneema (AAAS and Literature)
Maffitt, Kenneth(History)
Mahn, Jason (University Writing Program)
Makhulu, Anne-Maria (AAAS)
Mason, Lisa (Surgical Unit-2100)
McClain, Paula (Political Science)
Meintjes, Louise (Music)
Mignolo, Walter (Literature and Romance Studies)
Moreiras, Alberto (Romance Studies)
Neal, Mark Anthony (AAAS)
Nelson, Diane (Cultural Anthropology)
Olcott, Jolie (History)
Parades, Liliana (Romance Studies)
Payne, Charles (AAAS and History)
Pierce-Baker, Charlotte (Women’s Studies)
Pebles-Wilkins, Wilma
Petters, Arlie (Math)
Plesser, Ronen (Physics)
Radway, Jan (Literature)
Rankin, Tom (Center for Documentary Studies)
Rego, Marcia (University Writing Program)
Reisinger, Deborah S. (Romance Studies)
Rosenberg, Alex (Philosophy)
Rudy, Kathy (Women’s Studies)
Schachter, Marc (English)
Shannon, Laurie (English)
Sigal, Pete (History)
Silverblatt, Irene (Cultural Anthropology)
Somerset, Fiona (English)
Stein, Rebecca (Cultural Anthropology)
Thorne, Susan (History)
Viego, Antonio (Literature)
Vilaros, Teresa (Romance Studies)
Wald, Priscilla (English)
Wallace, Maurice (English and AAAS)
Wong, David (Philosophy)

UPDATE
HATE MONGER NIFONG RESIGNS FROM CASE

Misandrist Hate Monger of the Year, Filthy Turd Nifong has asked to be removed from the Duke University extortion hate case. In a January 12 letter to the North Carolina Lieyer General Roy Cooper, Filthy Turd Nifong asked Cooper to appoint his office's special prosecution unit to take over the case. Goodbye and good riddance to the Hate Monger of the Year. Now Cooper should prosecute Filthy Turd Nifong for malicious malfeasance and criminal violation of evidence laws. Read story.

The resignation of the Hate Monger of the Year, Filthy Turd Nifong, has not restored an atmosphere of peace for MEN at Duke Hate University where anti-white-men hate is still promoted and taught in several Hate Departments. No man will feel safe in Durham or at Duke Hate University while they teach hate and promote bigotry against us.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Universities are Irrelevant.

I heard that on a MEN's discussion the other day. Some female psychologist was flaunting her degrees and several of the men pointed out that her field of study amounted to little more than nonsense repeated endlessly. Several of the men observed that a university education has become irrelevant to a man's place in the world. They suggested that millions of young men are getting educated elsewhere and the result of their turning aside is showing up in declining male enrollment at universities.

The notion of universities becoming irrelevant intrigued me. If they are irrelevant, were they relevant previously? What does it mean for universities to be relevant or irrelevant?

Universities that we now know are pretty much a creature of the 20th century. Most of them were created as small schools in the late 19th century and became large and prosperous in the 20th. Sure there have always been centers of learning and teachers. Socrates held discussion classes for a group of students. Throughout the middle ages monks held classes and led discussions in letters. Oxford University is several centuries old, but until recently it was small and consisted largely of a few students getting together with some professor to discuss a particular topic. Harvard was founded in the 17th century as a seminary for Puritan ministers, and indeed most of the colleges of that day were primarily seminaries for religious studies. The great universities we know today began with the late 19th century ideas about universal education and blossomed into huge institutions in the 20th century. We who grew up in the late 20th century are tempted to believe that a university is the only way to get an education, but that is not the case.

Prior to the invention of universities people still got educated and conducted their affairs quite well. For example, in the early 19th century, Abraham Lincoln became a lawyer by apprenticing with a senior lawyer. My own grandfather had a long and successful career as a lawyer and judge after taking an undergraduate legal education at the University of Michigan. A century ago three years of "law school" following a 4 year university degree was virtually unheard of. Over the past two centuries, universities have been marketing their services by continually stretching out the number of years you have to devote before you are able to practice most "professions." But it was not always so, as Abraham Lincoln ought to teach us. In fact, universities have made their requirements so onerous that it's almost impossible to succeed, and so costly that many graduates are saddled with huge debts. Enough already!

During the men's discussion mentioned above it was pointed out that psychobabble degrees offer almost no useful information. None of theories and "knowledge" has any more factual basis than someone's opinion, which, if you track it down, is based on someone else's opinion in an endless circle. Many other university departments consist of "scholarship" which is nothing more than being able to cite other opinions who in turn cited someone else. If you follow the chain they have no actual knowledge or facts other than a closed group citing each other and calling that "research."

The bimbo flaunting her psychology degree displayed a complete lack of knowledge of the feelings or emotions of the men with whom she was discussing. That brings up another aspect of "relevant," it works both ways. For the entire history of formalized psychology the focus of their "research" has been on females. Almost all of Freud's customers were women, and today over 95% of psychology customers are female. They cater to their customers, females, and have NEVER investigated, understood, or cared about the psychology of men. Men, to the practice and teaching of psychology, are a side issue, not their focus, not in their database, irrelevant.

The English Department teaches literary theories. Among various literary theories is "feminist theory" but not "masculist theory." Several courses in the English Department are cross code listed with the Women's Studies department, but none cross code listed with the Men's Studies department. When English Department professors go to scholarly conference such as the Modern Language Association's annual conference, there are many papers presented on women and women's issues, but NONE on men and men's issues. They write doctoral dissertations on medieval women's rhetoric, but do you see any on men's medieval rhetoric? Sure, they still have some men studying English literature, but the Department, and the whole field of study has turned it's back on men. Men, men's issues, men's theories, men's needs, men's feelings, and about everything else, it seems, are irrelevant.

Of course English Department professors would deny that they have branded men irrelevant, after all they still have lots of men taking classes (a diminishing number that gets smaller every year). A man can still enroll, and get an English degree along with a Women's Studies like poor Jeff. He has several degrees, including Women's Studies, but really struggles trying to fit in when he's out with MEN building a home.

An then there are the speech codes, sexual harassment training, and Office of Men are Bad. They all have a "Women's Center" or equal, but not one has a "Men's Center." And their "Diversity Office" practices racist, sexist employment and only hires black women. Men are irrelevant at the Diversity Office, and men's feelings and needs are irrelevant to the administration.

If men are so irrelevant to be below the management radar at universities, how are men supposed to feel about spending 4 to 10 years of our lives and umpteen thousand dollars, going into massive debt, purchasing what they are selling? Is a university degree the only way for a MAN to become educated? Is a degree in Women's Studies an education at all for a MAN? Or the psychology of women? Or feminized filtered history?

We might also ask why people sacrifice years and a small fortune to get that degree? Half a century ago we were told that a university degree was the key to a good job and a successful career. Since then we have seen that promise turn to dust. Many companies now hire only women in many of the office jobs where college educated men once worked. My own former employer hadn't hired a man in an entry level position in 20 years, nor promoted a man from within. The few old men who still did most of the actual work were dying off or retiring. Can a university promise a good job to MEN when graduates face flagrant sexist discrimination in the after graduation job market? Not really, and the false promise shows that men have become irrelevant.

There are many ways for a man to get educated, and many kinds of knowledge that constitute education. The university monopoly would like us to believe that they have a monopoly and control the keys to education, but that really isn't so. The Internet, for example, has made knowledge universally and widely available. On-line chat rooms and discussions of all kinds can replace the discussion groups that have been part of universities for centuries.

A century ago feminism looked out and saw that many successful men were getting college education, and began trying to take over "education." Without knowing what it was about the college experience that made men successful, feminists wanted it for themselves. More yet, they wanted to change university education to feminize it. Over the past century the feminists have pretty much taken over the university. From the lowest professor to the halls of the President's office the university is all about catering to feminist females. Men, in the management or teaching have become -- irrelevant.

But, MEN are never going to go away and vanish. MEN will still be the ones who do all the real work of the society. MEN who don't graduate from college often still dominate industries. Bill Gates is an often mentioned example. In fact, a college education often only restricts a man to a modest level bureaucratic job of mediocrity and mundane plodding. Huge numbers of young men have learned that the university itself is the one that is becoming irrelevant. Huge numbers of men are voting with their feet and letting the university administrators know that they may be selling their feminized crapola, but we aren't buying. Enrollments by men are way below 50% and are rapidly declining as more and more men tell them to take their "education" and stuff it.

Does any man need to learn "feminist theory"? Does any man need female psychobabble? Does any man need the Women's Center and Women's Studies Department promoting anti-men hate? Are any of those relevant to the future of a young man?

For a century women have worked hard to take what men had in universities, and to take it away from men. They have succeeded, but in taking it away and turning it into something that is irrelevant to men's success. It's an empty accomplishment. It won't make their lives happier, nor make them successful. In the end, it isn't the circular citations that were the basis for a good education at universities several decades ago. It was the MEN who came and shared together that made it all relevant. MEN will always be the ones who make the society work, who create the homes, the food, the fun electronics, and all the good things of life. It will always be the MEN who are the center of relevance of a society. When men are cast aside and turned away, the institution itself becomes irrelevant, a shell of its former greatness. In the 21st century universities will decline, are already declining, as they have become irrelevant.

Bob

Labels: , , , , , ,